Now it's a basic law: The State of Israel is the national home of the Jewish people

However, it also now seems that Israel will continue to establish settlements as a means of pressure to bring the Arab Palestinian Leadership to the table.
Israel at least last 20 years doesn't establish new settlements in the West bank.
 
Black Flag:
"Plenty of Jews lived in the land that is now Israel, self-determining themselves, before the UN decided to deny the Arabs living there of their right to self-determination over their ancient homeland."

Almut Nebel's 2001 study, "The Y Chromosome Pool of Jews as Part of the Genetic Landscape of the Middle East" found that, '[T]he Y chromosomes in Palestinian Arabs and Bedouin represent, to a large extent, early lineages derived from the Neolithic inhabitants of the area and additional lineages from more-recent population movements. The early lineages are part of the common chromosome pool shared with Jews. According to our working model, the more-recent migrations were mostly from the ARABIAN PENINSULA [emphasis mine], as is seen in the Arab-specific Eu 10 chromosomes that include the modal haplotypes observed in Palestinians and Bedouins.'
[/QUOTE]

The. :asshole: Doesn’t have a clue to what you’re talking about
 
The Arabs in Israel have equal voting rights. Not only that, but Israel is one of the few places in the Middle East where Arab women have always been able to vote. The Arabs hold numerous seats in the Knesset and the only party ever banned by Israel is a Jewish one (Kach). Israeli Arabs have also held various government po‎sitions.

At the time of the foundation of Israel, only one Arab high school was open, today there are hundreds of Arab schools.

The only legal distinction between Jewish and Arab citizens of Israel is that they are not required to serve in the Israeli army. In 1999, Abdel Rahman Zuabi was the first Arab-Israeli to enter the Israeli Supreme Court.

As I wrote in my last book, Israel is the “freest Arab nation” in the world, the only country where an Arab spring really succeded, and without bloodshed..

(full article online)

The hypocrisy in opposing Israel's Nationality Law
 
Of the many virtues of the Israeli parliament passing a law declaring Israel as the nation-state of the Jewish people, not least is the entertainment value of observing the New York Times in what I call full-fledged frothing freakout frenzy mode.

Actually, the front-page, above-the-fold, two-bylines plus a photograph treatment that the Times gave the story has not only entertainment value, but educational value. It’s an opportunity to observe the Times putting all of its worst biased techniques on display to attack Israel. Among those techniques:

(full article online)

New York Times Loses It Over Israel’s ‘Incendiary’ Nation-State Law
 
Do You see any reference to skin color?
Only to Bantustans.
latest


Yes Israel IS a Bantustan, and anywhere beyond Jews are not allowed.
Although I prefer the term 'Reservation'.
As we can clearly see from the map, the imperialist expansionist Zionists are occupying Muslim lands!
 
Last edited:
Do You see any reference to skin color?
Only to Bantustans.
latest


Yes Israel IS a Bantustan, and anywhere beyond Jews are not allowed.
Although I prefer the term 'Reservation'.
As we can clearly see from the map, the imperialist expansionist Zionists are occupying Muslims lands!

It’s amazing that so few can overtake an entire part of the World
The expansionist "Zionist Entity" must be stopped! Maybe we can recruit the help of that newly elected communist House representative from Brooklyn?
 
However, it also now seems that Israel will continue to establish settlements as a means of pressure to bring the Arab Palestinian Leadership to the table.
Israel at least last 20 years doesn't establish new settlements in the West bank.

And this is why we must differentiate between the perception and the reality, and why the double standard, the propaganda and the irrational fears should not be given weight when discussing the reality. Everyone "knows" that Israel's continued settlement building is a "problem" and an "obstacle to peace" but the reality is that Israel froze settlement-building for 20 years in hopes of negotiated secession agreement or two.
 
However, it also now seems that Israel will continue to establish settlements as a means of pressure to bring the Arab Palestinian Leadership to the table.
Israel at least last 20 years doesn't establish new settlements in the West bank.

And this is why we must differentiate between the perception and the reality, and why the double standard, the propaganda and the irrational fears should not be given weight when discussing the reality. Everyone "knows" that Israel's continued settlement building is a "problem" and an "obstacle to peace" but the reality is that Israel froze settlement-building for 20 years in hopes of negotiated secession agreement or two.

There were no “ settlements” prior to 1967. The Palestinians have made it clear; they have no interest in “ negotiations.
 
There were no “ settlements” prior to 1967. The Palestinians have made it clear; they have no interest in “ negotiations.

There are no settlements now. There is no such thing as settlements, just like there is no such thing as an occupation. "Settlements" is just a negative code word for "Jews live there". Its an excuse to claim that there are places in the world where Jews should not be allowed to live.

It is the most obvious and vile type of hypocrisy -- the Arab Palestinians demanding Arab presence in Israel while simultaneously demanding a Jew-free state. Its saying that Arab Palestinians must be permitted to settle anywhere in the territory while Jews must be restricted from settling in parts of the area. Its claiming that Arabs have every right to exclusive use of the entire Temple Mount in the name of "freedom of worship" while Jews must be prevented from accessing the very place which is the most Holy and Sacred place of their faith. It is demanding that Israel be multi-cultural -- with two official languages, two flags, two systems of laws, two sets of holidays, two national anthems, two peoples with the rights to self-determination while simultaneously demanding that Palestine be developed as a nation for a single ethnic and national group with one language, one flag, one religion, one system of laws (based on Sharia), one set of religious holidays and calendar, one national anthem and only one people having the rights to self-determination.

That useful idiots around the world fall for this hypocrisy speaks volumes.
 
There were no “ settlements” prior to 1967. The Palestinians have made it clear; they have no interest in “ negotiations.

There are no settlements now. There is no such thing as settlements, just like there is no such thing as an occupation. "Settlements" is just a negative code word for "Jews live there". Its an excuse to claim that there are places in the world where Jews should not be allowed to live.

It is the most obvious and vile type of hypocrisy -- the Arab Palestinians demanding Arab presence in Israel while simultaneously demanding a Jew-free state. Its saying that Arab Palestinians must be permitted to settle anywhere in the territory while Jews must be restricted from settling in parts of the area. Its claiming that Arabs have every right to exclusive use of the entire Temple Mount in the name of "freedom of worship" while Jews must be prevented from accessing the very place which is the most Holy and Sacred place of their faith. It is demanding that Israel be multi-cultural -- with two official languages, two flags, two systems of laws, two sets of holidays, two national anthems, two peoples with the rights to self-determination while simultaneously demanding that Palestine be developed as a nation for a single ethnic and national group with one language, one flag, one religion, one system of laws (based on Sharia), one set of religious holidays and calendar, one national anthem and only one people having the rights to self-determination.

That useful idiots around the world fall for this hypocrisy speaks volumes.

“ Right of Return” isn’t going to happen . What I think is hilarious is that. Pro Pal Kool/Aid drinkers post links which claim that Israel can’t be both Jewish and Democratic but yet it’s O.K. To have a No Israelis Allowed Palestinian Country”. :cuckoo::cuckoo:
 
“ Right of Return” isn’t going to happen . What I think is hilarious is that. Pro Pal Kool/Aid drinkers post links which claim that Israel can’t be both Jewish and Democratic but yet it’s O.K. To have a No Israelis Allowed Palestinian Country”. :cuckoo::cuckoo:

If by "right of return" you mean to flood Israel with 7 million Arabs -- nope. Never going to happen. Never. Never. Get over it.

IF by "right of return" you mean that BOTH peoples have the right to return to settle in their homeland and develop their self-determination and cultural uniqueness in that place, then YES it should happen. What will that look like? The majority of Palestinians will settle in Palestine and the majority of Jews will settle in Israel. This will allow each culture to develop fully as a nation with a unique and special culture. Each state will have a minority of the other living in it, which poses absolutely no problems whatsoever (after all Palestinians constantly brag that Arabs and Jews lived in peace for centuries and Israel has proven it poses no problem).
 
“ Right of Return” isn’t going to happen . What I think is hilarious is that. Pro Pal Kool/Aid drinkers post links which claim that Israel can’t be both Jewish and Democratic but yet it’s O.K. To have a No Israelis Allowed Palestinian Country”. :cuckoo::cuckoo:

If by "right of return" you mean to flood Israel with 7 million Arabs -- nope. Never going to happen. Never. Never. Get over it.

IF by "right of return" you mean that BOTH peoples have the right to return to settle in their homeland and develop their self-determination and cultural uniqueness in that place, then YES it should happen. What will that look like? The majority of Palestinians will settle in Palestine and the majority of Jews will settle in Israel. This will allow each culture to develop fully as a nation with a unique and special culture. Each state will have a minority of the other living in it, which poses absolutely no problems whatsoever (after all Palestinians constantly brag that Arabs and Jews lived in peace for centuries and Israel has proven it poses no problem).

That’s what they want. If they can’t destro Israel externally their goal is to do it internally. :auiqs.jpg:That will never happen!!!
 
RE: Now it's a basic law: The State of Israel is the national home of the Jewish people
※→ ILOVEISRAEL, et al,

I think this is, at present, the bottom line.

That’s what they want. If they can’t destroy Israel externally their goal is to do it internally. :auiqs.jpg:That will never happen!!!
(COMMENT)

The Arab Palestinians are becoming more violent, and less respectful for the Rule of Law; most of which the Arab Palestinians have lost along with any 21st Century moral discipline. The Arab Palestinians are trying every new technique available to them to incite violence and disrupt the peace.

Most Respectfully,
R
 
Last edited:
RE: Now it's a basic law: The State of Israel is the national home of the Jewish people
※→ ILOVEISRAEL, et al,

Something is wrong here; I think!

“ Right of Return” isn’t going to happen. What I think is hilarious is that. Pro Pal Kool/Aid drinkers post links which claim that Israel can’t be both Jewish and Democratic but yet it’s O.K. To have a No Israelis Allowed Palestinian Country”. :cuckoo::cuckoo:
(COMMENT)

I'm not sure that there is a "Right of Return" that can both law and applied retroactively in the case of the events in 1948.

The Rules of Law and Human Rights • Fundamental principles of penal law • International Commission of Jurists said:
Chapter 4
2. Retroactive legislation
Certainty cannot exist in the criminal law where the law, or the penalty for its breach, is retrospective. Retroactive legislation, especially in criminal matters, is inconsistent with the Rule of Law.

Within the International Community, all the new UN drafts pertaining to the "Right of Return" (like A/RES/194 (III) 11 December 1948) does not apply to any allegation prior to 11 December 1948. And it is important to note that several Arab League members (Egypt, Iraq, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Syria, and Yemen) rejected Resolution 194 (III).

So I'm wondering what the Arab Palestinian is using for case law on the issue on the "Right of Return?" What group of alleged refugees are they demanding that the "Right of Return" be applied?

Most Respectfully,
R
 
Last edited:
Yes, you keep saying that. But your only argument seems to be: because Joooooooos.

Again, why is it labelled apartheid when Israel does it and not when Spain does it? Or any of a dozen other countries. It REEKS of a double standard and fall-back position of, "well, I don't really understand all this constitution and nationality stuff -- but if Israel does it -- it must be bad."
As long as you're determined to make shit up, you don't need me.
 
15th post
The Land belongs to the Jewish People, fatboy.
You can't move in to an area and automatically have more rights than the people already living there, you stupid *****!

You can have equal rights, especially if the people of the place called You for help, in demanding those equal rights.

This is what this Basic Law is all about in what You call the "area".
 
This is just ridiculous. Translation: Israel is apartheid because someone else said so.
Israel is apartheid because of the shit Israel is doing.

Israel has Arabs. Abbas has declared several times that the “ Palestinian State “ will not have one Israeli in it. There are many Arab Countries who don’t have a Jewish Population. You don’t see anything wrong with that, do you?? :321:
 

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom