'Nothing Illegal In Trump-Zelensky Call': NSC Official Tells Impeachment Inquiry

[toobfreak]

You mean kinda like when everyone told Chris Columbus to not sail out to sea because he would sail off the world? Or do you mean like when everyone said for Blacks to go to the back of the bus or use their own bathrooms so white folks weren't harmed or scared?

I've already heard several top former US officials say that there was nothing wrong with the call including a former AG. Now who do you think has more to lie and protect, the current democrats or some old, retired guy with no skin in the game?

If Trump is so damn guilty, there shouldn't be ANYONE saying he's innocent, much less take weeks of hearings just to gather the evidence on AFTER THEY HAVE ALREADY ACCUSED HIM.

I am SO going to enjoy watching your latest attempt to Mueller Trump punk out again. hehheh

No one with any integrity is saying he's innocent. Thanks for pointing out that I forgot that part.

yet you're going to declare him guilty w/o due process. just thought i'd point that out too.

I wouldn't take that tack considering you support those who were trying to impede due process...

...and then refusing to vote for the very transparency they were complaining about.

HYPOCRITES!!!

TARD TRANSLATION:

• IMPEDING DUE PROCESS: not cooperating with the inquisitor who wants to put you in the gas chamber to shut you up.

• REFUSING TO VOTE FOR TRANSPARENCY: not willing to give legitimacy to and play along with a sham railroading sought after for four years.

• Up the meds, your sycophancy is showing.

RETARD TRANSLATION: I ain't got nuttin' and I know this too shall fall apart in my face!

 

[M14 Shooter]

That's right, cherry-pick the one guy that backs up Trump and ignore the crowd that says otherwise.

"Crowd"

 

[M14 Shooter]

[
Gee, I wonder why White House lawyer John Eisenberg locked the transcript in a classified server after Lt. Col. Vindman said it wasn't accurate? Anyone have any suggestions...?

 

[Syriusly]

I believe this guy 100%.

'Nothing Illegal In Trump-Zelensky Call': NSC Official Tells Impeachment Inquiry

Of course you believe what you are being feed 100%. LOL

Actually if you read the statement, Tim Morrison offered his opinion that he didn't think anything in the call was illegal.

And then ordered the contents of the discussion to be squirreled away and kept secret from the American voters.

He may not have thought it was illegal- but he certainly thought that it was something that would damage President Trump politically.

Meanwhile others did think it was illegal.

Doesn't mean that either side is necessarily correct- but there are certainly those who say it appeared to be illegal and endangering the safety of the U.S. and others who didn't.

Great reason for the investigation.

 

[M14 Shooter]

White House Policy Official Corroborates Ukraine Narrative — But Saw Nothing Illegal
So he confirmed everything that all the other witnesses have testified to (that virtually everyone involved thinks is illegal)...but in his "opinion" ...there was nothing illegal about it.
Well gee thanks for your OPINION moron.

Funny how -you- have the opinion that Trump broke the law; absent any evidence to support it.

 

[The Original Tree]

That's right, cherry-pick the one guy that backs up Trump and ignore the crowd that says otherwise. Isn't it getting kind of loud inside that echo chamber?

You mean kinda like when everyone told Chris Columbus to not sail out to sea because he would sail off the world? Or do you mean like when everyone said for Blacks to go to the back of the bus or use their own bathrooms so white folks weren't harmed or scared?

I've already heard several top former US officials say that there was nothing wrong with the call including a former AG. Now who do you think has more to lie and protect, the current democrats or some old, retired guy with no skin in the game?

If Trump is so damn guilty, there shouldn't be ANYONE saying he's innocent, much less take weeks of hearings just to gather the evidence on AFTER THEY HAVE ALREADY ACCUSED HIM.

I am SO going to enjoy watching your latest attempt to Mueller Trump punk out again. hehheh

No one with any integrity is saying he's innocent. Thanks for pointing out that I forgot that part.

yet you're going to declare him guilty w/o due process. just thought i'd point that out too.

I wouldn't take that tack considering you support those who were trying to impede due process...



...and then refusing to vote for the very transparency they were complaining about.

HYPOCRITES!!!

I'd like to know who the people were who did not vote at all.

 

[WEATHER53]

So the next emotional delusion will be that the transcript is fake. Does not matter that all senders and receivers confirm it’s originality and authenticity.
Those facts don’t match Libs desires and emotions
For about the 50th time regarding lib demands
Libs-Produce the evidence...the documents...the tax returns...the Mueller report...the transcripts
Cons-Here they are
Libs-They are fake

A child’s tantrums usually do continue on even when what is demanded has been provided. It is the nature of undeveloped childhood emotions. Some never outgrow it but most libs simply elect to continue to try and use it.
The “I won’t stop shirieking and wailing until....” is identified by most thought and fact oriented people as the simple tantrum that it is
Now flail and wail you libbie infants.

 

[Syriusly]

I predict that their little "impeachment" will fail. Yet even after it fails, the Democrats won't show a single ounce of humility, shame, or remorse. They will simply begin work on the next "whatever" to attempt to overthrow Trump.

I have reached the point to where I will never ever accept one single thing coming out of a Democrat's mouth, as the truth. They have been crying "wolf" 24/7/365 for the last three years, and everything they have come up with has been an out and out lie.

So from now on if you are a liberal, a progressive, a socialist, or a Democrat, I don't care what you have to say: You have been automatically pinned as a "liar", no matter what "facts", "links", or "arguments" you provide.

You people brought this upon yourselves. So you now have the word "LIAR" tattooed across your collective foreheads, in big, bold, red letters.

Wear it with pride, because you earned it. You should also be made to wear a bell around your collective necks, so the rest of us know when you're coming around. Or better yet,how about your own personal theme song? I dub this nifty song the official song of the Democrat Party, liberalism, socialism, and the progressive movement. This should be played at 110dB every time you people open your foul mouths, because this what you are...

Poor little gullible snowflake

 

[The Original Tree]

White House Policy Official Corroborates Ukraine Narrative — But Saw Nothing Illegal
So he confirmed everything that all the other witnesses have testified to (that virtually everyone involved thinks is illegal)...but in his "opinion" ...there was nothing illegal about it.
Well gee thanks for your OPINION moron.

Funny how -you- have the opinion that Trump broke the law; absent any evidence to support it.

All Conversations with Leftist Commie Globalist Hairy Man Butt Lovers Go Thusly:

He Broke The Law!

What Law?

He is not Presidential!

What Law?

He's Putin's Puppet!

What Law did he break ?

ORANGE MAN BAD!

 

[bripat9643]

Congress will determine what was illegal

Sure they will. Their main goal was to get rid of Trump, or at the very least, make him look bad. Now they are just trying to find a way to do it.

Our founders created a way to penalize a President that does wrongdoing, not have a penalty and look for ways to use it. But then again, who is more un-American than the Democrat party?

Trump has no understanding of right and wrong. The bottom line, winning, and price tags are all he knows.

Substitute Dims for Trump and you have it right.

 

[iceberg]

That's right, cherry-pick the one guy that backs up Trump and ignore the crowd that says otherwise. Isn't it getting kind of loud inside that echo chamber?

You mean kinda like when everyone told Chris Columbus to not sail out to sea because he would sail off the world? Or do you mean like when everyone said for Blacks to go to the back of the bus or use their own bathrooms so white folks weren't harmed or scared?

I've already heard several top former US officials say that there was nothing wrong with the call including a former AG. Now who do you think has more to lie and protect, the current democrats or some old, retired guy with no skin in the game?

If Trump is so damn guilty, there shouldn't be ANYONE saying he's innocent, much less take weeks of hearings just to gather the evidence on AFTER THEY HAVE ALREADY ACCUSED HIM.

I am SO going to enjoy watching your latest attempt to Mueller Trump punk out again. hehheh

No one with any integrity is saying he's innocent. Thanks for pointing out that I forgot that part.

yet you're going to declare him guilty w/o due process. just thought i'd point that out too.

I wouldn't take that tack considering you support those who were trying to impede due process...



...and then refusing to vote for the very transparency they were complaining about.

HYPOCRITES!!!

Who am I saying is guilty of anything?

Project much?

Just because I think you are wrong doesn't mean 8 believe in all you hate.

 

[bripat9643]

I believe this guy 100%.

'Nothing Illegal In Trump-Zelensky Call': NSC Official Tells Impeachment Inquiry

Did your article quote Morrison saying:

"Dr. Hill told me that Ambassador Sondland and President Trump's personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, were trying to get President Zelensky to reopen Ukrainian investigations into Burisma."​

What law did that break?

I already told you, fucking moron. It's not my problem you're too big of a fucking moron to retain information for more than 30 seconds.

That's your sleazy way of saying that you can't name the law he broke.

Wrong again, fucking moron. You already asked me that and I already showed you the law and even linked it to the statute.

You did nothing of the sort, you sleazy lying moron.

 

[OldLady]

Congress will determine what was illegal

Sure they will. Their main goal was to get rid of Trump, or at the very least, make him look bad. Now they are just trying to find a way to do it.

Our founders created a way to penalize a President that does wrongdoing, not have a penalty and look for ways to use it. But then again, who is more un-American than the Democrat party?

Trump has no understanding of right and wrong. The bottom line, winning, and price tags are all he knows.

And that's Trump's motto: winning. A cut above the rest that use their government position for personal or party gain, such as the Democrats are doing (and have been doing) today. As long as Trump is in charge, we are going to win so much we'll be tired of winning.

A cut above the rest that use their government position for personal or party gain,
Holy shit, I can't believe you just said that based on what we know about his arm twisting Ukraine for campaign oppo fodder.
A true blind man, aren't you?

 

[Faun]

That's right, cherry-pick the one guy that backs up Trump and ignore the crowd that says otherwise. Isn't it getting kind of loud inside that echo chamber?

You mean kinda like when everyone told Chris Columbus to not sail out to sea because he would sail off the world? Or do you mean like when everyone said for Blacks to go to the back of the bus or use their own bathrooms so white folks weren't harmed or scared?

I've already heard several top former US officials say that there was nothing wrong with the call including a former AG. Now who do you think has more to lie and protect, the current democrats or some old, retired guy with no skin in the game?

If Trump is so damn guilty, there shouldn't be ANYONE saying he's innocent, much less take weeks of hearings just to gather the evidence on AFTER THEY HAVE ALREADY ACCUSED HIM.

I am SO going to enjoy watching your latest attempt to Mueller Trump punk out again. hehheh

No one with any integrity is saying he's innocent. Thanks for pointing out that I forgot that part.

yet you're going to declare him guilty w/o due process. just thought i'd point that out too.

I wouldn't take that tack considering you support those who were trying to impede due process...



...and then refusing to vote for the very transparency they were complaining about.

HYPOCRITES!!!

Unfuckingbelievable, right?

 

[Faun]

You mean kinda like when everyone told Chris Columbus to not sail out to sea because he would sail off the world? Or do you mean like when everyone said for Blacks to go to the back of the bus or use their own bathrooms so white folks weren't harmed or scared?

I've already heard several top former US officials say that there was nothing wrong with the call including a former AG. Now who do you think has more to lie and protect, the current democrats or some old, retired guy with no skin in the game?

If Trump is so damn guilty, there shouldn't be ANYONE saying he's innocent, much less take weeks of hearings just to gather the evidence on AFTER THEY HAVE ALREADY ACCUSED HIM.

I am SO going to enjoy watching your latest attempt to Mueller Trump punk out again. hehheh

No one with any integrity is saying he's innocent. Thanks for pointing out that I forgot that part.

yet you're going to declare him guilty w/o due process. just thought i'd point that out too.

I wouldn't take that tack considering you support those who were trying to impede due process...

...and then refusing to vote for the very transparency they were complaining about.

HYPOCRITES!!!

TARD TRANSLATION:

• IMPEDING DUE PROCESS: not cooperating with the inquisitor who wants to put you in the gas chamber to shut you up.

• REFUSING TO VOTE FOR TRANSPARENCY: not willing to give legitimacy to and play along with a sham railroading sought after for four years.

• Up the meds, your sycophancy is showing.

You have to put things in perspective for that one...

Spoiler

He's a Birther.

 

[Faun]

Did your article quote Morrison saying:

"Dr. Hill told me that Ambassador Sondland and President Trump's personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, were trying to get President Zelensky to reopen Ukrainian investigations into Burisma."​

What law did that break?

I already told you, fucking moron. It's not my problem you're too big of a fucking moron to retain information for more than 30 seconds.

That's your sleazy way of saying that you can't name the law he broke.

Wrong again, fucking moron. You already asked me that and I already showed you the law and even linked it to the statute.

You did nothing of the sort, you sleazy lying moron.

Holyfuckingshit!

Yes, fucking moron, I did. Do you really think this forum needs more evidence you're a fucking moron, fucking moron?

Well, sure, lemme provide that evidence....

The same law the USMB's fucking moron claims I didn't already show him.

 

[bripat9643]

I believe this guy 100%.

'Nothing Illegal In Trump-Zelensky Call': NSC Official Tells Impeachment Inquiry

Of course you believe what you are being feed 100%. LOL

Actually if you read the statement, Tim Morrison offered his opinion that he didn't think anything in the call was illegal.

And then ordered the contents of the discussion to be squirreled away and kept secret from the American voters.

He may not have thought it was illegal- but he certainly thought that it was something that would damage President Trump politically.

Meanwhile others did think it was illegal.

Doesn't mean that either side is necessarily correct- but there are certainly those who say it appeared to be illegal and endangering the safety of the U.S. and others who didn't.

Great reason for the investigation.

All conversations between a president and foreign leaders are keep secret, idiot. Can you post an example of a conversation Obama and another foreign leader becoming public?

Of course not.

You're a moron

 

[bripat9643]

What law did that break?

I already told you, fucking moron. It's not my problem you're too big of a fucking moron to retain information for more than 30 seconds.

That's your sleazy way of saying that you can't name the law he broke.

Wrong again, fucking moron. You already asked me that and I already showed you the law and even linked it to the statute.

You did nothing of the sort, you sleazy lying moron.

Holyfuckingshit!

Yes, fucking moron, I did. Do you really think this forum needs more evidence you're a fucking moron, fucking moron?

Well, sure, lemme provide that evidence....

The same law the USMB's fucking moron claims I didn't already show him.

There was no donation to Trump's campaign, moron. Schiff, Pelosi and Company aren't even trying to support that claim.

 

[Faun]

I already told you, fucking moron. It's not my problem you're too big of a fucking moron to retain information for more than 30 seconds.

That's your sleazy way of saying that you can't name the law he broke.

Wrong again, fucking moron. You already asked me that and I already showed you the law and even linked it to the statute.

You did nothing of the sort, you sleazy lying moron.

Holyfuckingshit!

Yes, fucking moron, I did. Do you really think this forum needs more evidence you're a fucking moron, fucking moron?

Well, sure, lemme provide that evidence....

The same law the USMB's fucking moron claims I didn't already show him.

There was no donation to Trump's campaign, moron. Schiff, Pelosi and Company aren't even trying to support that claim.

LOLOL

Fucking moron, now you wanna argue the content of the law after you just made a complete ass of yourself denying I showed you the law I just showed you for a second time??

Now you can fuck off as you proved you're not capable of arguing shit. You're batshit insane.

 

[WEATHER53]

Libs are trying to sell that words don’t mean what the letters spell.