Not All Uranium

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
131,874
Reaction score
67,668
Points
2,615
Location
Brooklyn, NY
1. "Nuclear weapons are both complicated and very simple. Conventional explosives get energy from breaking chemical bonds between atoms. Nuclear bombs release the energy bound up inside individual atoms, a far bigger source of power. The difference in power is staggering. Fat Man, the bomb that the United States dropped on Nagasaki in 1945, used fourteen pounds of plutonium to produce a blast with the energy produced by 42 million pounds of conventional explosive. The bomb killed 70,000 people immediately and tens of thousands more over the next generation. Yet by modern standards, the Fat Man bomb is puny.

2. Fortunately for humanity’s survival, most types of atoms can’t be used in nuclear weapons. The exceptions are plutonium and a certain kind of uranium, called U-235, so-called fissile materials.
. In its natural state, uranium ore consists of two different isotopes, U-235 and U-238. They look the same, a heavy dull yellow metal. But they have different atomic structures. U-235 can be used to make a bomb. U-238 can’t.

3. In its natural state, uranium is made up of 97 percent U-238, the useless kind, with just 3 percent U-235 mixed in. When the United States began the Manhattan Project to develop nuclear weapons, its scientists had to find a way to separate the valuable U-235 from U-238. They found the answer in centrifuges, enclosed chambers that spin very fast, and enabled them to pull the lighter U-235 out of the U-238.
In theory, the centrifuge procedure is relatively straightforward. But as the Iranians had found out, bridging the gap between theory and reality could be difficult. Even under the best of circumstances, it required a small army of well-trained engineers and physicists. The Iranians had an added challenge. Because of the threat of the Israeli air force, they were working in labs buried seventy feet underground."
From the novel "The Ghost War," by Alex Berenson, p. 68-70
Skip's ESL BITS - English Language Learning - ESL Listening Stories, Songs, Audiobooks


4. "During testimony on Capitol Hill last week, U.S. Central Command General Erika Kurilla warned Iran's nuclear program had progressed significantly and into the zone of a three week sprint to 10 nuclear bombs.

"The IAEA uses 90% enrichment as the benchmark for weapons-grade uranium, and it considers 25 kg of 90% enriched uranium enough to construct a simple nuclear weapon. The IAEA estimates current Iranian stockpiles to include over 400 kg of 60% enriched uranium – almost double of what it was just six months ago," Kurilla testified in front of the House Armed Services Committee. This is mere steps from reaching the 90% threshold for weaponization. Should the Regime decide to sprint to a nuclear weapon, it is estimated that current stockpiles and the available centrifuges across several enrichment plants are sufficient to produce its first 25 kg of weapons-grade material in roughly one week and enough for up to ten nuclear weapons in three weeks."


5. Is, or isn't, a nuclear Iran a threat to the world?
 
Commercial nuclear power typically uses fuel that is 5% U-235, and over its period of use, a fuel rod gradually degrades to something less than 2%, at which time it is removed and placed into a cooling pond for a year or so, then encased in a reinforced concrete container and stored on site*.

Even if Iran had any interest in commercial nuclear power (they don't) it would be pointless to enrich their U235 to anything above 5%. There is literally no legitimate reason for doing this; it is manifestly preparation for making weapons-grade material (90% or higher). The Clinton/Obama people foolishly went along with Iranian enrichment, telling a gullible public that in doing so, they were preventing Iran from making any bombs. Is this Leftist logic or what?

The Trump Administration's position w/r/t Iran's activity is, "no enrichment." If they should ever decide to utilize commercial nuclear power, fuel-grade materials are available on the world market at reasonable prices. Hell, Russia would give it to them.

___________________
* The U.S. government promised electric utilities that it would, in due time, provide a storage facility for all their spent fuel, and electric bills started including a surcharge for this Federal storage facility in 1953. The Feds created the facility at Yucca Mountain Nevada, but local Leftists, led by Light-Brain Harry Reid, objected so that 35 Billion facility has been abandoned. All further attempts to fulfill this Federal promise have been thwarted by Leftist agitators, although a facility called WIPP in New Mexico is large and capable enough for the job.
 
Commercial nuclear power typically uses fuel that is 5% U-235, and over its period of use, a fuel rod gradually degrades to something less than 2%, at which time it is removed and placed into a cooling pond for a year or so, then encased in a reinforced concrete container and stored on site*.

Even if Iran had any interest in commercial nuclear power (they don't) it would be pointless to enrich their U235 to anything above 5%. There is literally no legitimate reason for doing this; it is manifestly preparation for making weapons-grade material (90% or higher). The Clinton/Obama people foolishly went along with Iranian enrichment, telling a gullible public that in doing so, they were preventing Iran from making any bombs. Is this Leftist logic or what?

The Trump Administration's position w/r/t Iran's activity is, "no enrichment." If they should ever decide to utilize commercial nuclear power, fuel-grade materials are available on the world market at reasonable prices. Hell, Russia would give it to them.

___________________
* The U.S. government promised electric utilities that it would, in due time, provide a storage facility for all their spent fuel, and electric bills started including a surcharge for this Federal storage facility in 1953. The Feds created the facility at Yucca Mountain Nevada, but local Leftists, led by Light-Brain Harry Reid, objected so that 35 Billion facility has been abandoned. All further attempts to fulfill this Federal promise have been thwarted by Leftist agitators, although a facility called WIPP in New Mexico is large and capable enough for the job.
"... any interest in commercial nuclear power (they don't) it would be pointless to enrich their U235 to anything above 5%."


Thank you!
 
Iran developing nuclear weapons isn't the worst case scenario. Giving them to their terrorist proxies is.
 
only if they can produce another 9/11

~S~
Should Iran produce a nuclear weapon and see that it is used on someone they regard as an enemy it would make 9-11 look like a kid's firecracker. Pakistan must also be warned that if it allows the use of any of it's nuclear weapons by anybody else, no matter who, it will face annihilation.
 
Should Iran produce a nuclear weapon and see that it is used on someone they regard as an enemy it would make 9-11 look like a kid's firecracker. Pakistan must also be warned that if it allows the use of any of it's nuclear weapons by anybody else, no matter who, it will face annihilation.
MAD mentality is a tad hard to sign onto these days Old one, besides the only way they can reach across the Atlantic would be some suitcase/van/shipment scenario

~S~
 
MAD mentality is a tad hard to sign onto these days Old one, besides the only way they can reach across the Atlantic would be some suitcase/van/shipment scenario

~S~
How many US ports handle container ships? You could ship Little Boy or Fat Man in one of those, however, modern nuclear weapons are much smaller, so there are numerous ways that an insane fool could nuke a US city.
 
MAD mentality is a tad hard to sign onto these days Old one, besides the only way they can reach across the Atlantic would be some suitcase/van/shipment scenario

~S~
MAD is all that has kept WW3 from happening. And it is all that will, hopefully, keep some madman from trying to use one on their perceived enemy. However, someone with a martyr complex might not see that as a problem.
 
A nation in position to supply all it's power with solar for far less cost than nuclear.
Soooo......you still believe in the tooth fairy, too?

There is no such nation.


AI Overview

While many nations are actively expanding their use of solar energy, only a few currently generate a significant portion of their electricity from solar power


How's that Tesla you're drivin'???
 
MAD is all that has kept WW3 from happening. And it is all that will, hopefully, keep some madman from trying to use one on their perceived enemy. However, someone with a martyr complex might not see that as a problem.
respectfully, i find it hard to argue with my elders Old one. All i'd like to point out is, it's not checkers , it's chess

~S~
 
5. Is, or isn't, a nuclear Iran a threat to the world?

A nuclear Iran is much less of a threat to the world than the US or North Korea.
Iran has never done anything aggressive, and only defensive.
So a defensive nuclear deterrent makes perfect sense for Iran.

Iran could never get away with using nukes aggressively, so there is no reason to prevent their nuclear program.
And even more important, is that it is illegal to interfere with their nuclear program.
 
15th post
"... any interest in commercial nuclear power (they don't) it would be pointless to enrich their U235 to anything above 5%."


Thank you!

Wrong.
Traditionally nuclear power plants use about 60% enrichment because the facilities are a tenth the size then, and last much longer.

The U-238 blocks neutrons, wastes them, and acts as a moderator, preventing high output.

And yes, their interest is in nuclear power, just as everyone it.
Iraq, Saudia Arabia, and all the oil producers have nuclear power plants planned.
The oil is rapidly running out.
 
Should Iran produce a nuclear weapon and see that it is used on someone they regard as an enemy it would make 9-11 look like a kid's firecracker. Pakistan must also be warned that if it allows the use of any of it's nuclear weapons by anybody else, no matter who, it will face annihilation.

Wrong.
The country that needs to be obliterated is the one who would attack an innocent country and murder hundreds of people.
 
A nation in position to supply all it's power with solar for far less cost than nuclear.

Solar panels are heavy, expensive, fragile, and not very productive.
They also are DC instead of AC, so require wasteful inverters.
 
How many US ports handle container ships? You could ship Little Boy or Fat Man in one of those, however, modern nuclear weapons are much smaller, so there are numerous ways that an insane fool could nuke a US city.

Actually "modern nuclear weapons" are much bigger, because they are fusion weapons, not fission. The smallest one ever made was the Davey Crockett, but it made no sense and was abandoned because its death circle was greater than its launch range.

All ships, trucks, trains, etc., are checked for nuclear weapons, so there are no ways to use them unless you have long range ballistic missiles.
 
Back
Top Bottom