NOT A JOKE: Media Blaming the TRUCK, not the TERRORIST, For Attack in France!

easyt65

Diamond Member
Aug 4, 2015
90,307
61,233
2,645
Paul Joseph Watson - July 15, 2016 1615 Comments



Media Blames Truck, Not Terrorists or Islam, For Nice Attack

"Leftist media outlets reacted to the devastating attack in Nice not by blaming Islam or even terrorists, but by suggesting that an inanimate object – the truck – was responsible for the carnage.

Instead of pointing the finger at Islamists, CNN, CBC and the New York Times all published headlines that served to hide the true nature of the attack.

CBC reported, “Children feared killed in Nice as truck attacks family event”. Presumably, the truck was somehow able to manifest artificial intelligence and plough itself through dozens of victims.

Not to be outdone, CNN reported “Truck rams crowd; 84 dead in Nice,” again providing a convenient way of avoiding any mention of the ideology that inspired the driver."


-----

No use of the word 'Islamic Extremist', 'Radical Islam', 'ISIS', or even 'terrorist'.
No mention of 'terrorism' or 'terrorist' at all (for example, 'Terrorist Attack - Rams Truck Into Crowd killing 84') - Just 'TRUCK Rams Crow'.

So how long before we see Liberals demanding legislation be passed regarding TRUCKS or demanding Semis be labeled as 'ASAULT Trucks'? :p

"Given that the truck alone, and not the ideology that radicalized the terrorist who used one as a weapon, is to blame for the massacre in Nice, the solution to stop further violence is simple; Ban deadly assault trucks."
 
Kinda like republicans blaming Hillary, and not the terrorists for Benghazi.
The Americans would not have been in Benghazi had Hillary done her job...

(Gee, and I caught shit from Liberals because I made a comment making reference to something NOT directly associated to the thread at hand....thanks for the 'double-standard' demonstration.)
 
Has any organization claimed responsibility yet? We're all assuming it was ISIS, but it's kind of lo tech for them, isn't it. Also, any ideas why he had fake guns and grenades in the back of the truck?
Do you suppose he was a lone wolf nutcase who self-radicalized? Still a terrorist, but he sounds kinda flaky.
 
Kinda like republicans blaming Hillary, and not the terrorists for Benghazi.
The Americans would not have been in Benghazi had Hillary done her job...

(Gee, and I caught shit from Liberals because I made a comment making reference to something NOT directly associated to the thread at hand....thanks for the 'double-standard' demonstration.)
Stevens went to Benghazi of his own accord and against advice. That isn't even disputed.
 
Has any organization claimed responsibility yet? We're all assuming it was ISIS, but it's kind of lo tech for them, isn't it. Also, any ideas why he had fake guns and grenades in the back of the truck?
Do you suppose he was a lone wolf nutcase who self-radicalized? Still a terrorist, but he sounds kinda flaky.
I read where ISIS did, pretty quickly. That doesn't mean they did it, but it was obviously a TERRORIST. 'Lo Tech'? You're talking about people beheading and burning people at the stake. 'BODY COUNT' and 'HI PROFILE' is what they are after, no matter the method. I completely agree - anyone who can do something this horrific is well past 'flakey'.
 
Paul Joseph Watson - July 15, 2016 1615 Comments



Media Blames Truck, Not Terrorists or Islam, For Nice Attack

"Leftist media outlets reacted to the devastating attack in Nice not by blaming Islam or even terrorists, but by suggesting that an inanimate object – the truck – was responsible for the carnage.

Instead of pointing the finger at Islamists, CNN, CBC and the New York Times all published headlines that served to hide the true nature of the attack.

CBC reported, “Children feared killed in Nice as truck attacks family event”. Presumably, the truck was somehow able to manifest artificial intelligence and plough itself through dozens of victims.

Not to be outdone, CNN reported “Truck rams crowd; 84 dead in Nice,” again providing a convenient way of avoiding any mention of the ideology that inspired the driver."

Really. So they actually said the driver was innocent of any devious plan but the truck just up and commandeered itself, do they?

Could you quote that part?
 
OP be like: Media said Truck murders. WHO DID THE TRUCK MURDER AND WHEN DID TRUCKS START ACTING ON ITS OWN?
 
Kinda like republicans blaming Hillary, and not the terrorists for Benghazi.
Nowhere near the same. Hillary, in her position, failed to do her job when the terrorists did what they did. Who was supposed to stop the truck?

Interesting you say terrorists. You should explain that to Hillary. She says that a video circulating on the internet led to PROTESTS.
 
Stevens went to Benghazi of his own accord and against advice. That isn't even disputed.
Stephens went to Benghazi because he worked for Hillary / the State Department.

Every other nation pulled their people out due to the threats and terrorist attacks going on - they did not wait for their people to ASK if they could leave. Hillary / the State Dept DENIED hundreds - HUNDREDS - of requests from Stephens for additional security and even took away 14 members of his security team AFTER 2 TERRORIST ATTACKS ON HIS COMPOUND leading up to the 9/11/12 attack - WHO THE F* DOES THAT?!

So please stop with the attempted defense and justifications of Hillary as if she had no control of the State Department or what went on. At the very least you are claiming she was so incompetent and knew so little about what was going on in the Department SHE was supposed to be running that she allowed 4 Americans to die. If she could not even run an AGENCY without getting Americans killed, why the hell would anyone want to entrust the entire NATION to her 'care'?!
 
Paul Joseph Watson - July 15, 2016 1615 Comments



Media Blames Truck, Not Terrorists or Islam, For Nice Attack

"Leftist media outlets reacted to the devastating attack in Nice not by blaming Islam or even terrorists, but by suggesting that an inanimate object – the truck – was responsible for the carnage.

Instead of pointing the finger at Islamists, CNN, CBC and the New York Times all published headlines that served to hide the true nature of the attack.

CBC reported, “Children feared killed in Nice as truck attacks family event”. Presumably, the truck was somehow able to manifest artificial intelligence and plough itself through dozens of victims.

Not to be outdone, CNN reported “Truck rams crowd; 84 dead in Nice,” again providing a convenient way of avoiding any mention of the ideology that inspired the driver."

Really. So they actually said the driver was innocent of any devious plan but the truck just up and commandeered itself, do they?

Could you quote that part?

Did you look at the images? "Truck rams crowd".... "Truck Attack"
 
Has any organization claimed responsibility yet? We're all assuming it was ISIS, but it's kind of lo tech for them, isn't it. Also, any ideas why he had fake guns and grenades in the back of the truck?
Do you suppose he was a lone wolf nutcase who self-radicalized? Still a terrorist, but he sounds kinda flaky.
no organization has taken credit, he belongs to no known mosque.

right now any speculation of motivation is just that.
 

Forum List

Back
Top