North polar ice volume

[skookerasbil]

LOL..........can you just picture science OCD meatheads like Rolling Thunder and Old Rocks standing on the shores of Krakatoa in the late 1800's and saying, "Ahhhhhhhhhhhh.........that's but a tiny burp. Wait'll they see all the shit that comes out of a Z06 Corvette come 2005!!!!!!!!!"

 

[skookerasbil]

or better yet...................

Who couldnt see Old Rocks waxing poetic in Java, "Sh!t........the volcano isnt nothing!!! This aerosol can will do some SERIOUS damage yo's!!!!"

 

[skookerasbil]

Clearly..........................

>

I mean.........who cant see that???!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[skookerasbil]

 

[RollingThunder]

Oh............I get it.............Im the asshole here!!!!

Yeah, you are, I suppose, but primarily you're the ignorant retard here. In fact, you're so much of a retard that you made a ridiculously false claim about volcanic emissions and posted a link about volcanic emissions that refuted your own nutjob claim. LOL. You are really stupid!

Stupid green morons are so OCD on this, they look at only what they want to..........so go ahead and reference volcanic activity and its relation to C02 contributions. Meatheads!!! Like the haze from massive eruptions have no influence on world temps thus no impact on climate change!!!

Assuming that other people are as ignorant as you are is, for you, like betting on a 500-1 longshot. We all know that besides the CO2 emissions from volcanoes, which can contribute a tiny bit to global warming, there are also particulates and sulfates that have a short term cooling effect on the Earth's climate to one degree or another, depending on the size of the volcano, the strength of the eruption, and how long it lasts. The Pinatubo eruption had a distinct cooling effect but this latest volcano in Iceland is much smaller and scientists are estimating that it won't have much effect.

So what's your point, Mr. super-retardo.

 

[westwall]

Oh............I get it.............Im the asshole here!!!!

Yeah, you are, I suppose, but primarily you're the ignorant retard here. In fact, you're so much of a retard that you made a ridiculously false claim about volcanic emissions and posted a link about volcanic emissions that refuted your own nutjob claim. LOL. You are really stupid!

Stupid green morons are so OCD on this, they look at only what they want to..........so go ahead and reference volcanic activity and its relation to C02 contributions. Meatheads!!! Like the haze from massive eruptions have no influence on world temps thus no impact on climate change!!!

Assuming that other people are as ignorant as you are is, for you, like betting on a 500-1 longshot. We all know that besides the CO2 emissions from volcanoes, which can contribute a tiny bit to global warming, there are also particulates and sulfates that have a short term cooling effect on the Earth's climate to one degree or another, depending on the size of the volcano, the strength of the eruption, and how long it lasts. The Pinatubo eruption had a distinct cooling effect but this latest volcano in Iceland is much smaller and scientists are estimating that it won't have much effect.

So what's your point, Mr. super-retardo.

The point is, little boy, that you don't have one.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Let me see if I understand this: the Ice is melting, but only maybe on one part of the planet and as a result the oceans aren't rising but they are turning into battery acid.

Is that about right?

 

[Oddball]

Arctic Ice Volume Has Increased 25% Since May, 2008

The Navy requires accurate sea ice information for their operations, and has spent a lot of effort over the years studying, measuring, and operating in Arctic ice both above and below, such as they did in the ICEX 2009 exercise.

The US Navy attack submarine USS Annapolis (SSN 760) rests in the Arctic Ocean after surfacing through three feet of ice during Ice Exercise 2009 on March 21, 2009. The two-week training exercise, which is used to test submarine operability and war-fighting capability in Arctic conditions, also involved the USS Helena (SSN 725), the University of Washington and personnel from the Navy Arctic Submarine Laboratory.

So, if you are planning on bringing a $900 million Los Angeles class submarine through the ice, as the captain might say to the analyst after receiving an ice report: “you’d better be damn sure of the ice thickness before I risk the boat and the crew”.

Below is a blink comparator of U.S. Navy PIPS sea ice forecast data, zoomed to show the primary Arctic ice zone.

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/05/29/arctic-ice-volume-has-increased-25-since-may-2008/

Lemmie guess...The United States Navy is now a bunch of "deniers!"

 

[RollingThunder]

Oh............I get it.............Im the asshole here!!!!

Yeah, you are, I suppose, but primarily you're the ignorant retard here. In fact, you're so much of a retard that you made a ridiculously false claim about volcanic emissions and posted a link about volcanic emissions that refuted your own nutjob claim. LOL. You are really stupid!

Stupid green morons are so OCD on this, they look at only what they want to..........so go ahead and reference volcanic activity and its relation to C02 contributions. Meatheads!!! Like the haze from massive eruptions have no influence on world temps thus no impact on climate change!!!

Assuming that other people are as ignorant as you are is, for you, like betting on a 500-1 longshot. We all know that besides the CO2 emissions from volcanoes, which can contribute a tiny bit to global warming, there are also particulates and sulfates that have a short term cooling effect on the Earth's climate to one degree or another, depending on the size of the volcano, the strength of the eruption, and how long it lasts. The Pinatubo eruption had a distinct cooling effect but this latest volcano in Iceland is much smaller and scientists are estimating that it won't have much effect.

So what's your point, Mr. super-retardo.

The point is, little boy, that you don't have one.

Nobody has a point like the one on top of your head, walleyedretardo.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Arctic Ice Volume Has Increased 25% Since May, 2008

The Navy requires accurate sea ice information for their operations, and has spent a lot of effort over the years studying, measuring, and operating in Arctic ice both above and below, such as they did in the ICEX 2009 exercise.

The US Navy attack submarine USS Annapolis (SSN 760) rests in the Arctic Ocean after surfacing through three feet of ice during Ice Exercise 2009 on March 21, 2009. The two-week training exercise, which is used to test submarine operability and war-fighting capability in Arctic conditions, also involved the USS Helena (SSN 725), the University of Washington and personnel from the Navy Arctic Submarine Laboratory.

So, if you are planning on bringing a $900 million Los Angeles class submarine through the ice, as the captain might say to the analyst after receiving an ice report: “you’d better be damn sure of the ice thickness before I risk the boat and the crew”.

Below is a blink comparator of U.S. Navy PIPS sea ice forecast data, zoomed to show the primary Arctic ice zone.

Arctic Ice Volume Has Increased 25% Since May, 2008 | Watts Up With That?

Lemmie guess...The United States Navy is now a bunch of "deniers!"

NASA needs to tell the Navy they're reading the data all wrong.

 

[RollingThunder]

Arctic Ice Volume Has Increased 25% Since May, 2008

The Navy requires accurate sea ice information for their operations, and has spent a lot of effort over the years studying, measuring, and operating in Arctic ice both above and below, such as they did in the ICEX 2009 exercise.

The US Navy attack submarine USS Annapolis (SSN 760) rests in the Arctic Ocean after surfacing through three feet of ice during Ice Exercise 2009 on March 21, 2009. The two-week training exercise, which is used to test submarine operability and war-fighting capability in Arctic conditions, also involved the USS Helena (SSN 725), the University of Washington and personnel from the Navy Arctic Submarine Laboratory.

So, if you are planning on bringing a $900 million Los Angeles class submarine through the ice, as the captain might say to the analyst after receiving an ice report: “you’d better be damn sure of the ice thickness before I risk the boat and the crew”.

Below is a blink comparator of U.S. Navy PIPS sea ice forecast data, zoomed to show the primary Arctic ice zone.

Arctic Ice Volume Has Increased 25% Since May, 2008 | Watts Up With That?

Lemmie guess...The United States Navy is now a bunch of "deniers!"

The Navy is doing just fine. The submarines only do measurements in a very small area compared to the total area of the Arctic. It is the retards who wrote that propaganda bullshit who are the deniers - Steve Goddard and Anthony Watts - neither one of them are anything even close to a climate scientist. You choose to believe the pseudo-science off of denier cult blogs instead of the scientific data from NASA, NOAA, and the NSIDC but that is because you are kind of stupid and ideologically brainwashed to only believe the stuff that agrees with your ignorant, manipulated, rightwingretard delusions about this subject.

 

[Oddball]

Loser!

Argumentum ad hominem (argument directed at the person). This is the error of attacking the character or motives of a person who has stated an idea, rather than the idea itself. The most obvious example of this fallacy is when one debater maligns the character of another debater (e.g, "The members of the opposition are a couple of fascists!"), but this is actually not that common. A more typical manifestation of argumentum ad hominem is attacking a source of information -- for example, responding to a quotation from Richard Nixon on the subject of free trade with China by saying, "We all know Nixon was a liar and a cheat, so why should we believe anything he says?" Argumentum ad hominem also occurs when someone's arguments are discounted merely because they stand to benefit from the policy they advocate -- such as Bill Gates arguing against antitrust, rich people arguing for lower taxes, white people arguing against affirmative action, minorities arguing for affirmative action, etc. In all of these cases, the relevant question is not who makes the argument, but whether the argument is valid.

http://www.csun.edu/~dgw61315/fallacies.html#Argumentum ad hominem

 

[RollingThunder]

Let me see if I understand this: the Ice is melting, but only maybe on one part of the planet and as a result the oceans aren't rising but they are turning into battery acid.

Is that about right?

No, that is about as lamely idiotic as all of your posts, CrusaderRabbit. The ice is melting all over the planet - the Arctic, the Antarctic, Greenland and the glaciers - and the sea levels are rising. The drop in pH levels is affecting certain parts of the ocean ecosystem but that doesn't translate to "they are turning into battery acid" except in your little cult of denial where you just love straw-man arguments and idiotic hyperbole.

 

[Oddball]

Project much, Trolling Blunder?

 

[RollingThunder]

Project much, Trolling Blunder?

No, I'm just really good at spotting frauds, phonies, liars and retards like you, DumbDood.

 

[Oddball]

Haven't looked in the mirror lately, have you?

 

[RollingThunder]

Haven't looked in the mirror lately, have you?

You're just having a hissyfit because the pseudo-science and lies you parrot off of some moronic denier cult blog keep getting debunked by actual science from real climate scientists. You poor deluded and duped denier cult dingbat.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Let me see if I understand this: the Ice is melting, but only maybe on one part of the planet and as a result the oceans aren't rising but they are turning into battery acid.

Is that about right?

No, that is about as lamely idiotic as all of your posts, CrusaderRabbit. The ice is melting all over the planet - the Arctic, the Antarctic, Greenland and the glaciers - and the sea levels are rising. The drop in pH levels is affecting certain parts of the ocean ecosystem but that doesn't translate to "they are turning into battery acid" except in your little cult of denial where you just love straw-man arguments and idiotic hyperbole.

The "idiotic hyperbole" is how I present your ideas back to you in the hopes you'll say, "Um, yeah, if the ice is melting how come the oceans aren't rising?"

 

[Old Rocks]

The sea levels are rising at the rate of about 3 mm a year. That is about double the average rate for the 20th century.

Laboratory for Satellite Altimetry / Sea level rise - Products: Sea level time series

 

[ScienceRocks]

The sea levels are rising at the rate of about 3 mm a year. That is about double the average rate for the 20th century.

Laboratory for Satellite Altimetry / Sea level rise - Products: Sea level time series

It has been rising for 10,000 years...Also Alaska was connected by a land bridge that brought humans into the America's. So it has always been rising., The question is are the sea levels rising faster rate then it has for the last 3,000 years?

"The coastline as we see it today is, from a geologic perspective, a very recent phenomenon that dates back only about 3,000 years. In fact, prior to around 8,000 B.C., the area of the modern shoreline was high and dry, with the Gulf coast far to the east of its present position. This is because, in earlier millennia, global sea level was as much as 100 meters (over 300 feet) lower, with much of the world’s water supply “locked” in vast continental ice sheets and montane glaciers that were far more extensive than those of modern times. This era, the Pleistocene (or, in common parlance, the “Ice Age”) had markedly lower global temperatures than those of historical times. The final cold phase of the Pleistocene was around 20,000 years ago, after which rising global temperatures caused the continental ice sheets and mountain glaciers to begin a gradual melting process, with the result that sea level began to rise rapidly over the next 10,000 years.

Below is a graphical portrayal of the five major stages in the development of the modern Texas coastal environment. Look it over and then read the continued discussion after the last stage. " Coast Prehistory: sea level