- Thread starter
- #21
Not if it's virtually non-existing and it's under a mountain.I think he blew up his nuclear arsenal and is forced into making a deal.What would be the point of answering your question when you'll just twist it to mean what you want it to mean in it's worst connotation possible. What is the point of discussing anything with you when you're only interested in failure and what would hurt either Trump or the Republican party. You don't care about the truth, you only care about getting your next nominee into office.We make the promise and then let things progress as they progress. Regime change will come as people gain more freedom when and if they're ready for it.
What we did to Cuba was wrong. It kept their way of life the way it was. If we had allowed them to enjoy the gifts of freedom, of tourism, of food and medical aid back when Kennedy was in power, instead of stifling them things would be better off there today and perhaps today their people would be ready for actual self determination, or Democracy.
By sanctioning them we harmed the ones who could've made things better.
So you expect a guy to accept a deal which may end up with regime change? As in, HIS REGIME changes and he gets executed for it?
Why would anyone in their right mind accept such a deal?
What the US did in Cuba was wrong. What the US did in Iraq was wrong. What the US does all over the world is usually wrong.
Why would the US be right this time?
Trump isn't doing this for the good of North Korea, nor for anyone else, he's doing it to make himself look good.
Worst connotation?
I'm point out the blatantly obvious.
We don't know much. But what we do know is what has already been said.
Trump: Troop withdrawal from South Korea 'not on the table'
"
Trump: Troop withdrawal from South Korea 'not on the table'"
Though it's funny because Trump has threatened to withdraw troops from South Korea if he doesn't get a better deal, but won't pull troops out when he's dealing with North Korea.
That's Trump. But when it comes to China, Trump must know that if he pulls out of South Korea, he'll weaken his position against China, and he won't do that.
We know that Kim got annoyed because someone in the US govt brought up Libya. Then all of a sudden he's friendly again.
One minute hates the US, next minute smiles. But he's angry at the US because they've suggested he gets rid of his nukes, then the US can take over.
Do you think he's stupid?
You think?
Why would you think that?
Do you know what happens when people blow up their nuclear arsenals? You can see it from space.
Call it a hunch.