Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Sure I do, but what's the point of prattling them off. Can you not refute the arguments with basic logic and information?I'm clueless? But you don't actually provide any retort to what I say, you just say "the US will bomb it".If they use Radar it gets blown-up? LOL in what fantasy does the US have magic weapons that work 100% of the time and hit anywhere without delay?Pretty sure they'd just redeploy their radar and launchers into their bunkers during an incoming Cruise Missile attack.
The North Koreans have the ability to see those at the opening stages, until other radar sites are first removed, and even then a person in a fishing boat off the coast could report one flying in by radio if they were that dedicated.
If they use the radar- it gets blown up.
If they don't use the radar- then the KN06 is useless.
Is the US air force supposed to just wait hours, days, weeks for all the KN06 to be destroyed?
Will the North Koreans turn on their radars if there's no planes in the sky to shoot down?
I'll ask again. What is your expertise in these matters? You appear to be increasingly clueless.
Sure.
So, you have no expertise in military matters generally, much less the DPRK specifically.
Sure I do, but what's the point of prattling them off. Can you not refute the arguments with basic logic and information?I'm clueless? But you don't actually provide any retort to what I say, you just say "the US will bomb it".If they use Radar it gets blown-up? LOL in what fantasy does the US have magic weapons that work 100% of the time and hit anywhere without delay?If they use the radar- it gets blown up.
If they don't use the radar- then the KN06 is useless.
Is the US air force supposed to just wait hours, days, weeks for all the KN06 to be destroyed?
Will the North Koreans turn on their radars if there's no planes in the sky to shoot down?
I'll ask again. What is your expertise in these matters? You appear to be increasingly clueless.
Sure.
So, you have no expertise in military matters generally, much less the DPRK specifically.
Sure I do, but what's the point of prattling them off. Can you not refute the arguments with basic logic and information?I'm clueless? But you don't actually provide any retort to what I say, you just say "the US will bomb it".If they use Radar it gets blown-up? LOL in what fantasy does the US have magic weapons that work 100% of the time and hit anywhere without delay?If they use the radar- it gets blown up.
If they don't use the radar- then the KN06 is useless.
Is the US air force supposed to just wait hours, days, weeks for all the KN06 to be destroyed?
Will the North Koreans turn on their radars if there's no planes in the sky to shoot down?
I'll ask again. What is your expertise in these matters? You appear to be increasingly clueless.
Sure.
So, you have no expertise in military matters generally, much less the DPRK specifically.
Do you think that the KN06 radar will underperform?
Do you think the US Navy has sufficient mine sweepers?
Or that the Romeo class submarine can't deliver mines effectively?
What the fuck are your lame ass arguments.
If they use Radar it gets blown-up? LOL in what fantasy does the US have magic weapons that work 100% of the time and hit anywhere without delay?like a lot of members' theories, you also think the US will be like a snowman and just sit there
you think the US doesn't have plans for any and all the aspects you mention?
you think they just sit around reading about WW2 and the Korean war
a huge difference, like PG1 is the US will have air superiority with it's many advantages
The KN06 blunts the initial effects of Air superiority. Which is the point I first make. The second point regarding that is that the air superiority really isn't much on the ground when dealing with these Cold war level mass mobilizations. This isn't bombing 30 talibanis in a cave with a MOAB.
The KN 06 can protect it's own radar from cruise missiles? You know, those things that fly to specific point on earth and blow it up, and cannot be jammed?
Pretty sure they'd just redeploy their radar and launchers into their bunkers during an incoming Cruise Missile attack.
The North Koreans have the ability to see those at the opening stages, until other radar sites are first removed, and even then a person in a fishing boat off the coast could report one flying in by radio if they were that dedicated.
If they use the radar- it gets blown up.
If they don't use the radar- then the KN06 is useless.
Is the US air force supposed to just wait hours, days, weeks for all the KN06 to be destroyed?
Will the North Koreans turn on their radars if there's no planes in the sky to shoot down?
Korea was a win for everyone except NKListen rice for brains. You can’t identify a piece of propaganda when you see it. How about checking out the 1980 bronco in the opening or maybe the ultra modern 1950 trucks.
As far as the wars, I would defer to professionals but it was the lack of will in America, not military ability that determined the outcomes. Korea was a draw, Vietnam a loss, and Iraq a win. Why don’t you pull up the highway of hell picture From the Kuwait war and tell me air power in a conventional war is not Supreme.
Highway of Death - Google Search
Yeah, because North Koreans are in a big open desert with no AA, no indirect fire, and not no big giant mountains of solid Granite with thousands of miles of tunnels and bunkers dug out of them.
Why not just go all Nazi on them and bomb them into rubble and win the day? Oh wait, US did, and lost. BIGLY.
Korea was no more a draw than WW1 was a draw. LOL
And it's Imperia Hubris to think that YOU decided to lose the war. No, you LOST, there's a difference, losing means YOU COULD NOT WIN. Under the circumstances.
Bullshit.Korea was a win for everyone except NKListen rice for brains. You can’t identify a piece of propaganda when you see it. How about checking out the 1980 bronco in the opening or maybe the ultra modern 1950 trucks.
As far as the wars, I would defer to professionals but it was the lack of will in America, not military ability that determined the outcomes. Korea was a draw, Vietnam a loss, and Iraq a win. Why don’t you pull up the highway of hell picture From the Kuwait war and tell me air power in a conventional war is not Supreme.
Highway of Death - Google Search
Yeah, because North Koreans are in a big open desert with no AA, no indirect fire, and not no big giant mountains of solid Granite with thousands of miles of tunnels and bunkers dug out of them.
Why not just go all Nazi on them and bomb them into rubble and win the day? Oh wait, US did, and lost. BIGLY.
Korea was no more a draw than WW1 was a draw. LOL
And it's Imperia Hubris to think that YOU decided to lose the war. No, you LOST, there's a difference, losing means YOU COULD NOT WIN. Under the circumstances.
US kept SK from being overrun
SK kept from being overrun
China kept NK from being overrun
NK failed in their attempt to overrun SK
Yeah but it's hardly "as soon as it's turned on".If they use Radar it gets blown-up? LOL in what fantasy does the US have magic weapons that work 100% of the time and hit anywhere without delay?The KN06 blunts the initial effects of Air superiority. Which is the point I first make. The second point regarding that is that the air superiority really isn't much on the ground when dealing with these Cold war level mass mobilizations. This isn't bombing 30 talibanis in a cave with a MOAB.
The KN 06 can protect it's own radar from cruise missiles? You know, those things that fly to specific point on earth and blow it up, and cannot be jammed?
Pretty sure they'd just redeploy their radar and launchers into their bunkers during an incoming Cruise Missile attack.
The North Koreans have the ability to see those at the opening stages, until other radar sites are first removed, and even then a person in a fishing boat off the coast could report one flying in by radio if they were that dedicated.
If they use the radar- it gets blown up.
If they don't use the radar- then the KN06 is useless.
Is the US air force supposed to just wait hours, days, weeks for all the KN06 to be destroyed?
Will the North Koreans turn on their radars if there's no planes in the sky to shoot down?
The U.S. tactics are predicated on knocking out the radar as soon as it is switched on. I don't claim to be any expert on American abilities- but this is a pretty well known tactic- the Wild Weasel.
Sure I do, but what's the point of prattling them off. Can you not refute the arguments with basic logic and information?I'm clueless? But you don't actually provide any retort to what I say, you just say "the US will bomb it".If they use Radar it gets blown-up? LOL in what fantasy does the US have magic weapons that work 100% of the time and hit anywhere without delay?
Is the US air force supposed to just wait hours, days, weeks for all the KN06 to be destroyed?
Will the North Koreans turn on their radars if there's no planes in the sky to shoot down?
I'll ask again. What is your expertise in these matters? You appear to be increasingly clueless.
Sure.
So, you have no expertise in military matters generally, much less the DPRK specifically.
Do you think that the KN06 radar will underperform?
Do you think the US Navy has sufficient mine sweepers?
Or that the Romeo class submarine can't deliver mines effectively?
What the fuck are your lame ass arguments.
Do you think that the KN06 radar will underperform?- none of us know- but since they rely upon radar- and since the United States tactics specifically target radar- I think that the KN06 would not be effective beyond the first salvo.
Do you think the US Navy has sufficient mine sweepers? Sufficient for what- specifically?
Or that the Romeo class submarine can't deliver mines effectively? I imagine that they can- up to the point that they are sunk. None nuclear subs can't stay submerged forever- and can only carry so many mines
no no noBullshit.Korea was a win for everyone except NKListen rice for brains. You can’t identify a piece of propaganda when you see it. How about checking out the 1980 bronco in the opening or maybe the ultra modern 1950 trucks.
As far as the wars, I would defer to professionals but it was the lack of will in America, not military ability that determined the outcomes. Korea was a draw, Vietnam a loss, and Iraq a win. Why don’t you pull up the highway of hell picture From the Kuwait war and tell me air power in a conventional war is not Supreme.
Highway of Death - Google Search
Yeah, because North Koreans are in a big open desert with no AA, no indirect fire, and not no big giant mountains of solid Granite with thousands of miles of tunnels and bunkers dug out of them.
Why not just go all Nazi on them and bomb them into rubble and win the day? Oh wait, US did, and lost. BIGLY.
Korea was no more a draw than WW1 was a draw. LOL
And it's Imperia Hubris to think that YOU decided to lose the war. No, you LOST, there's a difference, losing means YOU COULD NOT WIN. Under the circumstances.
US kept SK from being overrun
SK kept from being overrun
China kept NK from being overrun
NK failed in their attempt to overrun SK
The US goal was to reunify the peninsula on their terms.
They failed.
The United Nations and the Korean War - History Learning SiteAmerica called on North Korea to withdraw to the 38th Parallel.
U.N. approves armed force to repel North Korea - Jun 27, 1950 - HISTORY.com, the U.N. Security Council issued a resolution calling for a cease-fire and an end to North Korean aggression
Truman orders U.S. forces to Korea - Jun 27, 1950 - HISTORY.comOn June 27, President Truman announced to the nation and the world that America would intervene in the Korean conflict in order to prevent the conquest of an independent nation by communism.
et c etc. Again MacArthur was warned not to provoke the Chinese
Bullshit.Korea was a win for everyone except NKListen rice for brains. You can’t identify a piece of propaganda when you see it. How about checking out the 1980 bronco in the opening or maybe the ultra modern 1950 trucks.
As far as the wars, I would defer to professionals but it was the lack of will in America, not military ability that determined the outcomes. Korea was a draw, Vietnam a loss, and Iraq a win. Why don’t you pull up the highway of hell picture From the Kuwait war and tell me air power in a conventional war is not Supreme.
Highway of Death - Google Search
Yeah, because North Koreans are in a big open desert with no AA, no indirect fire, and not no big giant mountains of solid Granite with thousands of miles of tunnels and bunkers dug out of them.
Why not just go all Nazi on them and bomb them into rubble and win the day? Oh wait, US did, and lost. BIGLY.
Korea was no more a draw than WW1 was a draw. LOL
And it's Imperia Hubris to think that YOU decided to lose the war. No, you LOST, there's a difference, losing means YOU COULD NOT WIN. Under the circumstances.
US kept SK from being overrun
SK kept from being overrun
China kept NK from being overrun
NK failed in their attempt to overrun SK
The US goal was to reunify the peninsula on their terms.
They failed.
Bullshit.Korea was a win for everyone except NKListen rice for brains. You can’t identify a piece of propaganda when you see it. How about checking out the 1980 bronco in the opening or maybe the ultra modern 1950 trucks.
As far as the wars, I would defer to professionals but it was the lack of will in America, not military ability that determined the outcomes. Korea was a draw, Vietnam a loss, and Iraq a win. Why don’t you pull up the highway of hell picture From the Kuwait war and tell me air power in a conventional war is not Supreme.
Highway of Death - Google Search
Yeah, because North Koreans are in a big open desert with no AA, no indirect fire, and not no big giant mountains of solid Granite with thousands of miles of tunnels and bunkers dug out of them.
Why not just go all Nazi on them and bomb them into rubble and win the day? Oh wait, US did, and lost. BIGLY.
Korea was no more a draw than WW1 was a draw. LOL
And it's Imperia Hubris to think that YOU decided to lose the war. No, you LOST, there's a difference, losing means YOU COULD NOT WIN. Under the circumstances.
US kept SK from being overrun
SK kept from being overrun
China kept NK from being overrun
NK failed in their attempt to overrun SK
The US goal was to reunify the peninsula on their terms.
They failed.
so they are withdrawing troops--they wanted to attack with less troops???!!!the United States had begun withdrawing its troops from South Korea in 1948. As late as January of 1950, Secretary of State Dean Acheson had implied that the Korea Peninsula lay outside the all-important "defense perimeter"
Bullshit.Korea was a win for everyone except NKListen rice for brains. You can’t identify a piece of propaganda when you see it. How about checking out the 1980 bronco in the opening or maybe the ultra modern 1950 trucks.
As far as the wars, I would defer to professionals but it was the lack of will in America, not military ability that determined the outcomes. Korea was a draw, Vietnam a loss, and Iraq a win. Why don’t you pull up the highway of hell picture From the Kuwait war and tell me air power in a conventional war is not Supreme.
Highway of Death - Google Search
Yeah, because North Koreans are in a big open desert with no AA, no indirect fire, and not no big giant mountains of solid Granite with thousands of miles of tunnels and bunkers dug out of them.
Why not just go all Nazi on them and bomb them into rubble and win the day? Oh wait, US did, and lost. BIGLY.
Korea was no more a draw than WW1 was a draw. LOL
And it's Imperia Hubris to think that YOU decided to lose the war. No, you LOST, there's a difference, losing means YOU COULD NOT WIN. Under the circumstances.
US kept SK from being overrun
SK kept from being overrun
China kept NK from being overrun
NK failed in their attempt to overrun SK
The US goal was to reunify the peninsula on their terms.
They failed.Bullshit.Korea was a win for everyone except NKListen rice for brains. You can’t identify a piece of propaganda when you see it. How about checking out the 1980 bronco in the opening or maybe the ultra modern 1950 trucks.
As far as the wars, I would defer to professionals but it was the lack of will in America, not military ability that determined the outcomes. Korea was a draw, Vietnam a loss, and Iraq a win. Why don’t you pull up the highway of hell picture From the Kuwait war and tell me air power in a conventional war is not Supreme.
Highway of Death - Google Search
Yeah, because North Koreans are in a big open desert with no AA, no indirect fire, and not no big giant mountains of solid Granite with thousands of miles of tunnels and bunkers dug out of them.
Why not just go all Nazi on them and bomb them into rubble and win the day? Oh wait, US did, and lost. BIGLY.
Korea was no more a draw than WW1 was a draw. LOL
And it's Imperia Hubris to think that YOU decided to lose the war. No, you LOST, there's a difference, losing means YOU COULD NOT WIN. Under the circumstances.
US kept SK from being overrun
SK kept from being overrun
China kept NK from being overrun
NK failed in their attempt to overrun SK
The US goal was to reunify the peninsula on their terms.
They failed.so they are withdrawing troops--they wanted to attack with less troops???!!!the United States had begun withdrawing its troops from South Korea in 1948. As late as January of 1950, Secretary of State Dean Acheson had implied that the Korea Peninsula lay outside the all-important "defense perimeter"
US Enters the Korean Conflict
a whole Corps got thrown off the peninsula!!Bullshit.Korea was a win for everyone except NKListen rice for brains. You can’t identify a piece of propaganda when you see it. How about checking out the 1980 bronco in the opening or maybe the ultra modern 1950 trucks.
As far as the wars, I would defer to professionals but it was the lack of will in America, not military ability that determined the outcomes. Korea was a draw, Vietnam a loss, and Iraq a win. Why don’t you pull up the highway of hell picture From the Kuwait war and tell me air power in a conventional war is not Supreme.
Highway of Death - Google Search
Yeah, because North Koreans are in a big open desert with no AA, no indirect fire, and not no big giant mountains of solid Granite with thousands of miles of tunnels and bunkers dug out of them.
Why not just go all Nazi on them and bomb them into rubble and win the day? Oh wait, US did, and lost. BIGLY.
Korea was no more a draw than WW1 was a draw. LOL
And it's Imperia Hubris to think that YOU decided to lose the war. No, you LOST, there's a difference, losing means YOU COULD NOT WIN. Under the circumstances.
US kept SK from being overrun
SK kept from being overrun
China kept NK from being overrun
NK failed in their attempt to overrun SK
The US goal was to reunify the peninsula on their terms.
They failed.Bullshit.Korea was a win for everyone except NKListen rice for brains. You can’t identify a piece of propaganda when you see it. How about checking out the 1980 bronco in the opening or maybe the ultra modern 1950 trucks.
As far as the wars, I would defer to professionals but it was the lack of will in America, not military ability that determined the outcomes. Korea was a draw, Vietnam a loss, and Iraq a win. Why don’t you pull up the highway of hell picture From the Kuwait war and tell me air power in a conventional war is not Supreme.
Highway of Death - Google Search
Yeah, because North Koreans are in a big open desert with no AA, no indirect fire, and not no big giant mountains of solid Granite with thousands of miles of tunnels and bunkers dug out of them.
Why not just go all Nazi on them and bomb them into rubble and win the day? Oh wait, US did, and lost. BIGLY.
Korea was no more a draw than WW1 was a draw. LOL
And it's Imperia Hubris to think that YOU decided to lose the war. No, you LOST, there's a difference, losing means YOU COULD NOT WIN. Under the circumstances.
US kept SK from being overrun
SK kept from being overrun
China kept NK from being overrun
NK failed in their attempt to overrun SK
The US goal was to reunify the peninsula on their terms.
They failed.so they are withdrawing troops--they wanted to attack with less troops???!!!the United States had begun withdrawing its troops from South Korea in 1948. As late as January of 1950, Secretary of State Dean Acheson had implied that the Korea Peninsula lay outside the all-important "defense perimeter"
US Enters the Korean Conflict
Right, like 1950 never happened, and the US didn't push all the way to the Yalu river in attempts to utterly destroy North Korea?
Come-on, you have a paper thin understanding of things
a whole Corps got thrown off the peninsula!!Bullshit.Korea was a win for everyone except NKYeah, because North Koreans are in a big open desert with no AA, no indirect fire, and not no big giant mountains of solid Granite with thousands of miles of tunnels and bunkers dug out of them.
Why not just go all Nazi on them and bomb them into rubble and win the day? Oh wait, US did, and lost. BIGLY.
Korea was no more a draw than WW1 was a draw. LOL
And it's Imperia Hubris to think that YOU decided to lose the war. No, you LOST, there's a difference, losing means YOU COULD NOT WIN. Under the circumstances.
US kept SK from being overrun
SK kept from being overrun
China kept NK from being overrun
NK failed in their attempt to overrun SK
The US goal was to reunify the peninsula on their terms.
They failed.Bullshit.Korea was a win for everyone except NKYeah, because North Koreans are in a big open desert with no AA, no indirect fire, and not no big giant mountains of solid Granite with thousands of miles of tunnels and bunkers dug out of them.
Why not just go all Nazi on them and bomb them into rubble and win the day? Oh wait, US did, and lost. BIGLY.
Korea was no more a draw than WW1 was a draw. LOL
And it's Imperia Hubris to think that YOU decided to lose the war. No, you LOST, there's a difference, losing means YOU COULD NOT WIN. Under the circumstances.
US kept SK from being overrun
SK kept from being overrun
China kept NK from being overrun
NK failed in their attempt to overrun SK
The US goal was to reunify the peninsula on their terms.
They failed.so they are withdrawing troops--they wanted to attack with less troops???!!!the United States had begun withdrawing its troops from South Korea in 1948. As late as January of 1950, Secretary of State Dean Acheson had implied that the Korea Peninsula lay outside the all-important "defense perimeter"
US Enters the Korean Conflict
Right, like 1950 never happened, and the US didn't push all the way to the Yalu river in attempts to utterly destroy North Korea?
Come-on, you have a paper thin understanding of things
most UN forces did not reach the Yalu
it says it right there in the links!!! they say nothing about taking over all of Korea
that was not Truman's goal---! please prove otherwise
any way--the US did win by keeping SKorea --this is undeniable
win win --SK saved ..undeniablea whole Corps got thrown off the peninsula!!Bullshit.Korea was a win for everyone except NK
US kept SK from being overrun
SK kept from being overrun
China kept NK from being overrun
NK failed in their attempt to overrun SK
The US goal was to reunify the peninsula on their terms.
They failed.Bullshit.Korea was a win for everyone except NK
US kept SK from being overrun
SK kept from being overrun
China kept NK from being overrun
NK failed in their attempt to overrun SK
The US goal was to reunify the peninsula on their terms.
They failed.so they are withdrawing troops--they wanted to attack with less troops???!!!the United States had begun withdrawing its troops from South Korea in 1948. As late as January of 1950, Secretary of State Dean Acheson had implied that the Korea Peninsula lay outside the all-important "defense perimeter"
US Enters the Korean Conflict
Right, like 1950 never happened, and the US didn't push all the way to the Yalu river in attempts to utterly destroy North Korea?
Come-on, you have a paper thin understanding of things
most UN forces did not reach the Yalu
it says it right there in the links!!! they say nothing about taking over all of Korea
that was not Truman's goal---! please prove otherwise
any way--the US did win by keeping SKorea --this is undeniable
Let me guess, on the Yalu river, after North Korea surrendered, the US would just return all of North Korea to Kim Il Sung and go about their business?
Don't be so naive.
The exact intentions were dictated by the ability to enforce them by power.
When the US lost that ability it revised its intentions like a good narcissist does.
I guess Persian Gulf 1 was not a win?? where we booted Iraq out of Kuwait?a whole Corps got thrown off the peninsula!!Bullshit.Korea was a win for everyone except NK
US kept SK from being overrun
SK kept from being overrun
China kept NK from being overrun
NK failed in their attempt to overrun SK
The US goal was to reunify the peninsula on their terms.
They failed.Bullshit.Korea was a win for everyone except NK
US kept SK from being overrun
SK kept from being overrun
China kept NK from being overrun
NK failed in their attempt to overrun SK
The US goal was to reunify the peninsula on their terms.
They failed.so they are withdrawing troops--they wanted to attack with less troops???!!!the United States had begun withdrawing its troops from South Korea in 1948. As late as January of 1950, Secretary of State Dean Acheson had implied that the Korea Peninsula lay outside the all-important "defense perimeter"
US Enters the Korean Conflict
Right, like 1950 never happened, and the US didn't push all the way to the Yalu river in attempts to utterly destroy North Korea?
Come-on, you have a paper thin understanding of things
most UN forces did not reach the Yalu
it says it right there in the links!!! they say nothing about taking over all of Korea
that was not Truman's goal---! please prove otherwise
any way--the US did win by keeping SKorea --this is undeniable
Let me guess, on the Yalu river, after North Korea surrendered, the US would just return all of North Korea to Kim Il Sung and go about their business?
Don't be so naive.
The exact intentions were dictated by the ability to enforce them by power.
When the US lost that ability it revised its intentions like a good narcissist does.
I guess Persian Gulf 1 was not a win?? where we booted Iraq out of Kuwait?a whole Corps got thrown off the peninsula!!Bullshit.
The US goal was to reunify the peninsula on their terms.
They failed.Bullshit.
The US goal was to reunify the peninsula on their terms.
They failed.so they are withdrawing troops--they wanted to attack with less troops???!!!the United States had begun withdrawing its troops from South Korea in 1948. As late as January of 1950, Secretary of State Dean Acheson had implied that the Korea Peninsula lay outside the all-important "defense perimeter"
US Enters the Korean Conflict
Right, like 1950 never happened, and the US didn't push all the way to the Yalu river in attempts to utterly destroy North Korea?
Come-on, you have a paper thin understanding of things
most UN forces did not reach the Yalu
it says it right there in the links!!! they say nothing about taking over all of Korea
that was not Truman's goal---! please prove otherwise
any way--the US did win by keeping SKorea --this is undeniable
Let me guess, on the Yalu river, after North Korea surrendered, the US would just return all of North Korea to Kim Il Sung and go about their business?
Don't be so naive.
The exact intentions were dictated by the ability to enforce them by power.
When the US lost that ability it revised its intentions like a good narcissist does.
win--SK is still around because the US defended SKI guess Persian Gulf 1 was not a win?? where we booted Iraq out of Kuwait?a whole Corps got thrown off the peninsula!!so they are withdrawing troops--they wanted to attack with less troops???!!!
US Enters the Korean Conflict
Right, like 1950 never happened, and the US didn't push all the way to the Yalu river in attempts to utterly destroy North Korea?
Come-on, you have a paper thin understanding of things
most UN forces did not reach the Yalu
it says it right there in the links!!! they say nothing about taking over all of Korea
that was not Truman's goal---! please prove otherwise
any way--the US did win by keeping SKorea --this is undeniable
Let me guess, on the Yalu river, after North Korea surrendered, the US would just return all of North Korea to Kim Il Sung and go about their business?
Don't be so naive.
The exact intentions were dictated by the ability to enforce them by power.
When the US lost that ability it revised its intentions like a good narcissist does.
Did the US cross into Iraq and take over Baghdad and push the Iraqi army into Syria?
Focus on apt comparisons.
The US deliberately did not invade Iraq in Gulf War. Nor did it extend that as part of the mandate of its coalition.
where are your links on how Truman wanted to take over NK?I guess Persian Gulf 1 was not a win?? where we booted Iraq out of Kuwait?a whole Corps got thrown off the peninsula!!so they are withdrawing troops--they wanted to attack with less troops???!!!
US Enters the Korean Conflict
Right, like 1950 never happened, and the US didn't push all the way to the Yalu river in attempts to utterly destroy North Korea?
Come-on, you have a paper thin understanding of things
most UN forces did not reach the Yalu
it says it right there in the links!!! they say nothing about taking over all of Korea
that was not Truman's goal---! please prove otherwise
any way--the US did win by keeping SKorea --this is undeniable
Let me guess, on the Yalu river, after North Korea surrendered, the US would just return all of North Korea to Kim Il Sung and go about their business?
Don't be so naive.
The exact intentions were dictated by the ability to enforce them by power.
When the US lost that ability it revised its intentions like a good narcissist does.
Did the US cross into Iraq and take over Baghdad and push the Iraqi army into Syria?
Focus on apt comparisons.
The US deliberately did not invade Iraq in Gulf War. Nor did it extend that as part of the mandate of its coalition.
If they use Radar it gets blown-up? LOL in what fantasy does the US have magic weapons that work 100% of the time and hit anywhere without delay?like a lot of members' theories, you also think the US will be like a snowman and just sit there
you think the US doesn't have plans for any and all the aspects you mention?
you think they just sit around reading about WW2 and the Korean war
a huge difference, like PG1 is the US will have air superiority with it's many advantages
The KN06 blunts the initial effects of Air superiority. Which is the point I first make. The second point regarding that is that the air superiority really isn't much on the ground when dealing with these Cold war level mass mobilizations. This isn't bombing 30 talibanis in a cave with a MOAB.
The KN 06 can protect it's own radar from cruise missiles? You know, those things that fly to specific point on earth and blow it up, and cannot be jammed?
Pretty sure they'd just redeploy their radar and launchers into their bunkers during an incoming Cruise Missile attack.
The North Koreans have the ability to see those at the opening stages, until other radar sites are first removed, and even then a person in a fishing boat off the coast could report one flying in by radio if they were that dedicated.
If they use the radar- it gets blown up.
If they don't use the radar- then the KN06 is useless.
Is the US air force supposed to just wait hours, days, weeks for all the KN06 to be destroyed?
Will the North Koreans turn on their radars if there's no planes in the sky to shoot down?
