The best irony here is that Peggy Noonan's only claim to fame, such as it is, is having been a speechwriter for Ronald Reagan,
whose presidency was in worse shape at this point in time than is President Obama's. I'm guessing she didn't refer to that as a disaster.
Her only claim to fame huh?
Well let's review.
A most successful columnist for the Wall Street Journal for some years now and syndicated which no doubt pays her quite handsomely. And she frequently has additional essays published in Forbes, Time, Newsweek, Washington Post, New York Times, US News and World Report, and numerous others.
Best selling author of seven books on American culture and politics. She has been quite a student of history and incorporates that into her books.
She is an often invited guest on political talk shows on all networks and cable.
She was nominated for an Emmy for a post 9/11 documentary and for her work on the television series "West Wing". In the mid 90's she wrote and hosted a PBS series on American Values.
She is on the Manhattan Institute Board, a post you don't get without some really heavy credentials. She has honorary doctorates from Adelphi University, St. John Fisher College, Miami University, and her alma mater, Fairleigh Dickinson University.
She has been a producer at CBS News, has written television news specials for CBS, wrote and produced Dan Rather's daily radio commentary, and at WEEI-AM in Boston won the Tom Phillips Award for excellence in broadcast commentary.
And for those who say she is not a journalist, she began her professional careers as an adjunct professor of journalism at New York University.
Somewhere in there she serve several years as assistant to President Reagan and as head speech writer for President Bush 41.
So maybe we might set aside the notion that is unqualified to 'opine' and accept that she is quite likely to do her homework and know what the hell she is talking about when she does.
What is it about some that they think it necessary to trash successful people who write or say things they don't like instead of discrediting what they write or say?
Maybe it's because they CAN'T discredit what they write or say?