Nobody needs an AK47 with a 30 round magazine

[Darkwind]

0.00295% of guns in the US are involved in a murder each year.
99.99704% are not.
Your claim is unjustifiable.

listen moron, you are lying. so stop it. I forget daily more about gun issues than you will ever learn.

What prohibits registration is the tenth amendment and the second amendment

The second amendment makes gun registration necessary. We need it to support a well regulated militia

The tenth amendment has no bearing on gun registration. States can require stricter rules if they prefer, but it has no bearing on registration

You've never heard of Selective Service?

Any person over the age of 18 is considered part of the militia. There is no need for gun registration. A completely asinine thing to say.

 

[Mathbud1]

Wrong.
/Next.

Rabbi Rules #2!

Just answering your OP on why a 30 round magazine is needed

If you want to shoot up a school or movie theater, you don't want to have to reload. It gives folks a chance to stop you. A large capacity magazine is needed to increase your chances of success

That is why large magazines are the choice of mass killers everywhere

It's of course not true. Plenty of crimes committed with 10rd mags. Even revolvers.
As usual you dont know what the hell you're talking about but that wont stop you.

A revolver or 10 round magazine are fine if you want to rob a liquor store or kill your spouse. But if you want to shoot up a school or movie theater, you need the right tool

And nothing beats an AR 15 or AK 47 with a large capacity magazine.

Our second amendment says you have a right to the weapon of your choice when you kill small children

Because popping in another 10 round magazine would take... like a really long time... right?

 

[R.C. Christian]

The OP is right. I don't need a sucky commie inspired weapon when I have 2 AR's, a Mini-14, an M14, M1 Garand, and a Nagant. Granted the Nagant is a commie weapon! Fired 1000 times dropped 500 times.

 

[Dr Grump]

0.00295% of guns in the US are involved in a murder each year.
99.99704% are not.
Your claim is unjustifiable.

It's not the amount of guns used, it's the amount of homicides that occur and how they occur....that matters...

 

[Mathbud1]

It's not the amount of guns used, it's the amount of homicides that occur and how they occur....that matters...

And, according to his numbers, if you removed 99.99704% of the guns you could still have the same number of homicides committed in exactly the same manner.

 

[Dr Grump]

And, according to his numbers, if you removed 99.99704% of the guns you could still have the same number of homicides committed in exactly the same manner.

No wouldn't, because the number of guns available would now be diluted throughout the US.

 

[Mathbud1]

No wouldn't, because the number of guns available would now be diluted throughout the US.

That's an assumption. It's possible that every gun taken would be a gun that was never going to be used in a crime and that every gun left would be used in a crime. The likelihood of that increases because the people who are most likely to comply with a law banning guns are the law abiding citizens.

 

[rightwinger]

0.00295% of guns in the US are involved in a murder each year.
99.99704% are not.
Your claim is unjustifiable.

listen moron, you are lying. so stop it. I forget daily more about gun issues than you will ever learn.

What prohibits registration is the tenth amendment and the second amendment

The second amendment makes gun registration necessary. We need it to support a well regulated militia

The tenth amendment has no bearing on gun registration. States can require stricter rules if they prefer, but it has no bearing on registration

You've never heard of Selective Service?

Any person over the age of 18 is considered part of the militia. There is no need for gun registration. A completely asinine thing to say.

Ever hear of a well regulated militia being necessary for a free state?

The draft doesn't cut it

 

[rightwinger]

Wrong.
/Next.

Rabbi Rules #2!

Just answering your OP on why a 30 round magazine is needed

If you want to shoot up a school or movie theater, you don't want to have to reload. It gives folks a chance to stop you. A large capacity magazine is needed to increase your chances of success

That is why large magazines are the choice of mass killers everywhere

It's of course not true. Plenty of crimes committed with 10rd mags. Even revolvers.
As usual you dont know what the hell you're talking about but that wont stop you.

A revolver or 10 round magazine are fine if you want to rob a liquor store or kill your spouse. But if you want to shoot up a school or movie theater, you need the right tool

And nothing beats an AR 15 or AK 47 with a large capacity magazine.

Our second amendment says you have a right to the weapon of your choice when you kill small children

Because popping in another 10 round magazine would take... like a really long time... right?

Yea....in the heat of a massacre changing mags is inconvenient. That's why they go for large capacity. Less
Chance of a screw up

 

[Mathbud1]

Yea....in the heat of a massacre changing mags is inconvenient. That's why they go for large capacity. Less
Chance of a screw up

Do you think they are going to say, "man this mass murder thing is just too inconvenient now" if you can just get those high cap mags banned?

 

[007]

Someone should prolly tell him anyone with a knife is gonna ruin his day trying to wield two rifles.

Is "prolly" homo for probably? Must be. I never hear normal use that dumbass word.

I hope the guy starts a trend. These filthy jungle animals have rioted, thieved and vandalized enough. start shooting them.

 

[M14 Shooter]

0.00295% of guns in the US are involved in a murder each year.
99.99704% are not.
Your claim is unjustifiable.

It's not the amount of guns used, it's the amount of homicides that occur and how they occur....that matters...

Um.... if more guns = more murders, then its the number guns used compared to the number of guns not used is impossibly relevant
A hugely overwhelming majority of guns are never used to commit a crime; this fact destroys your position in toto.

 

[Darkwind]

so you labor under the mentally deficient belief that if guns are banned, people who will engage in capital murder will actually obey gun laws?

No, I labour under the belief that the less guns are out there, the less chance there is of being shot or of firearms getting into the hands of those who would do a lot of harm against innocent people with them.

Well, I'm not burdened by that belief.

 

[turtledude]

0.00295% of guns in the US are involved in a murder each year.
99.99704% are not.
Your claim is unjustifiable.

listen moron, you are lying. so stop it. I forget daily more about gun issues than you will ever learn.

What prohibits registration is the tenth amendment and the second amendment

The second amendment makes gun registration necessary. We need it to support a well regulated militia

The tenth amendment has no bearing on gun registration. States can require stricter rules if they prefer, but it has no bearing on registration

You've never heard of Selective Service?

Any person over the age of 18 is considered part of the militia. There is no need for gun registration. A completely asinine thing to say.

Ever hear of a well regulated militia being necessary for a free state?

The draft doesn't cut it

ever heard of the tenth amendment? your understanding of constitutional scholarship appears to be less honest than your claim of being a "right winger". only a dishonest moron could claim "Shall not be infringed" requires registration. only a complete fool argues that ANYTHING in the Bill of Rights delegates power to the federal government

go away bug. You know nothing of constitutional law. stop pretending you do

 

[M14 Shooter]

It's not the amount of guns used, it's the amount of homicides that occur and how they occur....that matters...

And, according to his numbers, if you removed 99.99704% of the guns you could still have the same number of homicides committed in exactly the same manner.

Never mind the fact that the % of guns NOT used to commit murder, alone, dispoves any notion that the number of guns in the US is a "problem".

 

[Darkwind]

0.00295% of guns in the US are involved in a murder each year.
99.99704% are not.
Your claim is unjustifiable.

listen moron, you are lying. so stop it. I forget daily more about gun issues than you will ever learn.

What prohibits registration is the tenth amendment and the second amendment

The second amendment makes gun registration necessary. We need it to support a well regulated militia

The tenth amendment has no bearing on gun registration. States can require stricter rules if they prefer, but it has no bearing on registration

You've never heard of Selective Service?

Any person over the age of 18 is considered part of the militia. There is no need for gun registration. A completely asinine thing to say.

Ever hear of a well regulated militia being necessary for a free state?

The draft doesn't cut it

You really need to learn to follow you own thought processes.

Selective service is all the registration this or any government needs with regard to the Second Amendment.

If a person is listed on the Selective Service, they have the right to a gun and ARE considered part of the militia even though being in the militia is NOT a requirement to the Second Amendment.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Someone should prolly tell him anyone with a knife is gonna ruin his day trying to wield two rifles.

Yes -- because, as we all know, a knife is the weapon of choice in a gunfight.
:roll:

 

[Dr Grump]

It's not the amount of guns used, it's the amount of homicides that occur and how they occur....that matters...

And, according to his numbers, if you removed 99.99704% of the guns you could still have the same number of homicides committed in exactly the same manner.

Never mind the fact that the % of guns NOT used to commit murder, alone, dispoves any notion that the number of guns in the US is a "problem".

It is a problem if the number of deaths caused by guns per 100,000 far outweighs those of other civilised countries. Mass shooting have buttoned off in the US over the past six months, but the previous 2/3 years there was almost one a month. That occur in Ireland? Sweden? France? Germany? Canada? Australia? NZ?

Sorry Shooter, the prevalence of guns in your society is directly related to the people killed by such guns. Look, I'm not under the illusion that the US will get rid of its guns. It will never happen - too many people love their peashooters, lobby groups abound and you have the second. But please, don't piss on me and tell me it's raining that the plethora of guns you have in your society haven't been the cause of death, misery and mayhem for large parts of your society.

 

[turtledude]

0.00295% of guns in the US are involved in a murder each year.
99.99704% are not.
Your claim is unjustifiable.

It's not the amount of guns used, it's the amount of homicides that occur and how they occur....that matters...

Um.... if more guns = more murders, then its the number guns used compared to the number of guns not used is impossibly relevant
A hugely overwhelming majority of guns are never used to commit a crime; this fact destroys your position in toto.

true and the last 21 years have seen huge increases in the numbers of guns legally bought by Americans in reaction to the Democrap's jihad against gun ownership and millions of more guns carried by private citizens in public due to CCW laws. YET GUN CRIME HAS GONE DOWN

something the ARC twits ignore

 

[M14 Shooter]

It's not the amount of guns used, it's the amount of homicides that occur and how they occur....that matters...

And, according to his numbers, if you removed 99.99704% of the guns you could still have the same number of homicides committed in exactly the same manner.

Never mind the fact that the % of guns NOT used to commit murder, alone, dispoves any notion that the number of guns in the US is a "problem".

It is a problem if the number of deaths caused by guns per 100,000 far outweighs those of other civilised countries.

Yawn.
Two questions, to again render your point moot:
-What % of the guns in the UK, Germany, Canada, Australia and France are used to commit murder?
-How does the murder rate in the US compare to the UK, Germnay, Canada, Australia and France once you back out the murders committed with guns?