- Banned
- #1,081
I have. you lose.Rest your case MM
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have. you lose.Rest your case MM
I have. you lose.
How many different topics do you suppose has been discussed in this thread?
Petraeus says security crackdown working
By César G. Soriano, USA TODAY
BAGHDAD — When Gen. David Petraeus drives through the streets of Iraq's capital, he sees "astonishing signs of normalcy" in half, perhaps two-thirds of Baghdad.
"I'm talking about professional soccer leagues with real grass field stadiums, several amusement parks — big ones, markets that are very vibrant," says Petraeus, commander of the roughly 150,000 U.S. troops in Iraq. The scenes provide a sign that the new strategy in Iraq is working, although many problems remain, he told USA TODAY in an interview Wednesday.
Five months after President Bush ordered an increase of 20,000 U.S. troops in Iraq, data suggest that sectarian violence in Baghdad has declined. Other tentative signs of progress have included a rise in Iraqi army enlistments and some quality-of-life improvements such as fewer electricity blackouts in the capital.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2007-06-13-petraeus-security_N.htm
Petraeus says security crackdown working
By César G. Soriano, USA TODAY
BAGHDAD — When Gen. David Petraeus drives through the streets of Iraq's capital, he sees "astonishing signs of normalcy" in half, perhaps two-thirds of Baghdad.
"I'm talking about professional soccer leagues with real grass field stadiums, several amusement parks — big ones, markets that are very vibrant," says Petraeus, commander of the roughly 150,000 U.S. troops in Iraq. The scenes provide a sign that the new strategy in Iraq is working, although many problems remain, he told USA TODAY in an interview Wednesday.
Five months after President Bush ordered an increase of 20,000 U.S. troops in Iraq, data suggest that sectarian violence in Baghdad has declined. Other tentative signs of progress have included a rise in Iraqi army enlistments and some quality-of-life improvements such as fewer electricity blackouts in the capital.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2007-06-13-petraeus-security_N.htm
Overall, the number of violent attacks in Iraq in the last four months, is the highest it's been, for the entire war:
http://bp2.blogger.com/_1xQeOPE9ePU/RnLHcEhC1cI/AAAAAAAAAa0/BLKvsfbhNxI/s1600-h/unabaedviolence.jpg
You are aware of course that the TeT offensive in 1968 during the Vietnam war had the highest number of attacks and casualties for both sides? It was hailed by the press as the turning point, that we had lost. The truth of course was that the North had lost and only the US loss of will turned a military victory into a political defeat.
Overall, the number of violent attacks in Iraq in the last four months, is the highest it's been, for the entire war:
http://bp2.blogger.com/_1xQeOPE9ePU/RnLHcEhC1cI/AAAAAAAAAa0/BLKvsfbhNxI/s1600-h/unabaedviolence.jpg
Terrorists are doing what Dem want them to do - keep up the attacks and they will keep pushing for surrender
Dems are the best allies the terrorists have
Well done. A thoughtful, sober, and mature come-back.
How old did you say you were?
Terrorists are doing what Dem want them to do - keep up the attacks and they will keep pushing for surrender
Dems are the best allies the terrorists have
Dems have done all they can to undermine the war - they have no desire to win the war - and to a majority of Dems victory in Iraq is NOT important
Seriously, how old are you?
Hard for you to counter the facts? When libs can't they fall back on changing the subject
Now, do you want to get back to the topic at now or continue to do the Liberal Two Step?
you obviously refuse to understand that, while Baghdad itself may be safer - any city would be safer if you put twenty THOUSAND more cops on the street - the Pentagon itself has said that, throughout Iraq overall, the level of violence has NOT decreased. The Pentagon itself has said that the level of American casualties has NOT decreased.
But you want to hang on an op-ed from Liebereman and an assessment of the situation in Baghdad by Petraeus and ignore the fact that the Pentagon itself has said that the violence in Iraq has merely changed venue - AS I PREDICTED IT WOULD.
Well, rsr, if you can't form a coherent post beyond "Democrats are terrorist-lovers!", then I suggest you write to every republican representative and presidential candidate you can, and demand that they continue escalating the war and spending tens of billions more tax dollars on iraq.
Then, we'll sort in in 2008, which party the country wants to deliver the congress and the presidency to.
good idea. let's DO get back to the topic at hand. Why do you continue to ignore posts that blow holes in your rosy scenario?
now...will you address that point with something more reasoned than "terrorists love libs"?
I'll wait, but I certainly won't hold my breath.