bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,170
- 47,371
- 2,180
Climate change doesn't need anyone to endorse it any more than evolution or gravity needs someone to endorse it. It is a fact. Bottom line is if he can make a valid argument, it is valid regardless of his credentials. But Sarah was talking about him being no more of a scientist than she is which is false because this guy has spent his career teaching science whereas she is a politician and a sports journalist. Get it?Thats like saying that Sarah is 'more pregnant' than Nye.Point is he is more of a scientist than Sarah because he actually has a degree in engineering which requires learning science. He is a scientist entertainer, not a research scientist, but a scientist nonetheless. Whereas Sarah is a politician and a sports journalist.He graduated from a school of engineering. That makes him more of a scientist than you.
Um, no , it doesnt.
There is a huge difference between a scientist and an engineer.
Scientists develop and test theories in the lab for publication.
Engineers do real things in the real world.
Bill Nye is less an engineer and more of a 'entertainment personality' like Rush Limbaugh instead of an actual engineer anyway.
One is ether a scientist or one is not and Nye is not a scientist and I dont think he is really an engineer any more either.
His authority to endorse Climate Change is no better than Palins is.
Teaching so-called "science" doesn't make you a scientist. I had "science teachers" in high school. In most cases, I knew more than they did. They often said stuff in class that was just plain wrong.