No, Paedophiles Are Not Homosexual

Homo's are depraved subhumans who engage in animalistic perverted sex.

So it's not uncommon for them in their mental illness to target children. ... :evil:

Heteros who prey on children are subhumans who engage in perverted sex.

I couldn't agree more Jake, they should be locked away within the General Prison Population wearing a scarlett letter . Butt why do you insist on defending Gay Pedophiles - are they somehow a better and more noble brand of pervert to you ?
 
Greenbean Snow has crafted a bookish approach that appears expert, but is in fact slanted, disorderly, lobbied, and unfinished.
He posted nonsense as usual. I don't know why anybody engages with the clown. If you call him on his buffoonery he just starts calling you names.

Proof that what he says is false.
Facts About Homosexuality and Child Molestation

That is the normal pattern for the cultural jihadists like Gipper, Uncensored, PC, etc.
 
Homo's are depraved subhumans who engage in animalistic perverted sex.

So it's not uncommon for them in their mental illness to target children. ... :evil:

Heteros who prey on children are subhumans who engage in perverted sex.

I couldn't agree more Jake, they should be locked away within the General Prison Population wearing a scarlett letter . Butt why do you insist on defending Gay Pedophiles - are they somehow a better and more noble brand of pervert to you ?

True. Homosexual pedophiles are every bit as guilty of criminal activity as any other pedophile. We've all heard of Harvey Milk. He's actually being applauded by many within the homosexual community yet he was a pedophile. Double standards truly do abound in America's emerging "culture."
 
What's sickening is the U.S. Postal Service recently released a Harvey Milk postage stamp with the homo pedophile's picture on it to celebrate his so called achievements. .. :evil: :cuckoo:
 
What's sickening is the U.S. Postal Service recently released a Harvey Milk postage stamp with the homo pedophile's picture on it to celebrate his so called achievements. .. :evil: :cuckoo:

Milk's 16yo boyfriend hardly makes him a pedophile. But you knew that because you're a hypocrite, but not stupid.

If Milk had been guilty of having relationships below the then age of consent in California hey here's a thought, why was he never arrested for it? Googling it, the age of consent for sex in California then was 16. Think it's 18 now. But before politicians agree to honor people with schools named after them, days commenorating their lives, or putting them on stamps they do do a little background checking to make sure they're not honoring people guilty of crimes which would reflect poorly on the politicians.

MIlk wasn't actually guilty of anything other than being gay with a preference for twinks (you know, like everyone else in the world.)
 
What's sickening is the U.S. Postal Service recently released a Harvey Milk postage stamp with the homo pedophile's picture on it to celebrate his so called achievements. .. :evil: :cuckoo:

Pedophiles are attracted to pre pubescent children. Milk was a pederast and, by extension, a statutory rapist
 
What's sickening is the U.S. Postal Service recently released a Harvey Milk postage stamp with the homo pedophile's picture on it to celebrate his so called achievements. .. :evil: :cuckoo:

Milk's 16yo boyfriend hardly makes him a pedophile. But you knew that because you're a hypocrite, but not stupid.

If Milk had been guilty of having relationships below the then age of consent in California hey here's a thought, why was he never arrested for it? Googling it, the age of consent for sex in California then was 16. Think it's 18 now. But before politicians agree to honor people with schools named after them, days commenorating their lives, or putting them on stamps they do do a little background checking to make sure they're not honoring people guilty of crimes which would reflect poorly on the politicians.

MIlk wasn't actually guilty of anything other than being gay with a preference for twinks (you know, like everyone else in the world.)

Are you kidding me? Another revelation from Delta. First, it's okay to show porn to kids now 16 is an acceptable age to have homosexual sex. What about 15 Delta? 14? 13? Just where do you draw the line between pedophilia and non-pedophilia?
 
What's sickening is the U.S. Postal Service recently released a Harvey Milk postage stamp with the homo pedophile's picture on it to celebrate his so called achievements. .. :evil: :cuckoo:



If Milk had been guilty of having relationships below the then age of consent in California hey here's a thought, why was he never arrested for it?

MIlk wasn't actually guilty of anything other than being gay with a preference for twinks (you know, like everyone else in the world.)

First, he wasn't arrested for it because he was protected by a gaggle of Liberal, pro-homo politicians who likely partook in the same, sick activity. Second, thanks for revealing what I already suspected -- you're "attracted to twinks." Will the true Delta please stand up!
 
There is a difference... between exploring homosexual behavior and actually believing you are a homosexual.​

I don't care about their belief. I don't care about the agenda of the anti-culture to promote homosexuality. I don't care about Hollywood and gay culture. The FACT is that sex with someone of the same gender is homosexual.

The anti-culture tries to lump pubescent girls in to skew statistics, but in the case of prepubescent pedophilia - which IS the actual definition, mot perpetrators are male, and most victims are male. It is homosexual by nature.
 
Homo's are depraved subhumans who engage in animalistic perverted sex.

So it's not uncommon for them in their mental illness to target children. ... :evil:

Actually it IS uncommon. Most homosexuals are not pedophiles - very few are.

Most pedophiles - nearly all - are homosexuals, but this still represents only a tiny fraction of homosexuals in general.
 
Bisexuals and pansexuals also tend to explore homosexual behavior, as do some heterosexual people.​

Orientation is bullshit - something fabricated by the anti-culture to attempt to normalize aberrant behavior.

People are not homosexual - acts are. Sex between those of the same gender is homosexual.
 
What's sickening is the U.S. Postal Service recently released a Harvey Milk postage stamp with the homo pedophile's picture on it to celebrate his so called achievements. .. :evil: :cuckoo:

Milk's 16yo boyfriend hardly makes him a pedophile. But you knew that because you're a hypocrite, but not stupid.

If Milk had been guilty of having relationships below the then age of consent in California hey here's a thought, why was he never arrested for it? Googling it, the age of consent for sex in California then was 16. Think it's 18 now. But before politicians agree to honor people with schools named after them, days commenorating their lives, or putting them on stamps they do do a little background checking to make sure they're not honoring people guilty of crimes which would reflect poorly on the politicians.

MIlk wasn't actually guilty of anything other than being gay with a preference for twinks (you know, like everyone else in the world.)

Are you kidding me? Another revelation from Delta. First, it's okay to show porn to kids now 16 is an acceptable age to have homosexual sex. What about 15 Delta? 14? 13? Just where do you draw the line between pedophilia and non-pedophilia?

Looked it up, corrected my post in the other thread, the Politics: Poll about Milk. AoC was indeed 18 at the time of Milk.

I was wrong.

It doesn't harm kids to see porn is what I said, along with everyone else who's actually studied the issue. That's not the same thing as "it's okay to."

As to Milk, misrepresentations like above are why I don't just take people's words for things and look into them myself. In the Milk instance I was wrong, and admitted it in the Poll thread. As here. While it'd be swell if when other people are wrong they too admitted their mistake but I"m not that idealistic.
 
15th post
Milk's 16yo boyfriend hardly makes him a pedophile. But you knew that because you're a hypocrite, but not stupid.

You're right. It irritates me that the anti-culture has perverted the term "pedophile." Pedophilia involves prepubescent children. Clearly a 16 year old is pubescent.

HOWEVER this is still an adult having sex with a minor. Milk was pervert and a scumbag.

IF he had not been darling of the left and queer - he would have gone to prison for it. But in San Francisco, he was immune.
 
Looked it up, corrected my post in the other thread, the Politics: Poll about Milk. AoC was indeed 18 at the time of Milk.

I was wrong.

It doesn't harm kids to see porn is what I said, along with everyone else who's actually studied the issue. That's not the same thing as "it's okay to."

As to Milk, misrepresentations like above are why I don't just take people's words for things and look into them myself. In the Milk instance I was wrong, and admitted it in the Poll thread. As here. While it'd be swell if when other people are wrong they too admitted their mistake but I"m not that idealistic.

EDIT

What exactly do you mean?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Milk's 16yo boyfriend hardly makes him a pedophile. But you knew that because you're a hypocrite, but not stupid.

You're right. It irritates me that the anti-culture has perverted the term "pedophile." Pedophilia involves prepubescent children. Clearly a 16 year old is pubescent.

HOWEVER this is still an adult having sex with a minor. Milk was pervert and a scumbag.

IF he had not been darling of the left and queer - he would have gone to prison for it. But in San Francisco, he was immune.

While I said he shouldn't be on a stamp since it seems he did in fact commit a class C felony (using modern Missouri state definitions) that it's a crime should be considered through the lens that 16 would have been legal in half the rest of the country even now.

He woulda been guilty of a felony to be sure. But you must admit this isn't about aoc's or even that he was gay so much as he's being deified very publicly.

I don't think felons should be on stamps, have schools named after them, or anything else celebratory. But back there back then this was like objecting to a Boston Irish Catholic being alcoholic.
 
Looked it up, corrected my post in the other thread, the Politics: Poll about Milk. AoC was indeed 18 at the time of Milk.

I was wrong.

It doesn't harm kids to see porn is what I said, along with everyone else who's actually studied the issue. That's not the same thing as "it's okay to."

As to Milk, misrepresentations like above are why I don't just take people's words for things and look into them myself. In the Milk instance I was wrong, and admitted it in the Poll thread. As here. While it'd be swell if when other people are wrong they too admitted their mistake but I"m not that idealistic.

Do you wear an ankle bracelet or other electronic monitoring device? Are you registered on a web site so neighbors know you are in the neighborhood?

What exactly do you mean?

I mean what I type.
 
Back
Top Bottom