JakeStarkey
Diamond Member
- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,540
- 2,165
- Banned
- #221
"Sick *****... each and every single one": yup, pedophiles and homophobes
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The counter-position is that, "A homosexual man is no more likely to be a child molester than a heterosexual man - even a married man."
Do "we" believe that this is the case?
Is there relevant research that can be cited? I'm not sure the study mentioned at the top of this thread is on point.
The article you quoted is political and not scientific although it strives to present itself as being 'informed', in particular in that it comes from UC Davis , a bastion of left wing bull shit.and factual distortion.It took me a while to dig this out, but I finally found it. Probably the best explanation of why homophobes are so ignorant of the matter.
Facts About Homosexuality and Child Molestation
Another problem related to terminology arises because sexual abuse of male children by adult men is often referred to as "homosexual molestation." The adjective "homosexual" (or "heterosexual" when a man abuses a female child) refers to the victim's gender in relation to that of the perpetrator. Unfortunately, people sometimes mistakenly interpret it as referring to the perpetrator's sexual orientation.
As an expert panel of researchers convened by the National Academy of Sciences noted in a 1993 report: "The distinction between homosexual and heterosexual child molesters relies on the premise that male molesters of male victims are homosexual in orientation. Most molesters of boys do not report sexual interest in adult men, however" (National Research Council, 1993, p. 143, citation omitted).
To avoid this confusion, it is preferable to refer to men's sexual abuse of boys with the more accurate label of male-male molestation. Similarly, it is preferable to refer to men's abuse of girls as male-female molestation. These labels are more accurate because they describe the sex of the individuals involved but don't implicitly convey unwarranted assumptions about the perpetrator's sexual orientation.
The distinction between a victim's gender and a perpetrator's sexual orientation is important because many child molesters don't really have an adult sexual orientation. They have never developed the capacity for mature sexual relationships with other adults, either men or women. Instead, their sexual attractions focus on children boys, girls, or children of both sexes.
Over the years, this fact has been incorporated into various systems for categorizing child molesters. For example, Finkelhor and Araji (1986) proposed that perpetrators' sexual attractions should be conceptualized as ranging along a continuum from exclusive interest in children at one extreme, to exclusive interest in adult partners at the other end.
I hope this article succeeds in educating the uneducated of this forum.
Remscheid boy whores know it better.It took me a while to dig this out, but I finally found it. Probably the best explanation of why homophobes are so ignorant of the matter.
Facts About Homosexuality and Child Molestation
Another problem related to terminology arises because sexual abuse of male children by adult men is often referred to as "homosexual molestation." The adjective "homosexual" (or "heterosexual" when a man abuses a female child) refers to the victim's gender in relation to that of the perpetrator. Unfortunately, people sometimes mistakenly interpret it as referring to the perpetrator's sexual orientation.
As an expert panel of researchers convened by the National Academy of Sciences noted in a 1993 report: "The distinction between homosexual and heterosexual child molesters relies on the premise that male molesters of male victims are homosexual in orientation. Most molesters of boys do not report sexual interest in adult men, however" (National Research Council, 1993, p. 143, citation omitted).
To avoid this confusion, it is preferable to refer to men's sexual abuse of boys with the more accurate label of male-male molestation. Similarly, it is preferable to refer to men's abuse of girls as male-female molestation. These labels are more accurate because they describe the sex of the individuals involved but don't implicitly convey unwarranted assumptions about the perpetrator's sexual orientation.
The distinction between a victim's gender and a perpetrator's sexual orientation is important because many child molesters don't really have an adult sexual orientation. They have never developed the capacity for mature sexual relationships with other adults, either men or women. Instead, their sexual attractions focus on children boys, girls, or children of both sexes.
Over the years, this fact has been incorporated into various systems for categorizing child molesters. For example, Finkelhor and Araji (1986) proposed that perpetrators' sexual attractions should be conceptualized as ranging along a continuum from exclusive interest in children at one extreme, to exclusive interest in adult partners at the other end.
I hope this article succeeds in educating the uneducated of this forum.
Starkey Starkey the prince of Malarkey, if you had half a brain you'd still be a half wit. Overwhelming evidence supports the FACT that homosexuality is a sexual deviancy often accompanied by associated sexual deviance's and disordersThe above comment tries to counter-define 'pedophiles are not homosexuals' as, yes, pedos are homos. GB gives the game away with "most homosexual men are not" pedos" but then insists without scientific empirical data tht they are much like to be pedos than the rest of the population.

Of course pedos aren't gay. They just like little boys penis. What's gay about that?It took me a while to dig this out, but I finally found it. Probably the best explanation of why homophobes are so ignorant of the matter.
Facts About Homosexuality and Child Molestation
Another problem related to terminology arises because sexual abuse of male children by adult men is often referred to as "homosexual molestation." The adjective "homosexual" (or "heterosexual" when a man abuses a female child) refers to the victim's gender in relation to that of the perpetrator. Unfortunately, people sometimes mistakenly interpret it as referring to the perpetrator's sexual orientation.
As an expert panel of researchers convened by the National Academy of Sciences noted in a 1993 report: "The distinction between homosexual and heterosexual child molesters relies on the premise that male molesters of male victims are homosexual in orientation. Most molesters of boys do not report sexual interest in adult men, however" (National Research Council, 1993, p. 143, citation omitted).
To avoid this confusion, it is preferable to refer to men's sexual abuse of boys with the more accurate label of male-male molestation. Similarly, it is preferable to refer to men's abuse of girls as male-female molestation. These labels are more accurate because they describe the sex of the individuals involved but don't implicitly convey unwarranted assumptions about the perpetrator's sexual orientation.
The distinction between a victim's gender and a perpetrator's sexual orientation is important because many child molesters don't really have an adult sexual orientation. They have never developed the capacity for mature sexual relationships with other adults, either men or women. Instead, their sexual attractions focus on children boys, girls, or children of both sexes.
Over the years, this fact has been incorporated into various systems for categorizing child molesters. For example, Finkelhor and Araji (1986) proposed that perpetrators' sexual attractions should be conceptualized as ranging along a continuum from exclusive interest in children at one extreme, to exclusive interest in adult partners at the other end.
I hope this article succeeds in educating the uneducated of this forum.
Dr. Abel is one of America’s foremost researchers on child molestation ....A second-rate author-for-hire
You are the one who is defending them not me. It's ok though. I hear some democrats somewhere are trying to make it legal.You suffer from hubris.
- "Zone 3": Normal Site Wide Rules apply. A certain amount of off topic discourse and flaming is allowed but thread topics should be respected. Excessive trolling or flaming or excursions from the specific OP topic is not. Use your discretion: if you are using the thread to engage in a personal flame-fest with another poster - get out. If you go off-topic for a bit and start a derailment -- fix it by getting back on topic. Zone 3 includes all other forums that are not Zone1, Zone2, or Zone4.
You are too worried about others's sex lives, and you make implications that are foolish.
He's using a leftard tactic known as Jamming - he is not very good at it but he certainly is entertainingDefending child molesters again huh?The ad homs from the illiterate continue above.
The far right are always concerned (too much so) about the sex lives of others.
They are attempting to have it relabeled as "Inter Generational Intimacy" a semantic mind game similar to calling global warming "Climate Change" or calling Homosexuals "Gay"You are the one who is defending them not me. It's ok though. I hear some democrats somewhere are trying to make it legal.You suffer from hubris.
- "Zone 3": Normal Site Wide Rules apply. A certain amount of off topic discourse and flaming is allowed but thread topics should be respected. Excessive trolling or flaming or excursions from the specific OP topic is not. Use your discretion: if you are using the thread to engage in a personal flame-fest with another poster - get out. If you go off-topic for a bit and start a derailment -- fix it by getting back on topic. Zone 3 includes all other forums that are not Zone1, Zone2, or Zone4.
You are too worried about others's sex lives, and you make implications that are foolish.