Skylar
Diamond Member
- Jul 5, 2014
- 55,211
- 16,848
- 2,250
Commit acts.....according to you. Citing yourself. But your opinion is neither the law nor a legal standard. And Trump's own administration found no such crimes.What I am saying and have been saying is that your criminal buddies (Democrats) in D.C. can break crimes or at least commit acts that deserve deep-dive investigations but the DOJ and the FBI turn a blind eye.
And when we look at the actual EVIDENCE, your claims against Hillary fall apart. Her scheduling of Email deletion happened the year BEFORE the deletion, BEFORE subpoena.
Its literally impossible that she scheduled the deletion in response to the subpoena.
On the other hand there is strong, strong evidence that Trump ordered the deletion of videos AFTER the subpeana. Within days.
With Trump's own IT guy implicating Trump on his order to destroy the videos.
Trump looks at someone cross-eyed and gets an indictment. It's a two tiered system of "justice." Rules for thee don't apply to we.
Trump's own lawyer has testified that Trump tried to convince him to lie to authorities and withold documents. That's hardly 'looking at someone cross-eyed'. That's evidence of a crime so significant that it pierced attorney-client privilege.
There are not one but TWO recordings of Trump admitting that the secret docs he was showing off had been declassified. He was being recorded for a Mark Meadows book, and recorded this admission twice, on two seperate days. That's hardly 'looking at someone cross-eyed'.
Trump's own IT guy recanted his false he didn't remember being asked to delete videos. After getting a lawyer NOT paid for by Trump, he implicated Trump directly. That's at least obstruction, possibly witness tampering and conspiracy.
They found a trove of classified documents in Trump's residence (many at his DESK) that Trump had lied and told authorities he had returned.
These are serious, serious crimes. And there's strong evidence for all of them. The evidence absolutely justifies the charges.