No, Muslims Should NOT Be Allowed To Serve In Public Office

[AzogtheDefiler]

Placing the worship of Islam ahead of, and possibly in conflict with, the interests of the United States is disqualifying for serving the interest of the United States.

Placing loyalty to the Pope ahead of, and possibly in conflict with, the interests of the United States is disqualifying for JFK serving the interest of the United States.

memba that?

When did JFK do that exactly?

He didn’t, jackass, that’s the point.

Then write more coherently you wimp.

That doesn't make sense. What does coherent writing have to do with "wimp"? Are you sure you aren't just frustrated about something?

If you were not a wimp you would write more forcefully IMO and I would better understand what you meant.

 

[protectionist]

Islam is a religion whether you like it or not. Your statement that "it is IMPOSSIBLE for a true avowed Islamist sworn to Sharia Law to also uphold the U.S. Constitution" can be applied equally to those Christians who seek to establish a government in the U.S. that follows "biblical law" or Canon Law or claim that the U.S. is a "Christian nation."

Regardless of your dramatic use of your caps lock, you are misusing the term "treason" to mean someone's actions that hurt your feelings or don't conform to your opinions.

Oh, pack it in . Your DUMBBB dupey "Islam is a religion" BS was put to rest 2 days ago in this thread. It's not a religion, most people in the world don't regard it as a religion, some entire nations don't recognize it as a religion, it's the biggest con job farce that ever has existed, and you're a complete idiot to go around trying to make a case for what couldn't be more ludicrous.

EARTH TO LYSISTRATA: Religions have a "code of ethics" (Webster's New World College Dictionary) Advocating mass murder genocide, rape, wife-beating, a whole list of severe misogyinies, slavery, torture, animal cruelty, and just about every vile thing you can think of, isn't exactly ethics, YOU THINK ?

And almost as absurd is the equation theory that tries to equate Christianity with Islam. You might as well equate a desert with an ocean. For the 20th time in this thread, Christianity is not supremacist, Islam is. Islam violates the Constitution's supremacy clause, Christianity does not,

Please get a brain, and come back when you do . Thanks.

 

[IM2]

Western "civilization" has not been compatible with liberty. Of course I don't expect the low foreheads here to understand this comment and the simple minded personal attacks will be coming.

 

[IM2]

Islam is a religion whether you like it or not. Your statement that "it is IMPOSSIBLE for a true avowed Islamist sworn to Sharia Law to also uphold the U.S. Constitution" can be applied equally to those Christians who seek to establish a government in the U.S. that follows "biblical law" or Canon Law or claim that the U.S. is a "Christian nation."

Regardless of your dramatic use of your caps lock, you are misusing the term "treason" to mean someone's actions that hurt your feelings or don't conform to your opinions.

Oh, pack it in . Your DUMBBB dupey "Islam is a religion" B was put to rest 2 days ago in this thread. It's not a religion, most people in the world don't regard it as a religion, some entire nations don't recognize it as a religion, it's the biggest con job farce that ever has existed, and you're a complete idiot to go around trying to make a case for what couldn't be more ludicrous.

EARTH TO LYSISTRATA: Religions have a "code of ethics" (Webster's New World College Dictionary) Advocating mass murder genocide, rape, wife-beating, a whole list of severe misogyinies, slavery, torture, animal cruelty, and just about every vile thing you can think of, isn't exactly ethics, YOU THINK ?

And almost as absurd is the equation theory that tries to equate Christianity with Islam. You might as well equate a desert with an ocean. For the 20th time in this thread, Christianity is not supremacist, Islam is. Islam violates the Constitution's supremacy clause, Christianity does not,

Please get a brain, and come back when you do . Thanks.

Fool, Islam and Christianity both derive from Judaism.

 

[protectionist]

Fool, Islam and Christianity both derive from Judaism.

HA ha ha. Does this deserve a response ? I ask you. Anyone around here may post. Should I dignify this joke with a response ? mmmm….Nah!

Well I'll give him a break. Hey IM2, a nice hairdo and cancer are both derived from the human body. Get it ?

 

[protectionist]

Western "civilization" has not been compatible with liberty. Of course I don't expect the low foreheads here to understand this comment and the simple minded personal attacks will be coming.

Attacking western civilization says it all. No further words need be said.

 

[Unkotare]

Placing loyalty to the Pope ahead of, and possibly in conflict with, the interests of the United States is disqualifying for JFK serving the interest of the United States.

memba that?

When did JFK do that exactly?

He didn’t, jackass, that’s the point.

Then write more coherently you wimp.

That doesn't make sense. What does coherent writing have to do with "wimp"? Are you sure you aren't just frustrated about something?

If you were not a wimp you would write more forcefully IMO and I would better understand what you meant.

 

[Lysistrata]

Islam is a religion whether you like it or not. Your statement that "it is IMPOSSIBLE for a true avowed Islamist sworn to Sharia Law to also uphold the U.S. Constitution" can be applied equally to those Christians who seek to establish a government in the U.S. that follows "biblical law" or Canon Law or claim that the U.S. is a "Christian nation."

Regardless of your dramatic use of your caps lock, you are misusing the term "treason" to mean someone's actions that hurt your feelings or don't conform to your opinions.

Oh, pack it in . Your DUMBBB dupey "Islam is a religion" BS was put to rest 2 days ago in this thread. It's not a religion, most people in the world don't regard it as a religion, some entire nations don't recognize it as a religion, it's the biggest con job farce that ever has existed, and you're a complete idiot to go around trying to make a case for what couldn't be more ludicrous.

EARTH TO LYSISTRATA: Religions have a "code of ethics" (Webster's New World College Dictionary) Advocating mass murder genocide, rape, wife-beating, a whole list of severe misogyinies, slavery, torture, animal cruelty, and just about every vile thing you can think of, isn't exactly ethics, YOU THINK ?

And almost as absurd is the equation theory that tries to equate Christianity with Islam. You might as well equate a desert with an ocean. For the 20th time in this thread, Christianity is not supremacist, Islam is. Islam violates the Constitution's supremacy clause, Christianity does not,

Please get a brain, and come back when you do . Thanks.

You are a real nutjob. Yes, Islam is recognized as a religion internationally, regardless of frankie skanky says. Your assertion that "most people" don't recognize it as such is totally absurd. So is your ridiculous description of it. Christianity has real problems itself. Look at the right-wing thumpers insisting that this is a "Christian nation," "biblical law" should be imposed, LGBT folks should be shunned, if not murdered.

 

[WinterBorn]

A year ago, there was a thread entitled >> "Do Republicans believe a Muslim should be allowed to serve in public office if elected?" I'm now answering that by saying No, Republicans don't believe Muslims should be allowed to serve in public office, elected or not. Furthermore, no American should be OK with Muslims serving in public office.

First of all, in America, Islam is sedition, by virtue of it's supremacism, which is in violation of the Constitution (article 6, section 2, part 1-the Supremacy Clause).

Secondly, Islam is an ideology (masquerading as a religion), which advocates (if not commands) the violation of scores of US laws, including some of the most serious felonies (ex. murder, rape, pedophilia, slavery, sex discrimination)

Not only should Muslims not be part of government in America, but Islam should not exist in America, period. There should be no mosques, no Korans, no Islamic centers, etc

Article 6 of the US Constitution forbid any religious test. So there is the whole unconstitutional thing. But once you can ignore the US Constitution, your witch hunt should be fine.

which brings up the subject of democrats questioning the religious beliefs of Christian judges nominated to the courts

They should be called on it. Anyone nominated to a higher court should be aware that no religious test is allowed. If asked, point that out.

I do not give a pass to any party when the violation of the US Constitution is the problem.

 

[WinterBorn]

Islam is a religion whether you like it or not. Your statement that "it is IMPOSSIBLE for a true avowed Islamist sworn to Sharia Law to also uphold the U.S. Constitution" can be applied equally to those Christians who seek to establish a government in the U.S. that follows "biblical law" or Canon Law or claim that the U.S. is a "Christian nation."

Regardless of your dramatic use of your caps lock, you are misusing the term "treason" to mean someone's actions that hurt your feelings or don't conform to your opinions.

Oh, pack it in . Your DUMBBB dupey "Islam is a religion" BS was put to rest 2 days ago in this thread. It's not a religion, most people in the world don't regard it as a religion, some entire nations don't recognize it as a religion, it's the biggest con job farce that ever has existed, and you're a complete idiot to go around trying to make a case for what couldn't be more ludicrous.

EARTH TO LYSISTRATA: Religions have a "code of ethics" (Webster's New World College Dictionary) Advocating mass murder genocide, rape, wife-beating, a whole list of severe misogyinies, slavery, torture, animal cruelty, and just about every vile thing you can think of, isn't exactly ethics, YOU THINK ?

And almost as absurd is the equation theory that tries to equate Christianity with Islam. You might as well equate a desert with an ocean. For the 20th time in this thread, Christianity is not supremacist, Islam is. Islam violates the Constitution's supremacy clause, Christianity does not,

Please get a brain, and come back when you do . Thanks.

The US Gov't recognizes it as a religion. Other religions recognize it as a religion.

Insane radicals do not define a religion. There may be bad things about the religion, but it is a religion by standard definition.

 

[WinterBorn]

Western "civilization" has not been compatible with liberty. Of course I don't expect the low foreheads here to understand this comment and the simple minded personal attacks will be coming.

Attacking western civilization says it all. No further words need be said.

What IM2 said is accurate for most of the time Western Civilization has existed. To try and deny that means you are either lying or willfully ignorant of history. Your choice.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

However, Christianity is still FAR worse.
For example, the US still used torture techniques at Guantanmo, lied about Iraq WMD, and illegally murdered half a million Iraqi civilians by attacking the civilian infrastructure with Shock and Awe.

What a stupid comment. Those things weren't done out of or for christianity.

 

[Pogo]

However, Christianity is still FAR worse.
For example, the US still used torture techniques at Guantanmo, lied about Iraq WMD, and illegally murdered half a million Iraqi civilians by attacking the civilian infrastructure with Shock and Awe.

What a stupid comment. Those things weren't done out of or for christianity.

Clearly they weren't, but it's the same fallacy that produced those mindless Composition Fallacy Googly images. The 9/11 people didn't do it for "Islam" and the IRA people didn't do it for "Catholicism", but if they want to have it that way, let 'em pay the price.

 

[Pogo]

Islam is a religion whether you like it or not. Your statement that "it is IMPOSSIBLE for a true avowed Islamist sworn to Sharia Law to also uphold the U.S. Constitution" can be applied equally to those Christians who seek to establish a government in the U.S. that follows "biblical law" or Canon Law or claim that the U.S. is a "Christian nation."

Regardless of your dramatic use of your caps lock, you are misusing the term "treason" to mean someone's actions that hurt your feelings or don't conform to your opinions.

Oh, pack it in . Your DUMBBB dupey "Islam is a religion" BS was put to rest 2 days ago in this thread. It's not a religion, most people in the world don't regard it as a religion, some entire nations don't recognize it as a religion, it's the biggest con job farce that ever has existed, and you're a complete idiot to go around trying to make a case for what couldn't be more ludicrous.

EARTH TO LYSISTRATA: Religions have a "code of ethics" (Webster's New World College Dictionary) Advocating mass murder genocide, rape, wife-beating, a whole list of severe misogyinies, slavery, torture, animal cruelty, and just about every vile thing you can think of, isn't exactly ethics, YOU THINK ?

And almost as absurd is the equation theory that tries to equate Christianity with Islam. You might as well equate a desert with an ocean. For the 20th time in this thread, Christianity is not supremacist, Islam is. Islam violates the Constitution's supremacy clause, Christianity does not,

Please get a brain, and come back when you do . Thanks.

You are a real nutjob. Yes, Islam is recognized as a religion internationally, regardless of frankie skanky says. Your assertion that "most people" don't recognize it as such is totally absurd. So is your ridiculous description of it. Christianity has real problems itself. Look at the right-wing thumpers insisting that this is a "Christian nation," "biblical law" should be imposed, LGBT folks should be shunned, if not murdered.

Not to mention the Ku Klux Klan, who required Christianism to join it.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The 9/11 people didn't do it for "Islam"

Um...yes they did...they even said so...

The men who planned it said so. Every man who took part said so.

 

[grainbely]

This is a radical position to hold. We have freedom of religion in this country and no laws or constitutional backing for excluding any religion from our country or our public offices. You will never get such a selfish, bigoted, and evil position passed into law.

HA HA. It HAS BEEN THE LAW for over 200 years. Not radical at all.

You should read the thread before posting, Your moronic post here has been squashed into nothing 100 times in this thread. I'm not going to explain it yet again. Read the thread you lazy bum.

Do us a favor and update the main post with the main points of the discussion. I'm not going to wade through hundreds of vapid replies from a fringe radical. Be honest about it too, dont cherry pick only the stuff that supports your perspective.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Not to mention the Ku Klux Klan, who required Christianism to join it.

Which is an example of evil, christian fundamentalism.

And what has happened to the Klan over the last 100 years, as secular and progrrssive reform reshapes the world around them?

And that is what needs to happen in the islamic world.

 

[Pogo]

The 9/11 people didn't do it for "Islam"

Um...yes they did...they even said so...

The men who planned it said so. Every man who took part said so.

Um... no, I don't think so. That's a non sequitur.

US incursions into the Maghreb, nay, all over the world but certainly including areas that happen to be Muslim, has been well documented in this thread, right back to at least 1953 when our sterling CIA staged a coup in Iran. That shit brings proverbial chickens to roost. Then we want to jump up and blame ---- religion? Dooooooon't think so.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The 9/11 people didn't do it for "Islam"

Um...yes they did...they even said so...

The men who planned it said so. Every man who took part said so.

Um... no, I don't think so.

It doesn't matter that you don't think so. Facts dont care what you think or wish is true.

It was done to damage the Crusaders and Zionists. For Allah. It's literally what was said. Repeatedly.

 

[Pogo]

Not to mention the Ku Klux Klan, who required Christianism to join it.

Which is an example of evil, christian fundamentalism.

And what has happened to the Klan over the last 100 years, as secular and progrrssive reform reshapes the world around them?

And that is what needs to happen in the islamic world.

The "Islamic world" is not a monolith, not even close. That's a generalization fallacy.

(It's also poor writing, as Islamic is a proper adjective and gets capitalized. So does Christian.)

Nor of course is Christianism or fundie Christianism. But if we were to cherrypick the Klan and go "see? This is what Christians do", we would be committing the same fallacy the OP tried to float.