colfax_m
Diamond Member
- Nov 18, 2019
- 38,988
- 14,843
- 1,465
Cool. Why don’t you use your big brain to settle the argument.Smartest in a short bus.
Is non-COVID mortality higher with vaccination?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Cool. Why don’t you use your big brain to settle the argument.Smartest in a short bus.
Not at all, it was all calculated. Throes are totals so sum the five columns is the total deaths due to vaccines! It’s really simple math, 12,000 deaths vaccinated 8,000 unvaccinated. The calculation of each column was the same.I do. I’m also smart enough that the sum is useless without other information.
That’s why SMR is what you should be looking at.
I’m publishing stop the conCool. Why don’t you use your big brain to settle the argument.
Is non-COVID mortality higher with vaccination?
I don't know. CDC has been wrong on pretty much everything they said so far, beside they've been flat faced lying.Cool. Why don’t you use your big brain to settle the argument.
Is non-COVID mortality higher with vaccination?
So what cdc did is split the doses up and vaccine types then claimed the vaccine deaths were smaller. No, every column that says vaccinated and dose is accumulative. In order to get to dose 2 you had to take dose 1, they therefore get combinedI don't know. CDC has been wrong on pretty much everything they said so far, beside they've been flat faced lying.
I have a question for you: "How are antibodies that only target spike better then ones that recognize entire virus?"
Virtually all of the problems with the CDC occurred during the Trump Admin and were a reaction to Trump Admin interference .CDC has been wrong on pretty much everything they said so far
How exactly he was interfering?Virtually all of the problems with the CDC occurred during the Trump Admin and were a reaction to Trump Admin interference .
They were "crafting the messaging" ...hell they even installed a WH flack as PR director to approve or CHANGE and press releases or website infoHow exactly he was interfering?
Still no answer, except bullshit. Again... How exactly they were interfering?They were "crafting the messaging" ...hell they even installed a WH flack as PR director to approve or CHANGE and press releases or website info
What's wrong with WH requesting reports about COVID?Trump officials interfered with CDC reports on Covid-19
The politically appointed HHS spokesperson and his team demanded and received the right to review CDC’s scientific reports to health professionals.www.politico.com
Imagine that. What a bunch of pecker woods.It just caught my attention... they changed definition of anti-vaxxer to include people opposing forced vaccination.
View attachment 575491
Imagine that. What a bunch of pecker woods.
You’re being too simple. Not a surprise.Not at all, it was all calculated. Throes are totals so sum the five columns is the total deaths due to vaccines! It’s really simple math, 12,000 deaths vaccinated 8,000 unvaccinated. The calculation of each column was the same.
sure I do, I listened to the dude explain it. Each column was done in the same manner. And only the percentages are the mortality rate, the totals are the totals. They represent the percentage normalized. The count is the count. Now again, do you know how to use math? dose 1 + dose 2 + dose 1 + dose 2 + Jansen dose= ~12,000 total deaths------then unvaccinated + unvaccinated = ~8,000 total deaths. I could argue, taking a vaccine kills you faster. that's actually what the data shows.You’re being too simple. Not a surprise.
Do you know what a standardized mortality rate is?
And don’t you think the rate is more important than the total?sure I do, I listened to the dude explain it. Each column was done in the same manner. And only the percentages are the mortality rate, the totals are the totals. They represent the percentage normalized. The count is the count. Now again, do you know how to use math? dose 1 + dose 2 + dose 1 + dose 2 + Jansen dose= ~12,000 total deaths------then unvaccinated + unvaccinated = ~8,000 total deaths. I could argue, taking a vaccine kills you faster. that's actually what the data shows.
well again, they're splitting the rate, and you are still being conned. take the rate of the ~12,000 vs ~8,000. Just the flat numbers tells one the rate of death after vaccination is higher than unvaccinated. Again, the calculations are exactly the same for both figures.And don’t you think the rate is more important than the total?
The rate is in patient years so splitting it up is irrelevant. They’re taking deaths per patient per year of exposure.well again, they're splitting the rate, and you are still being conned. take the rate of the ~12,000 vs ~8,000. Just the flat numbers tells one the rate of death after vaccination is higher than unvaccinated. Again, the calculations are exactly the same for both figures.
and? more vaccinated people will die before unvaccinated.The rate is in patient years so splitting it up is irrelevant. They’re taking deaths per patient per year of exposure.