No longer a conspiracy theory, evidence of controlled demolitions on 9/11 resurfacing.

But, seeing how we're still being lied to about the JFK assassination, among many other things, don't hold your breath for too many news outlets jumping on the 9/11 truth wagon anytime soon.

Good to know some folks are still on the case though.

Total nonsense the planes knew exactly where to hit the building. They destroyed the corners which caused the collapse
 
But, seeing how we're still being lied to about the JFK assassination, among many other things, don't hold your breath for too many news outlets jumping on the 9/11 truth wagon anytime soon.

Good to know some folks are still on the case though.



1755446382455.webp
 
I didn't bring it up ....just sharing recent developments with the great people of usmb.
Reason for collapse
The collapse of WTC 7 was attributed to fires that burned for nearly seven hours after the collapse of WTC 1 (North Tower). Debris from WTC 1 ignited fires on at least 10 floors of WTC 7. These fires, primarily fueled by office contents, were uncontrolled because the building's sprinkler system was rendered inoperable due to damaged water mains.
The heat from the fires caused the steel floor beams and girders to thermally expand. This expansion led to a chain of events that resulted in the failure of a critical support column (Column 79) on the 13th floor, triggering a progressive collapse that brought the entire building down.
Investigation and findings
The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) conducted an extensive investigation into the collapse of WTC 7. Their 2008 report concluded that the fires were the primary cause of the collapse. While debris from the North Tower did damage some exterior columns, it did not initiate the collapse. NIST also considered and ruled out the possibility of explosives being involved in the collapse.
The collapse of WTC 7 is significant because it was the first known instance of a tall building collapsing primarily due to uncontrolled fires. This event has led to revisions in building codes and practices, including improvements in fireproofing, sprinkler systems, and structural integrity requirements,
 
Such a conspiracy might be a pretext for a world war, but not a small skirmish in the desert.
 
The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
Has been lying since it happened
This event has led to revisions in building codes and practices, including improvements in fireproofing, sprinkler systems, and structural integrity requirements,
The opposite is true.

Misinformation and ignoring and destroying evidence of what actually happened has hampered any progress of this kind.
 
Did he talk about the steel beams melting?

How hot is a fire that can melt steel beams?
 
And, yet, here we are in the Conspiracy Theory forum, cause that’s exactly what this is
 
Thermite goes over 4000°.
Nanoparticles throughout the dust samples have been saved for evidence .
Thermite is not the question.

steel melts at 2200-2500 F

cherry red is 650-750 F.

If you have no interest in the topic you can let it go.

Did he talk about the steel beams melting?
 
15th post
47 vertical 12" box columns in each twin....from the ground up ?
No. Who ever considered those ?
Most conspiracy theories include melted steel beams. You infer the same when you tried to sneak in ''thermite'.

No wonder you bought the 'ear bullet' too.
 
Most conspiracy theories include melted steel beams. You infer the same when you tried to sneak in ''thermite'.

No wonder you bought the 'ear bullet' too.
More precisely, in my view , they used military-grade nanothermite by the red grey chips seen.
chip_photomicrographs.webp
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: EMH
Back
Top Bottom