No Kings protest Oct 18th

donny wouldn't have had a pass re: his 34 convictions idf it was only limited.
He has limited immunity from criminal acts while prez.

They've petitioned NY appellate court to move it to the federal court.
It will probably apply there.
nice try, though.
LOL TM

Immunity was never granted in a SCOTUS decision until recently.

Nixon was granted absolute immunity from legal actions during his legal issues......by lower courts.

Now, thanks to Trump and Scotus, Obama can't be prosecuted for homicide in his decisions that resulted in the drone killing of a couple US citizens..... :biggrin:
 
Please link to that law. Your 'belief,' is irrelevant.

At the federal level, legislative immunity is grounded in the Speech or Debate Clause of Article I, Section 6 of the U.S. Constitution, which protects members of Congress from being questioned elsewhere about their legislative acts. Courts have extended similar protections to state and local legislators. See: Bogan v. Scott-Harris, 523 U.S. 44 (1998). Most states also provide explicit protection, with the majority including speech or debate clauses in their constitutions.

The protection covers activities that are integral to the legislative process, such as debating, voting, preparing reports, and introducing or drafting legislation. It may also extend to non-legislators performing functions directly related to the legislative process, for example, a mayor presenting a budget to a city council.

Legislative immunity does not apply to actions outside the legislative sphere. Public statements made at press conferences, political campaigning, or conduct lacking lawful authority, such as using unconstitutional procedures to pass a bill or seizing documents without proper authorization, fall outside the scope of immunity.

[Last reviewed in October of 2025 by the Wex Definitions Team]
legislative immunity

:lol:
 
He has limited immunity from criminal acts while prez.

They've petitioned NY appellate court to move it to the federal court.
It will probably apply there.

LOL TM

Immunity was never granted in a SCOTUS decision until recently.

Nixon was granted absolute immunity from legal actions during his legal issues......by lower courts.

Now, thanks to Trump and Scotus, Obama can't be prosecuted for homicide in his decisions that resulted in the drone killing of a couple US citizens..... :biggrin:
The Clintons could be prosecuted for homicide for dozens of killings over decades. Maybe some day they will.
 
At the federal level, legislative immunity is grounded in the Speech or Debate Clause of Article I, Section 6 of the U.S. Constitution, which protects members of Congress from being questioned elsewhere about their legislative acts. Courts have extended similar protections to state and local legislators. See: Bogan v. Scott-Harris, 523 U.S. 44 (1998). Most states also provide explicit protection, with the majority including speech or debate clauses in their constitutions.

The protection covers activities that are integral to the legislative process, such as debating, voting, preparing reports, and introducing or drafting legislation. It may also extend to non-legislators performing functions directly related to the legislative process, for example, a mayor presenting a budget to a city council.

Legislative immunity does not apply to actions outside the legislative sphere. Public statements made at press conferences, political campaigning, or conduct lacking lawful authority, such as using unconstitutional procedures to pass a bill or seizing documents without proper authorization, fall outside the scope of immunity.

[Last reviewed in October of 2025 by the Wex Definitions Team]
legislative immunity

:lol:
KUDOS! Now that wasn't so hard was it. Hopefully you'll continue on this adult track.
 
At the federal level, legislative immunity is grounded in the Speech or Debate Clause of Article I, Section 6 of the U.S. Constitution, which protects members of Congress from being questioned elsewhere about their legislative acts. Courts have extended similar protections to state and local legislators. See: Bogan v. Scott-Harris, 523 U.S. 44 (1998). Most states also provide explicit protection, with the majority including speech or debate clauses in their constitutions.

The protection covers activities that are integral to the legislative process, such as debating, voting, preparing reports, and introducing or drafting legislation. It may also extend to non-legislators performing functions directly related to the legislative process, for example, a mayor presenting a budget to a city council.

Legislative immunity does not apply to actions outside the legislative sphere. Public statements made at press conferences, political campaigning, or conduct lacking lawful authority, such as using unconstitutional procedures to pass a bill or seizing documents without proper authorization, fall outside the scope of immunity.

[Last reviewed in October of 2025 by the Wex Definitions Team]
legislative immunity

:lol:
Yeah, we knew that..... :biggrin:
 
They've petitioned NY appellate court to move it to the federal court.
It will probably apply there.
Just to clarify......the possible move to federal court is based on the state cooking existing law, which was beyond the statue of limitations, and attempting to use federal law in a state court where federal law can't be prosecuted.

And the NY appellate court seemed open to kicking it down the road.

Prez immunity wouldn't apply.... sorry for any confusion.
 
The Democrats are going have nation wide "No Kings" protests on Oct 18th.
This will be fun to watch.



Organizers of the “No Kings” coalition announced a nationwide mobilization for October 18 that they say will be even larger than June’s historic day of action, when millions of people demonstrated across thousands of cities against President Donald Trump’s escalating authoritarian tactics. With over 2,110 protests planned across all 50 states, organizers predict the October actions will be the largest peaceful protest in modern American history.
i read .... no kings protest ...
why should any kings protest?

😎
 
They looked fine.

The event drew significant attention online, with many viewers sharing and commenting on the troops' performance. The US Army’s 250th anniversary celebration, which coincided with US president Donald Trump's birthday on Saturday, turned into a target of widespread online mockery after videos of the event surfaced on social media.

The military parade faced heavy criticism for the poor coordination displayed by American troops. Footage from the event showed soldiers marching out of sync. Many social media users described the marching as sloppy and unprofessional, accusing the troops of deliberately showing defiance.

MSN

not mention they 'marched' to this?



that -

is what is called -

a silent protest.
 
The event drew significant attention online, with many viewers sharing and commenting on the troops' performance. The US Army’s 250th anniversary celebration, which coincided with US president Donald Trump's birthday on Saturday, turned into a target of widespread online mockery after videos of the event surfaced on social media.

The military parade faced heavy criticism for the poor coordination displayed by American troops. Footage from the event showed soldiers marching out of sync. Many social media users described the marching as sloppy and unprofessional, accusing the troops of deliberately showing defiance.

MSN

not mention they 'marched' to this?



that -

is what is called -

a silent protest.

A great parade. Trump is making America great again much to your Envy.
 
The orange globalist/deep state/child molester is doing that too.
The flock bristles at words used to describe this moment.

If they can look at what is happening -- one (1) man operating at the top with almost total impunity -- and not admit that this is classic authoritarianism, then they either don't know what the word means, or they are lying and they WANT it.

Either way, they are the perfect definition of what Lenin called "useful idiots".
 
15th post
The flock bristles at words used to describe this moment.

If they can look at what is happening -- one (1) man operating at the top with almost total impunity -- and not admit that this is classic authoritarianism, then they either don't know what the word means, or they are lying and they WANT it.

Either way, they are the perfect definition of what Lenin called "useful idiots".
Even when he told them.................


 
Even when he told them.................
The flock is about to have things taken away from them. In a normal time, I'd say that would make them angry. Or perhaps concerned.

But in this case, I don't know. I assume they'll just blame someone else. While they cheer Trump & friends' celebration of wealth.
 
Last edited:
1761411309342.webp
 
Back
Top Bottom