Furthermore, trying to apply philosophical tenants directly as policy is going to fail every time. They are modeling tools, the real world is what they attempt to model. Not the other way around. The real world isn't to be bent to a modeling tool. Applying these tenants directly as policy fundamentally fails, since there will always be deeper currents of influence that are beyond our immediate comprehension. The point of a philosophical tenant is to create a starting point, then iteratively merge it with elements of policy we know work with the real world until there is a workable solution.
Furthermore...a "tenant" is someone who rents property. In your attempt to sound "smart", you have made yourself sound astoundingly stupid.
Now...to address your bizarre claims...your entire desperate nonsense here is trumped (no pun intended - honest) by the realization that we are a nation of laws. And the U.S. Constitution is the
supreme law of the land. Which means your "iteratively merging of elements of policy" (God Almighty do you sound like a dill-hole) are
illegal. If it's not constitutional, it's illegal. Even if it "works" in your mind, snowflake.