No Evidence?

How was and how can this be ignored?

The data as presented is meaningless, arbitrary and easily dismissed. The article says they knocked on 500 doors and got 185 responses! That means that only 37% of those contacted responded! Then they go on to say (for instance), that: 13.2 percent had missing votes.

13% of the 500 or the 185?

You see, you are much more likely to respond if you think you HAD an issue with voting or the election in general than not, so that artificially inflates the numbers. The 63% who chose not to participate likely had no issues with the election, but were likely NOT COUNTED in the study. Had they had an issue or were unhappy about the election made them more likely to respond to the polling.

While intriguing and suggestive, for this study to be more meaningful, a LOT more than 185 doors out of 8.5 million registered voters needed asked! And to make the study more accurate, they needed to collect voter data from wherever they stopped, at least getting a "no issue" from every door. People not home or not answering are entirely skipped. Not say they knocked on 500 doors but only counted the ones who had issues. Or just say they collected 185 respondents which is far too few.

To make matters worse, the article leaves out how they tabulated the data--- as a percentage of those that responded or of those that were asked!

While the data shows there was definitely anomalies in the election that should concern people, the study needed to ask maybe 10,000 RESPONDING homes across most/all counties in the state.

This kind of sloppy incomplete work is partly why election fraud is still being dismissed.
 
This kind of sloppy incomplete work is partly why election fraud is still being dismissed.

ImpartialAnxiousFireant-size_restricted.gif
 
How was and how can this be ignored?
Since the election, an independent analysis and canvass of the voter roll by Audit the Vote PA has revealed several concerns in multiple counties. They canvassed multiple counties, both Democrat and Republican areas, and made some disturbing findings. In Allegheny County, a Democrat stronghold and home to Pittsburgh, Audit the Vote PA knocked on five hundred doors and collected 185 responses. They made the following findings:

• 78.6 percent of houses had some election anomaly, meaning the residents’ understanding of who voted from their addresses did not match official records.

• 69.7 percent of houses had some registration-count discrepancy, meaning the official record of registered voters at the residence did not match the residents’ knowledge.

• 64.8 percent had phantom registrations associated with their address, meaning the residents were unaware of additional voters being registered at their home.

• 4.8 percent had fewer registered voters on record than the resident stated.

• 42.5 percent of addresses had a different number of votes on record for 2020 than residents stated.

• 29.2 percent had phantom votes.

• 13.2 percent had missing votes.

Montgomery County, PA, is known for being a Democrat stronghold too, and the official results of the 2020 election say that Biden won 62 percent of the roughly 500,000 votes cast in the 2020 election. Biden claims to have won 319,511 votes to President Trump’s 185,460. Audit the Vote PA knocked on 548 doors and 183 voters responded to their questions, creating the following findings:

• 77 addresses had a registration-count discrepancy (42.1 percent).

• 42 addresses had phantom registrations (23 percent).

• 35 addresses were missing registrations (19.1 percent).

• 66 addresses had a vote-count discrepancy (36.1 percent).

• 24 addresses show phantom votes (13.1 percent).

• 42 addresses show missing votes (23 percent).

Your wasting your time educating these shills,they are either shills paid for by Langley or the dnc to come on boards and troll threads and instructed to deny,deny deny all evidence and ignore and not read it.
 
How was and how can this be ignored?
Since the election, an independent analysis and canvass of the voter roll by Audit the Vote PA has revealed several concerns in multiple counties. They canvassed multiple counties, both Democrat and Republican areas, and made some disturbing findings. In Allegheny County, a Democrat stronghold and home to Pittsburgh, Audit the Vote PA knocked on five hundred doors and collected 185 responses. They made the following findings:

• 78.6 percent of houses had some election anomaly, meaning the residents’ understanding of who voted from their addresses did not match official records.

• 69.7 percent of houses had some registration-count discrepancy, meaning the official record of registered voters at the residence did not match the residents’ knowledge.

• 64.8 percent had phantom registrations associated with their address, meaning the residents were unaware of additional voters being registered at their home.

• 4.8 percent had fewer registered voters on record than the resident stated.

• 42.5 percent of addresses had a different number of votes on record for 2020 than residents stated.

• 29.2 percent had phantom votes.

• 13.2 percent had missing votes.

Montgomery County, PA, is known for being a Democrat stronghold too, and the official results of the 2020 election say that Biden won 62 percent of the roughly 500,000 votes cast in the 2020 election. Biden claims to have won 319,511 votes to President Trump’s 185,460. Audit the Vote PA knocked on 548 doors and 183 voters responded to their questions, creating the following findings:

• 77 addresses had a registration-count discrepancy (42.1 percent).

• 42 addresses had phantom registrations (23 percent).

• 35 addresses were missing registrations (19.1 percent).

• 66 addresses had a vote-count discrepancy (36.1 percent).

• 24 addresses show phantom votes (13.1 percent).

• 42 addresses show missing votes (23 percent).

Don't forget, Allegheny was one of the places where they gave the vote counters the night off.
 
Yeah, that's the one!

The one where she got her ass handed to her in court, but keeps the farce going to please the rubes!
Looking like she may just turn the tables.

Shelby Busch: "Tabulators are not to exceed an error rate of .002, or 1 in 500 ballots. On Election Day, Maricopa County used 476 tabulators. Not ONE of them met EAC standard. As a matter of fact, they averaged 235 times the EAC standard. Rejecting over 1/4 of a million ballots."
 
Looking like she may just turn the tables.

Shelby Busch: "Tabulators are not to exceed an error rate of .002, or 1 in 500 ballots. On Election Day, Maricopa County used 476 tabulators. Not ONE of them met EAC standard. As a matter of fact, they averaged 235 times the EAC standard. Rejecting over 1/4 of a million ballots."
Okay, let me know when it's proven in court, and I'm in.
 
What if "Audit the Vote" is a partisan Republican organization that is giving us one-sided "evidence"? Can you guarantee they are not?

This is why we take things to court. So they can be publicly aired and fully challenged.

If the "evidence" is weak, the judge won't open the case. As we have seen, damn near 70 times now.

Most of us still believe in justice and the rule of law.
Meh, the interweb tells them it was stolen, so they will not believe anything else.
 
Looking like she may just turn the tables.

Shelby Busch: "Tabulators are not to exceed an error rate of .002, or 1 in 500 ballots. On Election Day, Maricopa County used 476 tabulators. Not ONE of them met EAC standard. As a matter of fact, they averaged 235 times the EAC standard. Rejecting over 1/4 of a million ballots."
Lost twice in court already. Is she going for 62, or 63?
 
You mean this state?




This shows no proof. Only allegations. Who knows where these signatures came from, from when, from which election.

Have proof???? Go to court and show it to a Judge.

So far she has been laughed out of court twice.
 
Propagating misinformation and lies about ‘fraud’ that doesn’t exist, such as this thread, undermines our democratic institutions and hobbles the political process.

The right’s war on democracy continues.
You have proven liars telling you the fraud never happened. Guess what that means?
 
Propagating misinformation and lies about ‘fraud’ that doesn’t exist, such as this thread, undermines our democratic institutions and hobbles the political process.

The right’s war on democracy continues.
You realize Lake has met the legal threshold for an investigation?
 
How was and how can this be ignored?
Since the election, an independent analysis and canvass of the voter roll by Audit the Vote PA has revealed several concerns in multiple counties. They canvassed multiple counties, both Democrat and Republican areas, and made some disturbing findings. In Allegheny County, a Democrat stronghold and home to Pittsburgh, Audit the Vote PA knocked on five hundred doors and collected 185 responses. They made the following findings:

• 78.6 percent of houses had some election anomaly, meaning the residents’ understanding of who voted from their addresses did not match official records.

• 69.7 percent of houses had some registration-count discrepancy, meaning the official record of registered voters at the residence did not match the residents’ knowledge.

• 64.8 percent had phantom registrations associated with their address, meaning the residents were unaware of additional voters being registered at their home.

• 4.8 percent had fewer registered voters on record than the resident stated.

• 42.5 percent of addresses had a different number of votes on record for 2020 than residents stated.

• 29.2 percent had phantom votes.

• 13.2 percent had missing votes.

Montgomery County, PA, is known for being a Democrat stronghold too, and the official results of the 2020 election say that Biden won 62 percent of the roughly 500,000 votes cast in the 2020 election. Biden claims to have won 319,511 votes to President Trump’s 185,460. Audit the Vote PA knocked on 548 doors and 183 voters responded to their questions, creating the following findings:

• 77 addresses had a registration-count discrepancy (42.1 percent).

• 42 addresses had phantom registrations (23 percent).

• 35 addresses were missing registrations (19.1 percent).

• 66 addresses had a vote-count discrepancy (36.1 percent).

• 24 addresses show phantom votes (13.1 percent).

• 42 addresses show missing votes (23 percent).

Wow, could you imagine if any of that were actually true?
 

Forum List

Back
Top