No Difference Between Newtown and Abortion

[Article 15]

I thought Article 15s were for minor offenses. How would that be a felony?

they are. anyone who served would know that.

i guess pole's another fake vet.

shocker

I bet he won't be back in this thread.

Prolly not.

That was really moronic assertion he made.

 

[SAYIT]

on its own?

Precious few of us get by on our own no matter where we are in our development. We all need a bit of help sometimes.

You're still attached to your mother by an embilical cord? You can't breath on your own?

My mom died last year but thanks for your concern, ya snarky little twit.

 

[L.K.Eder]

His question is a honest one for discussion.

When does human life gain its value? Is it variable or a constant?

I am not going to go into the right or wrong moral aspect of abortion. That is not for me to decide for others.

I am curious however as to how we as people view the human life from conception to death.

Does the tragic loss of a child through miscarriage aka spontaneous abortion mean less and have less "life" value than the tragic loss of a toddler or a first grader?

d'uh.

we just lost a fetus due to spontaneous abortion.

that sucks, but it is not at all comparable to the situation where my toddler suddenly dies.

why is this such a difficult concept.

there is, after all, a difference between a toddler and a fetus.

 

[sfcalifornia]

I thought Article 15s were for minor offenses. How would that be a felony?

they are. anyone who served would know that.

i guess pole's another fake vet.

shocker

I bet he won't be back in this thread.

yep.

pussed out again. as usual.

 

[L.K.Eder]

a hilarious turn can be witnessed in this thread.


hahahahahahaha

i went to the brass ceaselessness exhibit at moma.

it was breathtaking, liebchen

figures that you fall for this librul crap, socialist *****.

 

[Valerie]

His question is a honest one for discussion.

When does human life gain its value? Is it variable or a constant?

I am not going to go into the right or wrong moral aspect of abortion. That is not for me to decide for others.

I am curious however as to how we as people view the human life from conception to death.

Does the tragic loss of a child through miscarriage aka spontaneous abortion mean less and have less "life" value than the tragic loss of a toddler or a first grader?

d'uh.

we just lost a fetus due to spontaneous abortion.

that sucks, but it is not at all comparable to the situation where my toddler suddenly dies.

why is this such a different concept.

there is, after all, a difference between a toddler and a fetus.

sorry for your loss...

 

[del]

His question is a honest one for discussion.

When does human life gain its value? Is it variable or a constant?

I am not going to go into the right or wrong moral aspect of abortion. That is not for me to decide for others.

I am curious however as to how we as people view the human life from conception to death.

Does the tragic loss of a child through miscarriage aka spontaneous abortion mean less and have less "life" value than the tragic loss of a toddler or a first grader?

well, yeah, it does, unless you're completely unhinged.

 

[Article 15]

His question is a honest one for discussion.

When does human life gain its value? Is it variable or a constant?

I am not going to go into the right or wrong moral aspect of abortion. That is not for me to decide for others.

I am curious however as to how we as people view the human life from conception to death.

Does the tragic loss of a child through miscarriage aka spontaneous abortion mean less and have less "life" value than the tragic loss of a toddler or a first grader?

Absolutely

 

[SAYIT]

Ha! You made the claim, cum-guzzling parolee, it's not up to anyone else to disprove it.

No wonder you get your ass beat down so hard here on such a frequent basis. You even admit to being an utter idiot.

You are correct.
It is up to the OP to make his argument (not require you to make it for him) but there is no serious debate about the status of a human fetus or even an embryo ... it is alive.
I would suggest we discuss the real issue in this matter: when does a human fetus deserve the same right to live as out-of-the-wombers? Of course, you can continue to bash your head against the wall but perhaps you'd like to act like an adult for at least a bit:
BBC - Ethics - Abortion: When is the foetus 'alive'?

I'm sorry, but not only are you scientifically illiterate, you've proven yourself to be utterly incapable of rational discourse or debate.

Perhaps one day when you grow up a little, child.

As I suspected. You have nothing but your obnoxious personalty under all that smarminess. What a surprise.

 

[del]

a hilarious turn can be witnessed in this thread.


hahahahahahaha

i went to the brass ceaselessness exhibit at moma.

it was breathtaking, liebchen

figures that you fall for this librul crap, socialist *****.

they had obama's indonesian birth certificate.

i had my picture taken with it while holding a copy of the the protocols of the elders of zion.

a tingle went up my leg.

 

[Article 15]

a hilarious turn can be witnessed in this thread.


hahahahahahaha

Chalk another one up for the good guys.

 

[L.K.Eder]

His question is a honest one for discussion.

When does human life gain its value? Is it variable or a constant?

I am not going to go into the right or wrong moral aspect of abortion. That is not for me to decide for others.

I am curious however as to how we as people view the human life from conception to death.

Does the tragic loss of a child through miscarriage aka spontaneous abortion mean less and have less "life" value than the tragic loss of a toddler or a first grader?

d'uh.

we just lost a fetus due to spontaneous abortion.

that sucks, but it is not at all comparable to the situation where my toddler suddenly dies.

why is this such a different concept.

there is, after all, a difference between a toddler and a fetus.

sorry for your loss...

thanks.

 

[Dreamy]

His question is a honest one for discussion.

When does human life gain its value? Is it variable or a constant?

I am not going to go into the right or wrong moral aspect of abortion. That is not for me to decide for others.

I am curious however as to how we as people view the human life from conception to death.

Does the tragic loss of a child through miscarriage aka spontaneous abortion mean less and have less "life" value than the tragic loss of a toddler or a first grader?

d'uh.

we just lost a fetus due to spontaneous abortion.

that sucks, but it is not at all comparable to the situation where my toddler suddenly dies.

why is this such a different concept.

there is, after all, a difference between a toddler and a fetus.

So very sorry.

Not to the parent who once held her almost full term child it did not. (Not myself for the sake of truth.) But you do address the disproportionate value to life we often do apply. Certain losses of life seemingly give us more of a collective grief unity.

By the way, what is the difference between a fetus and a toddler other than they are both dependent on others for their life? I do not mean legally, I mean emotionally.

Just curious, if one of those shot at the school had been a pregnant woman shot in the belly and she survived but her fetus did not would the dead fetus have the same life value as the dead little children in the classroom? The answer to that might offer some interesting insight for each of us.

 

[SAYIT]

So how many of us could survive without some occasional help from someone? A guy should at least be able to count on his mom. Viability isn't the measure of life ... life is, so the question remains: at what point does that human fetus deserve, as you and I do, the right to live?

Well, you know my take on that - at conception.

Yeah, I got that but despite what the "pro-abortionists" here offer as "intellectual debate," there are other valid positions. I have some respect for our courts and abortion has been legal for decades.

 

[Ravi]

Does the tragic loss of a child through miscarriage aka spontaneous abortion mean less and have less "life" value than the tragic loss of a toddler or a first grader?

Yes. What a stupid question.

 

[L.K.Eder]

i went to the brass ceaselessness exhibit at moma.

it was breathtaking, liebchen

figures that you fall for this librul crap, socialist *****.

they had obama's indonesian birth certificate.

i had my picture taken with it while holding a copy of the the protocols of the elders of zion.

a tingle went up my leg.

the curator of the exhibition was orly taitz, right?

i hope you went friday afternoon, and did not pay the entry fee.

 

[Article 15]

His question is a honest one for discussion.

When does human life gain its value? Is it variable or a constant?

I am not going to go into the right or wrong moral aspect of abortion. That is not for me to decide for others.

I am curious however as to how we as people view the human life from conception to death.

Does the tragic loss of a child through miscarriage aka spontaneous abortion mean less and have less "life" value than the tragic loss of a toddler or a first grader?

d'uh.

we just lost a fetus due to spontaneous abortion.

that sucks, but it is not at all comparable to the situation where my toddler suddenly dies.

why is this such a different concept.

there is, after all, a difference between a toddler and a fetus.

Not to the parent who once held her almost full term child. (Not myself for the sake of truth.) But you do address the disproportionate value to life we often do apply. Certain losses of life seemingly give us more of a collective grief unity.

By the way, what is the difference between a fetus and a toddler other than they are both dependent on others for their life?

Just curious, if one of those shot at the school had been a pregnant woman shot in the belly and she survived but her fetus did not would the dead fetus have the same life value as the dead little children in the classroom? The answer to that might offer some interesting insight for each of us.

C'mon now, Dreamy

 

[Warrior102]

007 - Art's right on this
Article 15 is a NON JUDICIAL punishment.
Think of it like the wrist slapping Bill Clinton got when caught lying under oath.

 

[Dreamy]

Thanks for your simple honesty Article and Del. There is no right or wrong since to me it is a personal issue but it does show once again that we do not all value life the same at all stages of life. No breaking news gleamed.

 

[SAYIT]

And that would be your opinion.

Indeed, and isn't everyone here just expressing theirs in one form or another?

That is what I was saying. Some people look at their opinion as fact though.

So can we agree that whether or not you subscribe to them, my beliefs may be valid?