Zone1 No Christian can vote for Kamala

[ding]

So you agree that if abortion is murder after 6 weeks it's also murder before 6 weeks.
Conservatives approved of early murder only.

Never given it any thought. My participation on this subject is limited. Women should acknowledge they are ending a specific human life, one that has never existed before and will never exist again. I'd be happy if abortion were a misdemeanor. That way no one would be arguing it was good and just.

 

[Arlette]

Never given it any thought. My participation on this subject is limited. Women should acknowledge they are ending a specific human life, one that has never existed before and will never exist again. I'd be happy if abortion were a misdemeanor. That way no one would be arguing it was good and just.

The purpose of abortion is to end a specific human life.

 

[ding]

The purpose of abortion is to end a specific human life.

The purpose is to end a human life. The reality is that it ends a specific human life. One that has never existed before and will never exist again. That is the reality. It's just science.

 

[Arlette]

The purpose is to end a human life. The reality is that it ends a specific human life. One that has never existed before and will never exist again. That is the reality. It's just science.

And? How is that different from what I said?

 

[ding]

And? How is that different from what I said?

It seemed like you were saying it was personal. So I restated it.

 

[Arlette]

It seemed like you were saying it was personal. So I restated it.

It is personal to me. Every state allows the legal murder of those innocent babies in the early weeks of gestation. And guess what - the sun still comes up in the morning.

 

[Hector12]

Sure you do. Good luck with your wish for forced abortions and forced sterilizations. It's never going to happen.

I am not in favor of forced abortions and serializations. I would require them of those receiving welfare checks. If they refused, they would be denied what they had done nothing to earn.

 

[ding]

It is personal to me. Every state allows the legal murder of those innocent babies in the early weeks of gestation. And guess what - the sun still comes up in the morning.

Sure but not for the lives that were aborted. That was their one and only shot.

 

[ding]

I am not in favor of forced abortions and serializations. I would require them of those receiving welfare checks. If they refused, they would be denied what they had done nothing to earn.

Semantics at best, rationalizing a wrong as a right at worst.

 

[Arlette]

Sure but not for the lives that were aborted. That was their one and only shot.

Yeah yeah yeah. God already had a plan for it.

 

[Hector12]

Sure but not for the lives that were aborted. That was their one and only shot.

Every teenage girl and every woman who has an abortion is pregnant with a child she does not want to raise. What do you think should be done with those children? Will you adopt one?

 

[Meriweather]

Every teenage girl and every woman who has an abortion is pregnant with a child she does not want to raise. What do you think should be done with those children? Will you adopt one?

We were never meant to look to government for the standards for our morality.

 

[Hector12]

We were never meant to look to government for the standards for our morality.

That is not the answer to my question. That question, once again: will you adopt a child whose mother does not want to raise the child?

 

[ding]

Every teenage girl and every woman who has an abortion is pregnant with a child she does not want to raise. What do you think should be done with those children? Will you adopt one?

How does that justify forced abortions and forced sterilizations?

 

[ding]

Yeah yeah yeah. God already had a plan for it.

These aren't the droids you are looking for.

 

[Meriweather]

That is not the answer to my question. That question, once again: will you adopt a child whose mother does not want to raise the child?

This isn't the question. The question is for the man to ask the woman: "If you happen to become pregnant will you raise the child?" She can then ask the man, "If I happen to become pregnant, will you raise the child?" If neither of them is up to raising a child, then obviously it is not the time for either to be having sex. My question stands. Should we be looking to government for our standards of morality?

As for your mindless question: If I was of child bearing age and death not being the next milestone in my life, (like I was when I made that offer to a young woman) I would. However, as too many have told me, "I wouldn't want anyone else raising my child..." Basically, few are willing to risk changing their minds upon giving birth. Then there is fact that many, many childless couples are looking to adopt and there are not enough babies available.

The woman I was referencing had an abortion the next day, brought a flower with her to work the next day saying, "They were so sweet. They gave me this rose." I haven't been able to truly appreciate a rose since.

 

[Hector12]

How does that justify forced abortions and forced sterilizations?

That is not the answer to my question.

 

[LuckyDuck01!]

<ahem>

#1.

Newsmax – Bias and Credibility​

---

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE​

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

• We rate Newsmax Right Biased and Questionable based on the promotion of conspiracy theories and pseudoscience as well as numerous failed fact checks.

---

Detailed Report​

Questionable Reasoning: Conspiracy Theories, Pseudoscience, Propaganda, Fake News, Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: RIGHT
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: TV Station
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

The last I recall, we had a president named Donald Trump for an entire term of four years and in that time, had plenty of good accomplishments, despite the bellowing rhetoric of his political opponents.
During his time in office, I just don't recall him creating large "concentration camps" and shoving massive number of Jews, Gypsies, or handicapped in them, then gassing and incinerating them. Could you please point them out on maps?
If one actually looks back at Trump "before" he ran for office, he was a darling of the liberals (old school liberals that is). One only need to search out those things he donated to. He even donated to the Clinton Foundation. As to him claiming he would like to have some generals like Hitler had. Despite Hitler being a madman and monster, he did have some good generals. In our Civil War, Grant had said that he wished we had General Lee in the Northern Army. His opinion was correct. The war with the racist Dixie Democrats of the south would have been shortened.
General Rommel in Germany would have been a good tank commander to have had on our side. As for Trump wanting revenge on those that have been attacking him with all of this BS, I side with him on that. The far left has become evil and Marxist-like in its methods. They're even using Nazi and Fascist techniques at rallies against republican speakers. Remember this: Once you permanently silence all political opposition and opinions that don't agree with yours, you actually END DEMOCRACY. A DEMOCRACY is ALL opinions having a voice.

 

[ding]

That is not the answer to my question.

It is because your logic is ridiculous. There is no justification for what you want to do regardless of how many babies go on welfare or don't get adopted.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

The last I recall, we had a president named Donald Trump for an entire term of four years and in that time, had plenty of good accomplishments, despite the bellowing rhetoric of his political opponents.
During his time in office, I just don't recall him creating large "concentration camps" and shoving massive number of Jews, Gypsies, or handicapped in them, then gassing and incinerating them. Could you please point them out on maps?
If one actually looks back at Trump "before" he ran for office, he was a darling of the liberals (old school liberals that is). One only need to search out those things he donated to. He even donated to the Clinton Foundation. As to him claiming he would like to have some generals like Hitler had. Despite Hitler being a madman and monster, he did have some good generals. In our Civil War, Grant had said that he wished we had General Lee in the Northern Army. His opinion was correct. The war with the racist Dixie Democrats of the south would have been shortened.
General Rommel in Germany would have been a good tank commander to have had on our side.

And to emphasize your point, our space program and moon landing happened thanks to nazi rocket scientists.