No AR-15 found

[Pogo]

Everybody had it wrong including the doctors who removed the slugs. The multiple shooters story didn't pan out either. It didn't faze good old Barry Hussein though. While helicopters were buzzing around, Reagan airport was grounded and all the Police cars in the city were howling barely a mile away he went on with his campaign speech about the economy. He is one cold freaking fish.

Reagan Airport? Hmm... Reagan... Reagan... wasn't he the POTUS who was shot with a not-AR-15?
Was that why he survived?

No.

But still it was a not-AR-15. That means he was never shot, right?

I knew it. It was all staged just like the moon landing.

 

[Pogo]

Was there a point?

Considering that I put this thread in media, pointed out the fact that no one found an AR-15, and then showed CNN blathering away about AR-15s after they admitted there wasn't one, and then made an offhand comment about bias, I thought the point was self explanatory. I obviously forgot to factor in the knee jerk reactions of the anti gun nuts.

Huh?

Perhaps the point of asking the point sailed over more than one head. What I'm asking is, why does it matter whether it was an AR-15 or a QM-27? Aren't the victims just as dead? Is it not still a shooting? Is it not mass murder? What am I missing in this ever so crucial distinction?

Didn't initial reports on Lanza give his brother's name? Are not details on breaking news stories, particularly urgent ones, commonly subject to correction?

IOW why are you hung up on this detail? What's the point?

The ******* point is that it doesn't matter what weapon is used, the anti gun nuts will still try to take away all guns. If you don't understand that simple truth, you are part of the problem.

FINALLY - paydirt. Man that was like pulling teeth.
So since it doesn't matter................ what's the point of this thread then?

 

[martybegan]

Ah good, this one type of firearm not involved. Excellent news, I'm sure the dead victims will be ecstatic to learn that the AR-15 said to have killed them does not exist, therefore they are free to come back to life. Huzzah.

Was there a point coming with this thread, or does that cost extra?

Was there a point?

Considering that I put this thread in media, pointed out the fact that no one found an AR-15, and then showed CNN blathering away about AR-15s after they admitted there wasn't one, and then made an offhand comment about bias, I thought the point was self explanatory. I obviously forgot to factor in the knee jerk reactions of the anti gun nuts.

Huh?

Perhaps the point of asking the point sailed over more than one head. What I'm asking is, why does it matter whether it was an AR-15 or a QM-27? Aren't the victims just as dead? Is it not still a shooting? Is it not mass murder? What am I missing in this ever so crucial distinction?

Didn't initial reports on Lanza give his brother's name? Are not details on breaking news stories, particularly urgent ones, commonly subject to correction?

IOW why are you hung up on this detail? What's the point?

Its very very simple. The AR-15 is the "boogeyman" gun, its scary looking, and its the low hanging fruit that grabbers want to get banned from non governmental ownership. They figure if they get that one, then next they can get semi-auto pistols (call them assault pistols maybe) and so on and so on until only the goverment can have firearms.

Thus the grabbers actually hoped it was an AR-15 or another semi-automatic rifle, so they can further thier agenda.

That it is not, that it was a common pump action shotgun is unusable to them, because even though they want to ban those as well, they will look unreasonable to most americans in banning something as common as a pump shotgun. AR-15's on the other hand are scary enough to fool some people into wanting them banned.

 

[Pogo]

Was there a point?

Considering that I put this thread in media, pointed out the fact that no one found an AR-15, and then showed CNN blathering away about AR-15s after they admitted there wasn't one, and then made an offhand comment about bias, I thought the point was self explanatory. I obviously forgot to factor in the knee jerk reactions of the anti gun nuts.

Huh?

Perhaps the point of asking the point sailed over more than one head. What I'm asking is, why does it matter whether it was an AR-15 or a QM-27? Aren't the victims just as dead? Is it not still a shooting? Is it not mass murder? What am I missing in this ever so crucial distinction?

Didn't initial reports on Lanza give his brother's name? Are not details on breaking news stories, particularly urgent ones, commonly subject to correction?

IOW why are you hung up on this detail? What's the point?

Its very very simple. The AR-15 is the "boogeyman" gun, its scary looking, and its the low hanging fruit that grabbers want to get banned from non governmental ownership. They figure if they get that one, then next they can get semi-auto pistols (call them assault pistols maybe) and so on and so on until only the goverment can have firearms.

Thus the grabbers actually hoped it was an AR-15 or another semi-automatic rifle, so they can further thier agenda.

That it is not, that it was a common pump action shotgun is unusable to them, because even though they want to ban those as well, they will look unreasonable to most americans in banning something as common as a pump shotgun. AR-15's on the other hand are scary enough to fool some people into wanting them banned.

Now that's the first answer I got that was even coherent, thanks. Even though it contradicts what QW just said you'd think the OP could have articulated what the **** it was talking about.

So basically he's saying "a dozen innocent people are dead but thankfully the AR-15 was not hurt". I had hoped I was missing something. Oh well. It just confirms what I keep noting about our values. Someday I hope to be wrong about that.

 

[peach174]

He was Killed by a AR 15.

The news people are so mentally conditioned that they heard the murder used an AR15. Not that he was killed by an AR15.

The NRA and Republicans want the mentally ill put on the computers for background checks just like felons are, so that no mentally ill person can't buy any guns.
Had the Dems not fought that law, all of these last few killing sprees would not have happened.
You don't think that Dems have their own powerful lobbyists?
It's lefty lobbyist's that won't allow the mentally ill to get on back ground checks.

 

[Jos]

No One will mention the mind altering SSRI drugs he was proscribed?

 

[R.C. Christian]

No One will mention the mind altering SSRI drugs he was proscribed?

No ***** democrat on this board will not to mention their heroes like that ass clown Piers Organ or the filthy commie Matthews.

 

[Stephanie]

the lamstream media with the help from the progressives has become a danger and an enemy to YOU the people in this country...they spread this DISHONEST MISINFORMATION then step in and say, oops we were wrong, so sorry

you need to wake up

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Reagan Airport? Hmm... Reagan... Reagan... wasn't he the POTUS who was shot with a not-AR-15?
Was that why he survived?

No.

But still it was a not-AR-15. That means he was never shot, right?

I knew it. It was all staged just like the moon landing.

No, it means you are a hack.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Huh?

Perhaps the point of asking the point sailed over more than one head. What I'm asking is, why does it matter whether it was an AR-15 or a QM-27? Aren't the victims just as dead? Is it not still a shooting? Is it not mass murder? What am I missing in this ever so crucial distinction?

Didn't initial reports on Lanza give his brother's name? Are not details on breaking news stories, particularly urgent ones, commonly subject to correction?

IOW why are you hung up on this detail? What's the point?

The ******* point is that it doesn't matter what weapon is used, the anti gun nuts will still try to take away all guns. If you don't understand that simple truth, you are part of the problem.

FINALLY - paydirt. Man that was like pulling teeth.
So since it doesn't matter................ what's the point of this thread then?

You entirely missed the point even when I spoonfed you, how stupid is that?

 

[Pogo]

No.

But still it was a not-AR-15. That means he was never shot, right?

I knew it. It was all staged just like the moon landing.

No, it means you are a hack.

Uh huh.
You've just admitted {post 40) that your thread has no basis.

But I'm the hack.



Low hanging fruit. It's what's for lunch.

 

[peach174]

No One will mention the mind altering SSRI drugs he was proscribed?

When was this reported? I haven't heard anything about it yet .
I was wondering if he had been put on some type mind altering drug at the V.A.

That is what all of these connections have.
Mental illness
Mind altering drugs and addiction to violent video games.
But Dem's won't pass anything that would harm their powerful Drug Lobbyists.

 

[whitehall]

Keep in mind that the maniac who murdered 32 people in the worst college campus shooting in history at Va. Tech in Blacksburg barely 6 years ago was a mental patient. The liberals and mostly democrats at the time thought that it would be a violation of privacy if the instant name check for purchasing a firearm included mental history. Apparently the federal government was equally negligent when they issued a security clearance to a paranoid schizophrenic.

 

[Pogo]

Keep in mind that the maniac who murdered 32 people in the worst college campus shooting in history at Va. Tech in Blacksburg barely 6 years ago was a mental patient. The liberals and mostly democrats at the time thought that it would be a violation of privacy if the instant name check for purchasing a firearm included mental history. Apparently the federal government was equally negligent when they issued a security clearance to a paranoid schizophrenic.

Good to know. What did they give you this clearance for?

 

[peach174]

Reagan Airport? Hmm... Reagan... Reagan... wasn't he the POTUS who was shot with a not-AR-15?
Was that why he survived?

No.

But still it was a not-AR-15. That means he was never shot, right?

I knew it. It was all staged just like the moon landing.

No he was killed by an AR 15.
That puts the AR 15 in a good light and the left can't have that, because they think the AR 15 is evil.
They can't vilify the shot gun.

 

[earlycuyler]

How does CNN report the fact that no AR-15 was used in the DC Navy Yard shooting?

A U.S. law enforcement official said Monday that gunman Aaron Alexis unleashed a barrage of bullets using an AR-15, a rifle and a semi-automatic handgun. Authorities believed the AR-15 was used for most of the shooting, the official said. The news prompted Sen. Dianne Feinstein, one of the strongest proponents of a ban on assault weapons like the AR-15, to issue a statement the same day asking, "When will enough be enough?"
However, federal law enforcement sources told CNN Tuesday that authorities have recovered three weapons from the scene of the mass shooting, including one -- a shotgun -- that investigators believe Alexis brought in to the compound. The other two weapons, which sources say were handguns, may have been taken from guards at the Navy complex.
The sources, who have detailed knowledge of the investigation, cautioned that initial information that an AR-15 was used in the shootings may have been incorrect. It is believed that Alexis had rented an AR-15, but returned it before Monday morning's shootings. Authorities are still investigating precisely how many weapons Alexis had access to and when.

Navy Yard shooting: AR-15, back in the news -- briefly - CNN.com

Nope, no bias there.

Well, they just arent reporting anything now. Due to the fact I only have CNN now (got flooded out) I want to see if Mr Morgan has anything further to say about it.

 

[BullKurtz]

The FBI disagrees, but keep complaining about weapons that weren't used.

Well it was initially reported that's what he used.

Seems that's changed.

In any case, he was legally able to purchase a shotgun.

And the NRA..and Republicans have made sure he could do that.

And are making sure any future mass murdering crazies can do the same.

He was legally able to buy a shotgun because he was never charged with a crime, despite having shot off two guns. He was also never evaluated by a doctor even though he called the police and complained about magic people and voices.

Why is this my fault?

Most firearm sales here in Arizona require at least a 20 minute wait...Barry's SLFU is stocked with Barry voters....they work about 3 hours a day between watching porn and cartoons.

 

[R.C. Christian]

Keep in mind that the maniac who murdered 32 people in the worst college campus shooting in history at Va. Tech in Blacksburg barely 6 years ago was a mental patient. The liberals and mostly democrats at the time thought that it would be a violation of privacy if the instant name check for purchasing a firearm included mental history. Apparently the federal government was equally negligent when they issued a security clearance to a paranoid schizophrenic.

Good to know. What did they give you this clearance for?

A stunning, awe inspiring rebuttal sure the keep the thread perfectly on topic moron.

 

[Pogo]

Keep in mind that the maniac who murdered 32 people in the worst college campus shooting in history at Va. Tech in Blacksburg barely 6 years ago was a mental patient. The liberals and mostly democrats at the time thought that it would be a violation of privacy if the instant name check for purchasing a firearm included mental history. Apparently the federal government was equally negligent when they issued a security clearance to a paranoid schizophrenic.

Good to know. What did they give you this clearance for?

A stunning, awe inspiring rebuttal sure the keep the thread perfectly on topic moron.

Perhaps it was humour, which may be beyond your ken.

And perhaps it's part of a history with the poster I was addressing, which we'll note is not you.

Perhaps you should mind your own business.

 

[Pogo]

No.

But still it was a not-AR-15. That means he was never shot, right?

I knew it. It was all staged just like the moon landing.

No he was killed by an AR 15.
That puts the AR 15 in a good light and the left can't have that, because they think the AR 15 is evil.
They can't vilify the shot gun.

I envy your fertility of imagination, Peach.

I dunno -- Martybegan says the AR-15 is significant, the OP says it isn't. I don't know what to think.