Athletic dorm. I'm sorry my attempt at levity didn't levitate.
Oh, I see now. Yeah, they have a nice athletic dorm. My son lived in the honors dorm. Pretty nice dorm too. My son also had someone walk him thru his registration process personally. Should the engineering students that get treated differently unionize too?
Oh, and since Alabama and Ohio State are state universities, this ruling doesn't apply to them. Or at least I believe the ruling only applies to private colleges and universities.
I thought the distinction between engineering and football was pretty clear. The NLRB bought the argument that football players were treated differently than other students, in that keeping them eligible and less academically stressed to facilitate their use as football players was more important than getting them the "most best" education available.
As I said, I don't that that argument would hold true with athletes of other Div I sports, except perhaps basketball and a few others in isolated instances at individual schools. It certainly wouldn't hold true for engineering students. Their value to a school is as successful engineers who participate in alumni fund drives.
And again, the impact on the ruling on state univerisities is in the finding that football players at NW are treated substantively differently from other students, and thus may be employees rather than students. If state univ players seek to unionize at the state law level, there is the NLRB to use as persuasion. More importantly, it is one more nail in NCAA coffin of arguing that Div I players at places like Ala and Ohio State are treated like all other students. Sure some kids are smart and graduate, and others are spit out to be low skill workers.