Nicholas Maduro has been captured: Trump

And Trump is obviously doing Wag-The-Dog as so many prior presidents have done, because of his Epstein involvement.

Somehow dumb Americans always fail to see the obvious. State controlled propaganda always works on the dumb.
What is he going to do control Venezuela from airforce 1 by X? if they want control of the Country it will take hundreds of thousands of troops and when some come back in sacks MAGA will freak out, there are thousands of armed pro Maduro Militia in Venezuela they won't accept becoming a US Colony, the mad Dog has not thought it through.
 
On many of the issues we have questioned as citizens, drugs are part of it. You guys let the worst of the worst into our nation as part of the illegals. All for votes and for the obvious corruption of stealing resources from the taxpayer. Our social programs are corrupted as all hell. And politicians and those around them are involved in it. The only disappointment seems to be that we are not seeing the guilty put into prison.....again. Many Republican voters are impatient.
1767528035595.webp


Are you always duped by R presidents, or just Trump?
 
That's an outdated and long debunked conspiracy theory. Feel free to provide a credible source with exact data, agreements, etc.

The United States does not "take oil" - it allows the private sector to work it out through free trade. In the case of Iraq, US companies were outbid initially - other than a few - by other countries and companies. And when the US lost presence in Iraq - Iran/Russia and China moved in and took almost complete control of Iraq's oil contracts. That's the way the cookie crumbles when you believe in free trade.
Contracts. They BOUGHT their way in. Who did they pay?

Us
 
What is he going to do control Venezuela from airforce 1 by X? if they want control of the Country it will take hundreds of thousands of troops and when some come back in sacks MAGA will freak out, there are thousands of armed pro Maduro Militia in Venezuela they won't accept becoming a US Colony, the mad Dog has not thought it through.
Yup. Same problem as Iraq
 
False there is an open indictment pending in NY State and Maduro was never elected in fact he lost the election. So its 100% legal.
We both know Biden couldnt do it because he was too impaired and has no backbone.
Today we have real leader

An American indictment of a foreign leader has no legal jurisdiction whatsoever.

This is just one convicted felon taking out another criminal politician.
 
Well that's your story you fascist pig.
Not 'my' story. It's reality. An illegal government has no title to legitimacy. BTW, thank you for your kind words and compliment.
Mad Dog Trump said he will take the oil, how is that not looting?
Trump said no such thing you pinko swine.

the US looted Syrian oil,
He denied your hero, Bashar al-Assad, access to the oil and let the kurds have the oil revenue.
Hardly 'looting'.
 
Contracts. They BOUGHT their way in. Who did they pay?
The US and European oil companies, originally, were granted 'concessions' to develop Venezuela's oil. It was sometime around the early 1900's under dictator Juan Vicente Gómez.

Sonofabitch..... there's that word again, dictator.
 
An American indictment of a foreign leader has no legal jurisdiction whatsoever.

Wanna bet?

'The Frisbee Doctrine'

waitforit-wait.gif


International law shields sitting presidents from arrest, but US domestic law differs. Under the Ker-Frisbie doctrine, American courts can try a foreign leader regardless of how they were brought to US soil, even if the capture violated international law.

Serving leaders are untouchable

Under customary international law, a serving Head of State enjoys absolute immunity (ratione personae) from foreign criminal jurisdiction. According to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in the Arrest Warrant Case (2002), foreign courts cannot prosecute a sitting leader, even for war crimes, to ensure they can perform their diplomatic duties without fear of arrest.

The ICC Exception

While national courts are restricted, the International Criminal Court (ICC) plays by different rules. Article 27 of the Rome Statute explicitly states that 'official capacity as a Head of State' does not exempt a person from criminal responsibility. This means a leader can be legally seized if the ICC issues the warrant, provided member states cooperate.

Captured

In the United States, the judiciary relies on a century-old principle called the Ker-Frisbie doctrine (stemming from Ker v. Illinois, 1886). It effectively states that a court's power to try a defendant is not negated by how they were brought there. Even if a foreign president is 'kidnapped' in violation of international law, US courts can still legally put them on trial once they are on American soil.

The 'Narco-Terrorist' Loophole

To bypass diplomatic immunity, a capturing state may refuse to recognise the target as a legitimate Head of State. For instance, by designating a leader as the head of a 'narco-terrorist organisation' (as seen in US indictments), prosecutors argue they are arresting a criminal, not a president. This strips away the protections usually afforded to diplomats under the Vienna Convention.

That damn Trump is so stupid.

 
Hugo Chavez:
"Years ago, someone told me: 'They’re going to end up accusing you of being a drug trafficker—you personally—you, Chávez. Not just that the government supports it, or permits it—no, no, no. They’re going to try to apply the Noriega formula to you.
'They’re looking for a way to associate Chávez directly with drug trafficking. And then, anything goes against a ‘drug trafficker president,’ right?"
History can teach us so much about the future if we just listen.
 
15th post
Hugo Chavez:
"Years ago, someone told me: 'They’re going to end up accusing you of being a drug trafficker—you personally—you, Chávez. Not just that the government supports it, or permits it—no, no, no. They’re going to try to apply the Noriega formula to you.
'They’re looking for a way to associate Chávez directly with drug trafficking. And then, anything goes against a ‘drug trafficker president,’ right?"
History can teach us so much about the future if we just listen.
Moral: Don't do drug trafficker shit.
 
Oh, well, I can't rebut that sound argument. All the experts are wrong and you are right. That's how maga world is.
Really?

What’s the current GDP growth for the US?
4.3%, which is way higher than your beloved economists predicted.

MAGA world is based on reality, not fantasy land that your “intellectuals” live in.
 
Moral: Don't do drug trafficker shit.
No, behave like north koreans, then your country will never appear on the American list for “democratization.”

We'll kill a bunch of civilians, but at least we'll get rid of Saddam.
We'll plunge the country into a decade of hell, but at least we'll get rid of Gaddafi.
We'll raze a city to the ground and kill 60,000 people, but at least we'll get rid of Hamas.

Now, at least we'll get rid of Maduro...
 
Last edited:

Really?

What’s the current GDP growth for the US?
4.3%, which is way higher than your beloved economists predicted.

MAGA world is based on reality, not fantasy land that your “intellectuals” live in.
Being an expert doesn't mean you are infallible. Smart people understand that predicting something doesn't mean it will happen.
4.3% was the fourth quarter of 2025.
 
Back
Top Bottom