NH Audit

You can't make this shit up. Yep....somehow voting machines made errors. Imagine that. And all the errors hurt the GOP candidates and helped the Dim candidates. I'm sure it has to be purely coincidence, right? :lol:


Here's the story.


Sounds like Cyber Ninjas is doing the audit.
 
You can't make this shit up. Yep....somehow voting machines made errors. Imagine that. And all the errors hurt the GOP candidates and helped the Dim candidates. I'm sure it has to be purely coincidence, right? :lol:


Here's the story.


Sounds like Cyber Ninjas is doing the audit.


Lol

If the Mossad was not really worried about AZ, faun would not be here attacking it every day....
 
Sorry bout that,

1. I feel like very soon this whole stolen election, will be revealed, as a baby that plops out of the womb, in an undue time.
2. And you can bet this baby, will be screaming, at the top of its lungs.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
 
You can't make this shit up. Yep....somehow voting machines made errors. Imagine that. And all the errors hurt the GOP candidates and helped the Dim candidates. I'm sure it has to be purely coincidence, right? :lol:


Here's the story.


Sounds like Cyber Ninjas is doing the audit.


Lol

If the Mossad was not really worried about AZ, faun would not be here attacking it every day....
Only because they pay so well. But the shekel to dollar exchange is brutal.
 
And so the dominoes are falling one by one.

You can't make this shit up. Yep....somehow voting machines made errors. Imagine that. And all the errors hurt the GOP candidates and helped the Dim candidates. I'm sure it has to be purely coincidence, right? :lol:


Here's the story.



Hmm... still no evidence of fraud dumbstruck.




Oh?

Me thinks you are willfully blind.

What did I miss? I read the article. The handcounts were different than the machine counts. Any reason to trust the hand counts over the machine counts? More importantly, is there ANY evidence that the counts were rigged, that there was a nationwide conspiracy to steal the election? Because that's what you need to show. Supposedly anomalous data doesn't prove anything.
Sorry but the auditors were likely CPAs. CPAs know when something fishy is done. Apparently you didn't know that you can't buy your party out of their nefarious schemas forever.

These auditors said nothing fishy was done, that the machine count was inaccurate because they were using 40 year old voting machines, and the errors were caught during the November 12th hand recount.

The audit was simply to verify the hand count as correct.

This is a big fat nothing burger. The system worked. The result was correct, and that's what matters.
Of COURSE the "system" worked - said the guy who was joyful that they got away with it.

What exactly did they "get away with? Nothing. The hand recount on November 12th was used.

No result was changed. No errors were found. Nobody did anything illegal, improper nor was there any cheating.

Your desperation to find something to bitch about is palpable!!!!
 
You can't make this shit up. Yep....somehow voting machines made errors. Imagine that. And all the errors hurt the GOP candidates and helped the Dim candidates. I'm sure it has to be purely coincidence, right? :lol:


Here's the story.


Yet you are making stuff up.

Your title is simply a lie.
Nobody is making anything up.

You cheating shit biscuits thought that nobody would quibble over 4 electoral votes, and got totally careless.
LOL

You gotta be a special kinda stupid to think Democrats cheated in this election.

The audit revealed a difference of just a couple of hundred votes each, meanwhile, only one race was close and Republicans won every seat. Another seat by over 1000 votes and the other 2 seats by a couple of thousand votes. According to you idiots, Democrats cheated to lose. :cuckoo:

11032020-General-Election-Results
 
And so the dominoes are falling one by one.


Indeed! ;)


View attachment 490936



...Joe won dumbass, election was certified by Congress and by law nothing can reverse outcome after certification.

Can you deal with that?
So certain are you...
It's called facts of life.

Constitution planly states that the President shall be whoever is counted to have the most EC reprentative votes when the Congress convines for certification and there are specifically provisions to object at that time.

There are no Constitutional provisions for reconvining, there is not a re-do:


The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted; -- The person having the greatest number of votes for President, shall be the President

It's been over for a long time you fucking idiots.
 
And so the dominoes are falling one by one.


Indeed! ;)


View attachment 490936



...Joe won dumbass, election was certified by Congress and by law nothing can reverse outcome after certification.

Can you deal with that?
So certain are you...
It's called facts of life.

Constitution planly states that the President shall be whoever is counted to have the most EC reprentative votes when the Congress convines for certification and there are specifically provisions to object at that time.

There are no Constitutional provisions for reconvining, there is no recounting the outcome.

It's been over for a long time you fucking idiots.






If it is found that the election was fraudulent the SCOTUS has the power, and the obligation to remove the illegal resident of the White House.
 
And so the dominoes are falling one by one.


Indeed! ;)


View attachment 490936



...Joe won dumbass, election was certified by Congress and by law nothing can reverse outcome after certification.

Can you deal with that?
So certain are you...
It's called facts of life.

Constitution planly states that the President shall be whoever is counted to have the most EC reprentative votes when the Congress convines for certification and there are specifically provisions to object at that time.

There are no Constitutional provisions for reconvining, there is not a re-do:


The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted; -- The person having the greatest number of votes for President, shall be the President

It's been over for a long time you fucking idiots.
So you would advocate a permanent far Left one party state in the US, just like every other fucking far Left loon?
 
And so the dominoes are falling one by one.


Indeed! ;)


View attachment 490936



...Joe won dumbass, election was certified by Congress and by law nothing can reverse outcome after certification.

Can you deal with that?
So certain are you...
It's called facts of life.

Constitution planly states that the President shall be whoever is counted to have the most EC reprentative votes when the Congress convines for certification and there are specifically provisions to object at that time.

There are no Constitutional provisions for reconvining, there is no recounting the outcome.

It's been over for a long time you fucking idiots.
If it is found that the election was fraudulent the SCOTUS has the power, and the obligation to remove the illegal resident of the White House.

Cite the Consitution for any such SCOTUS power.

The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted; -- The person having the greatest number of votes for President, shall be the President

Thats it, there is not another way. You fools live out on the moon.
 
And so the dominoes are falling one by one.


Indeed! ;)


View attachment 490936



...Joe won dumbass, election was certified by Congress and by law nothing can reverse outcome after certification.

Can you deal with that?
So certain are you...
It's called facts of life.

Constitution planly states that the President shall be whoever is counted to have the most EC reprentative votes when the Congress convines for certification and there are specifically provisions to object at that time.

There are no Constitutional provisions for reconvining, there is not a re-do:


The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted; -- The person having the greatest number of votes for President, shall be the President

It's been over for a long time you fucking idiots.
So you would advocate a permanent far Left one party state in the US, just like every other fucking far Left loon?

No no, I would never. And I've got a crazy crazy idea for you Republicans to share into the power - WIN A FUCKING ELECTION.
 
And so the dominoes are falling one by one.


Indeed! ;)


View attachment 490936



...Joe won dumbass, election was certified by Congress and by law nothing can reverse outcome after certification.

Can you deal with that?
So certain are you...
It's called facts of life.

Constitution planly states that the President shall be whoever is counted to have the most EC reprentative votes when the Congress convines for certification and there are specifically provisions to object at that time.

There are no Constitutional provisions for reconvining, there is not a re-do:


The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted; -- The person having the greatest number of votes for President, shall be the President

It's been over for a long time you fucking idiots.
So you would advocate a permanent far Left one party state in the US, just like every other fucking far Left loon?

I've got a crazy crazy idea for you Republicans to share into the power - WIN A FN ELECTION.







If the election is found to be fraudulent, dumbass, it WAS won.
 
And so the dominoes are falling one by one.


Indeed! ;)


View attachment 490936



...Joe won dumbass, election was certified by Congress and by law nothing can reverse outcome after certification.

Can you deal with that?
So certain are you...
It's called facts of life.

Constitution planly states that the President shall be whoever is counted to have the most EC reprentative votes when the Congress convines for certification and there are specifically provisions to object at that time.

There are no Constitutional provisions for reconvining, there is not a re-do:


The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted; -- The person having the greatest number of votes for President, shall be the President

It's been over for a long time you fucking idiots.
So you would advocate a permanent far Left one party state in the US, just like every other fucking far Left loon?

I've got a crazy crazy idea for you Republicans to share into the power - WIN A FN ELECTION.

If the election is found to be fraudulent, dumbass, it WAS won.

There has been no eleciton found fraudulent, reality really sucks for you nutsbags doesn't it?
 
These auditors said nothing fishy was done, that the machine count was inaccurate because they were using 40 year old voting machines, and the errors were caught during the November 12th hand recount.

The audit was simply to verify the hand count as correct.

This is a big fat nothing burger. The system worked. The result was correct, and that's what matters.
Ruiner.
 
And so the dominoes are falling one by one.


Indeed! ;)


View attachment 490936



...Joe won dumbass, election was certified by Congress and by law nothing can reverse outcome after certification.

Can you deal with that?
So certain are you...
It's called facts of life.

Constitution planly states that the President shall be whoever is counted to have the most EC reprentative votes when the Congress convines for certification and there are specifically provisions to object at that time.

There are no Constitutional provisions for reconvining, there is not a re-do:


The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted; -- The person having the greatest number of votes for President, shall be the President

It's been over for a long time you fucking idiots.
So you would advocate a permanent far Left one party state in the US, just like every other fucking far Left loon?

I've got a crazy crazy idea for you Republicans to share into the power - WIN A FN ELECTION.

If the election is found to be fraudulent, dumbass, it WAS won.

There has been no eleciton found fraudulent, reality really sucks for you nutsbags doesn't it?







Yet. These audits are finding all sorts of fraud though. Now, we have to find a Court that hasn't been bought by the Chinese American Communist Association.
 
And so the dominoes are falling one by one.


Indeed! ;)


View attachment 490936



...Joe won dumbass, election was certified by Congress and by law nothing can reverse outcome after certification.

Can you deal with that?
So certain are you...
It's called facts of life.

Constitution planly states that the President shall be whoever is counted to have the most EC reprentative votes when the Congress convines for certification and there are specifically provisions to object at that time.

There are no Constitutional provisions for reconvining, there is no recounting the outcome.

It's been over for a long time you fucking idiots.






If it is found that the election was fraudulent the SCOTUS has the power, and the obligation to remove the illegal resident of the White House.
Nope. The SCOTUS would rule like they did in 2000 -- times up, baby.
 

Forum List

Back
Top