You can't make this shit up. Yep....somehow voting machines made errors. Imagine that. And all the errors hurt the GOP candidates and helped the Dim candidates. I'm sure it has to be purely coincidence, right?
Here's the story.
May 17—PEMBROKE — The first review in the forensic audit of Windham election returns has produced different vote totals than were reported right after the Nov. 3 election. The four Republican candidates for state representative in Windham each got roughly 220 more votes through an audit of...
www.yahoo.com
Hmm... still no evidence of fraud dumbstruck.
Oh?
Me thinks you are willfully blind.
What did I miss? I read the article. The handcounts were different than the machine counts. Any reason to trust the hand counts over the machine counts? More importantly, is there ANY evidence that the counts were rigged, that there was a nationwide conspiracy to steal the election? Because that's what you need to show. Supposedly anomalous data doesn't prove anything.
Sorry but the auditors were likely CPAs. CPAs know when something fishy is done. Apparently you didn't know that you can't buy your party out of their nefarious schemas forever.
These auditors said nothing fishy was done, that the machine count was inaccurate because they were using 40 year old voting machines, and the errors were caught during the November 12th hand recount.
The audit was simply to verify the hand count as correct.
This is a big fat nothing burger. The system worked. The result was correct, and that's what matters.
