Next 3-4 Weeks Will Be Explosive

[EvilEyeFleegle]

"I would Think." Mistake #1.
"Thinks there was Fraud". #2
"It is like it has been proved." #3

If you went to court with these arguments, you would be dismissed, while being laughed at.
Rudy went to court with these arguments, and guess what.

Rudy was dismissed and laughed at. Repeatedly. "Yeah Rudy, He's our man."

Oh yeah..and he was disbarred and sanctioned--and sued by Dominion~

 

[candycorn]

I am sure the attacks on the source will be the most important thing to some, not what was said.

Bernie Kerik: Next 3-4 Weeks Will Be Explosive – Will Vindicate Everything We’ve Been Saying – Election Was Stolen​

Bernie Kerik: Next 3-4 Weeks Will Be Explosive - Will Vindicate Everything We've Been Saying - Election Was Stolen (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

Former New York City Police Commissioner Bernard Kerik joined Steve Bannon on Monday morning on The War Room.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

You people keep asking when, now you know. Again, not a conspiracy theory, it is a factual report on what was said.

No one is giving up. Very cool.

Any Arrests yet?

 

[EvilEyeFleegle]

They will not allow any evidence of fraud to get to court. Did you miss that?

Did you miss the fact that not a single time was fraud alleged in any of the filings? Not once??

 

[Lastamender]

Ded you miss the fact that not a single time was fraud alleged in any of the filings? Not once??

No. I did not. They did not need to use the word fraud, just have the court negate the crooked agreements made without the legislatures of states. That is against the law and would decertify the elections in GA and WI. They could have proven it easily. That is why no court heard it.

 

[Winco]

They will not allow any evidence of fraud to get to court. Did you miss that?

Whose they?

Are 'they' the judges that laughed at Rudy, when he said he had evidence, then when asked to see it, Rudy claimed the 'so-called evidence wasn't ready'.

That evidence????? You fucking clown, How many times do you need to be shown that RUDY is the Fraud?

 

[meaner gene]

Did you miss the fact that not a single time was fraud alleged in any of the filings? Not once??

No. I did not. They did not need to use the word fraud, just have the court negate the crooked agreements made without the legislatures of states. That is against the law and would decertify the elections in GA and WI. They could have proven it easily. That is why no court heard it.

They needed to use the word "fraud". But even when Rudy Guiliani was asked that directly, he said he wasn't alleging "fraud". Because "fraud" required a higher degree of proof. And they had so little evidence of error, no less deliberate fraud.

 

[meaner gene]

That is against the law and would decertify the elections in GA and WI. They could have proven it easily. That is why no court heard it.

Actually the court would be hard pressed to decertify an election, that elected the Georgia legislature, effectively shutting down the Georgia legislature until new elections could be held.

 

[Lastamender]

They needed to use the word "fraud". But even when Rudy Guiliani was asked that directly, he said he wasn't alleging "fraud". Because "fraud" required a higher degree of proof. And they had so little evidence of error, no less deliberate fraud.

The fact that several states made deals to accept votes without the legislatures approval ( a law) is not little evidence. It is breaking that state's law.

 

[meaner gene]

You don't decertify elections lightly. The ripple effect would be huge. Such as the entire Georgia legislature house was elected in 2020. Mayors, city councils, and even judges were elected in 2020. To invalidate the election would mean those offices would have to be vacated, with no legal way to fill most of them, except by election. The decisions made by them legally void, thereby effectively shutting down government.

 

[bodecea]

Any Arrests yet?

Still waiting for this explosion.

 

[meaner gene]

The fact that several states made deals to accept votes without the legislatures approval ( a law) is not little evidence. It is breaking that state's law.

What you neglect is that the supreme courts of those states allowed those changes, either by direct acclimation or by tacit approval in accordance with the states constitution.

And as you should know, the states highest court are the one's who decide what that states constitution says, and what it allows.

 

[Lastamender]

You don't decertify elections lightly. The ripple effect would be huge. Such as the entire Georgia legislature house was elected in 2020. Mayors, city councils, and even judges were elected in 2020. To invalidate the election would mean those offices would have to be vacated, with no legal way to fill most of them, except by election. The decisions made by them legally void, thereby effectively shutting down government.

So a fraudulent president is OK? That is what you are saying.

 

[Lastamender]

What you neglect is that the supreme courts of those states allowed those changes, either by direct acclimation or by tacit approval in accordance with the states constitution.

And as you should know, the states highest court are the one's who decide what that states constitution says, and what it allows.

The courts do not have that authority. They do not pass legislation.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Yep. Although ignorance and you go together well.

Psychological projection involves projecting undesirable feelings or emotions onto someone else, rather than admitting to or dealing with the unwanted feelings.

 

[the other mike]

 

[Lastamender]

Psychological projection involves projecting undesirable feelings or emotions onto someone else, rather than admitting to or dealing with the unwanted feelings.

Exactly.

 

[meaner gene]

So a fraudulent president is OK? That is what you are saying.

Actually the constitution speaks of such things.

Congress may by Law provide for the Case of Removal, Death, Resignation or Inability, both of the President and Vice President, declaring what Officer shall then act as President, and such Officer shall act accordingly, until the Disability be removed, or a President shall be elected.

 

[meaner gene]

The courts do not have that authority. They do not pass legislation.

Actually the states constitution gives the courts that authority, as did the case of Marbury v Madison.

 

[Lastamender]

Actually the states constitution gives the courts that authority, as did the case of Marbury v Madison.

The State legislature has plenary power over elections in their state.

 

[meaner gene]

The State legislature has plenary power over elections in their state.

And the states through that legislature gave to the executive the power to carry out the election, and to the courts the power to settle all disputes over the election. Including interpretation of the statutes, and the constitutionality of any issue.