Next 3-4 Weeks Will Be Explosive

Faun said:
Nope, just you paranoid delusional freaks are. At least in your empty heads.
Click to expand...
There is nothing paranoid about believing the 2020 election was stolen. You are the paranoid one still here trying to get people to believe your lies.
 
Hellbilly said:
The election was not stolen and the only fraud is you
Click to expand...
The election was stolen. There is not one doubt in my mind. And anyone with a brain should realize that. Sorry you are just not qualified for an opinion.
 
Lastamender said:
There is nothing paranoid about believing the 2020 election was stolen. You are the paranoid one still here trying to get people to believe your lies.
Click to expand...

2Ā¾ years have passed. Zero claims of election fraud have been proven to be true. Every count affirmed the results. Every recount reaffirmed the results. Every audit re-reaffirmed the results. Every investigation re-re-reaffirmed the results. Every state certified their results. Trump lawyers have had law licenses suspended for lying about election fraud and/or they're being sued for lying about election fraud.

So yeah, one must be batshit insane and paranoid to ignore all that and still think the election was stolen.
 
Faun said:
2Ā¾ years have passed. Zero claims of election fraud have been proven to be true. Every count affirmed the results. Every recount reaffirmed the results. Every audit re-reaffirmed the results. Every investigation re-re-reaffirmed the results. Every state certified their results. Trump lawyers have had law licenses suspended for lying about election fraud and/or they're being sued for lying about election fraud.

So yeah, one must be batshit insane and paranoid to ignore all that and still think the election was stolen.
Click to expand...
One was just proven on MI. Try and keep up.
 
Hellbilly said:
Fake news
Click to expand...
An anonymous election integrity non-profit recently commissioned respected Lansing, Michigan
Forensic Analysis firm, Speckin Forensics, LLC to ā€œexamine and recount the ballots, envelopes,
totals tapes, record books and other documentsā€ from the 2020 election in Detroit. This
included all 134 Absent Voter Counting Boards (AVCBā€™s) and all 503 precincts. The firmā€™s team
spent a month from April 17th to May 17th at the Detroit Department of Elections, where they
were permitted to view, but not touch the ballots.The DOE staff handled all ballots and assisted
in the counting process.
Key findings of the report, released on July 26th include:
ā€¢ In two of the 134 counting boards, AVCBā€™s #79 and #122, the analysts paired up each
ballot envelope with its corresponding ballot application. This was a long and
painstaking process, according to the team leader, Erich Spekin.
Spekin and his team discovered that a significant percentage of the ballot applications
turned up missing.
Note: that under Michigan Election Law, a signed absent voter ballot application is an
eligibility requirement for absentee voting. MCL 168.759 states clearly:
Subject to section 761(2), a clerk or assistant clerk shall not deliver an absent voter ballot to an applicant
who does not sign the application.
Thus, a signed application is needed to obtain an absent voter ballot. Yet, in 20% of
cases in one Detroit absent voter counting board and 12% in another, this eligibility
requirement was not met. These ballots were therefore illegitimate and in a non-
corrupted election system would have been rejected.
ā€¢ Spekin extrapolated the 20 and 12 percent numbers and stated:
It would follow that if all the boards were compared in this manner, with approximately 170,000 AV
ballots, the range at 8%-20% would be 13,600 to 34,000 ballots with no application requesting the ballot.
Of course, unless and until the rest of the AVCBā€™s are evaluated, we wonā€™t know if the
numbers are higher or lower. However, what we do know is that barring some
ā€œmiraculousā€ discovery of the missing ballot applications (which would be highly
suspicious after two and half years), we now have documented, forensic evidence
supportive of election fraud in Detroit. Indeed this evidence can now be combined with
the eyewitness evidence of the numerous challengersā€™ affidavits as documented in the
authorā€™s and MC4EIā€™s TCF Timeline: the 2020 Election in Detroit.* That report found that
the central marker for fraud was the fact that so many challengers reported seeing
ballots not found in the poll books, meaning they were not listed in the precinct-specific
download of that section of the state voter roll. In Michigan itā€™s known as the Qualified
Voter File or QVF.
 
Last edited:
Lastamender said:
An anonymous election integrity non-profit recently commissioned respected Lansing, Michigan
Forensic Analysis firm, Speckin Forensics, LLC to ā€œexamine and recount the ballots, envelopes,
totals tapes, record books and other documentsā€ from the 2020 election in Detroit. This
included all 134 Absent Voter Counting Boards (AVCBā€™s) and all 503 precincts. The firmā€™s team
spent a month from April 17th to May 17th at the Detroit Department of Elections, where they
were permitted to view, but not touch the ballots.The DOE staff handled all ballots and assisted
in the counting process.
Key findings of the report, released on July 26th include:
ā€¢ In two of the 134 counting boards, AVCBā€™s #79 and #122, the analysts paired up each
ballot envelope with its corresponding ballot application. This was a long and
painstaking process, according to the team leader, Erich Spekin.
Spekin and his team discovered that a significant percentage of the ballot applications
turned up missing.
Note: that under Michigan Election Law, a signed absent voter ballot application is an
eligibility requirement for absentee voting. MCL 168.759 states clearly:
Subject to section 761(2), a clerk or assistant clerk shall not deliver an absent voter ballot to an applicant
who does not sign the application.
Thus, a signed application is needed to obtain an absent voter ballot. Yet, in 20% of
cases in one Detroit absent voter counting board and 12% in another, this eligibility
requirement was not met. These ballots were therefore illegitimate and in a non-
corrupted election system would have been rejected.
ā€¢ Spekin extrapolated the 20 and 12 percent numbers and stated:
It would follow that if all the boards were compared in this manner, with approximately 170,000 AV
ballots, the range at 8%-20% would be 13,600 to 34,000 ballots with no application requesting the ballot.
Of course, unless and until the rest of the AVCBā€™s are evaluated, we wonā€™t know if the
numbers are higher or lower. However, what we do know is that barring some
ā€œmiraculousā€ discovery of the missing ballot applications (which would be highly
suspicious after two and half years), we now have documented, forensic evidence
supportive of election fraud in Detroit. Indeed this evidence can now be combined with
the eyewitness evidence of the numerous challengersā€™ affidavits as documented in the
authorā€™s and MC4EIā€™s TCF Timeline: the 2020 Election in Detroit.* That report found that
the central marker for fraud was the fact that so many challengers reported seeing
ballots not found in the poll books, meaning they were not listed in the precinct-specific
download of that section of the state voter roll. In Michigan itā€™s known as the Qualified
Voter File or QVF.
Click to expand...
tl:dr
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

The Big Lie

< Previous Thread

African Calls Asian Cop A "Chink" (video)

Next Thread >

Similar threads

Doc7505
FBI Director Kash Patel Turns Over First Batch of Explosive Jan. 6 Pipe Bomb Docs to House Republicans
Replies
7
Views
161
Delldude
Delldude
Seymour Flops
Another Big Democrat uses the term A**h*les to Describe a perception of Democrats
Replies
1
Views
70
mudwhistle
mudwhistle
Votto
Looks like China will dictate who the next Pope is
Replies
4
Views
94
luiza
L
Doc7505
Deep State Just Got Deeper ā€“ Recorded Evidence of the Real Insurrection
Replies
10
Views
162
The Sage of Main Street
T
Zafira Cherry
Trump was so upset by ā€˜small handsā€™ reference in 1984 GQ cover story he told staff to buy up all copies, writer says
Replies
14
Views
172
Blaster
Blaster

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom