Newly Elected Congresswoman Who Grew Up in Soviet Ukraine Gives Stark Warning About Socialism

[hadit]

Are you saying that poverty causes crime and drug use?

Yes. Some localities are even raising the amount of property theft before police will bother to get involved. Why would anyone "work hard" to commit crime if they could go on unemployment compensation instead. We could abolish our War on Crime via market friendly public policy instead of your socialism on a national basis while alleging y'all are not really like that in socialism threads.

Dude, again, you're talking about welfare, NOT UC. And I hate to break it to you, but crime and drug use happens behind the gates of the wealthy gated communities just like it does anywhere else, they just do a better job of hiding it and escaping the consequences. Or do you think Hunter Biden will get the same jail sentence for his crack use like Jamal from the hood would get?

Equal protection of the laws is socialism not capitalism especially when it promotes the general welfare.

I pay more in taxes than some and less than some. Is that equal protection under the law?
I can't get food stamps or subsidized housing. Is that equal protection under the law?

Or does your pet phrase only apply to your pet issues?

You can't be very moral if you are complaining about you being fortunate enough to make a decent living by participating in the market for labor.

I'm asking you to think. You carry on ad nauseum about equal protection under the law when it comes to welfare, so...

I pay more in taxes than some and less than some. Is that equal protection under the law?
I can't get food stamps or subsidized housing. Is that equal protection under the law?

 

[danielpalos]

Means tested welfare is for complex poverty because solving for a simple poverty of capital may not be enough under our form of Capitalism.

What is the difference between complex and simple poverty?

Simple poverty can be solved with mere Capital under our form of Capitalism.

 

[danielpalos]

Are you saying that poverty causes crime and drug use?

Yes. Some localities are even raising the amount of property theft before police will bother to get involved. Why would anyone "work hard" to commit crime if they could go on unemployment compensation instead. We could abolish our War on Crime via market friendly public policy instead of your socialism on a national basis while alleging y'all are not really like that in socialism threads.

That is foolish.
Do you realize that when you get unemployment, you are just getting your own money back, that you had withheld before?
There is no welfare "free ride" in the US, or anywhere for that matter.

Better public policy could actually solve our problems by not sacrificing the End to the Means. Employment is at the will of either party. Equal protection of the law for unemployment compensation could eliminate our homeless problem while automatically stabilizing our economy better.

And this is why you are rightly considered the most extremely dogmatic poster I've ever seen. No matter what, no matter how many times you get destroyed, you continue spouting the exact same phrases over and over again. A bot is more flexible.

You never answered my questions from before:

I pay more in taxes than some people. Am I not getting equal protection under the law?
I can't get food stamps and subsidized housing. Am I not getting equal protection under the law?

Only the right wing, never gets it. I am merely promoting the general welfare.

You carry on ad nauseum about equal protection under the law.

I pay more in taxes than some people. Am I not getting equal protection under the law?
I can't get food stamps and subsidized housing. Am I not getting equal protection under the law?

Why do you make so much if you believe you are so poor?

 

[danielpalos]

Are you saying that poverty causes crime and drug use?

Yes. Some localities are even raising the amount of property theft before police will bother to get involved. Why would anyone "work hard" to commit crime if they could go on unemployment compensation instead. We could abolish our War on Crime via market friendly public policy instead of your socialism on a national basis while alleging y'all are not really like that in socialism threads.

That is foolish.
Do you realize that when you get unemployment, you are just getting your own money back, that you had withheld before?
There is no welfare "free ride" in the US, or anywhere for that matter.

Better public policy could actually solve our problems by not sacrificing the End to the Means. Employment is at the will of either party. Equal protection of the law for unemployment compensation could eliminate our homeless problem while automatically stabilizing our economy better.

And this is why you are rightly considered the most extremely dogmatic poster I've ever seen. No matter what, no matter how many times you get destroyed, you continue spouting the exact same phrases over and over again. A bot is more flexible.

You never answered my questions from before:

I pay more in taxes than some people. Am I not getting equal protection under the law?
I can't get food stamps and subsidized housing. Am I not getting equal protection under the law?

Only the right wing, never gets it. I am merely promoting the general welfare.

Why are you doing that?

I am a federalist and being faithful to our federal doctrine and federal Constitution. It is the secular and temporal "bible" for the militia of the United States. What is not covered by our Ten simple Amendments?

That's weird -
The 10 amendments were written to limit the Government - yet you wish to expand the Government.

Promoting the general welfare should include better solutions at lower cost. Actually solving some of our problems could lower the Cost of Government. Only the Right Wing denies and disparages that concept. Capitalism, what is That, sayeth the Right Wing every time it comes up.

 

[Billiejeens]

Are you saying that poverty causes crime and drug use?

Yes. Some localities are even raising the amount of property theft before police will bother to get involved. Why would anyone "work hard" to commit crime if they could go on unemployment compensation instead. We could abolish our War on Crime via market friendly public policy instead of your socialism on a national basis while alleging y'all are not really like that in socialism threads.

That is foolish.
Do you realize that when you get unemployment, you are just getting your own money back, that you had withheld before?
There is no welfare "free ride" in the US, or anywhere for that matter.

Better public policy could actually solve our problems by not sacrificing the End to the Means. Employment is at the will of either party. Equal protection of the law for unemployment compensation could eliminate our homeless problem while automatically stabilizing our economy better.

And this is why you are rightly considered the most extremely dogmatic poster I've ever seen. No matter what, no matter how many times you get destroyed, you continue spouting the exact same phrases over and over again. A bot is more flexible.

You never answered my questions from before:

I pay more in taxes than some people. Am I not getting equal protection under the law?
I can't get food stamps and subsidized housing. Am I not getting equal protection under the law?

Only the right wing, never gets it. I am merely promoting the general welfare.

Why are you doing that?

I am a federalist and being faithful to our federal doctrine and federal Constitution. It is the secular and temporal "bible" for the militia of the United States. What is not covered by our Ten simple Amendments?

That's weird -
The 10 amendments were written to limit the Government - yet you wish to expand the Government.

Promoting the general welfare should include better solutions at lower cost. Actually solving some of our problems could lower the Cost of Government. Only the Right Wing denies and disparages that concept. Capitalism, what is That, sayeth the Right Wing every time it comes up.

You are Bizarre

 

[danielpalos]

Are you saying that poverty causes crime and drug use?

Yes. Some localities are even raising the amount of property theft before police will bother to get involved. Why would anyone "work hard" to commit crime if they could go on unemployment compensation instead. We could abolish our War on Crime via market friendly public policy instead of your socialism on a national basis while alleging y'all are not really like that in socialism threads.

That is foolish.
Do you realize that when you get unemployment, you are just getting your own money back, that you had withheld before?
There is no welfare "free ride" in the US, or anywhere for that matter.

Better public policy could actually solve our problems by not sacrificing the End to the Means. Employment is at the will of either party. Equal protection of the law for unemployment compensation could eliminate our homeless problem while automatically stabilizing our economy better.

And this is why you are rightly considered the most extremely dogmatic poster I've ever seen. No matter what, no matter how many times you get destroyed, you continue spouting the exact same phrases over and over again. A bot is more flexible.

You never answered my questions from before:

I pay more in taxes than some people. Am I not getting equal protection under the law?
I can't get food stamps and subsidized housing. Am I not getting equal protection under the law?

Only the right wing, never gets it. I am merely promoting the general welfare.

Why are you doing that?

I am a federalist and being faithful to our federal doctrine and federal Constitution. It is the secular and temporal "bible" for the militia of the United States. What is not covered by our Ten simple Amendments?

That's weird -
The 10 amendments were written to limit the Government - yet you wish to expand the Government.

Promoting the general welfare should include better solutions at lower cost. Actually solving some of our problems could lower the Cost of Government. Only the Right Wing denies and disparages that concept. Capitalism, what is That, sayeth the Right Wing every time it comes up.

You are Bizarre

You are full of fallacy (of argumentum ad hominem).

 

[Orangecat]

Simple poverty can be solved with mere Capital under our form of Capitalism.

A fancy way of saying "give them money"? Whose money?
Why can't you solve complex poverty with the same childish solution?

 

[danielpalos]

Simple poverty can be solved with mere Capital under our form of Capitalism.

A fancy way of saying "give them money"? Whose money?
Why can't you solve complex poverty with the same childish solution?

Solving simple poverty also corrects for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment and automatically stabilizes the cycle of structural forms of unemployment.

 

[hadit]

Are you saying that poverty causes crime and drug use?

Yes. Some localities are even raising the amount of property theft before police will bother to get involved. Why would anyone "work hard" to commit crime if they could go on unemployment compensation instead. We could abolish our War on Crime via market friendly public policy instead of your socialism on a national basis while alleging y'all are not really like that in socialism threads.

That is foolish.
Do you realize that when you get unemployment, you are just getting your own money back, that you had withheld before?
There is no welfare "free ride" in the US, or anywhere for that matter.

Better public policy could actually solve our problems by not sacrificing the End to the Means. Employment is at the will of either party. Equal protection of the law for unemployment compensation could eliminate our homeless problem while automatically stabilizing our economy better.

And this is why you are rightly considered the most extremely dogmatic poster I've ever seen. No matter what, no matter how many times you get destroyed, you continue spouting the exact same phrases over and over again. A bot is more flexible.

You never answered my questions from before:

I pay more in taxes than some people. Am I not getting equal protection under the law?
I can't get food stamps and subsidized housing. Am I not getting equal protection under the law?

Only the right wing, never gets it. I am merely promoting the general welfare.

You carry on ad nauseum about equal protection under the law.

I pay more in taxes than some people. Am I not getting equal protection under the law?
I can't get food stamps and subsidized housing. Am I not getting equal protection under the law?

Why do you make so much if you believe you are so poor?

I didn't say I was poor. Answer the questions:

I pay more in taxes than some people. Am I not getting equal protection under the law?
I can't get food stamps and subsidized housing. Am I not getting equal protection under the law?

 

[hadit]

Are you saying that poverty causes crime and drug use?

Yes. Some localities are even raising the amount of property theft before police will bother to get involved. Why would anyone "work hard" to commit crime if they could go on unemployment compensation instead. We could abolish our War on Crime via market friendly public policy instead of your socialism on a national basis while alleging y'all are not really like that in socialism threads.

That is foolish.
Do you realize that when you get unemployment, you are just getting your own money back, that you had withheld before?
There is no welfare "free ride" in the US, or anywhere for that matter.

Better public policy could actually solve our problems by not sacrificing the End to the Means. Employment is at the will of either party. Equal protection of the law for unemployment compensation could eliminate our homeless problem while automatically stabilizing our economy better.

And this is why you are rightly considered the most extremely dogmatic poster I've ever seen. No matter what, no matter how many times you get destroyed, you continue spouting the exact same phrases over and over again. A bot is more flexible.

You never answered my questions from before:

I pay more in taxes than some people. Am I not getting equal protection under the law?
I can't get food stamps and subsidized housing. Am I not getting equal protection under the law?

Only the right wing, never gets it. I am merely promoting the general welfare.

Why are you doing that?

I am a federalist and being faithful to our federal doctrine and federal Constitution. It is the secular and temporal "bible" for the militia of the United States. What is not covered by our Ten simple Amendments?

That's weird -
The 10 amendments were written to limit the Government - yet you wish to expand the Government.

Promoting the general welfare should include better solutions at lower cost. Actually solving some of our problems could lower the Cost of Government. Only the Right Wing denies and disparages that concept. Capitalism, what is That, sayeth the Right Wing every time it comes up.

We've thrown trillions at poverty and it's still with us. Throwing more won't solve the problem. Acknowledging that the poor in our country live better than the middle class in many countries would be a start.

 

[Orangecat]

Solving simple poverty also corrects for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment and automatically stabilizes the cycle of structural forms of unemployment.

You seem confused. Here are the questions again:
1. Is that just a fancy way of saying "give them money"? (You are advocating giving away money, correct?)
2. Whose money?
3. Why can't you solve complex poverty with the same childish solution?

Try not to just regurgitate some pre-programmed propaganda instead of addressing the actual questions this time.

 

[danielpalos]

Are you saying that poverty causes crime and drug use?

Yes. Some localities are even raising the amount of property theft before police will bother to get involved. Why would anyone "work hard" to commit crime if they could go on unemployment compensation instead. We could abolish our War on Crime via market friendly public policy instead of your socialism on a national basis while alleging y'all are not really like that in socialism threads.

That is foolish.
Do you realize that when you get unemployment, you are just getting your own money back, that you had withheld before?
There is no welfare "free ride" in the US, or anywhere for that matter.

Better public policy could actually solve our problems by not sacrificing the End to the Means. Employment is at the will of either party. Equal protection of the law for unemployment compensation could eliminate our homeless problem while automatically stabilizing our economy better.

And this is why you are rightly considered the most extremely dogmatic poster I've ever seen. No matter what, no matter how many times you get destroyed, you continue spouting the exact same phrases over and over again. A bot is more flexible.

You never answered my questions from before:

I pay more in taxes than some people. Am I not getting equal protection under the law?
I can't get food stamps and subsidized housing. Am I not getting equal protection under the law?

Only the right wing, never gets it. I am merely promoting the general welfare.

You carry on ad nauseum about equal protection under the law.

I pay more in taxes than some people. Am I not getting equal protection under the law?
I can't get food stamps and subsidized housing. Am I not getting equal protection under the law?

Why do you make so much if you believe you are so poor?

I didn't say I was poor. Answer the questions:

I pay more in taxes than some people. Am I not getting equal protection under the law?
I can't get food stamps and subsidized housing. Am I not getting equal protection under the law?

lol.

“The law, in its majestic equality, forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal their bread.”

― Anatole France

 

[danielpalos]

Are you saying that poverty causes crime and drug use?

Yes. Some localities are even raising the amount of property theft before police will bother to get involved. Why would anyone "work hard" to commit crime if they could go on unemployment compensation instead. We could abolish our War on Crime via market friendly public policy instead of your socialism on a national basis while alleging y'all are not really like that in socialism threads.

That is foolish.
Do you realize that when you get unemployment, you are just getting your own money back, that you had withheld before?
There is no welfare "free ride" in the US, or anywhere for that matter.

Better public policy could actually solve our problems by not sacrificing the End to the Means. Employment is at the will of either party. Equal protection of the law for unemployment compensation could eliminate our homeless problem while automatically stabilizing our economy better.

And this is why you are rightly considered the most extremely dogmatic poster I've ever seen. No matter what, no matter how many times you get destroyed, you continue spouting the exact same phrases over and over again. A bot is more flexible.

You never answered my questions from before:

I pay more in taxes than some people. Am I not getting equal protection under the law?
I can't get food stamps and subsidized housing. Am I not getting equal protection under the law?

Only the right wing, never gets it. I am merely promoting the general welfare.

Why are you doing that?

I am a federalist and being faithful to our federal doctrine and federal Constitution. It is the secular and temporal "bible" for the militia of the United States. What is not covered by our Ten simple Amendments?

That's weird -
The 10 amendments were written to limit the Government - yet you wish to expand the Government.

Promoting the general welfare should include better solutions at lower cost. Actually solving some of our problems could lower the Cost of Government. Only the Right Wing denies and disparages that concept. Capitalism, what is That, sayeth the Right Wing every time it comes up.

We've thrown trillions at poverty and it's still with us. Throwing more won't solve the problem. Acknowledging that the poor in our country live better than the middle class in many countries would be a start.

Conspiracy or coincidence?

We have quantum supremacy now and economics is not rocket science.

Automatic stabilization of our economy now!

 

[Billiejeens]

Solving simple poverty also corrects for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment and automatically stabilizes the cycle of structural forms of unemployment.

You seem confused. Here are the questions again:
1. Is that just a fancy way of saying "give them money"? (You are advocating giving away money, correct?)
2. Whose money?
3. Why can't you solve complex poverty with the same childish solution?

Try not to just regurgitate some pre-programmed propaganda instead of addressing the actual questions this time.

I think he just opens the page of some book he is reading and copies down a couple of sentences randomly.
it is not cohesive
It is not consistent
He doesn't answer any questions - it's just more random words.

 

[danielpalos]

Solving simple poverty also corrects for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment and automatically stabilizes the cycle of structural forms of unemployment.

You seem confused. Here are the questions again:
1. Is that just a fancy way of saying "give them money"? (You are advocating giving away money, correct?)
2. Whose money?
3. Why can't you solve complex poverty with the same childish solution?

Try not to just regurgitate some pre-programmed propaganda instead of addressing the actual questions this time.

I gave you the answer. You are simply begging the question.

 

[hadit]

Are you saying that poverty causes crime and drug use?

Yes. Some localities are even raising the amount of property theft before police will bother to get involved. Why would anyone "work hard" to commit crime if they could go on unemployment compensation instead. We could abolish our War on Crime via market friendly public policy instead of your socialism on a national basis while alleging y'all are not really like that in socialism threads.

That is foolish.
Do you realize that when you get unemployment, you are just getting your own money back, that you had withheld before?
There is no welfare "free ride" in the US, or anywhere for that matter.

Better public policy could actually solve our problems by not sacrificing the End to the Means. Employment is at the will of either party. Equal protection of the law for unemployment compensation could eliminate our homeless problem while automatically stabilizing our economy better.

And this is why you are rightly considered the most extremely dogmatic poster I've ever seen. No matter what, no matter how many times you get destroyed, you continue spouting the exact same phrases over and over again. A bot is more flexible.

You never answered my questions from before:

I pay more in taxes than some people. Am I not getting equal protection under the law?
I can't get food stamps and subsidized housing. Am I not getting equal protection under the law?

Only the right wing, never gets it. I am merely promoting the general welfare.

You carry on ad nauseum about equal protection under the law.

I pay more in taxes than some people. Am I not getting equal protection under the law?
I can't get food stamps and subsidized housing. Am I not getting equal protection under the law?

Why do you make so much if you believe you are so poor?

I didn't say I was poor. Answer the questions:

I pay more in taxes than some people. Am I not getting equal protection under the law?
I can't get food stamps and subsidized housing. Am I not getting equal protection under the law?

lol.

“The law, in its majestic equality, forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal their bread.”

― Anatole France

I pay more in taxes than some people. Am I not getting equal protection under the law?
I can't get food stamps and subsidized housing. Am I not getting equal protection under the law?

 

[danielpalos]

Solving simple poverty also corrects for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment and automatically stabilizes the cycle of structural forms of unemployment.

You seem confused. Here are the questions again:
1. Is that just a fancy way of saying "give them money"? (You are advocating giving away money, correct?)
2. Whose money?
3. Why can't you solve complex poverty with the same childish solution?

Try not to just regurgitate some pre-programmed propaganda instead of addressing the actual questions this time.

I think he just opens the page of some book he is reading and copies down a couple of sentences randomly.
it is not cohesive
It is not consistent
He doesn't answer any questions - it's just more random words.

You need valid arguments for rebuttal not mere ad hominems.

 

[hadit]

Are you saying that poverty causes crime and drug use?

Yes. Some localities are even raising the amount of property theft before police will bother to get involved. Why would anyone "work hard" to commit crime if they could go on unemployment compensation instead. We could abolish our War on Crime via market friendly public policy instead of your socialism on a national basis while alleging y'all are not really like that in socialism threads.

That is foolish.
Do you realize that when you get unemployment, you are just getting your own money back, that you had withheld before?
There is no welfare "free ride" in the US, or anywhere for that matter.

Better public policy could actually solve our problems by not sacrificing the End to the Means. Employment is at the will of either party. Equal protection of the law for unemployment compensation could eliminate our homeless problem while automatically stabilizing our economy better.

And this is why you are rightly considered the most extremely dogmatic poster I've ever seen. No matter what, no matter how many times you get destroyed, you continue spouting the exact same phrases over and over again. A bot is more flexible.

You never answered my questions from before:

I pay more in taxes than some people. Am I not getting equal protection under the law?
I can't get food stamps and subsidized housing. Am I not getting equal protection under the law?

Only the right wing, never gets it. I am merely promoting the general welfare.

Why are you doing that?

I am a federalist and being faithful to our federal doctrine and federal Constitution. It is the secular and temporal "bible" for the militia of the United States. What is not covered by our Ten simple Amendments?

That's weird -
The 10 amendments were written to limit the Government - yet you wish to expand the Government.

Promoting the general welfare should include better solutions at lower cost. Actually solving some of our problems could lower the Cost of Government. Only the Right Wing denies and disparages that concept. Capitalism, what is That, sayeth the Right Wing every time it comes up.

We've thrown trillions at poverty and it's still with us. Throwing more won't solve the problem. Acknowledging that the poor in our country live better than the middle class in many countries would be a start.

Conspiracy or coincidence?

We have quantum supremacy now and economics is not rocket science.

Automatic stabilization of our economy now!

Do you deny that the poor in our country live better than most around the world?

 

[danielpalos]

Are you saying that poverty causes crime and drug use?

Yes. Some localities are even raising the amount of property theft before police will bother to get involved. Why would anyone "work hard" to commit crime if they could go on unemployment compensation instead. We could abolish our War on Crime via market friendly public policy instead of your socialism on a national basis while alleging y'all are not really like that in socialism threads.

That is foolish.
Do you realize that when you get unemployment, you are just getting your own money back, that you had withheld before?
There is no welfare "free ride" in the US, or anywhere for that matter.

Better public policy could actually solve our problems by not sacrificing the End to the Means. Employment is at the will of either party. Equal protection of the law for unemployment compensation could eliminate our homeless problem while automatically stabilizing our economy better.

And this is why you are rightly considered the most extremely dogmatic poster I've ever seen. No matter what, no matter how many times you get destroyed, you continue spouting the exact same phrases over and over again. A bot is more flexible.

You never answered my questions from before:

I pay more in taxes than some people. Am I not getting equal protection under the law?
I can't get food stamps and subsidized housing. Am I not getting equal protection under the law?

Only the right wing, never gets it. I am merely promoting the general welfare.

You carry on ad nauseum about equal protection under the law.

I pay more in taxes than some people. Am I not getting equal protection under the law?
I can't get food stamps and subsidized housing. Am I not getting equal protection under the law?

Why do you make so much if you believe you are so poor?

I didn't say I was poor. Answer the questions:

I pay more in taxes than some people. Am I not getting equal protection under the law?
I can't get food stamps and subsidized housing. Am I not getting equal protection under the law?

lol.

“The law, in its majestic equality, forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal their bread.”

― Anatole France

I pay more in taxes than some people. Am I not getting equal protection under the law?
I can't get food stamps and subsidized housing. Am I not getting equal protection under the law?

Means testing is a valid means for achieving the End, via the general welfare.

 

[Billiejeens]

Solving simple poverty also corrects for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment and automatically stabilizes the cycle of structural forms of unemployment.

You seem confused. Here are the questions again:
1. Is that just a fancy way of saying "give them money"? (You are advocating giving away money, correct?)
2. Whose money?
3. Why can't you solve complex poverty with the same childish solution?

Try not to just regurgitate some pre-programmed propaganda instead of addressing the actual questions this time.

I think he just opens the page of some book he is reading and copies down a couple of sentences randomly.
it is not cohesive
It is not consistent
He doesn't answer any questions - it's just more random words.

You need valid arguments for rebuttal not mere ad hominems.

Speed, go virtual, upward toward the downward spiral for that is that.