New Zealand's Wacky PM bans sale of semi-automatic rifles, institutes mandatory buyback program

Looks like that cop has an AR.
As they should

If we don't need them, the police don't need them.

The police are not some new class of Knights, we do not give up our RKBA to them, what we grant them is only the power to arrest without fear of prosecution as long as they follow procedures.

They have flash-bang grenades and tear gas...

Those aren't arms.

The police should be no better armed than the populace.

But they still have them….. “if we don’t need them, the police don’t need them” doesn’t apply then….right?

No what applies is that you will never get rid of them 100%, so the police need weapons to counter them. and if the police need them, then the lawful citizenry needs them.

Its amazing how little you trust your fellow citizens and how eager you are to suck the dicks of the government.
 
Looks like that cop has an AR.
As they should

If we don't need them, the police don't need them.

The police are not some new class of Knights, we do not give up our RKBA to them, what we grant them is only the power to arrest without fear of prosecution as long as they follow procedures.

Yes they do
You are not entitled to the same weapons as peace officers or the military

According to the 2nd amendment I sure as hell am, as long as they are considered "arms"
 
Only the cops and the thugs can have them in NZ now.

Sad.
The libs think that this is a victory.....dead Muslims....and a gun ban.

Conservatives think mass killing weapons keep them safe. It’s not working. You have the highest rates of murder, gun crime, and mass shootings in the free world.

US POPULATION: 325,700,000.

HOMICIDES BY FIREARM: Approximately 11,000 average per year, give or take. Primarily thugs and gangbangers.

Not even a blip.

That is quite a blip
No other civilized society has to endure such a blip
Except New Zealand and the Netherlands.
 
Another lesson learned from those Loony Tunes in New Zealand:

We must do everything we can in America to NOT let flaky left wing white women hold political offices.
 
Looks like that cop has an AR.
Only the cops and the thugs can have them in NZ now.

Sad.
The libs think that this is a victory.....dead Muslims....and a gun ban.

Conservatives think mass killing weapons keep them safe. It’s not working. You have the highest rates of murder, gun crime, and mass shootings in the free world.
Honduras and Columbia aren't free?
 
The next thing is that the All Blacks rugby team will be doing the Haka wearing a burka and hijab.


1552938289289_jpg-885005.JPG
 
That PM isnt much of a leader. Knee jerking is a sign of weakness and cowardice.
That's Socialism.
Right now the Jews in America that escaped the Holocaust are seeing exactly what they saw in Germany and Poland in the 1930s.
First they boycott their businesses, then they round them up, then they throw em in ovens.
 
This could be us in short order if the Democrats get what they want.
All the left has to do is either allow an attack to take place anywhere in the world, or plan and excecute a similar attack here and they could convince enough idiots that getting rid of guns is a good idea.
Then you won't be able to live in peace anymore.

Thugs will take over our streets and the cops will let it happen because they are controlled by the state.

Let the anti-White ethnic-cleansing begin.

arden_jacinda.jpg

New Zealand mosque shootings: Assault rifles to be banned - CNN

r
This thread is irrelevant and obsolete. We now have the ability to just declare a national emergency and ban automatic war weapons pens, and even bullets!
No we don't.
 
The libs think that this is a victory.....dead Muslims....and a gun ban.

This won't turn out well.
It has turned out very well in Australia.

And yet an Australian with an RV full of guns just shot up a mosque.
In New Zealand. Did you know that is a DIFFERENT COUNTRY?

New Zealand is just down the block from Australia.
And we are just down the block from Cuba. Your point?
 
This isn't necessarily a knee-jerk reaction.

In 1996, Australia had it's anti gun legislation written up years ahead of Port Arthur shooting that allowed the parliament to ram it through with no opposition.

New Zealand would have had this legislation prepared well ahead of time in order to trot it out in response to an appropriate tragedy.

This legislation did not come about in a vacuum. They are using all the same buzz words used by anti gun groups globally. High capacity, military-style, assault rifles.

Interesting side note, this isn't legislation in the common meaning of the term.

NZ Parliament didn't vote on this, it is an edict from their Cabinet.

But all parties have come out in support of it.

A second tranche of measures is being introduced next week.

including issues such as licensing, registration, and storage.

The country will be a lot safer for this.

Not true. But, who can expect a troll to acknowledge the truth?
 
Looks like that cop has an AR.
Only the cops and the thugs can have them in NZ now.

Sad.
The libs think that this is a victory.....dead Muslims....and a gun ban.

Conservatives think mass killing weapons keep them safe. It’s not working. You have the highest rates of murder, gun crime, and mass shootings in the free world.

Hey, troll girl....shut up. You have no opinion that is relevant to the discussion in the United States.
 
That PM isnt much of a leader. Knee jerking is a sign of weakness and cowardice.
Worked in Australia

Correlation does not equal causation.

This idea that stuff that works in other countries can’t possibly work in the USA is bullshit.

You have 35,000 people dying every year by gun violence. Another 100,000 a year are wounded. And it’s not just gangbangers and brown people. The vast majority of victims are white people. The vast majority of gun suicides are white people in the mid-west. The highest rates of violent crime are now I the fly-over states.

Again, it's none of your business.
 
The Useful Idiots are playing right into the hands of the killer.

He said he could have killed the Muslims other ways but chose to use an AR to rile up the anti gun nuts and he succeeded.

This is what happens in a country without a Bill of Rights and separate branches of government. You get rule by the Mob.

Good new for the Japanese. If they ever decide to invade Ne Zealand they don't have to worry about a New Zealander behind every blade of grass.
Maybe we should try it. Sounds like the mob got it right.

That's the sort of thinking that got us Prohibition and the War on Drugs.
 
That PM isnt much of a leader. Knee jerking is a sign of weakness and cowardice.
Worked in Australia
Weakness never works. Thats why your kenyan messiah was such a failure.
It's not "weakness." If you want to start shooting Muslims, go to war someplace. The churches and coffee houses and theaters of the world are not the place for war.
That has nothing to do with what i said.
This dumb bitch is giving the killer EXACTLY what he wanted.
He wanted certain semi-automatic rifles with in New Zealand to be outlawed?
 
As they should

If we don't need them, the police don't need them.

The police are not some new class of Knights, we do not give up our RKBA to them, what we grant them is only the power to arrest without fear of prosecution as long as they follow procedures.

They have flash-bang grenades and tear gas...

Those aren't arms.

The police should be no better armed than the populace.

But they still have them….. “if we don’t need them, the police don’t need them” doesn’t apply then….right?

No what applies is that you will never get rid of them 100%, so the police need weapons to counter them. and if the police need them, then the lawful citizenry needs them.

Its amazing how little you trust your fellow citizens and how eager you are to suck the dicks of the government.
Well, you don't need an AR-type weapon with 30 bullet cartridges to protect yourself. Not all guns were banned. Read the post that outlines the changes.
 
If we don't need them, the police don't need them.

The police are not some new class of Knights, we do not give up our RKBA to them, what we grant them is only the power to arrest without fear of prosecution as long as they follow procedures.

They have flash-bang grenades and tear gas...

Those aren't arms.

The police should be no better armed than the populace.

But they still have them….. “if we don’t need them, the police don’t need them” doesn’t apply then….right?

No what applies is that you will never get rid of them 100%, so the police need weapons to counter them. and if the police need them, then the lawful citizenry needs them.

Its amazing how little you trust your fellow citizens and how eager you are to suck the dicks of the government.
Well, you don't need an AR-type weapon with 30 bullet cartridges to protect yourself. Not all guns were banned. Read the post that outlines the changes.

What does outlawing an "AR-type weapon" do when you allow more powerful weapons to continue to be available to the general population? Why is an "AR-type weapon" so much more intrinsically bad or dangerous than a .308? And, how is one 30 round magazine worse than four 10 round magazines?
 
They have flash-bang grenades and tear gas...

Those aren't arms.

The police should be no better armed than the populace.

But they still have them….. “if we don’t need them, the police don’t need them” doesn’t apply then….right?

No what applies is that you will never get rid of them 100%, so the police need weapons to counter them. and if the police need them, then the lawful citizenry needs them.

Its amazing how little you trust your fellow citizens and how eager you are to suck the dicks of the government.
Well, you don't need an AR-type weapon with 30 bullet cartridges to protect yourself. Not all guns were banned. Read the post that outlines the changes.

What does outlawing an "AR-type weapon" do when you allow more powerful weapons to continue to be available to the general population? Why is an "AR-type weapon" so much more intrinsically bad or dangerous than a .308? And, how is one 30 round magazine worse than four 10 round magazines?
Did you read the post that actually shows the guns being outlawed? Perhaps more powerful weapons don't take large cartridges? I wouldn't know.
 
This isn't necessarily a knee-jerk reaction.

In 1996, Australia had it's anti gun legislation written up years ahead of Port Arthur shooting that allowed the parliament to ram it through with no opposition.

New Zealand would have had this legislation prepared well ahead of time in order to trot it out in response to an appropriate tragedy.

This legislation did not come about in a vacuum. They are using all the same buzz words used by anti gun groups globally. High capacity, military-style, assault rifles.

Interesting side note, this isn't legislation in the common meaning of the term.

NZ Parliament didn't vote on this, it is an edict from their Cabinet.

But all parties have come out in support of it.

A second tranche of measures is being introduced next week.

including issues such as licensing, registration, and storage.

The country will be a lot safer for this.

Not true. But, who can expect a troll to acknowledge the truth?
Why dont you produce a list of countries ranked by gun deaths. And then show me the ones who have gun control.
 
"New Zealand Gun Ban Days After Attack Shows What Could Happen Here Without 2nd Amendment"

A responsive government that offers more than just “thoughts and prayers” to the dead? I’m in.
When’s your flight leave?
 

Forum List

Back
Top