New York Times Poll: Kamala Harris Trails Donald Trump 17% with Working-Class Voters — Same Deficit Joe Biden Faced in June

[AntonToo]

No he didn't what?

From the NBC interview: "I haven't seen anything to say he was legally responsible for it in terms of incitement," Barr said.

Do you know how to read?

On the J6 Barr's comment is specifically on the INCITEMENT, which Trump wasn't charged with.
He was charged with defrauding, obstructing and conspiring against rights.

Barr's 2022 comments about incitement was BEFORE THE ACTUAL CHARGES.

Here is what he thought of the charges when they were dropped:

I think this case is the most serious of the cases, because the conduct here involved, trying to subvert and prevent the progress, the execution of probably the most important process and proceeding we have in our country, which is the peaceful transfer of power after an election.

And what's being alleged here is that he knew that he lost the election, he knew that the claims of a stolen election were false, and yet he decided he was going to try to stay in office by subverting that process, by putting out misinformation, but, more important, by putting out these false panels of electors and presenting them to Congress and trying to push the vice president to make these decisions to suppress the legitimate votes.

I mean, that was outrageous. And putting aside whether it's criminal or know, it — I don't see how the Republican Party could nominate someone who's capable of doing something like that.

Bill Barr: Trump committed a 'grave wrongdoing' in Jan. 6 case

Former President Trump returned to Washington Thursday to face a federal judge on charges related to his alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election results. Geoff Bennett spoke with former Attorney General Bill Barr about the historic legal case his former boss is now facing and...

www.pbs.org

 

[struth]

Do you know how to read?

maybe you should read the article....he's being interviewed and discussing both the documents and J6.

Stop looking so foolish...and intelligent person would have read the article....geez

 

[AntonToo]

maybe you should read the article....he's being interviewed and discussing both the documents and J6.

Stop looking so foolish...and intelligent person would have read the article....geez

Idiot Barr said in 2022 he wouldn't charge INCITEMENT and Trump wasn't charged with it.


What the fuck do you not understand?

 

[struth]

Idiot Barr said in 2022 he wouldn't charge INCITEMENT and Trump wasn't charged with it.


What the fuck do you not understand?

what part of the link I provided : Former AG Barr says he wouldn't have prosecuted Trump for Jan. 6 or taking classified documents

Former AG Barr says he wouldn't have prosecuted Trump for Jan. 6 or taking classified documents​

Don't you understand? This was in 2022 when he gave the interview....the link has a date on it.
"To tell you the truth, I probably wouldn't," Barr said. He suggested that Trump's having made off with the documents was probably not illegal.

"The whole classification system is done under executive order. It's the president. The president decides everything," Barr said,


Wow, you really wasted a lot of money on that education, you need the working class to pay for now, you didn't gain even a little intelligence.

 

[AntonToo]

what part of the link I provided : Former AG Barr says he wouldn't have prosecuted Trump for Jan. 6 or taking classified documents

Former AG Barr says he wouldn't have prosecuted Trump for Jan. 6 or taking classified documents​

Don't you understand? This was in 2022 when he gave the interview....the link has a date on it.
"To tell you the truth, I probably wouldn't," Barr said. He suggested that Trump's having made off with the documents was probably not illegal.

"The whole classification system is done under executive order. It's the president. The president decides everything," Barr said,


Wow, you really wasted a lot of money on that education, you need the working class to pay for now, you didn't gain even a little intelligence.

Idiot, wrong prosecution. These comments are from MARCH 2022 about documents case (and his PROBABLY doesn't reasonably mean he actually wouldn't).

When the actual indictment was filed Barr had this to say about it - "if half of this stuff is true he is toast"

When the actual indictement for J6 dropped he equally didn't mince his words making perfectly clear that Trump was culpable and the case against him is very serious.

Again, this is from a hardcore partisan who will vote for Trump anyway no matter what he does.

 

[struth]

Idiot, wrong prosecution. These comments are from MARCH 2022 about documents case (and his PROBABLY doesn't reasonably mean he actually wouldn't).

When the actual indictment was filed Barr had this to say about it - "if half of this stuff is true he is toast"

When the actual indictement for J6 dropped he equally didn't mince his words making perfectly clear that Trump was culpable and the case against him is very serious.

It's the same document case.

Yeah there was a lot of BS in the indictment drafted by an illegally political prosecutor. Barr was there, he knows the truth, and why he said he wouldn't prosecute.

 

[Hollie]

More breibet trash.

More hurt feelings.

 

[AntonToo]

It's the same document case.

Yeah there was a lot of BS in the indictment drafted by an illegally political prosecutor. Barr was there, he knows the truth, and why he said he wouldn't prosecute.

Barr commented on the indictments after they were made public and he had a chance to read them. He didn't mince words, said these these are serious cases, Trump is culpable and if charges were proven in court, then Trump is toast.

Never did he say or suggest that these are somehow frivoulous, merritless cases. Nope, that is restricted only to your wild asstruth imagination.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Harris and the demoquacks don't have a prayer with the struggling working class

All her babble speak doesn't trump.."it's the economy"

 

[struth]

Barr commented on the indictments after they were made public and he had a chance to read them. He didn't mince words, said these these are serious cases, Trump is culpable and if charges were proven in court, then Trump is toast.

Never did he say or suggest that these are somehow frivoulous, merritless cases. Nope, that is restricted only to your wild asstruth imagination.

Sure he made a comment on the indictments, but I showed you his comment on the facts and evidence

Of course he did, when he said he wouldn’t indict

 

[AntonToo]

Sure he made a comment on the indictments, but I showed you his comment on the facts and evidence

Of course he did, when he said he wouldn’t indict

Dummy Barr’s early comments are not based on facts and evidence, he wasn’t the investigator, DUH.

He said he wouldn’t indict Incitement charge - and no one did.

And he said he “probably wouldn’t” charge documents case, followed by his jaw dropping when he actually read the charges and the shit Trump was up to.

 

[SmokeALib]

Article's own link clearly says non-college-educated. "working class" was simply made up.

The poll....shows Trump leading Harris by 17 points, 56 percent to 39 percent, among non-college-educated voters.

See? Trump loves democrats!

 

[struth]

Dummy Barr’s early comments are not based on facts and evidence, he wasn’t the investigator, DUH.

He said he wouldn’t indict Incitement charge - and no one did.

And he said he “probably wouldn’t” charge documents case, followed by his jaw dropping when he actually read the charges and the shit Trump was up to.

Of course they are based on facts and evidence…he was there!

nobody cares what the indictment say, they aren’t evidence…especially one drafted by an illegally appointed political prosecutior

 

[AntonToo]

See? Trump loves democrats!

holy shit you are dumb.

More and more, Republicans attract the uneducated.