- Feb 22, 2017
- 104,797
- 35,482
- 2,290
it has to violate both sovereignties.just post something that verifies your statement.You know, your state has a dual sovereignty law that allows them to ignore double jeopardy for certain cases...
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.comSo if you’re charged with a federal crime each of the 50 states can then charge you if they don’t like the result. Well that shouldn’t be concerning at all.The dual sovereignty law allows the state to charge and try people for the same offense they were charged with on a Fed Level.
Felony gun crimes are an area where it is used
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
It has been the law of the land in your state (and many others I am sure) for longer than you have been alive. Have you seen any thing to be concerned about in regards to it?
The SCOTUS has ruled it does not violate the Constitution on numerous occasions going back to at least the 1950s
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Google “dual sovereignty laws”. Too big a pain from my phone to do it now.
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
I am amazed at people that just willfully and gleefully remain ignorant instead of opening a website beside this forum.
Dual Sovereignty, Due Process, and Duplicative Punishment: A New Solution to an Old Problem
While the protections afforded by the Clause are, in a sense, quite broad, the Clause carries with it a major exception: the dual sovereignty doctrine.
And some other sites about it
FindLaw's United States Supreme Court case and opinions.
Roach v. Missouri | Constitutional Accountability Center