If one such report has a state in the middle of the pack and another such report has a state at the end of their list, how is it not completely subjective?
At that point, the reasonable thing to do, would be to look at them and the data in them to see which of the lists is more accurate.
Golf instead, ridiculed the very idea of using lists of data to judge quality of life.
He knows that California, and America are being negatively impacted by increasing diversity, but supports it anyways, for reasons he will not share. If he is even aware of his reasons.
America is the most diverse country on earth
It is what made us great
That is nonsense. This country was built on diverse immigrants being assimilated into a fairly homogeneous American settler culture bound together by a common language, common faith and shared ethos.
You don't have to use dog whistles like "homogeneous" anymore. The Klan has taken off their hoods and march in public. ..FYI.
The issue is diversity. THe opposite of diversity is homogeneous. Hence my use of the term.
I'm not afraid to say White, if that is what you are implying.
And white really doesn't fit my point there, though it is close. After all there was a lot of diversity, in the ethnic and cultural make up of the immigrants. Even though by our modern standards, looking back, we see them as "white", to the people of the time, a lot of those immigrants were seen as "other".
I know that is probably all over your head. YOu just wanted to shut me up with the race card.
But, I'm not afraid of it, nor you.
My point stands, despite your race baiting.
This country was built on diverse immigrants being assimilated into a fairly homogeneous American settler culture bound together by a common language, common faith and shared ethos.
You race baiting asshole.