New Strategy From Rittenhouse Defense Team; He Was Just Hunting

Even if all this is true - and its not - none of this in any way negates this claims to self-defense.
Why do you think it is illegal to shoot armed people chasing you with the intent to harm you?

Do you take guns to a peaceful protest? What was Rittenhouse protesting?
 
He traveled from another state with a gun to get involved in a protest.
No, he bought the gun from a friend, who purchased it for him, in Wisconsin. That gun only crossed state lines when he brought it back with him to Illinois.
 
No, he bought the gun from a friend, who purchased it for him, in Wisconsin. That gun only crossed state lines when he brought it back with him to Illinois.

Did Rittenhouse go to Wisconsin to protest police brutaality?
 
Why were they chasing him?

1634235952802.png


1634235998308.png


Looks like the kicker and the guy with the skateboard were trying to kill him.
 
By killing him? How did they know he shot anybody?

One of them even had a gun.

The guy with one bicep?
Who says they were trying to kill him? People chasing him were yelling he just shot someone. And again, Grosskreutz didn't have to approach Rittenhouse. If their intent was to kill him, Grosskreutz would have just shot him.
 
Who says they were trying to kill him? People chasing him were yelling he just shot someone. And again, Grosskreutz didn't have to approach Rittenhouse. If their intent was to kill him, Grosskreutz would have just shot him.

Who says they were trying to kill him?

Who says they weren't?

People chasing him were yelling he just shot someone.

If I chase you and yell you just shot someone, people are allowed to kick you and hit you
in the head with skateboards? Would you be allowed to defend yourself if they did?

If their intent was to kill him, Grosskreutz would have just shot him.

He didn't try to shoot him? And what does his failure have to do with the intention of the other two?
 
Who says they were trying to kill him?
People chasing him were yelling he just shot someone.
If their intent was to kill him, Grosskreutz would have just shot him.
It all boils down this this:
To believe Rittehouse did not act in self-defense, you have to believe the people chashing him the intent to harm him had the right to do so.
 
Who says they were trying to kill him?

Who says they weren't?

People chasing him were yelling he just shot someone.

If I chase you and yell you just shot someone, people are allowed to kick you and hit you
in the head with skateboards? Would you be allowed to defend yourself if they did?

If their intent was to kill him, Grosskreutz would have just shot him.

He didn't try to shoot him? And what does his failure have to do with the intention of the other two?
Their actions say they weren't. A guy trying to kick him isn't trying to kill him. Another guy with a gun trying to charge, rather than shoot him at him, certainly isn't. Huber may or may not have, we'll never know.
 
Their actions say they weren't. A guy trying to kick him isn't trying to kill him. Another guy with a gun trying to charge, rather than shoot him at him, certainly isn't. Huber may or may not have, we'll never know.

Their actions say they weren't. A guy trying to kick him isn't trying to kill him.

A guy hitting him in the head with a skateboard says they were.

Another guy with a gun trying to charge, rather than shoot him at him, certainly isn't.

Pointing a gun at him after two others just hit him.......almost fatal stupidity.
 
Their actions say they weren't. A guy trying to kick him isn't trying to kill him.

A guy hitting him in the head with a skateboard says they were.

Another guy with a gun trying to charge, rather than shoot him at him, certainly isn't.

Pointing a gun at him after two others just hit him.......almost fatal stupidity.
Show an image of Grosskreutz pointing his gun at Rittenhouse...
 
You are confused by cause and effect. We have had it demonstrated, over and over again, that liberals are teh ones that have created a fantasy,

ie, that they are the Heroes, up against evul villains, that are thus, justified in violating their professional, ethical, moral, or even legal responsibilities to win the fight against the Evul Ones.



Thus, if there is any political angle in an event or action, the motive of the liberal, has to be called into question and his actions not trusted.


Russia gate, where teh FUCKING FBI violated federal law, lying to a federal judge, to get a warrant, sealed that deal.


Anyone that denies that now, is either a fool or a liar. No other options.
Vapid whining. Your fantasies are colliding with reality again. And instead of puting on your big boy pants and taking the L, you are regressing to a childlike state and inventing fantasy 'spiracies to explain why the world isn't coddling your retarded fetishes.

Just exactly like your orange lard and master. My how you adore and emulate him in every way.
 

Forum List

Back
Top