New Polling: Only 22% of Men and Independent Voters Have a Favorable View of the Democrat Party. More than 2/3 of Men have an Unfavorable View.

Sure...just as an example, the idea that men can be women just because they say so is not anywhere near the center.
Well, if Christians can think that virgins can give birth then I guess men being women is no weirder or unnatural right?
 
The point has sailed right over your head twice now. Name calling is childish and pointless. Your clueless opinion of me is duly noted though if that makes you feel any better snowflake.

Uh?

Oh, I thought teh point was that what you said, ie that maga policies are "radical" was really incredibly stupid, and I explained that and supported that by listing the two primary issues that have driven maga, ie jobs and deportations of illegals.


So, when i called you "retarded" I was being correct, i describing how stupid what you said was.


When you called me "retarded" back, that was just you talking shit like a retarded child.

As you kept repeating it, that was just you being retarded MORE, and as I repeated it, that was just me being RIGHT more.


So, yeah.
 
Uh?

Oh, I thought teh point was that what you said, ie that maga policies are "radical" was really incredibly stupid, and I explained that and supported that by listing the two primary issues that have driven maga, ie jobs and deportations of illegals.


So, when i called you "retarded" I was being correct, i describing how stupid what you said was.


When you called me "retarded" back, that was just you talking shit like a retarded child.

As you kept repeating it, that was just you being retarded MORE, and as I repeated it, that was just me being RIGHT more.


So, yeah.
:fu:
 

Your inability to think or understand that reality is not defined by word choice, and similar sentence structure,


is common among lefties.

you really though that our back and forth was equal.


Even though you knew that what I said was true adn what you said was retarded.


That is you being... fucked in the head.
 
Your inability to think or understand that reality is not defined by word choice, and similar sentence structure,


is common among lefties.

you really though that our back and forth was equal.


Even though you knew that what I said was true adn what you said was retarded.


That is you being... fucked in the head.
Wow! I am SO glad to see all those psychology classes you took at Trump University were not wasted on you!
 
Wow! I am SO glad to see all those psychology classes you took at Trump University were not wasted on you!

It's still you that was retarded, not me.

Pro-job trade policy and sending illegals home, is not "radical" and it was retarded of you to claim it was.


You calling me "retarded" back, was you just doubling down on how retarded you were.
 
Well, if Christians can think that virgins can give birth then I guess men being women is no weirder or unnatural right?

No Christians don’t believe that virgins can give birth one only one notable exception a couple of thousand years ago.

You guys think any man can say he is a woman and thus he is. That is quite a bit different.

I figured you would be anti-Christian/religion. Most hard core Democrats are.
 
No Christians don’t believe that virgins can give birth one only one notable exception a couple of thousand years ago.
Do you believe in Santa Claus too?
You guys think any man can say he is a woman and thus he is. That is quite a bit different.
I believe anybody should be free to say anything they want as long as it doesn't cause harm to others.
I figured you would be anti-Christian/religion. Most hard core Democrats are.
I am only "anti" Christian/religion insofar as I pity people who have to engage in such mass psychosis for validation. Beyond that if you want to "worship" fairy tales then just get down with your happy self!
You do you.
 
Pro-job trade policy and sending illegals home, is not "radical" and it was retarded of you to claim it was.
Got a credible links to any of these "pro job" trade policies and how deporting illegal immigrants has affected our economy?
Credible is the operative word here.
 
I believe anybody should be free to say anything they want as long as it doesn't cause harm to others.

You mean like a biological male competing against biological females? Harm like that? The morons on your side of the aisle support that.

I am only "anti" Christian/religion insofar as I pity people who have to engage in such mass psychosis for validation. Beyond that if you want to "worship" fairy tales then just get down with your happy self!

I choose to believe that this incredibly complex universe didn’t just happen into being, out of nothing without intelligent design. That is a real fairytale and psychosis. You worship simple men/women in government and simple men/women in science.

You do you.
 
You mean like a biological male competing against biological females? Harm like that? The morons on your side of the aisle support that.
I do not agree with biological males participating in women's sports. I believe that is one of many of the stupid "social justice" hills the Dem Party has chosen to fight and die on. I am hoping that the party eventually backs off from these losing "woke agenda" items and focuses it's energy on issues that most Americans actually care about like Republican's loyalty to a friend of pedophiles and the mess they and Dirty Donald have made of our economy.
I choose to believe that this incredibly complex universe didn’t just happen into being, out of nothing without intelligent design. That is a real fairytale and psychosis. You worship simple men/women in government and simple men/women in science.

You do you.
I "worship" being alive. Full stop.
I believe in SOMETHING bigger than me and MUCH bigger than the mythological god of The Bible or The Koran (same god).
I believe that science is god's gift to humanity and that science exists to help us unravel the mysteries of the universe thereby better understanding how this "mind" of god works.
My "god" does live live in a dusty, old, mostly obsolete and widely misunderstood compilation of bronze-age, superstitious writings called The Bible.
Those bible stories are for children...and adults with childish minds. I've outgrown them.
 
Got a credible links to any of these "pro job" trade policies and how deporting illegal immigrants has affected our economy?
Credible is the operative word here.

No, it's not. My point is not to get you to agree to our policies.

THe point is that you claimed our policies were RADICAL.

That is retarded.

It would be valid and legitimate IF you said something like, MAGA policies are traditional and normal, just not practical as being implemented or something similar to that.

But YOU set the bar as "radical".


That was you spewing retarded shit talk.


So, I called you out on it.


YOU did a rhetorical device mirroring my words.


The difference between us, was that my words were true, while yours were false.


YOu are a lying asshole spewing retarded shit, and I am the person calling you out on it.
 
No, it's not. My point is not to get you to agree to our policies.

THe point is that you claimed our policies were RADICAL.

That is retarded.

It would be valid and legitimate IF you said something like, MAGA policies are traditional and normal, just not practical as being implemented or something similar to that.

But YOU set the bar as "radical".


That was you spewing retarded shit talk.


So, I called you out on it.


YOU did a rhetorical device mirroring my words.


The difference between us, was that my words were true, while yours were false.


YOu are a lying asshole spewing retarded shit, and I am the person calling you out on it.
Ain't you just a cute little snowflake. Still waiting on that CREDIBLE link to Dirty Donald's "pro-jobs" agenda Simp.
Do try to keep up here ok?
 
Ain't you just a cute little snowflake. Still waiting on that CREDIBLE link to Dirty Donald's "pro-jobs" agenda Simp.
Do try to keep up here ok?

You are trying to have it both ways.

You started this conversation by pretending that MAGA was "radical" and extreme and worthy of ridicule.

When I pointed out that that was retardedd of you, you pivoted to try to put the onus on ME to prove that our policies were WORKABLE, to the point that you would admit that they were "credible" as though you would ever do that.


What you really are trying to do, is AVOID serious discussion on ANY issues, because you know that your policies have all failed.


And real discussion, will open up people's mind to the possiblity of success with maga policies and that is something you cannot accept.

So you try to shout us down with retarded shit like "radical" or "racist".

Our policies are normal. YOU are the radical that cannot defend your ideas.


The FREE TRADE policies of Reagan have failed to deliver the promised results. It is time to end them and try something else.
 
The FREE TRADE policies of Reagan have failed to deliver the promised results. It is time to end them and try something else.
Ah, there we go. You've finally said something worth replying to. The rest of this post is just noise.
We finally agree on something. Trump's bone-headed tariffs were (are) a radical, regressive tax on consumers. He's finally realizing that which is why he's just announced that he's backing off of some tariffs.
A competent leader would have known better than to impose these radical tariffs in the first place, but not Trump.
Also his radical tax breaks for the wealthy are ballooning the national deficit.
You would think he would have learned from his first term when his ridiculous tax cuts for his swamp buddies added 8 trillion (before Covid) to the national debt, but no...not Trump. He thinks it will all work differently this time.

So yeah , we agree that "Reaganomics" and trickle down economic theory has been the problem for the last 40 years. It has ruined our economy. The obvious solution is to return tax rates back to where they were pre Reagan and implement a financial model that borrows more from the principles of Democratic Socialism.
Instead Trump wants to just do more of the same old same old.
Pretty radical.
 
Ah, there we go. You've finally said something worth replying to. The rest of this post is just noise.
We finally agree on something. Trump's bone-headed tariffs were (are) a radical, regressive tax on consumers. He's finally realizing that which is why he's just announced that he's backing off of some tariffs.
A competent leader would have known better than to impose these radical tariffs in the first place, but not Trump.
Also his radical tax breaks for the wealthy are ballooning the national deficit.
You would think he would have learned from his first term when his ridiculous tax cuts for his swamp buddies added 8 trillion (before Covid) to the national debt, but no...not Trump. He thinks it will all work differently this time.

So yeah , we agree that "Reaganomics" and trickle down economic theory has been the problem for the last 40 years. It has ruined our economy. The obvious solution is to return tax rates back to where they were pre Reagan and implement a financial model that borrows more from the principles of Democratic Socialism.
Instead Trump wants to just do more of the same old same old.
Pretty radical.


Interesting. Your solution to a failed trade policy is to raise taxes?


The trade policy that built up the manufacturing base that was here once, was PROTECTIONISM.

The rest of your post was... confused.
 
15th post

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom