New Pictures of "Coffee Boy" George Papadopolous Meeting With President of Greece After the Election

[Lewdog]

Related good read about this "self-important" kido. I think the court's going to have a hard time buying the honesty of his testimony.

For ‘low level volunteer,’ Papadopoulos sought high profile as Trump adviser

They won't have to. Supposedly he wore a wire on some of the people.

 

[EverCurious]

Yes Lewdog, I think it is a perfectly valid argument. Do you people know /nothing/ of foreign politics?

I think this is a case study of confirmation bias.

Every foreign government on the ******* planet was likely trying to get a meeting with Trump and his admin, of course they want to get in good with a potential president, or the elected president, of the most powerful nation on earth - shit they'd be failing at their jobs if they /didn't/ do so...

Oh but because it was Russia... well now that's not allowed - please.

There is ZERO proof of Greece doing anything to try and influence the outcome of the election. Do you know what the word collusion means?

There's almost no proof of Russia doing it either, but details are unimportant I know.

Can you point me to the law prevents "collusion" regarding foreign governments wanting to improve their relationships with potential or incoming presidents? When did this policy of foreign opinion black out during elections become the norm? When did it become "illegal" or even "wrong" for a foreign government to voice opinions on who they'd prefer as the president of the US? When do we start sanctioning all the European leaders who voiced support for Clinton and "influenced" American public opinion during the election? How about the charges of "collusion" against the MSM since they were /clearly/ and /blatantly/ attempting to influence the outcome of the election?

All I'm saying is you're getting out of wack over it being "Russian's" yet all of the other nations and entities doing it were fine.

Why? Because some hacker group fingered a literal troll group as Russian... Like seriously, that is the source of the claim that FB ads were taken out by Russians. Your other source is a pro-Ukrainian, anti-Russia group who fingered Fuzzy Bear and Cozy Bear as Russian. BOTH are based on opinions, opinions of ******* foreigners no less...

Believe what you want, it's just a stretch IMO. A framework made of matchsticks isn't going to hold water...

 

[ClosedCaption]

They don't seem to grasp how easy it is to prove they're lying.

1. Scott Dworkin on Twitter
2. Scott Dworkin on Twitter
3. Scott Dworkin on Twitter

How generous of him to take time out of his day to meet with a barista.

What do you imagine this proves?

This obviously proves that either Trump let's the guy who grabs coffee handle foreign affairs meetings or Trump lied.

 

[Lewdog]

Yes Lewdog, I think it is a perfectly valid argument. Do you people know /nothing/ of foreign politics?

I think this is a case study of confirmation bias.

Every foreign government on the ******* planet was likely trying to get a meeting with Trump and his admin, of course they want to get in good with a potential president, or the elected president, of the most powerful nation on earth - shit they'd be failing at their jobs if they /didn't/ do so...

Oh but because it was Russia... well now that's not allowed - please.

There is ZERO proof of Greece doing anything to try and influence the outcome of the election. Do you know what the word collusion means?

There's almost no proof of Russia doing it either, but details are unimportant I know.

Can you point me to the law prevents "collusion" regarding foreign governments wanting to improve their relationships with potential or incoming presidents? When did this policy of foreign opinion black out during elections become the norm? When did it become "illegal" or even "wrong" for a foreign government to voice opinions on who they'd prefer as the president of the US? When do we start sanctioning all the European leaders who voiced support for Clinton and "influenced" American public opinion during the election? How about the charges of "collusion" against the MSM since they were /clearly/ and /blatantly/ attempting to influence the outcome of the election?

All I'm saying is you're getting out of wack over it being "Russian's" yet all of the other nations and entities doing it were fine.

Why? Because some hacker group fingered a literal troll group as Russian... Like seriously, that is the source of the claim that FB ads were taken out by Russians. Your other source is a pro-Ukrainian, anti-Russia group who fingered Fuzzy Bear and Cozy Bear as Russian. BOTH are based on opinions, opinions of ******* foreigners no less...

Believe what you want, it's just a stretch IMO. A framework made of matchsticks isn't going to hold water...

All I can do is laugh at your post. If at this point you are still questioning if Russia worked to influence the election after EVERY single person in the federal government agrees that they did, except only a handful, then the rest or your post is mute. AG Sessions just testified to Congress once again, that it is clear what Russia did.

 

[nat4900]

LWNJ's will be grasping at straws for the next 7 years,,,,,

Sorry kids, hiLIARy lost. Put your big boy pants on and stop whining.

So if Senator Hillary Clinton lost, why are Republicans and the rightwing media acting as if she's the CURRENT President?

Possible answer: It is "easier" to attack Clinton than to even attempt to defend the orange clown's daily screw-ups?

 

[EverCurious]

Yes Lewdog, I think it is a perfectly valid argument. Do you people know /nothing/ of foreign politics?

I think this is a case study of confirmation bias.

Every foreign government on the ******* planet was likely trying to get a meeting with Trump and his admin, of course they want to get in good with a potential president, or the elected president, of the most powerful nation on earth - shit they'd be failing at their jobs if they /didn't/ do so...

Oh but because it was Russia... well now that's not allowed - please.

There is ZERO proof of Greece doing anything to try and influence the outcome of the election. Do you know what the word collusion means?

There's almost no proof of Russia doing it either, but details are unimportant I know.

Can you point me to the law prevents "collusion" regarding foreign governments wanting to improve their relationships with potential or incoming presidents? When did this policy of foreign opinion black out during elections become the norm? When did it become "illegal" or even "wrong" for a foreign government to voice opinions on who they'd prefer as the president of the US? When do we start sanctioning all the European leaders who voiced support for Clinton and "influenced" American public opinion during the election? How about the charges of "collusion" against the MSM since they were /clearly/ and /blatantly/ attempting to influence the outcome of the election?

All I'm saying is you're getting out of wack over it being "Russian's" yet all of the other nations and entities doing it were fine.

Why? Because some hacker group fingered a literal troll group as Russian... Like seriously, that is the source of the claim that FB ads were taken out by Russians. Your other source is a pro-Ukrainian, anti-Russia group who fingered Fuzzy Bear and Cozy Bear as Russian. BOTH are based on opinions, opinions of ******* foreigners no less...

Believe what you want, it's just a stretch IMO. A framework made of matchsticks isn't going to hold water...

All I can do is laugh at your post. If at this point you are still questioning if Russia worked to influence the election after EVERY single person in the federal government agrees that they did, except only a handful, then the rest or your post is mute. AG Sessions just testified to Congress once again, that it is clear what Russia did.

No, I question that it even matters if they did when every government on the planet was doing it. [Edit- influencing the American election I mean] Frankly, given that Hillary was hot to trot to start a war with them over Syria, I don't blame them for coming out hard against her election, not one bit.

IF you want to say that the FB ads are in fact Russian propaganda, fine, but your argument that "it was to support Trump" falls apart when you do that, because their alleged "influence campaign" also put out pro-Sanders ads, pro-Hillary ads, and pushed for immigration reform, for killing ISIS, for socialism, communism, and capitalism, for coal workers, and pretty much everything under the sun (basically exactly what you'd expect from a self-professed troll group like 4chan.)

I'll buy a maybe Russia wanted to destabilize America theory, but then drop the Trump connection because it doesn't jibe anymore, and then tell me /why/ Putin wanted to destabilize America. What is their benefit from having divided our nation? I don't think Putin is stupid enough to think that by sowing division he'd suddenly bring his nation to greatness...

 

[Lewdog]

Yes Lewdog, I think it is a perfectly valid argument. Do you people know /nothing/ of foreign politics?

I think this is a case study of confirmation bias.

Every foreign government on the ******* planet was likely trying to get a meeting with Trump and his admin, of course they want to get in good with a potential president, or the elected president, of the most powerful nation on earth - shit they'd be failing at their jobs if they /didn't/ do so...

Oh but because it was Russia... well now that's not allowed - please.

There is ZERO proof of Greece doing anything to try and influence the outcome of the election. Do you know what the word collusion means?

There's almost no proof of Russia doing it either, but details are unimportant I know.

Can you point me to the law prevents "collusion" regarding foreign governments wanting to improve their relationships with potential or incoming presidents? When did this policy of foreign opinion black out during elections become the norm? When did it become "illegal" or even "wrong" for a foreign government to voice opinions on who they'd prefer as the president of the US? When do we start sanctioning all the European leaders who voiced support for Clinton and "influenced" American public opinion during the election? How about the charges of "collusion" against the MSM since they were /clearly/ and /blatantly/ attempting to influence the outcome of the election?

All I'm saying is you're getting out of wack over it being "Russian's" yet all of the other nations and entities doing it were fine.

Why? Because some hacker group fingered a literal troll group as Russian... Like seriously, that is the source of the claim that FB ads were taken out by Russians. Your other source is a pro-Ukrainian, anti-Russia group who fingered Fuzzy Bear and Cozy Bear as Russian. BOTH are based on opinions, opinions of ******* foreigners no less...

Believe what you want, it's just a stretch IMO. A framework made of matchsticks isn't going to hold water...

All I can do is laugh at your post. If at this point you are still questioning if Russia worked to influence the election after EVERY single person in the federal government agrees that they did, except only a handful, then the rest or your post is mute. AG Sessions just testified to Congress once again, that it is clear what Russia did.

No, I question that it even matters if they did when every government on the planet was doing it. [Edit- influencing the American election I mean] Frankly, given that Hillary was hot to trot to start a war with them over Syria, I don't blame them for coming out hard against her election, not one bit.

IF you want to say that the FB ads are in fact Russian propaganda, fine, but your argument that "it was to support Trump" falls apart when you do that, because their alleged "influence campaign" also put out pro-Sanders ads, pro-Hillary ads, and pushed for immigration reform, for killing ISIS, for socialism, communism, and capitalism, for coal workers, and pretty much everything under the sun (basically exactly what you'd expect from a self-professed troll group like 4chan.)

I'll buy a maybe Russia wanted to destabilize America theory, but then drop the Trump connection because it doesn't jibe anymore, and then tell me /why/ Putin wanted to destabilize America. What is their benefit from having divided our nation? I don't think Putin is stupid enough to think that by sowing division he'd suddenly bring his nation to greatness...

And you are getting off-topic. You wanted to compare Greece to Russia on collusion simply because Papadopolous went to Greece and talked to the President there. They are not in the same ball park, or even n the same galaxy.

 

[EverCurious]

Yes Lewdog, I think it is a perfectly valid argument. Do you people know /nothing/ of foreign politics?

I think this is a case study of confirmation bias.

Every foreign government on the ******* planet was likely trying to get a meeting with Trump and his admin, of course they want to get in good with a potential president, or the elected president, of the most powerful nation on earth - shit they'd be failing at their jobs if they /didn't/ do so...

Oh but because it was Russia... well now that's not allowed - please.

There is ZERO proof of Greece doing anything to try and influence the outcome of the election. Do you know what the word collusion means?

There's almost no proof of Russia doing it either, but details are unimportant I know.

Can you point me to the law prevents "collusion" regarding foreign governments wanting to improve their relationships with potential or incoming presidents? When did this policy of foreign opinion black out during elections become the norm? When did it become "illegal" or even "wrong" for a foreign government to voice opinions on who they'd prefer as the president of the US? When do we start sanctioning all the European leaders who voiced support for Clinton and "influenced" American public opinion during the election? How about the charges of "collusion" against the MSM since they were /clearly/ and /blatantly/ attempting to influence the outcome of the election?

All I'm saying is you're getting out of wack over it being "Russian's" yet all of the other nations and entities doing it were fine.

Why? Because some hacker group fingered a literal troll group as Russian... Like seriously, that is the source of the claim that FB ads were taken out by Russians. Your other source is a pro-Ukrainian, anti-Russia group who fingered Fuzzy Bear and Cozy Bear as Russian. BOTH are based on opinions, opinions of ******* foreigners no less...

Believe what you want, it's just a stretch IMO. A framework made of matchsticks isn't going to hold water...

All I can do is laugh at your post. If at this point you are still questioning if Russia worked to influence the election after EVERY single person in the federal government agrees that they did, except only a handful, then the rest or your post is mute. AG Sessions just testified to Congress once again, that it is clear what Russia did.

No, I question that it even matters if they did when every government on the planet was doing it. [Edit- influencing the American election I mean] Frankly, given that Hillary was hot to trot to start a war with them over Syria, I don't blame them for coming out hard against her election, not one bit.

IF you want to say that the FB ads are in fact Russian propaganda, fine, but your argument that "it was to support Trump" falls apart when you do that, because their alleged "influence campaign" also put out pro-Sanders ads, pro-Hillary ads, and pushed for immigration reform, for killing ISIS, for socialism, communism, and capitalism, for coal workers, and pretty much everything under the sun (basically exactly what you'd expect from a self-professed troll group like 4chan.)

I'll buy a maybe Russia wanted to destabilize America theory, but then drop the Trump connection because it doesn't jibe anymore, and then tell me /why/ Putin wanted to destabilize America. What is their benefit from having divided our nation? I don't think Putin is stupid enough to think that by sowing division he'd suddenly bring his nation to greatness...

And you are getting off-topic. You wanted to compare Greece to Russia on collusion simply because Papadopolous went to Greece and talked to the President there. They are not in the same ball park, or even n the same galaxy.

No actually I'm not, the Greek government thought that they could get in good with Trump through this guy. Its the same shit, influence peddling, the only difference in the /morality/ of it is in your mind - because you hate Trump... [Edit - or Russia, or both]

 

[deanrd]

Could you imagine if these were Democrats?

 

[Lewdog]

There is ZERO proof of Greece doing anything to try and influence the outcome of the election. Do you know what the word collusion means?

There's almost no proof of Russia doing it either, but details are unimportant I know.

Can you point me to the law prevents "collusion" regarding foreign governments wanting to improve their relationships with potential or incoming presidents? When did this policy of foreign opinion black out during elections become the norm? When did it become "illegal" or even "wrong" for a foreign government to voice opinions on who they'd prefer as the president of the US? When do we start sanctioning all the European leaders who voiced support for Clinton and "influenced" American public opinion during the election? How about the charges of "collusion" against the MSM since they were /clearly/ and /blatantly/ attempting to influence the outcome of the election?

All I'm saying is you're getting out of wack over it being "Russian's" yet all of the other nations and entities doing it were fine.

Why? Because some hacker group fingered a literal troll group as Russian... Like seriously, that is the source of the claim that FB ads were taken out by Russians. Your other source is a pro-Ukrainian, anti-Russia group who fingered Fuzzy Bear and Cozy Bear as Russian. BOTH are based on opinions, opinions of ******* foreigners no less...

Believe what you want, it's just a stretch IMO. A framework made of matchsticks isn't going to hold water...

All I can do is laugh at your post. If at this point you are still questioning if Russia worked to influence the election after EVERY single person in the federal government agrees that they did, except only a handful, then the rest or your post is mute. AG Sessions just testified to Congress once again, that it is clear what Russia did.

No, I question that it even matters if they did when every government on the planet was doing it. [Edit- influencing the American election I mean] Frankly, given that Hillary was hot to trot to start a war with them over Syria, I don't blame them for coming out hard against her election, not one bit.

IF you want to say that the FB ads are in fact Russian propaganda, fine, but your argument that "it was to support Trump" falls apart when you do that, because their alleged "influence campaign" also put out pro-Sanders ads, pro-Hillary ads, and pushed for immigration reform, for killing ISIS, for socialism, communism, and capitalism, for coal workers, and pretty much everything under the sun (basically exactly what you'd expect from a self-professed troll group like 4chan.)

I'll buy a maybe Russia wanted to destabilize America theory, but then drop the Trump connection because it doesn't jibe anymore, and then tell me /why/ Putin wanted to destabilize America. What is their benefit from having divided our nation? I don't think Putin is stupid enough to think that by sowing division he'd suddenly bring his nation to greatness...

And you are getting off-topic. You wanted to compare Greece to Russia on collusion simply because Papadopolous went to Greece and talked to the President there. They are not in the same ball park, or even n the same galaxy.

No actually I'm not, the Greek government thought that they could get in good with Trump through this guy. Its the same shit, influence peddling, the only difference in the /morality/ of it is in your mind - because you hate Trump... [Edit - or Russia, or both]

You still don't get it. What kind of IQ test did you take? Was it in Reader's Digest?

You still don't understand what collusion means. What did Greece do to try and influence the outcome of the election in favor of Trump?

 

[Lewdog]

Could you imagine if these were Democrats?

I don't care what party it is... I'm just amazed how dumb some people are that they can't see right through this.

The guy was obviously not just some guy that went and got coffee.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

He was clearly a very important person in the Trump campaign who was designated to meet with Russian spies and reported directly to the head of the campaign.

 

[EverCurious]

There's almost no proof of Russia doing it either, but details are unimportant I know.

Can you point me to the law prevents "collusion" regarding foreign governments wanting to improve their relationships with potential or incoming presidents? When did this policy of foreign opinion black out during elections become the norm? When did it become "illegal" or even "wrong" for a foreign government to voice opinions on who they'd prefer as the president of the US? When do we start sanctioning all the European leaders who voiced support for Clinton and "influenced" American public opinion during the election? How about the charges of "collusion" against the MSM since they were /clearly/ and /blatantly/ attempting to influence the outcome of the election?

All I'm saying is you're getting out of wack over it being "Russian's" yet all of the other nations and entities doing it were fine.

Why? Because some hacker group fingered a literal troll group as Russian... Like seriously, that is the source of the claim that FB ads were taken out by Russians. Your other source is a pro-Ukrainian, anti-Russia group who fingered Fuzzy Bear and Cozy Bear as Russian. BOTH are based on opinions, opinions of ******* foreigners no less...

Believe what you want, it's just a stretch IMO. A framework made of matchsticks isn't going to hold water...

All I can do is laugh at your post. If at this point you are still questioning if Russia worked to influence the election after EVERY single person in the federal government agrees that they did, except only a handful, then the rest or your post is mute. AG Sessions just testified to Congress once again, that it is clear what Russia did.

No, I question that it even matters if they did when every government on the planet was doing it. [Edit- influencing the American election I mean] Frankly, given that Hillary was hot to trot to start a war with them over Syria, I don't blame them for coming out hard against her election, not one bit.

IF you want to say that the FB ads are in fact Russian propaganda, fine, but your argument that "it was to support Trump" falls apart when you do that, because their alleged "influence campaign" also put out pro-Sanders ads, pro-Hillary ads, and pushed for immigration reform, for killing ISIS, for socialism, communism, and capitalism, for coal workers, and pretty much everything under the sun (basically exactly what you'd expect from a self-professed troll group like 4chan.)

I'll buy a maybe Russia wanted to destabilize America theory, but then drop the Trump connection because it doesn't jibe anymore, and then tell me /why/ Putin wanted to destabilize America. What is their benefit from having divided our nation? I don't think Putin is stupid enough to think that by sowing division he'd suddenly bring his nation to greatness...

And you are getting off-topic. You wanted to compare Greece to Russia on collusion simply because Papadopolous went to Greece and talked to the President there. They are not in the same ball park, or even n the same galaxy.

No actually I'm not, the Greek government thought that they could get in good with Trump through this guy. Its the same shit, influence peddling, the only difference in the /morality/ of it is in your mind - because you hate Trump... [Edit - or Russia, or both]

You still don't get it. What kind of IQ test did you take? Was it in Reader's Digest?

You still don't understand what collusion means. What did Greece do to try and influence the outcome of the election in favor of Trump?

MENSA.

/YOU/ don't get it.

What is the "moral" difference:

Someone like Soros who spends millions influencing American society and politics on a daily basis

VS

Russia spending $100k on FB ads to influence American society and politics during an election cycle?


ZERO, but for your hatred of Trump, Russia, or both.

 

[deanrd]

Trump said no one talked about the Russians. Only "Coffee Boy" says otherwise.

Mmm, who is lying?

Sessions and Trump on either end.

And "Coffee Boy" smack dab in the middle.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

All I can do is laugh at your post. If at this point you are still questioning if Russia worked to influence the election after EVERY single person in the federal government agrees that they did, except only a handful, then the rest or your post is mute. AG Sessions just testified to Congress once again, that it is clear what Russia did.

No, I question that it even matters if they did when every government on the planet was doing it. [Edit- influencing the American election I mean] Frankly, given that Hillary was hot to trot to start a war with them over Syria, I don't blame them for coming out hard against her election, not one bit.

IF you want to say that the FB ads are in fact Russian propaganda, fine, but your argument that "it was to support Trump" falls apart when you do that, because their alleged "influence campaign" also put out pro-Sanders ads, pro-Hillary ads, and pushed for immigration reform, for killing ISIS, for socialism, communism, and capitalism, for coal workers, and pretty much everything under the sun (basically exactly what you'd expect from a self-professed troll group like 4chan.)

I'll buy a maybe Russia wanted to destabilize America theory, but then drop the Trump connection because it doesn't jibe anymore, and then tell me /why/ Putin wanted to destabilize America. What is their benefit from having divided our nation? I don't think Putin is stupid enough to think that by sowing division he'd suddenly bring his nation to greatness...

And you are getting off-topic. You wanted to compare Greece to Russia on collusion simply because Papadopolous went to Greece and talked to the President there. They are not in the same ball park, or even n the same galaxy.

No actually I'm not, the Greek government thought that they could get in good with Trump through this guy. Its the same shit, influence peddling, the only difference in the /morality/ of it is in your mind - because you hate Trump... [Edit - or Russia, or both]

You still don't get it. What kind of IQ test did you take? Was it in Reader's Digest?

You still don't understand what collusion means. What did Greece do to try and influence the outcome of the election in favor of Trump?

MENSA.

/YOU/ don't get it.

What is the "moral" difference:

Someone like Soros, a foreigner, who spends millions influencing American society and politics on a daily basis

VS

Russia spending $100k on FB ads to influence American society and politics during an election cycle?


ZERO, but for your hatred of Trump, Russia, or both.

Haha, see, this is what I am talking about. Look at the ridiculous shit that being attached to Trump makes your brain say.

Yes, of course there is a difference between domestic and foreign influence on our democratic process. Duh. The fact that this even has to be explained to a grown man is just pathetic.

 

[EverCurious]

No, I question that it even matters if they did when every government on the planet was doing it. [Edit- influencing the American election I mean] Frankly, given that Hillary was hot to trot to start a war with them over Syria, I don't blame them for coming out hard against her election, not one bit.

IF you want to say that the FB ads are in fact Russian propaganda, fine, but your argument that "it was to support Trump" falls apart when you do that, because their alleged "influence campaign" also put out pro-Sanders ads, pro-Hillary ads, and pushed for immigration reform, for killing ISIS, for socialism, communism, and capitalism, for coal workers, and pretty much everything under the sun (basically exactly what you'd expect from a self-professed troll group like 4chan.)

I'll buy a maybe Russia wanted to destabilize America theory, but then drop the Trump connection because it doesn't jibe anymore, and then tell me /why/ Putin wanted to destabilize America. What is their benefit from having divided our nation? I don't think Putin is stupid enough to think that by sowing division he'd suddenly bring his nation to greatness...

And you are getting off-topic. You wanted to compare Greece to Russia on collusion simply because Papadopolous went to Greece and talked to the President there. They are not in the same ball park, or even n the same galaxy.

No actually I'm not, the Greek government thought that they could get in good with Trump through this guy. Its the same shit, influence peddling, the only difference in the /morality/ of it is in your mind - because you hate Trump... [Edit - or Russia, or both]

You still don't get it. What kind of IQ test did you take? Was it in Reader's Digest?

You still don't understand what collusion means. What did Greece do to try and influence the outcome of the election in favor of Trump?

MENSA.

/YOU/ don't get it.

What is the "moral" difference:

Someone like Soros, a foreigner, who spends millions influencing American society and politics on a daily basis

VS

Russia spending $100k on FB ads to influence American society and politics during an election cycle?


ZERO, but for your hatred of Trump, Russia, or both.

Haha, see, this is what I am talking about. Look at the ridiculous shit that being attached to Trump makes your brain say.

Yes, of course there is a difference between domestic and foreign influence on our democratic process. Duh. The fact that this even has to be explained to a grown man is just pathetic.

Not a man son.

So you're saying that all the Russian's had to do was become Russian-American citizens to make it okay? I'm sure the next nation wanting to influence American society and politics will remember that key "allowance".

Also, thank you for inadvertently admitting that American opinions are the only ones that matter. #fuckglobalism #fucktheun and #fuckEurope heh

 

[Lewdog]

All I can do is laugh at your post. If at this point you are still questioning if Russia worked to influence the election after EVERY single person in the federal government agrees that they did, except only a handful, then the rest or your post is mute. AG Sessions just testified to Congress once again, that it is clear what Russia did.

No, I question that it even matters if they did when every government on the planet was doing it. [Edit- influencing the American election I mean] Frankly, given that Hillary was hot to trot to start a war with them over Syria, I don't blame them for coming out hard against her election, not one bit.

IF you want to say that the FB ads are in fact Russian propaganda, fine, but your argument that "it was to support Trump" falls apart when you do that, because their alleged "influence campaign" also put out pro-Sanders ads, pro-Hillary ads, and pushed for immigration reform, for killing ISIS, for socialism, communism, and capitalism, for coal workers, and pretty much everything under the sun (basically exactly what you'd expect from a self-professed troll group like 4chan.)

I'll buy a maybe Russia wanted to destabilize America theory, but then drop the Trump connection because it doesn't jibe anymore, and then tell me /why/ Putin wanted to destabilize America. What is their benefit from having divided our nation? I don't think Putin is stupid enough to think that by sowing division he'd suddenly bring his nation to greatness...

And you are getting off-topic. You wanted to compare Greece to Russia on collusion simply because Papadopolous went to Greece and talked to the President there. They are not in the same ball park, or even n the same galaxy.

No actually I'm not, the Greek government thought that they could get in good with Trump through this guy. Its the same shit, influence peddling, the only difference in the /morality/ of it is in your mind - because you hate Trump... [Edit - or Russia, or both]

You still don't get it. What kind of IQ test did you take? Was it in Reader's Digest?

You still don't understand what collusion means. What did Greece do to try and influence the outcome of the election in favor of Trump?

MENSA.

/YOU/ don't get it.

What is the "moral" difference:

Someone like Soros who spends millions influencing American society and politics on a daily basis

VS

Russia spending $100k on FB ads to influence American society and politics during an election cycle?


ZERO, but for your hatred of Trump, Russia, or both.

IT'S NOT ABOUT MORALS! IT'S ABOUT THE DEFINITION OF COLLUSION!

And if the guy was just a coffee boy then why did Greece think meeting with the guy would get them in good graces with Trump?

It's ALL WRONG.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

And you are getting off-topic. You wanted to compare Greece to Russia on collusion simply because Papadopolous went to Greece and talked to the President there. They are not in the same ball park, or even n the same galaxy.

No actually I'm not, the Greek government thought that they could get in good with Trump through this guy. Its the same shit, influence peddling, the only difference in the /morality/ of it is in your mind - because you hate Trump... [Edit - or Russia, or both]

You still don't get it. What kind of IQ test did you take? Was it in Reader's Digest?

You still don't understand what collusion means. What did Greece do to try and influence the outcome of the election in favor of Trump?

MENSA.

/YOU/ don't get it.

What is the "moral" difference:

Someone like Soros, a foreigner, who spends millions influencing American society and politics on a daily basis

VS

Russia spending $100k on FB ads to influence American society and politics during an election cycle?


ZERO, but for your hatred of Trump, Russia, or both.

Haha, see, this is what I am talking about. Look at the ridiculous shit that being attached to Trump makes your brain say.

Yes, of course there is a difference between domestic and foreign influence on our democratic process. Duh. The fact that this even has to be explained to a grown man is just pathetic.

Not a man son.

So you're saying that all the Russian's had to do was become Russian-American citizens to make it okay? I'm sure the next nation wanting to influence American society and politics will remember that key "allowance".

Also, thank you for inadvertently admitting that American opinions are the only ones that matter. #fuckglobalism #fucktheun and #fuckEurope heh

We're not talking about "any Russians" , we are talking about the Russian dictator and his spy agency.

If the lawyers for Trump's traitor clan come armed with arguments as laughably stupid as yours, they better start picking out their favorite color jumpsuits....

"American opinions"

Influenced and changed by a Russian dictator and his spy agency. Like yours, for instance.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Is that the same trip


that a commentator-who-shall-remain-nameless said Page took to pass on a recording of Trump asking for Putin's help in the election?

Carter Page Went to Moscow With a Tape of Donald Trump Offering Treason For Hacking

Sources with links to the intelligence community say it is believed that Carter Page went to Moscow in early July carrying with him a pre-recorded tape of Donald Trump offering to change American policy if he were to be elected, to make it more favorable to Putin. In exchange, Page was authorized directly by Trump to request the help of the Russian government in hacking the election.

 

[Lewdog]

Is that the same trip


that a commentator-who-shall-remain-nameless said Page took to pass on a recording of Trump asking for Putin's help in the election?

Carter Page Went to Moscow With a Tape of Donald Trump Offering Treason For Hacking

Sources with links to the intelligence community say it is believed that Carter Page went to Moscow in early July carrying with him a pre-recorded tape of Donald Trump offering to change American policy if he were to be elected, to make it more favorable to Putin. In exchange, Page was authorized directly by Trump to request the help of the Russian government in hacking the election.

If true that would be about as solid impeachment material as it gets, however it is going to take a much better source than that.