New Melt Record for Greenland Ice Sheet; 'Exceptional'
Season Stretched Up to 50 Days Longer Than Average
ScienceDaily (Jan. 21, 2011) — .......
"This past melt season was exceptional, with melting in some areas stretching up to 50 days longer than average," said
Dr. Marco Tedesco, director of the Cryospheric Processes Laboratory at The City College of New York (CCNY -- CUNY), who is leading a project studying variables that affect ice sheet melting.
"Melting in 2010 started exceptionally early at the end of April and ended quite late in mid- September."
The study, with different aspects sponsored by World Wildlife Fund (WWF), the National Science Foundation and NASA, examined surface temperature anomalies over the Greenland ice sheet surface,
as well as estimates of surface melting from satellite data, ground observations
and models.
In an article published in Environmental Research Letters, Professor Tedesco and co-authors note that in 2010, summer temperatures
up to 3C above the average were combined with reduced snowfall.
"
Bare ice is much darker than snow and absorbs more solar radiation," said Professor Tedesco. "Other ice melting feedback loops that we are examining include the impact of lakes on the glacial surface, of
dust and soot deposited over the ice sheet and how surface meltwater affects the flow of the ice toward the ocean."
WWF
climate specialist Dr. Martin Sommerkorn said "Sea level rise is expected to top 1 metre by 2100, largely due to melting from ice sheets. And it will not stop there --
the longer we take to limit greenhouse gas production, the more melting and water level rise will continue."
Dr. Tedesco's continuing research on ice sheets can be followed on
Cryocity.org.
For more on Arctic climate change, visit
WWF - The Arctic.
New melt record for Greenland ice sheet; 'Exceptional' season stretched up to 50 days longer than average
You asked for it...and I`ll lay my cards on the table ANYTIME!!!:
I'm putting the cards on the table. Put yours. Temps are based on moderate enso conditions.
Seldom do You see so much bullshit piled up in one place, except maybe in a cattle truck!
You let an asshole from New York who has never even been to Greenland sell You this crap as science!
Let`s start with this lie first:
The asshole from New York looks at a Satellite picture from Greenland and everything that doesn`t look white is "soot and dust" on the ice sheet!.......
Have You any idea what "card" You just laid on the table, by quoting this fuckhead director from the New York Cry o spherical hysterical institute who thinks "solar radiation"
melted all this ice
Since You have not even the foggiest notion what enthalpy is, or any other thermodynamics I put it in terms even a simpleton can understand:
Ice - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Does that give You a vague idea what kind of super nova solar radiation it would take to melt all this ice...?
And what kind of crap "science" expert You just quoted here with the "cards you lay on the table"..?
The same massive amount of solar radiation which would be necessary to melt all that ice would fry everything around the Greenland glaciers and You could hard boil eggs in the Remus river!!!!
Since You have no idea about Greenland You probably need to be told that the pic`s with the ice were not taken in the winter, but at the height of summer..
doooh?...`cause during Winter it`s pitch dark 24 hours.
Does this look like we are kneeling on that Diesel Engine exhaust " soot" which the New York cryohysterical director spotted on his satellite picture????..
He did say soot!...no need to mention a diesel engine if you choose that word!
.that`s less than 500 miles from the pole and the entire country side is peppered with TREE STUMPS!
And then he talks about estimates and "average temperatures"...
.in GREENLAND!!
Let me clue You in on a little something, although YOU have not been up there You could have found that out with just a little bit due diligence:
Greenland ice sheet - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Well You may be excused, but the
New York City "Expert" on Greenland certainly not!
Also he is saying the EXACT OPPOSITE of what NASA has in fact been saying:
...on the same web page!...This dumb **** from New York wants to quote NASA and doesn`t even bother checking what they say the snowfall was in Greenland!
People think they know everything about Greenland, just by looking at a picture screen with a Satellite image on it:
Even if the asshole from New York has never been to Greenland he should have noticed something, unless he is even more retarded as I estimate him to be...!
1.) Look at the color coded scale...notice something?
Look at the color scale for an INCREASE !
2.) If he was an "expert" he should have noticed where the highest decrease is!
That`s where You have the
STEEPEST terrain gradients in all of Greenland, nowhere else does it drop off that steep and that long...
Do You have any idea what kind of pressure we are talking about at the base of this glacier?....I`m sure You don`t and that is forgivable too, because You committed no fraud here You simply quoted the asshole expert from New York and Played Your card"...as You put it Yourself!
Just make damn sure You are playing with a full deck...!
And an "expert" should have known at least a little bit about Physics:
And I guess You have no Idea what kind of pressures we are talking about at that deep blue color coded area of Greenland, well here is a little hint how thick the ice is and take a wild guess why the ice is melting from UNDERNEATH ad NOT FROM THE TOP:
As if that higher melt rate especially at that spot has anything to do with "soot on the ice"..! Or "average higher temperature".
He should have at least read what some of his buddies who are a bit more up to speed and have finally discovered what Mr. Faraday has discovered long before they finally just did too:
Geotimes - October 2003 - New model for glacial erosion
And here is some of this "new data" which was not new to anyone who paid attention during his Physics lectures:
Greenland ice sheet flow driven by short-term weather extremes, not gradual warming: UBC research UBC Public Affairs
See,,? But they too still think water has to melt from the top,
seep 2 MILES down an "lubricate" the bottom of a glacier!
Shit they could have just looked here, someone posted how
Regelation causes a glacier to slide downhill:
Pressure melting point - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
But hey, why deflate their balloon , let them re-invent the wheel ...for all I care, they can stand on top, piss.. and do a study how they can "lubricate a glacier".
And do You really think that European "climate scientists" can measure a sea rise level of 0.14 mm...You knew of course that we are talking about
5/ hundredth of an inch...or did you?
**** how much of this "computer modeling bullshit" can You swallow?...
Not a single one of these assholes ever even bothers to measure ANYTHING they feed their fuckhead estimates in a "computer model which is the mirror image of their shits for brains and show You a stupid 2 dimensional graph!...and You are impressed by it!
So if somebody tells You they measured John Candy`s waist line while he was huffing and puffing doing jumping jacks with 5/100 th of an inch accuracy You believe that too...
and "lay your card on the table"...
I recommend You
count Your deck before You start playing cards!
But they are all Arm chair Greenland "experts"...him too:
http://www.usmessageboard.com/environment/150781-global-warming-dire-prediction-for-the-year-3000-a.html#post3212985
He must be talking about how much they have been paying at the fuel pumps in Europe since the Ferkel, Andrea Merkel, the "climate chancellor" has enacted "greenhouse gas legislation"....and thinks that is only billions of Dollars...he can`t even do simple math, 1 liter of regular is about 1.5 Euros with the current exchange rate that`s U$ 5.40 per Gallon and that ***** has been in office since 2005!
So guess again how much this CO2 scam has been costing!
I know for sure this jerk has never been to Greenland either!
And now I am wondering if he has ever even been to school
Where the **** do You get "information" like this?....
Old Rocks
The present tempertures for Hudson's Bay and Greenland are far above normal for January.
You asked an expert..?... because You are too stupid to look it up yourself:
Churchill, Manitoba, Canada weather conditions and forecast : WorldTimeServer.com
Weather in Churchill, Manitoba, Canada
Current Conditions in Churchill
skyicon
-33°F / -36°C
Feels like -59°F / -36°C
Wind: W at 13 mph / 21 km/h
Humidity: 62%
Pressure: 30.03 inches / 1017 mb
Sunrise: 8:43 AM
Sunset: 4:11 PM
Conditions updated at Sat, 22 Jan 2011 2:00 am CST
Oh yeah the polar Bears in Churchill must be sweating!