New FBI files contain allegations of 'quid pro quo' in Clinton's emails (UNBELIEVABLE)

[Vigilante]

The HITS just keep on coming...just think, WikiLeaks has only released 11,000 of the 50,000 emails it has and will finish them by early November, leaving the most devastating ones for consumption a week or less before election!

Fox News ^ | October 15, 2016 | Catherine Herridge, Pamela Browne

FBI interview summaries and notes, provided late Friday to the House Government Oversight and Intelligence Committees, contain allegations of a "quid pro quo" between a senior State Department executive and FBI agents during the Hillary Clinton email investigation, two congressional sources told Fox News.

In return for altering the classification, the possibility of additional slots for the FBI at missions overseas was discussed,” Chaffetz said.

As Fox News previously reported, interviews released earlier this month, known as 302s, reveal the serious allegation that Kennedy applied pressure to subordinates to change classified email codes so they would be shielded from Congress and the public. Fox News was told as far back as August 2015 that Kennedy was running interference on Capitol Hill. But Kennedy, in his FBI interview on Dec. 21, 2015, “categorically rejected” allegations of classified code tampering.

 

[Vastator]

Surely there's at least one or two Republican senators willing to raise hell over these emails. Where the hell are they?

 

[leftwinger]

Surely there's at least one or two Republican senators willing to raise he'll over these emails. Where the hell are they?

As far as I can tell they are all bashing The Trumpster.

 

[ABikerSailor]

The HITS just keep on coming...just think, WikiLeaks has only released 11,000 of the 50,000 emails it has and will finish them by early November, leaving the most devastating ones for consumption a week or less before election!

Fox News ^ | October 15, 2016 | Catherine Herridge, Pamela Browne

FBI interview summaries and notes, provided late Friday to the House Government Oversight and Intelligence Committees, contain allegations of a "quid pro quo" between a senior State Department executive and FBI agents during the Hillary Clinton email investigation, two congressional sources told Fox News.

In return for altering the classification, the possibility of additional slots for the FBI at missions overseas was discussed,” Chaffetz said.

As Fox News previously reported, interviews released earlier this month, known as 302s, reveal the serious allegation that Kennedy applied pressure to subordinates to change classified email codes so they would be shielded from Congress and the public. Fox News was told as far back as August 2015 that Kennedy was running interference on Capitol Hill. But Kennedy, in his FBI interview on Dec. 21, 2015, “categorically rejected” allegations of classified code tampering.

A couple of points about your link...................

First off............it says that it's "alleged", meaning that they haven't gotten enough evidence to charge her with anything, but they THINK there MAY have been something going on.

Second...................although Chaffetz is making these allegations, it even states in the linked article that he hasn't read anything on these allegations.

Swing and a miss.......................

 

[Vigilante]

The HITS just keep on coming...just think, WikiLeaks has only released 11,000 of the 50,000 emails it has and will finish them by early November, leaving the most devastating ones for consumption a week or less before election!

Fox News ^ | October 15, 2016 | Catherine Herridge, Pamela Browne

FBI interview summaries and notes, provided late Friday to the House Government Oversight and Intelligence Committees, contain allegations of a "quid pro quo" between a senior State Department executive and FBI agents during the Hillary Clinton email investigation, two congressional sources told Fox News.

In return for altering the classification, the possibility of additional slots for the FBI at missions overseas was discussed,” Chaffetz said.

As Fox News previously reported, interviews released earlier this month, known as 302s, reveal the serious allegation that Kennedy applied pressure to subordinates to change classified email codes so they would be shielded from Congress and the public. Fox News was told as far back as August 2015 that Kennedy was running interference on Capitol Hill. But Kennedy, in his FBI interview on Dec. 21, 2015, “categorically rejected” allegations of classified code tampering.

A couple of points about your link...................

First off............it says that it's "alleged", meaning that they haven't gotten enough evidence to charge her with anything, but they THINK there MAY have been something going on.

Second...................although Chaffetz is making these allegations, it even states in the linked article that he hasn't read anything on these allegations.

Swing and a miss.......................

Good doggy, you get the DNC check of the day.... But with ALL these hundreds of new allegations.....you struck out!

 

[Care4all]

The HITS just keep on coming...just think, WikiLeaks has only released 11,000 of the 50,000 emails it has and will finish them by early November, leaving the most devastating ones for consumption a week or less before election!

Fox News ^ | October 15, 2016 | Catherine Herridge, Pamela Browne

FBI interview summaries and notes, provided late Friday to the House Government Oversight and Intelligence Committees, contain allegations of a "quid pro quo" between a senior State Department executive and FBI agents during the Hillary Clinton email investigation, two congressional sources told Fox News.

In return for altering the classification, the possibility of additional slots for the FBI at missions overseas was discussed,” Chaffetz said.

As Fox News previously reported, interviews released earlier this month, known as 302s, reveal the serious allegation that Kennedy applied pressure to subordinates to change classified email codes so they would be shielded from Congress and the public. Fox News was told as far back as August 2015 that Kennedy was running interference on Capitol Hill. But Kennedy, in his FBI interview on Dec. 21, 2015, “categorically rejected” allegations of classified code tampering.

A couple of points about your link...................

First off............it says that it's "alleged", meaning that they haven't gotten enough evidence to charge her with anything, but they THINK there MAY have been something going on.

Second...................although Chaffetz is making these allegations, it even states in the linked article that he hasn't read anything on these allegations.

Swing and a miss.......................

As usual! Par for the course!

 

[Vigilante]

The HITS just keep on coming...just think, WikiLeaks has only released 11,000 of the 50,000 emails it has and will finish them by early November, leaving the most devastating ones for consumption a week or less before election!

Fox News ^ | October 15, 2016 | Catherine Herridge, Pamela Browne

FBI interview summaries and notes, provided late Friday to the House Government Oversight and Intelligence Committees, contain allegations of a "quid pro quo" between a senior State Department executive and FBI agents during the Hillary Clinton email investigation, two congressional sources told Fox News.

In return for altering the classification, the possibility of additional slots for the FBI at missions overseas was discussed,” Chaffetz said.

As Fox News previously reported, interviews released earlier this month, known as 302s, reveal the serious allegation that Kennedy applied pressure to subordinates to change classified email codes so they would be shielded from Congress and the public. Fox News was told as far back as August 2015 that Kennedy was running interference on Capitol Hill. But Kennedy, in his FBI interview on Dec. 21, 2015, “categorically rejected” allegations of classified code tampering.

A couple of points about your link...................

First off............it says that it's "alleged", meaning that they haven't gotten enough evidence to charge her with anything, but they THINK there MAY have been something going on.

Second...................although Chaffetz is making these allegations, it even states in the linked article that he hasn't read anything on these allegations.

Swing and a miss.......................

As usual! Par for the course!

Hundreds of allegations, so little time to indict her!!!

 

[ABikerSailor]

The HITS just keep on coming...just think, WikiLeaks has only released 11,000 of the 50,000 emails it has and will finish them by early November, leaving the most devastating ones for consumption a week or less before election!

Fox News ^ | October 15, 2016 | Catherine Herridge, Pamela Browne

FBI interview summaries and notes, provided late Friday to the House Government Oversight and Intelligence Committees, contain allegations of a "quid pro quo" between a senior State Department executive and FBI agents during the Hillary Clinton email investigation, two congressional sources told Fox News.

In return for altering the classification, the possibility of additional slots for the FBI at missions overseas was discussed,” Chaffetz said.

As Fox News previously reported, interviews released earlier this month, known as 302s, reveal the serious allegation that Kennedy applied pressure to subordinates to change classified email codes so they would be shielded from Congress and the public. Fox News was told as far back as August 2015 that Kennedy was running interference on Capitol Hill. But Kennedy, in his FBI interview on Dec. 21, 2015, “categorically rejected” allegations of classified code tampering.

A couple of points about your link...................

First off............it says that it's "alleged", meaning that they haven't gotten enough evidence to charge her with anything, but they THINK there MAY have been something going on.

Second...................although Chaffetz is making these allegations, it even states in the linked article that he hasn't read anything on these allegations.

Swing and a miss.......................

As usual! Par for the course!

Hundreds of allegations, so little time to indict her!!!

Like most conservatives, it appears you do not understand the meaning of words. Lemmie help you out...............

allegation

[al-i-gey-shuh n]

Synonyms

• Examples
• Word Origin

See more synonyms on Thesaurus.com
noun
1.the act of alleging; affirmation.
2.an assertion made with little or no proof.
3.an assertion made by a party in a legal proceeding, which the party then undertakes to prove.
4.a statement offered as a plea, excuse, or justification.

Pay close attention to definition 2. Allegations mean that you have little or no proof to back up your claims.

Try again.......swing and a miss.........

 

[EvilCat Breath]

The HITS just keep on coming...just think, WikiLeaks has only released 11,000 of the 50,000 emails it has and will finish them by early November, leaving the most devastating ones for consumption a week or less before election!

Fox News ^ | October 15, 2016 | Catherine Herridge, Pamela Browne

FBI interview summaries and notes, provided late Friday to the House Government Oversight and Intelligence Committees, contain allegations of a "quid pro quo" between a senior State Department executive and FBI agents during the Hillary Clinton email investigation, two congressional sources told Fox News.

In return for altering the classification, the possibility of additional slots for the FBI at missions overseas was discussed,” Chaffetz said.

As Fox News previously reported, interviews released earlier this month, known as 302s, reveal the serious allegation that Kennedy applied pressure to subordinates to change classified email codes so they would be shielded from Congress and the public. Fox News was told as far back as August 2015 that Kennedy was running interference on Capitol Hill. But Kennedy, in his FBI interview on Dec. 21, 2015, “categorically rejected” allegations of classified code tampering.

A couple of points about your link...................

First off............it says that it's "alleged", meaning that they haven't gotten enough evidence to charge her with anything, but they THINK there MAY have been something going on.

Second...................although Chaffetz is making these allegations, it even states in the linked article that he hasn't read anything on these allegations.

Swing and a miss.......................

Alleged always means not yet proved in court.

 

[ABikerSailor]

See post 8 Tipsy, I got the definition on there from dictionary.com

 

[Vigilante]

The HITS just keep on coming...just think, WikiLeaks has only released 11,000 of the 50,000 emails it has and will finish them by early November, leaving the most devastating ones for consumption a week or less before election!

Fox News ^ | October 15, 2016 | Catherine Herridge, Pamela Browne

FBI interview summaries and notes, provided late Friday to the House Government Oversight and Intelligence Committees, contain allegations of a "quid pro quo" between a senior State Department executive and FBI agents during the Hillary Clinton email investigation, two congressional sources told Fox News.

In return for altering the classification, the possibility of additional slots for the FBI at missions overseas was discussed,” Chaffetz said.

As Fox News previously reported, interviews released earlier this month, known as 302s, reveal the serious allegation that Kennedy applied pressure to subordinates to change classified email codes so they would be shielded from Congress and the public. Fox News was told as far back as August 2015 that Kennedy was running interference on Capitol Hill. But Kennedy, in his FBI interview on Dec. 21, 2015, “categorically rejected” allegations of classified code tampering.

A couple of points about your link...................

First off............it says that it's "alleged", meaning that they haven't gotten enough evidence to charge her with anything, but they THINK there MAY have been something going on.

Second...................although Chaffetz is making these allegations, it even states in the linked article that he hasn't read anything on these allegations.

Swing and a miss.......................

As usual! Par for the course!

Hundreds of allegations, so little time to indict her!!!

Like most conservatives, it appears you do not understand the meaning of words. Lemmie help you out...............

allegation

[al-i-gey-shuh n]

Synonyms

• Examples
• Word Origin

See more synonyms on Thesaurus.com
noun
1.the act of alleging; affirmation.
2.an assertion made with little or no proof.
3.an assertion made by a party in a legal proceeding, which the party then undertakes to prove.
4.a statement offered as a plea, excuse, or justification.

Pay close attention to definition 2. Allegations mean that you have little or no proof to back up your claims.

Try again.......swing and a miss.........

See post 8 Tipsy, I got the definition on there from dictionary.com

Apparently you didn't know it, and had to look it up!

 

[ABikerSailor]

The HITS just keep on coming...just think, WikiLeaks has only released 11,000 of the 50,000 emails it has and will finish them by early November, leaving the most devastating ones for consumption a week or less before election!

Fox News ^ | October 15, 2016 | Catherine Herridge, Pamela Browne

FBI interview summaries and notes, provided late Friday to the House Government Oversight and Intelligence Committees, contain allegations of a "quid pro quo" between a senior State Department executive and FBI agents during the Hillary Clinton email investigation, two congressional sources told Fox News.

In return for altering the classification, the possibility of additional slots for the FBI at missions overseas was discussed,” Chaffetz said.

As Fox News previously reported, interviews released earlier this month, known as 302s, reveal the serious allegation that Kennedy applied pressure to subordinates to change classified email codes so they would be shielded from Congress and the public. Fox News was told as far back as August 2015 that Kennedy was running interference on Capitol Hill. But Kennedy, in his FBI interview on Dec. 21, 2015, “categorically rejected” allegations of classified code tampering.

A couple of points about your link...................

First off............it says that it's "alleged", meaning that they haven't gotten enough evidence to charge her with anything, but they THINK there MAY have been something going on.

Second...................although Chaffetz is making these allegations, it even states in the linked article that he hasn't read anything on these allegations.

Swing and a miss.......................

As usual! Par for the course!

Hundreds of allegations, so little time to indict her!!!

Like most conservatives, it appears you do not understand the meaning of words. Lemmie help you out...............

allegation

[al-i-gey-shuh n]

Synonyms

• Examples
• Word Origin

See more synonyms on Thesaurus.com
noun
1.the act of alleging; affirmation.
2.an assertion made with little or no proof.
3.an assertion made by a party in a legal proceeding, which the party then undertakes to prove.
4.a statement offered as a plea, excuse, or justification.

Pay close attention to definition 2. Allegations mean that you have little or no proof to back up your claims.

Try again.......swing and a miss.........

See post 8 Tipsy, I got the definition on there from dictionary.com

Apparently you didn't know it, and had to look it up!

Actually, I did know the definition, which is why I knew you were using it wrong, as well as decided to get the real definition for you from a real source so you could see the error of your ways.

You're almost as stupid as Rep. King was when he praised Boehner's "mendacity".

 

[Vigilante]

A couple of points about your link...................

First off............it says that it's "alleged", meaning that they haven't gotten enough evidence to charge her with anything, but they THINK there MAY have been something going on.

Second...................although Chaffetz is making these allegations, it even states in the linked article that he hasn't read anything on these allegations.

Swing and a miss.......................

As usual! Par for the course!

Hundreds of allegations, so little time to indict her!!!

Like most conservatives, it appears you do not understand the meaning of words. Lemmie help you out...............

allegation

[al-i-gey-shuh n]

Synonyms

• Examples
• Word Origin

See more synonyms on Thesaurus.com
noun
1.the act of alleging; affirmation.
2.an assertion made with little or no proof.
3.an assertion made by a party in a legal proceeding, which the party then undertakes to prove.
4.a statement offered as a plea, excuse, or justification.

Pay close attention to definition 2. Allegations mean that you have little or no proof to back up your claims.

Try again.......swing and a miss.........

See post 8 Tipsy, I got the definition on there from dictionary.com

Apparently you didn't know it, and had to look it up!

Actually, I did know the definition, which is why I knew you were using it wrong, as well as decided to get the real definition for you from a real source so you could see the error of your ways.

You're almost as stupid as Rep. King was when he praised Boehner's "mendacity".

Well you are right on one thing, King is an asshole, and an allegation is what is needed for an investigation to start, as in this case!

 

[2aguy]

Surely there's at least one or two Republican senators willing to raise hell over these emails. Where the hell are they?

and that is why Trump beat the other Republicans......even the Republicans who will take up this crime....don't do it well..the others...don't even try...