What's new
US Message Board 🦅 Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

New Details Emerge About Coronavirus Research At Chinese Lab

Doc7505

Diamond Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2016
Messages
9,151
Reaction score
14,857
Points
2,430
Location
North Carolina
New Details Emerge About Coronavirus Research At Chinese Lab

More than 900 pages of materials related to US.-funded coronavirus research in China were released following a FOIA lawsuit by The Intercept.

7 Sep 2021 ~~ By Sharon Lerner & Mara Hvistendahl

NEWLY RELEASED DOCUMENTS provide details of U.S.-funded research on several types of coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China. The Intercept has obtained more than 900 pages of documents detailing the work of EcoHealth Alliance, a U.S.-based health organization that used federal money to fund bat coronavirus research at the Chinese laboratory. The trove of documents includes two previously unpublished grant proposals that were funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, as well as project updates relating to EcoHealth Alliance’s research, which has been scrutinized amid increased interest in the origins of the pandemic.
The documents were released in connection with ongoing Freedom of Information Act litigation by The Intercept against the National Institutes of Health. The Intercept is making the full documents available to the public.
“This is a road map to the high-risk research that could have led to the current pandemic,” said Gary Ruskin, executive director of U.S. Right To Know, a group that has been investigating the origins of Covid-19.
One of the grants, titled “Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence,” outlines an ambitious effort led by EcoHealth Alliance President Peter Daszak to screen thousands of bat samples for novel coronaviruses. The research also involved screening people who work with live animals. The documents contain several critical details about the research in Wuhan, including the fact that key experimental work with humanized mice was conducted at a biosafety level 3 lab at Wuhan University Center for Animal Experiment — and not at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, as was previously assumed. The documents raise additional questions about the theory that the pandemic may have begun in a lab accident, an idea that Daszak has aggressively dismissed.
The bat coronavirus grant provided EcoHealth Alliance with a total of $3.1 million, including $599,000 that the Wuhan Institute of Virology used in part to identify and alter bat coronaviruses likely to infect humans. Even before the pandemic, many scientists were concerned about the potential dangers associated with such experiments. The grant proposal acknowledges some of those dangers: “Fieldwork involves the highest risk of exposure to SARS or other CoVs, while working in caves with high bat density overhead and the potential for fecal dust to be inhaled.”
Alina Chan, a molecular biologist at the Broad Institute, said the documents show that EcoHealth Alliance has reason to take the lab-leak theory seriously. “In this proposal, they actually point out that they know how risky this work is. They keep talking about people potentially getting bitten — and they kept records of everyone who got bitten,” Chan said. “Does EcoHealth have those records? And if not, how can they possibly rule out a research-related accident?”
According to Richard Ebright, a molecular biologist at Rutgers University, the documents contain critical information about the research done in Wuhan, including about the creation of novel viruses. “The viruses they constructed were tested for their ability to infect mice that were engineered to display human type receptors on their cell,” Ebright wrote to The Intercept after reviewing the documents. Ebright also said the documents make it clear that two different types of novel coronaviruses were able to infect humanized mice. “While they were working on SARS-related coronavirus, they were carrying out a parallel project at the same time on MERS-related coronavirus,” Ebright said, referring to the virus that causes Middle East Respiratory Syndrome.
Asked about the grant materials, Robert Kessler, communications manager at EcoHealth Alliance, said, “We applied for grants to conduct research. The relevant agencies deemed that to be important research, and thus funded it. So I don’t know that there’s a whole lot to say.”
The grant was initially awarded for a five-year period — from 2014 to 2019. Funding was renewed in 2019 but suspended by the Trump administration in April 2020.
The closest relative of SARS-CoV-2, which causes Covid-19, is a virus found in bats, making the animals a focal point for efforts to understand the origins of the pandemic. Exactly how the virus jumped to humans is the subject of heated debate. Many scientists believe that it was a natural spillover, meaning that the virus passed to humans in a setting such as a wet market or rural area where humans and animals are in close contact. Biosafety experts and internet sleuths who suspect a lab origin, meanwhile, have spent more than a year poring over publicly available information and obscure scientific publications looking for answers. In the past few months, leading scientists have also called for a deeper investigation of the pandemic’s origins, as has President Joe Biden, who in May ordered the intelligence community to study the issue. On August 27, Biden announced that the intelligence inquiry was inconclusive.
Biden blamed China for failing to release critical data, but the U.S. government has also been slow to release information. The Intercept initially requested the proposals in September 2020.
“I wish that this document had been released in early 2020,” said Chan, who has called for an investigation of the lab-leak origin theory. “It would have changed things massively, just to have all of the information in one place, immediately transparent, in a credible document that was submitted by EcoHealth Alliance.”
The second grant, “Understanding Risk of Zoonotic Virus Emergence in Emerging Infectious Disease Hotspots of Southeast Asia,” was awarded in August 2020 and extends through 2025. The proposal, written in 2019, often seems prescient, focusing on scaling up and deploying resources in Asia in case of an outbreak of an “emergent infectious disease” and referring to Asia as “this hottest of the EID hotspots.”

Comment:
Thanks to the authors for opening this up so we could all see part of it. I'm sure everyone will just read into it what they want to see, but that's just the way things are now.
Just in time for the 650,000 mark on American deaths from Coronavirus. And a total of 4.55 Million dead worldwide. That we know about.
Fauci, has lied to Congress and America. The article also proves this. Peter Daszak was a key player in the gain of function research that was sent to the Wuhan Lab in China.. Fauci has been disingenuous and lying to all for personal reasons. Common sense tells anyone that very dangerous genetic modifications were occurring in the Wuhan labs that were partially funded by the U.S.
This goes without saying that Fauci should resign at the least his position at NIH.
The censorship, the blatant lies, the coverup and now we're seeing more and more of the mainstream media FINALLY accepting the fact that this whole thing wasn't what it was played to be. How long before the intercept connects the dots on Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson, Arta Zeneca, et al... and the so-called vaccine, and the connection to the amount of money to be made mandating people get something that is questionable at best?
 

Augustine_

Gold Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2019
Messages
4,655
Reaction score
2,145
Points
210
Location
Nunya
New Details Emerge About Coronavirus Research At Chinese Lab

More than 900 pages of materials related to US.-funded coronavirus research in China were released following a FOIA lawsuit by The Intercept.

7 Sep 2021 ~~ By Sharon Lerner & Mara Hvistendahl

NEWLY RELEASED DOCUMENTS provide details of U.S.-funded research on several types of coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China. The Intercept has obtained more than 900 pages of documents detailing the work of EcoHealth Alliance, a U.S.-based health organization that used federal money to fund bat coronavirus research at the Chinese laboratory. The trove of documents includes two previously unpublished grant proposals that were funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, as well as project updates relating to EcoHealth Alliance’s research, which has been scrutinized amid increased interest in the origins of the pandemic.
The documents were released in connection with ongoing Freedom of Information Act litigation by The Intercept against the National Institutes of Health. The Intercept is making the full documents available to the public.
“This is a road map to the high-risk research that could have led to the current pandemic,” said Gary Ruskin, executive director of U.S. Right To Know, a group that has been investigating the origins of Covid-19.
One of the grants, titled “Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence,” outlines an ambitious effort led by EcoHealth Alliance President Peter Daszak to screen thousands of bat samples for novel coronaviruses. The research also involved screening people who work with live animals. The documents contain several critical details about the research in Wuhan, including the fact that key experimental work with humanized mice was conducted at a biosafety level 3 lab at Wuhan University Center for Animal Experiment — and not at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, as was previously assumed. The documents raise additional questions about the theory that the pandemic may have begun in a lab accident, an idea that Daszak has aggressively dismissed.
The bat coronavirus grant provided EcoHealth Alliance with a total of $3.1 million, including $599,000 that the Wuhan Institute of Virology used in part to identify and alter bat coronaviruses likely to infect humans. Even before the pandemic, many scientists were concerned about the potential dangers associated with such experiments. The grant proposal acknowledges some of those dangers: “Fieldwork involves the highest risk of exposure to SARS or other CoVs, while working in caves with high bat density overhead and the potential for fecal dust to be inhaled.”
Alina Chan, a molecular biologist at the Broad Institute, said the documents show that EcoHealth Alliance has reason to take the lab-leak theory seriously. “In this proposal, they actually point out that they know how risky this work is. They keep talking about people potentially getting bitten — and they kept records of everyone who got bitten,” Chan said. “Does EcoHealth have those records? And if not, how can they possibly rule out a research-related accident?”
According to Richard Ebright, a molecular biologist at Rutgers University, the documents contain critical information about the research done in Wuhan, including about the creation of novel viruses. “The viruses they constructed were tested for their ability to infect mice that were engineered to display human type receptors on their cell,” Ebright wrote to The Intercept after reviewing the documents. Ebright also said the documents make it clear that two different types of novel coronaviruses were able to infect humanized mice. “While they were working on SARS-related coronavirus, they were carrying out a parallel project at the same time on MERS-related coronavirus,” Ebright said, referring to the virus that causes Middle East Respiratory Syndrome.
Asked about the grant materials, Robert Kessler, communications manager at EcoHealth Alliance, said, “We applied for grants to conduct research. The relevant agencies deemed that to be important research, and thus funded it. So I don’t know that there’s a whole lot to say.”
The grant was initially awarded for a five-year period — from 2014 to 2019. Funding was renewed in 2019 but suspended by the Trump administration in April 2020.
The closest relative of SARS-CoV-2, which causes Covid-19, is a virus found in bats, making the animals a focal point for efforts to understand the origins of the pandemic. Exactly how the virus jumped to humans is the subject of heated debate. Many scientists believe that it was a natural spillover, meaning that the virus passed to humans in a setting such as a wet market or rural area where humans and animals are in close contact. Biosafety experts and internet sleuths who suspect a lab origin, meanwhile, have spent more than a year poring over publicly available information and obscure scientific publications looking for answers. In the past few months, leading scientists have also called for a deeper investigation of the pandemic’s origins, as has President Joe Biden, who in May ordered the intelligence community to study the issue. On August 27, Biden announced that the intelligence inquiry was inconclusive.
Biden blamed China for failing to release critical data, but the U.S. government has also been slow to release information. The Intercept initially requested the proposals in September 2020.
“I wish that this document had been released in early 2020,” said Chan, who has called for an investigation of the lab-leak origin theory. “It would have changed things massively, just to have all of the information in one place, immediately transparent, in a credible document that was submitted by EcoHealth Alliance.”
The second grant, “Understanding Risk of Zoonotic Virus Emergence in Emerging Infectious Disease Hotspots of Southeast Asia,” was awarded in August 2020 and extends through 2025. The proposal, written in 2019, often seems prescient, focusing on scaling up and deploying resources in Asia in case of an outbreak of an “emergent infectious disease” and referring to Asia as “this hottest of the EID hotspots.”

Comment:
Thanks to the authors for opening this up so we could all see part of it. I'm sure everyone will just read into it what they want to see, but that's just the way things are now.
Just in time for the 650,000 mark on American deaths from Coronavirus. And a total of 4.55 Million dead worldwide. That we know about.
Fauci, has lied to Congress and America. The article also proves this. Peter Daszak was a key player in the gain of function research that was sent to the Wuhan Lab in China.. Fauci has been disingenuous and lying to all for personal reasons. Common sense tells anyone that very dangerous genetic modifications were occurring in the Wuhan labs that were partially funded by the U.S.
This goes without saying that Fauci should resign at the least his position at NIH.
The censorship, the blatant lies, the coverup and now we're seeing more and more of the mainstream media FINALLY accepting the fact that this whole thing wasn't what it was played to be. How long before the intercept connects the dots on Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson, Arta Zeneca, et al... and the so-called vaccine, and the connection to the amount of money to be made mandating people get something that is questionable at best?
Keep in mind this guy is shitting his pants over just $600,000 distributed over 10 years
 

Rambunctious

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2010
Messages
47,256
Reaction score
32,695
Points
2,605
Keep in mind this guy is shitting his pants over just $600,000 distributed over 10 years
A dollar for each American death due to covid...don't cover for this...what else are they doing behind our backs with our money?...
 

Augustine_

Gold Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2019
Messages
4,655
Reaction score
2,145
Points
210
Location
Nunya
A dollar for each American death due to covid...don't cover for this...what else are they doing behind our backs with our money?...
If you live in a world where $600,000 can fund 10 years of developing a pandemic, then your stupid fucking ass is doomed.
 

Rambunctious

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2010
Messages
47,256
Reaction score
32,695
Points
2,605
If you live in a world where $600,000 can fund 10 years of developing a pandemic, then your stupid fucking ass is doomed.
No its you that is stupid...for every dollar of that 600,000 our research labs did 10 times that amount of this dangerous research....
 

Augustine_

Gold Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2019
Messages
4,655
Reaction score
2,145
Points
210
Location
Nunya
No its you that is stupid...for every dollar of that 600,000 our research labs did 10 times that amount of this dangerous research....
You're a fucking idiot
 

Bootney Lee Farnsworth

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2017
Messages
37,063
Reaction score
21,009
Points
1,915
Location
Tejas
If you live in a world where $600,000 can fund 10 years of developing a pandemic, then your stupid fucking ass is doomed.
Good LORD, go fuck yourself.
 

Bootney Lee Farnsworth

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2017
Messages
37,063
Reaction score
21,009
Points
1,915
Location
Tejas

WTF19

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2020
Messages
6,748
Reaction score
4,420
Points
928
OP
Doc7505

Doc7505

Diamond Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2016
Messages
9,151
Reaction score
14,857
Points
2,430
Location
North Carolina
Keep in mind this guy is shitting his pants over just $600,000 distributed over 10 years


Really, the investment of 600,000 killed
If you live in a world where $600,000 can fund 10 years of developing a pandemic, then your stupid fucking ass is doomed.

Just a little reminder there was also $3.4 million dollars funding to Peter Daszak's EcoHealth Alliance by NIH in 2014
But the pentagon funded the research at EcoHealth Alliance at $39 million between 2013 to 2020
**********​
  • Federal data seen by DailyMail.com reveals The Pentagon gave $39 million to EcoHealth Alliance, which funded a lab in Wuhan, China, between 2013 and 2020
  • The Wuhan Institute of Virology is accused of being the source of Covid-19
  • The majority of the DoD funding came from the DTRA, a military branch with a mission to 'counter and deter weapons of mass destruction and improvised threat networks'
  • Federal grant data assembled by independent researchers shows that the charity has received more than $123 million from the government in total
  • Grants from the Pentagon included $6,491,025 from the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) from 2017 to 2020
  • EHA also received $64.7 million from the US Agency for International Development (USAID)
  • It received $13 million from Health and Human Services, which includes the National Institutes of Health and Centers for Disease Control
  • It is not known how much of the money actually went to the Wuhan lab
  • EHA has also funded deeply controversial 'gain of function' experiments, where dangerous viruses are made more infectious to study their effect on human cells
 

AMart

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2020
Messages
4,177
Reaction score
4,243
Points
1,938
Richard H. Ebright

@R_H_Ebright

·
Sep 6

The documents make it clear that assertions by the NIH Director, Francis Collins, and the NIAID Director, Anthony Fauci, that the NIH did not support gain-of-function research or potential pandemic pathogen enhancement at WIV are untruthful.
 

Burgermeister

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2021
Messages
2,010
Reaction score
2,271
Points
1,938
Go to jail, directly to jail.
 

badger2

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2016
Messages
13,870
Reaction score
2,778
Points
140
New Details Emerge About Coronavirus Research At Chinese Lab

More than 900 pages of materials related to US.-funded coronavirus research in China were released following a FOIA lawsuit by The Intercept.

7 Sep 2021 ~~ By Sharon Lerner & Mara Hvistendahl

NEWLY RELEASED DOCUMENTS provide details of U.S.-funded research on several types of coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China. The Intercept has obtained more than 900 pages of documents detailing the work of EcoHealth Alliance, a U.S.-based health organization that used federal money to fund bat coronavirus research at the Chinese laboratory. The trove of documents includes two previously unpublished grant proposals that were funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, as well as project updates relating to EcoHealth Alliance’s research, which has been scrutinized amid increased interest in the origins of the pandemic.
The documents were released in connection with ongoing Freedom of Information Act litigation by The Intercept against the National Institutes of Health. The Intercept is making the full documents available to the public.
“This is a road map to the high-risk research that could have led to the current pandemic,” said Gary Ruskin, executive director of U.S. Right To Know, a group that has been investigating the origins of Covid-19.
One of the grants, titled “Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence,” outlines an ambitious effort led by EcoHealth Alliance President Peter Daszak to screen thousands of bat samples for novel coronaviruses. The research also involved screening people who work with live animals. The documents contain several critical details about the research in Wuhan, including the fact that key experimental work with humanized mice was conducted at a biosafety level 3 lab at Wuhan University Center for Animal Experiment — and not at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, as was previously assumed. The documents raise additional questions about the theory that the pandemic may have begun in a lab accident, an idea that Daszak has aggressively dismissed.
The bat coronavirus grant provided EcoHealth Alliance with a total of $3.1 million, including $599,000 that the Wuhan Institute of Virology used in part to identify and alter bat coronaviruses likely to infect humans. Even before the pandemic, many scientists were concerned about the potential dangers associated with such experiments. The grant proposal acknowledges some of those dangers: “Fieldwork involves the highest risk of exposure to SARS or other CoVs, while working in caves with high bat density overhead and the potential for fecal dust to be inhaled.”
Alina Chan, a molecular biologist at the Broad Institute, said the documents show that EcoHealth Alliance has reason to take the lab-leak theory seriously. “In this proposal, they actually point out that they know how risky this work is. They keep talking about people potentially getting bitten — and they kept records of everyone who got bitten,” Chan said. “Does EcoHealth have those records? And if not, how can they possibly rule out a research-related accident?”
According to Richard Ebright, a molecular biologist at Rutgers University, the documents contain critical information about the research done in Wuhan, including about the creation of novel viruses. “The viruses they constructed were tested for their ability to infect mice that were engineered to display human type receptors on their cell,” Ebright wrote to The Intercept after reviewing the documents. Ebright also said the documents make it clear that two different types of novel coronaviruses were able to infect humanized mice. “While they were working on SARS-related coronavirus, they were carrying out a parallel project at the same time on MERS-related coronavirus,” Ebright said, referring to the virus that causes Middle East Respiratory Syndrome.
Asked about the grant materials, Robert Kessler, communications manager at EcoHealth Alliance, said, “We applied for grants to conduct research. The relevant agencies deemed that to be important research, and thus funded it. So I don’t know that there’s a whole lot to say.”
The grant was initially awarded for a five-year period — from 2014 to 2019. Funding was renewed in 2019 but suspended by the Trump administration in April 2020.
The closest relative of SARS-CoV-2, which causes Covid-19, is a virus found in bats, making the animals a focal point for efforts to understand the origins of the pandemic. Exactly how the virus jumped to humans is the subject of heated debate. Many scientists believe that it was a natural spillover, meaning that the virus passed to humans in a setting such as a wet market or rural area where humans and animals are in close contact. Biosafety experts and internet sleuths who suspect a lab origin, meanwhile, have spent more than a year poring over publicly available information and obscure scientific publications looking for answers. In the past few months, leading scientists have also called for a deeper investigation of the pandemic’s origins, as has President Joe Biden, who in May ordered the intelligence community to study the issue. On August 27, Biden announced that the intelligence inquiry was inconclusive.
Biden blamed China for failing to release critical data, but the U.S. government has also been slow to release information. The Intercept initially requested the proposals in September 2020.
“I wish that this document had been released in early 2020,” said Chan, who has called for an investigation of the lab-leak origin theory. “It would have changed things massively, just to have all of the information in one place, immediately transparent, in a credible document that was submitted by EcoHealth Alliance.”
The second grant, “Understanding Risk of Zoonotic Virus Emergence in Emerging Infectious Disease Hotspots of Southeast Asia,” was awarded in August 2020 and extends through 2025. The proposal, written in 2019, often seems prescient, focusing on scaling up and deploying resources in Asia in case of an outbreak of an “emergent infectious disease” and referring to Asia as “this hottest of the EID hotspots.”

Comment:
Thanks to the authors for opening this up so we could all see part of it. I'm sure everyone will just read into it what they want to see, but that's just the way things are now.
Just in time for the 650,000 mark on American deaths from Coronavirus. And a total of 4.55 Million dead worldwide. That we know about.
Fauci, has lied to Congress and America. The article also proves this. Peter Daszak was a key player in the gain of function research that was sent to the Wuhan Lab in China.. Fauci has been disingenuous and lying to all for personal reasons. Common sense tells anyone that very dangerous genetic modifications were occurring in the Wuhan labs that were partially funded by the U.S.
This goes without saying that Fauci should resign at the least his position at NIH.
The censorship, the blatant lies, the coverup and now we're seeing more and more of the mainstream media FINALLY accepting the fact that this whole thing wasn't what it was played to be. How long before the intercept connects the dots on Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson, Arta Zeneca, et al... and the so-called vaccine, and the connection to the amount of money to be made mandating people get something that is questionable at best?
Ebright’s mention of MERS: we have some connections in this regard. Wuhan “bat lady” Zheng-Li Shi wrote about viruses of shrimp in 2006, and last year “Patient Zero” for COVID-19 was supposedly a shrimp seller. Both Wuhan lab and Wuhan University co-authored a 2016 paper that also is co-authored by a nidovirus expert, Snijder, in The Netherlands. This Leiden location would not be far from Johnson & Johnson’s division, Janssen Pharmaceutica. Janssen is the originator of fentanyl.

The Jul 2016 paper is about a virus of shrimp. We will expound on this connection, due to Omura’s first use of his discovery, ivermectin, against a nematode that also occurs in an Oregon pocket gopher.
 

badger2

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2016
Messages
13,870
Reaction score
2,778
Points
140
The first “Understanding the Risks” proposal comes almost two years after SARS-CoV-2’s closest relative came out of the Mojiang mine. They knew there was something bad in there before it was discovered. Out of 900 pages we were tossed a bone.
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$120.00
Goal
$350.00

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top