New Corona Variant, that might be very dangerous, spreads in South Africa

[Gracie]

 

[Gracie]

 

[Gracie]

Dr. Judy Mikovits – FAUCI IS BEHIND EVERY PANDEMIC SINCE 1984 |

Dr. Judy Mikovits – FAUCI IS BEHIND EVERY PANDEMIC SINCE 1984​

Thu 3:43 pm +00:00, 2 Sep 2021 1
posted by Weaver
Dr Judy Mikovits joins Mike Adams and she’s dismayed, that despite all of her best efforts to warn people for the past year and the best efforts of people like Dr Luc Montagnier, Dr Dolores Cahill, Dr Sherri Tenpenny and many others who predicted this mass murder, and yet it happened, anyway.

“100 million Americans have been injected with a synthetic virus with…the most dangerous spike protein, consisting of HIV, XMRV and SARS.”

FAUCI IS BEHIND EVERY PANDEMIC SINCE 1984

She reminds us that the lab origins of the current pandemic are hardly novel; that every “pandemic” has had lab origins since 1984, when Anthony Fauci started working at the NIAID, starting with AIDS.

“HIV/AIDS; you’ll remember the story of how we were lied to by Tony Fauci, Bob Gallo, the people at the top of NIH, CDC, FDA, even then. So the scenario, the game plan is exactly the same…

“We knew the spike protein, alone, the envelope protein, alone is the disease, so they can all backtrack, because they just injected everyone in the world with a synthetic deadly virus. They injected the poison. The word ‘virus’ means ‘poison’ and they injected it into everybody in the world, so they can back off now, because they’ve accomplished their end game. You will have customers for life and you will succeed at mass-murder.

“You’re going to kill everyone with HIV, you’re going to kill the 6% of America that had XMRV, when we were supposedly debunked. Xenotropic Murine Leukemia Virus is the mouse’s syncytin gene. So we knew the mouse virus was in everybody from the vaccines. We knew the flu vaccine put people at risk of dying of COVID…what I think what everybody has to wake up to is NEVER, EVER, EVER get another shot and we will never, ever, ever see another pandemic.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Fear mongers even have already given this new variant a 'Transformer' like name in calling it OMICRON!

This will be more hype over nothing.

 

[B. Kidd]

I thought it made people grow a Uni-horn?

 

[Flopper]

Thank you for the source. From your source:
“This estimated rate of evolution matches the number of mutations observed in variants present today, about a year after the onset of the pandemic, most of which contain about 20 to 30 mutations. The extreme examples in terms of number of mutations, of variants such as B.1.1.7, accumulated closer to 40 mutations compared to the first strains isolated.”

Are the 40 mutations confirmed or an estimated rate? Thanks

The virus does not determine when alpha becomes delta nor when one mutation is really two mutations. Someone makes a decision based on a set of rules which everyone may not be in agreement. We like to think of scientific data as absolute like mathematics but it isn't. It is always subject to change and exactly what the data is and exactly what it means is always subject to discussion. For the laymen, it is consensus that is important. This is both the ugliness and the beauty science.

 

[badger2]

The virus does not determine when alpha becomes delta nor when one mutation is really two mutations. Someone makes a decision based on a set of rules which everyone may not be in agreement. We like to think of scientific data as absolute like mathematics but it isn't. It is always subject to change and exactly what the data is and exactly what it means is always subject to discussion. For the laymen, it is consensus that is important. This is both the ugliness and the beauty science.

The virus determines its mutations.

 

[B. Kidd]

Omicron, please have mercy....

 

[ClaireH]

A

The virus does not determine when alpha becomes delta nor when one mutation is really two mutations. Someone makes a decision based on a set of rules which everyone may not be in agreement. We like to think of scientific data as absolute like mathematics but it isn't. It is always subject to change and exactly what the data is and exactly what it means is always subject to discussion. For the laymen, it is consensus that is important. This is both the ugliness and the beauty science.

I would add a relatively recent layer to what constitutes the average laymen. Taking out extremes from both ends, uninformed by choice on one end and quest for untainted knowledge non-stop individuals, the average voter is becoming more interested in factual info when it comes to personal health decisions.

Not long ago, it was more about the regular layperson quoting their doctors, their specialists, and not doing anything without their specialist’s or doctor’s advice. Because of the access all laymen have now to medical journal entries shortly after submission, times they are a changing! No longer will a patient go to their doctor and only have to accept one diagnosis. No longer do people have to stop on just obtaining 2 expert opinions when they can fully research specific cases and outcomes. The info is there, and it only takes the drive and effort to obtain it.

 

[ColonelAngus]

It MIGHT not be dangerous as well.

 

[B. Kidd]

It MIGHT not be dangerous as well.

I got it!
It's dangerous!
My nuts ache!!

 

[boedicca]

They mutate out of existence. Poor Dimm's.

Their ignorance of pretty much everything besides Novel Pronouns and Genders is astounding.

 

[Flopper]

They mutate out of existence. Poor Dimm's.

There is certainly some truth here. We tend to think mutations as some terrible but in fact it is just a change which may help the virus to break into cells or replicant or it may do the opposite or it may do nothing. However, I doubt this virus actually will mutate out of existence since mutations are random.

 

[B. Kidd]

There is certainly some truth here. We tend to think mutations as some terrible but in fact it is just a change which may help the virus to break into cells or replicant or it may do the opposite or it may do nothing. However, I doubt this virus actually will mutate out of existence since mutations are random.

Randomly worse? Please link.

 

[Flopper]

The virus determines its mutations.

 

[beagle9]

Yes, about two weeks. It was in news a few days ago so we should know in about 10 days how effective the current vaccines are. It seems likely that after 40 mutations of spike protein, we are going to need updates to all the vaccines if the transmission rate is as high as has been reported. That too, we will know soon.

Cha ching, Cha ching goes Fauci's bank account. I bet that rascal is smiling like a mule eating briar's. He said long ago that a pandemic would be great, well he got his wish, and even more so.

 

[Flopper]

A

I would add a relatively recent layer to what constitutes the average laymen. Taking out extremes from both ends, uninformed by choice on one end and quest for untainted knowledge non-stop individuals, the average voter is becoming more interested in factual info when it comes to personal health decisions.

Not long ago, it was more about the regular layperson quoting their doctors, their specialists, and not doing anything without their specialist’s or doctor’s advice. Because of the access all laymen have now to medical journal entries shortly after submission, times they are a changing! No longer will a patient go to their doctor and only have to accept one diagnosis. No longer do people have to stop on just obtaining 2 expert opinions when they can fully research specific cases and outcomes. The info is there, and it only takes the drive and effort to obtain it.

When I say layman, I'm speaking of a person that simply can not understand the science enough to make an informed decision without years of study. They may well be able to understand those that have read the abstracts of consensus of opinion of the pure research and summarized it such that the laymen can understand it. This is what most people read or the media who puts it in even more readable terms.

Do you believe average person would understand this very basic explanation of what mRNA does. "mRNA is an RNA version of the gene that leaves the cell nucleus and moves to the cytoplasm where proteins are made. During protein synthesis, an organelle called a ribosome moves along the mRNA, reads its base sequence, and uses the genetic code to translate each three-base triplet, or codon, into its corresponding amino acid....."

 

[Flopper]

Cha ching, Cha ching goes Fauci's bank account. I bet that rascal is smiling like a mule eating briar's. He said long ago that a pandemic would be great, well he got his wish, and even more so.

Link. I doubt Fauci said that. If so, it was probably taken out of context. Fauci is not stupid.

 

[braalian]

A

I would add a relatively recent layer to what constitutes the average laymen. Taking out extremes from both ends, uninformed by choice on one end and quest for untainted knowledge non-stop individuals, the average voter is becoming more interested in factual info when it comes to personal health decisions.

Not long ago, it was more about the regular layperson quoting their doctors, their specialists, and not doing anything without their specialist’s or doctor’s advice. Because of the access all laymen have now to medical journal entries shortly after submission, times they are a changing! No longer will a patient go to their doctor and only have to accept one diagnosis. No longer do people have to stop on just obtaining 2 expert opinions when they can fully research specific cases and outcomes. The info is there, and it only takes the drive and effort to obtain it.

As someone who works in healthcare, I can confidently say that 99% of patients are completely incapable of researching anything online to any sort of scientific standard.

They cherry pick any stupid bullshit they find on the web that they think justifies what they *want* to do versus what they *should* do.

Most people have no desire to research actual peer-reviewed studies. And if they do, they have a hard time finding and identifying them. And if they do find them, they are difficult to understand unless you actually have education/experience in that specific field.

By all means, advocate for yourself and your loved ones. But patients googling their condition and then thinking they know more than PhD holding experts is stupid and dangerous.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Does not have to be. Yes or no?

"Opinions are not based on fact."

You tell me. What does that sentence say?