New: CBP Shoots and Kills Man in MN

Leaping tall buildings requires not getting anything hung up along the way, of course that wouldn't account for the web gear, but whatever.
Yes, I did notice that was quite an agile jump aout a foot or so straight up into the air as soon as the first pop sounded.

I didn't even notice the bag on his other side, I dunno what was in it. Could have been that, I guess.
 


Kyle wasn't on the scene TO protest, he was there to protect his community FROM protesters, and didn't kill anyone until AFTER he was threatened and attacked. It svcks that simple things like 'facts' and 'logic' elude you so routinely, you should really try to work on that. Try this in fact, if any thought enters your head, just assume that thought is wrong and that the opposite is the truth.
 
Kyle wasn't on the scene TO protest, he was there to protect his community FROM protesters, and didn't kill anyone until AFTER he was threatened and attacked. It svcks that simple things like 'facts' and 'logic' elude you so routinely, you should really try to work on that. Try this in fact, if any thought enters your head, just assume that thought is wrong and that the opposite is the truth.
Irrelevant.

The words were, "attend a protest".

And the white nationalist cops let the child stroll in with a rifle after curfew.
 
If you are carrying, and you won't comply with orders, and they think you are reaching for your gun, you will get shot.

Who doesn't know this in 2026?

Unfortunately this might just trigger the Insurrection Act, because the Left has whipped their people into a total frenzy.
EXCEPT NOBODY WAS REACHING FOR A GUN AND NO ICE AGENT THOUGHT THAT WAS HAPPENING

New Video Analysis Reveals Flawed and Fatal Decisions in Shooting of Pretti

A frame-by-frame assessment of actions by Alex Pretti and the two officers who fired 10 times shows how lethal force came to be used against a target who didn’t pose a threat.


When federal agents shot and killed 37-year-old Alex Pretti in Minneapolis on Saturday, officials said he approached agents with a handgun, intending to massacre them. “An individual approached U.S. Border Patrol agents with a 9 mm semiautomatic handgun.” “This looks like a situation where an individual arrived at the scene to inflict maximum damage on individuals and to kill law enforcement.”

But a Times analysis of video footage from the scene in the moments when two officers opened fire, clearly contradict federal government statements. Pretti does not appear to pose a threat to agents. In fact, at several critical junctures, he is outnumbered and under their control. Here are the key moments that reveal what happened. We see Pretti walking about, filming a group of protesters who are speaking with a federal agent. He’s holding a cell phone in one hand.

The other hand is empty. It’s just over 30 seconds before the shooting when a protester is pushed to the ground. Pretti steps between her and the agent who’d shoved her, briefly putting his hand on the agent’s waist. The agent pepper-sprays Pretti’s face.

We can see Pretti is still holding his phone in one hand while holding his other hand up to protect himself against the spray. Contrary to statements by federal officials, he’s made no threatening movements towards agents.

Pretti, who had a firearms permit, carries a gun holstered on his right hip, but he doesn’t reach for it. And it appears agents are unaware the gun is even there. He reaches toward the protester, apparently trying to help her up, while agents begin grabbing him from behind.

He tries to pull away, and again he makes no threatening movements towards the agents. But agents pull him backwards and force him to the ground. Then shots ring out. [gunfire] Now we’ll slow things down, so each moment is clear.

Here is Pretti. Several agents are restraining him. And this is the Border Patrol agent who will shoot him first. This appears to be when agents first notice that Pretti is carrying a firearm and yell that he has a gun. Watching the same moment from a different angle, the agent who first pepper-sprayed Pretti beats him several times with the spray canister.

We can see that both of Pretti’s arms are pinned down by his head. This agent in gray reaches to remove Pretti’s weapon from his hip, as this agent unholsters his gun, nudges the agent in gray out of the way and fires. [gunfire] Let’s rewind and focus on the agent who shoots first. Just seconds before he fired, he was facing away from Pretti and focusing on an entirely different situation as he tries to spray a nearby woman with an irritant. The spray appears to malfunction, and the agent turns as he adjusts it. That’s when someone yells that Pretti has a gun. And around five seconds after fully turning his attention toward Pretti, the agent draws his weapon and shoots. [gunfire] His arm visibly recoils at the first shot. The firearm has clearly been removed from the scrum when the first shots are fired toward Pretti at close range. [gunfire]

The officer who disarmed Pretti can be seen reacting to the sound of the first shot, looking back toward the skirmish. The shooter was standing behind Pretti and not under direct threat, contradicting statements from Homeland Security officials that he fired defensive shots.

He also has a vantage point to see the gun pulled from the scene, but it’s unclear if he did and whether he thought a weapon was still on Pretti. He then fires three more shots from behind Pretti, whose arms are down as he appears to brace himself against the pavement.

In one hand, he still holds his phone, and in his other, his glasses. The agent in gray, who removed Pretti’s gun, carries it across the street. Pretti is disarmed and falling to the ground.

But the agent who first pepper-sprayed Pretti and later beat him with a canister, also pulls out his gun. From a distance, despite the fact that Pretti is lying motionless on the ground, these two agents fire six more shots. Neither is under threat. [screaming] [gunfire, screaming] In total, the agents fire 10 shots in five seconds.

After the shooting, an agent kneeling next to Pretti’s body asks where the gun is — — showing that not all of the officers seem to know the weapon had been removed. Agents appear to begin giving medical aid. About 31 seconds elapsed from the time agents first physically engaged Pretti to the moment the last shot was fired.


 
There is a cop on his knees and he is trying to get Prettis left arm behind him. You can see him trying to hook that arm and he is absolutely fighting it. This happens in the video literally right before he is shot.

Okay. What's the timestamp on the video, if you don't mind? That way I can see precisely what you're talking about.

Thanks!


On a side note, its super annoying to watch cops struggle with a ******* arm like that. If someone spent 5 minutes with every cop, they would know how to do a "kimura". Dont any of these cops watch MMA? Its fuckin simple as shit to do a kimura, especially if the guy is being held down by other cops. :dunno:

Yeah, maybe, I dunno. There were a bunch of em on top of him, it looked like. That's why I asked about where specificially in that recording you were talking about him resisting.

Do you do karate?
 
Irrelevant.

The words were, "attend a protest".

And the white nationalist cops let the child stroll in with a rifle after curfew.

Pretti wasn't killed b/c he 'had a gun at a protest.' If that were true, why didn't the cops shoot him immediately after he showed up at the protest? He was killed, unfortunately, b/c he involved himself in a process that he did not belong in.

Additionally, Kyle didn't 'stroll in after curfew,' photographic evidence proved that he was in town around the scene of the protests all day.
 
Kyle wasn't on the scene TO protest, he was there to protect his community FROM protesters, and didn't kill anyone until AFTER he was threatened and attacked. It svcks that simple things like 'facts' and 'logic' elude you so routinely, you should really try to work on that. Try this in fact, if any thought enters your head, just assume that thought is wrong and that the opposite is the truth.
He lived a state over, so how the hell was he protecting his community? The owners did ask for his services. The owners of the Car Source dealership testified that they never requested or authorized Kyle Rittenhouse or his group of armed individuals to protect their business.

He wasn't even old enough to carry a firearm, Pretti had a legitimate firearm, now deal with those facts.
 
Okay. What's the timestamp on the video, if you don't mind? That way I can see precisely what you're talking about.

Thanks!




Yeah, maybe, I dunno. There were a bunch of em on top of him, it looked like. That's why I asked about where specificially in that recording you were talking about him resisting.

Do you do karate?
Its literally like 1 second before the shots.

No, i dont do karate. I did Tae Kwon Do. A "kimura" is considered jiu jitsu, but in reality it was invented by a legendary judoka (aka, a judo master) named Masahiko Kimura, who left Japan and went to Brazil where he taught grappling to Helio Gracie (the grandfather of the world famous Gracie family), who then went on to create "Brazilian jiu jitsu". If Kimura had never gone to Brazil, the UFC and MMA in general wouldnt even exist.
 
Last edited:
He wasn't trying to throw down with anyone. He was pepper sprayed. You know what that does to people. They can't see. They can't even think rationally.

After the pepper spray was deployed, that should've been the end of it, because those who were pepper sprayed aren't going to do anything but try and recuperate from the effects. This is why pepper spray is so effective. Once that crap gets in your eyes and lungs, it's over. All you want in your entire life is get that crap off of you.
They then moved to arrest. They were gonna arrest him and probably the women.

Its against the law to obstruct. Gun went off in scuffle. All agents fired when GUN GUN GUN CALLED
 
They then moved to arrest. They were gonna arrest him and probably the women.

Its against the law to obstruct. Gun went off in scuffle. All agents fired when GUN GUN GUN CALLED
Which just highlights their negligence and incompetence.
 
They then moved to arrest. They were gonna arrest him and probably the women.

Its against the law to obstruct. Gun went off in scuffle. All agents fired when GUN GUN GUN CALLED

That's irrelevant to shooting him after he was disarmed. Especially since the agent that shot Pretti saw the other agent disarm him.

7:15 to 10:05
 
why are people physically fighting with Federal Agents ? and fighting with them while carrying a firearm is not likely to end well .. this isn't happening in FL where authorities have detained thousands more illegals than Minn .. the gov of Minn is encouraging this with his insurrection against the federal gov ..

Was he fighting, or was he covering up and on his hands and knees because he was getting mobbed by a group of thugs, punching and kicking him?
 
15th post
He may as well have left it home because when he was murdered he didn't have a weapon on his person and had never held it at any time one of the ICE thugs had already taken it from him.
Link...
 
He lived a state over, so how the hell was he protecting his community? The owners did ask for his services. The owners of the Car Source dealership testified that they never requested or authorized Kyle Rittenhouse or his group of armed individuals to protect their business.

He wasn't even old enough to carry a firearm, Pretti had a legitimate firearm, now deal with those facts.


In mid-August last year, he had begun working as a lifeguard at the Pleasant Prairie RecPlex in Kenosha County and — although he did not possess a driver’s license — would drive to work from Antioch each day, he said. Rittenhouse told the court that he drove to work on Aug. 24 and stayed in Kenosha overnight at Black’s stepfather’s house. He remained in the city on Aug. 25, cleaning graffiti off a high school early in the day and then later going to a local store to buy a sling for his rifle.

Antioch IL and Kenosha WI are 20 miles from each other. My job is 22 miles from my house, and I consider this entire area to be MY community. This is not uncommon.

Also, a VERY simple Google search finds that...

Kyle Rittenhouse was 17 years old at the time of the shootings, making him too young under Wisconsin law to legally purchase a handgun, but a legal exception regarding barrel length allowed him to possess a long gun. While prosecutors argued he was too young to carry the weapon, the judge dismissed the misdemeanor charge because the rifle he possessed did not violate the specific, narrow statute for minors.
Key details regarding the legality of the firearm possession:
  • Age and Statute: Wisconsin law prohibits individuals under 18 from possessing a dangerous weapon, but an exception exists for rifles and shotguns if the minor is not in violation of specific, smaller-caliber restrictions.
  • The Firearm: The judge ruled that because the AR-15-style rifle Rittenhouse used had a barrel longer than 16 inches, it did not fall under the prohibition for minors, resulting in the dismissal of the charge.
  • Purchase Legality: Rittenhouse did not legally purchase the rifle himself; it was purchased for him by Dominick Black because Rittenhouse was under 18.

Hours before closing arguments began on Monday, Judge Bruce Schroeder granted a defense motion to toss out the weapons charge. Rittenhouse attorneys Mark Richards and Corey Chirafsi pointed to an exception in the law that they said allows minors to possess shotguns and rifles as long as they're not short-barreled.

Assistant District Attorney James Kraus argued that the exception renders the state's prohibition on minors possessing dangerous weapons meaningless. But when he acknowledged that Rittenhouse's rifle's barrel was longer than 16 inches, the minimum barrel length allowed under state law, Schroeder dismissed the charge.

To Kenosha-based defense attorney Michael Cicchini, the statute clearly requires a weapon to be short-barreled to apply, and the judge made the right call.

"There doesn't seem to be much ambiguity here," he said. "(The charge) should have been dismissed earlier."


Have I sufficiently dealt with your NON-facts?
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom