Never mind transitional species.

Where are the fossils of creatures that didn't make the cut?
The answer to your question is simple and readily available to you.

P. m. me for an appointment to discuss and learn.

(you question isn't intelligible and needs correcting) (ancesstors of crows didn't make the cut)
 
The answer to your question is simple and readily available to you.

P. m. me for an appointment to discuss and learn.

(you question isn't intelligible and needs correcting) (ancesstors of crows didn't make the cut)
The question is simple. Where are the fossils of creatures whose evolutionary changes weren't 'selected'? Where are the goofy looking fossils?
 
Last edited:
An appointment is necessary to discuss.

p.m. me for time and a clarified question.

It's become necessary to eliminate spammers first.
90 percent (approximately) of posts on these forums are spammers or trolls. Just make your case. Others may want to jump in.
 
The absence of transitional species in the fossil record undermines the theory of gradual evolution, which Darwin himself disavowed in his later years. Perhaps future DNA analysis will provide a better explanation.
 
If you believe that a species can morph into something else, in order to do so it would take millions of years. We should be walking on all the transitional bones it would take for just one single species to turn into something else.
True. Evolution isn't metamorphosis. There should be gazillions of fossils showing transition. Instead, all we find is the finished product.
 
If this topic has been researched at all the results have been kept under lock and key. This thread is meant to evoke some thought out about why the creatures that failed to survive and pass their evolutionary changes on have left no fossils. All we have are fossils that were successful.

Oh my word.

You want this thread to evoke thought, but you're unwilling to actually think.

Well done.
 
Oh my word.

You want this thread to evoke thought, but you're unwilling to actually think.

Well done.
This thread is the product of very critical thought. Wave it away if you can't contribute anything useful.
 
This thread is the product of very critical thought. Wave it away if you can't contribute anything useful.
Oh Jesus, I just pissed myself, I think I might even have shit on the floor, because you made me laugh so fucking hard nothing would stay in. Wait, is that my liver on the floor over there.

No offense (what people say when they're being offensive) but you're not really the sort of person on this forum I expect "critical thought" from.
 
Oh Jesus, I just pissed myself, I think I might even have shit on the floor, because you made me laugh so fucking hard nothing would stay in. Wait, is that my liver on the floor over there.

No offense (what people say when they're being offensive) but you're not really the sort of person on this forum I expect "critical thought" from.
Critical thought is my thing. It's the simplicity of it that likely confuses you.
 
Abstinence is a good example of critical thought regarding unwanted pregnancy, and associated problems. Simple but effective.

Abstinence is stupid.

We know that places where abstinence is taught end up with higher unwanted teenage preganacies.


1) Mississippi
2) Arkansas
3) Louisiana
4) Kentucky
5) Oklahoma
6) Tennessee
7) Alabama
8) Texas
9) West Virginia

How do you explain that the most religious, most likely to teach abstinence, least like to teach sex education are the ones with the highest rates of teenage preganacies?

No difficult, shouldn't take all that "critical thought" you've got.

These bumblefuck states all do the simple thing. So simple it doesn't work.
 
Abstinence is stupid.

We know that places where abstinence is taught end up with higher unwanted teenage preganacies.


1) Mississippi
2) Arkansas
3) Louisiana
4) Kentucky
5) Oklahoma
6) Tennessee
7) Alabama
8) Texas
9) West Virginia

How do you explain that the most religious, most likely to teach abstinence, least like to teach sex education are the ones with the highest rates of teenage preganacies?

No difficult, shouldn't take all that "critical thought" you've got.

These bumblefuck states all do the simple thing. So simple it doesn't work.
It's 100 percent successful for those who practice it. If you abstain from sex you don't need "sex education" until you marry and want children. Why go the law school if you're not going to become a lawyer?
 
Last edited:
9vmviz.jpg


9vmvnf.jpg



 
It's 100 percent successful for those who practice it. If you abstain from sex you don't need "sex education" until you marry and want children. Why go the law school if you're not going to become a lawyer?

Yeah... then again we were born to have sex. Why on Earth Christianity and Islam go around making out like it's something bad..... and then make it worse.
 
Yeah... then again we were born to have sex. Why on Earth Christianity and Islam go around making out like it's something bad..... and then make it worse.
Sex within marriage is good. The problem is that few are raised to wait until marriage.
 
Back
Top Bottom