martybegan
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2010
- 93,415
- 43,660
- 2,300
Nope.![]()
Yep. and all your dancing around her grave over it makes you a ghoulish twat.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nope.![]()
Hiding behind a sham investigation and pretending you don't get a chubby thinking someone you hate politically died doesn't make your shit true.
What twisting?
LOL
Oh? The investigations (plural) you never saw were "shams?"
If truth and reality were on your side, you wouldn't have to make up shit like that.
That was for the DC Metro Police, and their documents showed no good reason for her to be shot.
Babbitt shooting internal police docs reveal 'no good reason for shooting,' according to Judicial Watch
LOLOL
This is the first time you ever looked at the investigation report you've been dismissing all along, isn't it?
![]()
She wasn't a threat. Hanging in a window, an unarmed woman.
Yep. and all your dancing around her grave over it makes you a ghoulish twat.
Again, you decide we are “implying” something we aren’t because your entire argument is based on a strawman.Because I know what deadly force guidelines are specific to police officers, and shooting one woman to get the rest of the mob to stop hitting the door isn't part of them.
You idiots have to dance around the bush to avoid saying that, all the while implying that.
The results were the sham. Would have been nice to see the whole reports, but we never saw those.
I found the one Maerner listed and that was for the DC metro Police, which was the one they filed the FOIA claim against.
Meanwhile we have not seen the full report from your two supposed independent agencies, just the results saying "nothing happened"
She was. Had she made it through the window, she would have unlocked the doors and let the mob in as the congress people were evacuating.You have to make it sound like she was an actual threat to the officer, which she was not.
She was a threat.
She wasn't hanging.
And she wasn't unarmed.
If truth and reality were on your side, you wouldn't have to lie like ya do.![]()
Again, you decide we are “implying” something we aren’t because your entire argument is based on a strawman.
She was shot because she came through the window. The rationale is specific to her. The facts are articulable.
You called the investigations, "shams." You didn't even know they existed. What a shame you got caught again making shit up.
Quote where they state, "nothing happened."
She was. Had she made it through the window, she would have unlocked the doors and let the mob in as the congress people were evacuating.
The officer was within his right to shoot her. End of story.
At least I don’t have to distort and lie about your argument to blow it up.And your entire position is based on bullshit.
But it's government official bullshit, and like a good wibble lemming, you slurp it all down.
The fact is she was unarmed hanging through a window, and was shot for no good reason.
What was she armed with?
She wasn't a threat.
At the time of the shooting she was hanging in the window.
Is that your best point?
LOL.