Networks Skip Sheriff's Congressional Slam of Eric Holder's 'Ugly' Comments

MSM media isn't hardcore news...it is a synopsis of current events. Anyone who watches a football star and a beauty queen for their news is an idiot...just like those who think FNC and MSNBC are unbiased and report all of the news.

Blaming MSM for GOP failures is nonsense...self victimization that sounds like a black guy blaming whites for their personal failure.

Anyone whining about the MSM....hypocrites.

Hmmm. Well if the MSM is not the place to expect hard core news, where do you suggest we go for hard core news?
Newspaper, internet. There is no single source. That is the problem with broadcasters and ex-broadcasters that couldn't hack it - they think news is more than it really is and become disalussioned when they realize anchors are nothing more than script readers with a pretty face and reporters are nothing more than underpaid researchers to make the anchors look good.

Yeah, there are biased producers, news directors and talent, but in the end...a 30 minute newscast can only cover so much. In the end, GMA and the rest of the morning shows are NOT hard news...it is couch news trying to relate to ditzy white females. They cover headlines...nothing more.
When I was broadcasting news we got our stories off the AP news feed, it was already written, we had no way or time to call up for intense details......
 
MSM media isn't hardcore news...it is a synopsis of current events. Anyone who watches a football star and a beauty queen for their news is an idiot...just like those who think FNC and MSNBC are unbiased and report all of the news.

Blaming MSM for GOP failures is nonsense...self victimization that sounds like a black guy blaming whites for their personal failure.

Anyone whining about the MSM....hypocrites.

Hmmm. Well if the MSM is not the place to expect hard core news, where do you suggest we go for hard core news?
Newspaper, internet. There is no single source. That is the problem with broadcasters and ex-broadcasters that couldn't hack it - they think news is more than it really is and become disalussioned when they realize anchors are nothing more than script readers with a pretty face and reporters are nothing more than underpaid researchers to make the anchors look good.

Yeah, there are biased producers, news directors and talent, but in the end...a 30 minute newscast can only cover so much. In the end, GMA and the rest of the morning shows are NOT hard news...it is couch news trying to relate to ditzy white females. They cover headlines...nothing more.

Newspapers ARE part of the MSM as are some internet websites. And they are all just as capable of dishonest bias as is the evening newscast on the free networks. The popularity of channels like CNN, MSNBC, or Fox News are because some people want more depth of information that can be provided in a 30-second news segment on the evening news.
1. That is because you should have different sources if you want to be informed.
2. All networks are biased....CNN, MSNBC, FNC...and they provide you with 30 seconds of news and 2 minutes of opinion...that is not in-depth, it is pushing a narrative from one side or both. (Depending on the network)
But what 30-second news segments are included and what is not included on that evening newscast says as much about the integrity of journalism demonstrated by the producers as does what is actually said.
You sure you were actually a broadcaster? You sure don't seem to know much about the industry...about what is an actual newscast and what is not. A beauty queen and a football player talking about lifestyle news....that is NOT a newscast, hard news is NOT their genre. As for what a producer chooses to air...I would like to see a rundown of all of the major networks during a news hour and see who actually covers what. You would be pleasantly surprised.

And oh, just so you will now...I have about 10 years experience in the industry. Yes, there is bias if you are looking for it, but what is important to you...is only important to a small portion of their target audience. All the complaining is much ado about nothing....self victimization and an excuse by the RW.
 
MSM media isn't hardcore news...it is a synopsis of current events. Anyone who watches a football star and a beauty queen for their news is an idiot...just like those who think FNC and MSNBC are unbiased and report all of the news.

Blaming MSM for GOP failures is nonsense...self victimization that sounds like a black guy blaming whites for their personal failure.

Anyone whining about the MSM....hypocrites.

Hmmm. Well if the MSM is not the place to expect hard core news, where do you suggest we go for hard core news?
Newspaper, internet. There is no single source. That is the problem with broadcasters and ex-broadcasters that couldn't hack it - they think news is more than it really is and become disalussioned when they realize anchors are nothing more than script readers with a pretty face and reporters are nothing more than underpaid researchers to make the anchors look good.

Yeah, there are biased producers, news directors and talent, but in the end...a 30 minute newscast can only cover so much. In the end, GMA and the rest of the morning shows are NOT hard news...it is couch news trying to relate to ditzy white females. They cover headlines...nothing more.
When I was broadcasting news we got our stories off the AP news feed, it was already written, we had no way or time to call up for intense details......
Small market....that is what we did in radio...but it was raw news that needed to be written. And no matter how hard it was to be unbiased...there was always bias according to the listeners.
 
MSM media isn't hardcore news...it is a synopsis of current events. Anyone who watches a football star and a beauty queen for their news is an idiot...just like those who think FNC and MSNBC are unbiased and report all of the news.

Blaming MSM for GOP failures is nonsense...self victimization that sounds like a black guy blaming whites for their personal failure.

Anyone whining about the MSM....hypocrites.

Hmmm. Well if the MSM is not the place to expect hard core news, where do you suggest we go for hard core news?
Newspaper, internet. There is no single source. That is the problem with broadcasters and ex-broadcasters that couldn't hack it - they think news is more than it really is and become disalussioned when they realize anchors are nothing more than script readers with a pretty face and reporters are nothing more than underpaid researchers to make the anchors look good.

Yeah, there are biased producers, news directors and talent, but in the end...a 30 minute newscast can only cover so much. In the end, GMA and the rest of the morning shows are NOT hard news...it is couch news trying to relate to ditzy white females. They cover headlines...nothing more.
When I was broadcasting news we got our stories off the AP news feed, it was already written, we had no way or time to call up for intense details......

Well that's really sad. That puts those reporting the news at the mercy of the research/investigation, good or bad, of the AP. However, that's fine for routine stuff or the more inconsequential matters of interest, and of course every news organization I have worked for--television, radio, and/or newspaper--also used the wire services for filler as they needed it.

But every journalist/reporter worth his/her salt wants a scoop when he/she can get it. What if Bernstein and Woodward had not had sufficient courage and curiosity to go after and fully investigate the Watergate scandal? We never would have known the truth about that. But even now there are numbnuts who buy into the politically motivated 're-edits' of that story and many others and report them as fact. It's bad enough when the numbnuts and politicians do it, but it is indefensible when it is done under the banner of 'responsible jouranlism.'
 

Forum List

Back
Top