Netanyahu’s Historic Win — and Obama’s Humiliating Loss

You're a fucking moron. That's been thoroughly established. That's also very likely why you actually believe sanctions are going to prevent Iran from obtaining Uranium.

Moron Faun...it is your new handle. Look! The people in Iran are already on edge with the mullahs in their country. Crushing Sanctions handed down by a president with guts and respect (unfortunately both of which Obama lacks) will put pressure on an already unstable government in Iran. Why don't you get that? Then a few thousand well placed bombs and you bring down the Iranian government in less than a year. And Kick their asses out of Iraq as well.
They do not belong there. We the United States of America won that war. We should still be there today but Obama had an election to win so he gave away our victory to Isis scumbags.
Anyone that still respects Obama is as big of a loser as he is. Check his latest poll numbers. They are doing a nose dive as we speak.
Great. Another moron. :rolleyes: Imbecile ... we had sanctions on North Korea, they still built nuclear weapons. We've had sanctions on Iran for many years now. They are still working on developing nuclear weapons.

Sanctions don't prevent nations from building nukes. Israel is fucked if they rely on America's brain-dead right to prevent Iran from building a nuclear weapon.

And really? You want to talk about Obama's poll numbers?? At this point in each Republicans presidency according to Gallup...

Obama ......... 46%
GHW Bush ... 35%
GH Bush ....... not in office
Reagan ......... 47%
Ford .............. not in office
Nixon ............ not in office
Eisenhower .. 51%

You have to go back 56 years to find one with even a 5 point margin higher than Obama. And even that was still within the MoE.

Thank YOU for making the point that "helping" them with nuclear energy leads to them developing bombs!! And THAT is what happens when you help rogue countries develop nuclear capabilities.

North Korea and weapons of mass destruction - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

The nuclear program can be traced back to about 1962, when North Korea committed itself to what it called "all-fortressization", which was the beginning of the hyper-militarized North Korea of today.[18] In 1963 North Korea asked the Soviet Union for help in developing nuclear weapons, but was refused. The Soviet Union agreed to help North Korea develop a peaceful nuclear energy program, including the training of nuclear scientists. Later, China, after its nuclear tests, similarly rejected North Korean requests for help with developing nuclear weapons.[19]

Soviet specialists took part in the construction of the Yongbyon Nuclear Scientific Research Center[20] and began construction of an IRT-2000research reactor in 1963, which became operational in 1965 and was upgraded to 8 MW in 1974.[21] In 1979 North Korea indigenously began to build in Yongbyon a second research reactor, an ore processing plant and a fuel rod fabrication plant.[22]

North Korea's nuclear weapons program dates back to the 1980s. Focusing on practical uses of nuclear energy and the completion of a nuclear weapon development system, North Korea began to operate facilities for uranium fabrication and conversion, and conducted high-explosive detonation tests.[18] In 1985 North Korea ratified the NPT, but did not conclude the required safeguards agreement with the IAEA until 1992. In early 1993, while verifying North Korea's initial declaration, the IAEA concluded that there was strong evidence this declaration was incomplete. When North Korea refused the requested special inspection, the IAEA reported its non-compliance to the UN Security Council. In 1993, North Korea announced its withdrawal from the NPT, but suspended that withdrawal before it took effect.[23]

Under the 1994 Agreed Framework, the U.S. government agreed to facilitate the supply of two light water reactors to North Korea in exchange for North Korean disarmament.[24][25] Such reactors are considered "more proliferation-resistant than North Korea's graphite-moderated reactors",[26]but not "proliferation proof".[27] Implementation of the Agreed Framework floundered, and in 2002 the Agreed Framework fell apart, with each side blaming the other for its failure. By 2002, Pakistan had admitted that North Korea had gained access to Pakistan's nuclear technology in the late 1990s.[28] Based on evidence from Pakistan, Libya, and multiple confessions from North Korea itself, the United States accused North Korea of non-compliance and halted oil shipments; North Korea later claimed its public confession of guilt had been deliberately misconstrued. By the end of 2002, the Agreed Framework was officially dead.
Neither side ever lived up to the agreement. NK proceeded with clandestine efforts to enrich Uranium and the U.S. never completed construction of the 2 light water reactors.
 
Old enough to know Carter never eased sanctions on North Korea. Clinton did, but the sanctions left in place were still severe

Carter propped that nation up. He sent them just what they needed to survive and that was criminal in my opinion.. Do you know how many lives were lost and ruined because of his weak ass presidency? Not just in NK but many other places in the world. Democrats wreak havoc on everything they try and fix. Obama is no different....actually he is worse. He knows his ideas won't work and pushes them on us anyway.
 
Umm ... with Obama's plan, they don't have to. With Obama's plan, they have a pledge from the U.S., Britain, Russia, China, France and Germany that they will bomb Iran (effectively for Israel).

So how is Israel better off bombing Iran when they could have the U.S., Britain, Russia, China, France and Germany bombing Iran for them?

So . . . now the left wants to bomb Iran. How ironic. :rolleyes-41: We could keep enforcing sanctions. Then they don't have the MEANS to obtain uranium.

This also works on our side because once the people are hungry, they are going to become angry. What do you think the people are going to choose? Food or nuclear power plants?
You're a fucking moron. That's been thoroughly established. That's also very likely why you actually believe sanctions are going to prevent Iran from obtaining Uranium. :eusa_doh:
So you will trust a treaty negotiated by a guy that draws imaginary red lines?
The deal is not with Obama alone. It includes Britain, Russia, China, France and Germany.
If it goes through, who do you think will take credit? At least it's proven it didn't do any good.
If the deal doesn't do any good, I can't imagine anyone taking credit for it. I would assume all parties involved would point fingers.
 
You're a fucking moron. That's been thoroughly established. That's also very likely why you actually believe sanctions are going to prevent Iran from obtaining Uranium.

Moron Faun...it is your new handle. Look! The people in Iran are already on edge with the mullahs in their country. Crushing Sanctions handed down by a president with guts and respect (unfortunately both of which Obama lacks) will put pressure on an already unstable government in Iran. Why don't you get that? Then a few thousand well placed bombs and you bring down the Iranian government in less than a year. And Kick their asses out of Iraq as well.
They do not belong there. We the United States of America won that war. We should still be there today but Obama had an election to win so he gave away our victory to Isis scumbags.
Anyone that still respects Obama is as big of a loser as he is. Check his latest poll numbers. They are doing a nose dive as we speak.
Great. Another moron. :rolleyes: Imbecile ... we had sanctions on North Korea, they still built nuclear weapons. We've had sanctions on Iran for many years now. They are still working on developing nuclear weapons.

Sanctions don't prevent nations from building nukes. Israel is fucked if they rely on America's brain-dead right to prevent Iran from building a nuclear weapon.

And really? You want to talk about Obama's poll numbers?? At this point in each Republicans presidency according to Gallup...

Obama ......... 46%
GHW Bush ... 35%
GH Bush ....... not in office
Reagan ......... 47%
Ford .............. not in office
Nixon ............ not in office
Eisenhower .. 51%

You have to go back 56 years to find one with even a 5 point margin higher than Obama. And even that was still within the MoE.

Is that all you care about, is Obama? Pathetic. FTW, as long as you can make Obama look good. You're a disgrace to the human race.
Of course that's not all I care about. However, anytime someone points to Obama's JAR and declares what a shitty president he is, comparing him to every other Republican president Gallup has tracked is entirely appropriate. I understand that may cause some like you some consternation since Obama's lasted in office longer than half of them, is up by double digits over Bush, statistically tied with Reagan (that one's gotta hurt), and [barely] within MoE of the other.

Translation for morons like you ... if Obama sucks, so does every Republican president since Hoover-R gave us the Great Depression. :ack-1:
 
You're a fucking moron. That's been thoroughly established. That's also very likely why you actually believe sanctions are going to prevent Iran from obtaining Uranium.

Moron Faun...it is your new handle. Look! The people in Iran are already on edge with the mullahs in their country. Crushing Sanctions handed down by a president with guts and respect (unfortunately both of which Obama lacks) will put pressure on an already unstable government in Iran. Why don't you get that? Then a few thousand well placed bombs and you bring down the Iranian government in less than a year. And Kick their asses out of Iraq as well.
They do not belong there. We the United States of America won that war. We should still be there today but Obama had an election to win so he gave away our victory to Isis scumbags.
Anyone that still respects Obama is as big of a loser as he is. Check his latest poll numbers. They are doing a nose dive as we speak.
Great. Another moron. :rolleyes: Imbecile ... we had sanctions on North Korea, they still built nuclear weapons. We've had sanctions on Iran for many years now. They are still working on developing nuclear weapons.

Sanctions don't prevent nations from building nukes. Israel is fucked if they rely on America's brain-dead right to prevent Iran from building a nuclear weapon.

And really? You want to talk about Obama's poll numbers?? At this point in each Republicans presidency according to Gallup...

Obama ......... 46%
GHW Bush ... 35%
GH Bush ....... not in office
Reagan ......... 47%
Ford .............. not in office
Nixon ............ not in office
Eisenhower .. 51%

You have to go back 56 years to find one with even a 5 point margin higher than Obama. And even that was still within the MoE.

Thank YOU for making the point that "helping" them with nuclear energy leads to them developing bombs!! And THAT is what happens when you help rogue countries develop nuclear capabilities.

North Korea and weapons of mass destruction - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

The nuclear program can be traced back to about 1962, when North Korea committed itself to what it called "all-fortressization", which was the beginning of the hyper-militarized North Korea of today.[18] In 1963 North Korea asked the Soviet Union for help in developing nuclear weapons, but was refused. The Soviet Union agreed to help North Korea develop a peaceful nuclear energy program, including the training of nuclear scientists. Later, China, after its nuclear tests, similarly rejected North Korean requests for help with developing nuclear weapons.[19]

Soviet specialists took part in the construction of the Yongbyon Nuclear Scientific Research Center[20] and began construction of an IRT-2000research reactor in 1963, which became operational in 1965 and was upgraded to 8 MW in 1974.[21] In 1979 North Korea indigenously began to build in Yongbyon a second research reactor, an ore processing plant and a fuel rod fabrication plant.[22]

North Korea's nuclear weapons program dates back to the 1980s. Focusing on practical uses of nuclear energy and the completion of a nuclear weapon development system, North Korea began to operate facilities for uranium fabrication and conversion, and conducted high-explosive detonation tests.[18] In 1985 North Korea ratified the NPT, but did not conclude the required safeguards agreement with the IAEA until 1992. In early 1993, while verifying North Korea's initial declaration, the IAEA concluded that there was strong evidence this declaration was incomplete. When North Korea refused the requested special inspection, the IAEA reported its non-compliance to the UN Security Council. In 1993, North Korea announced its withdrawal from the NPT, but suspended that withdrawal before it took effect.[23]

Under the 1994 Agreed Framework, the U.S. government agreed to facilitate the supply of two light water reactors to North Korea in exchange for North Korean disarmament.[24][25] Such reactors are considered "more proliferation-resistant than North Korea's graphite-moderated reactors",[26]but not "proliferation proof".[27] Implementation of the Agreed Framework floundered, and in 2002 the Agreed Framework fell apart, with each side blaming the other for its failure. By 2002, Pakistan had admitted that North Korea had gained access to Pakistan's nuclear technology in the late 1990s.[28] Based on evidence from Pakistan, Libya, and multiple confessions from North Korea itself, the United States accused North Korea of non-compliance and halted oil shipments; North Korea later claimed its public confession of guilt had been deliberately misconstrued. By the end of 2002, the Agreed Framework was officially dead.
Neither side ever lived up to the agreement. NK proceeded with clandestine efforts to enrich Uranium and the U.S. never completed construction of the 2 light water reactors.

That is not the point. The point is that the Russians "helped" NK develop a program that was supposedly for peaceful purposes, and instead they developed weapons with that technology. Same exact thing that is happening with Iran.
 
You're a fucking moron. That's been thoroughly established. That's also very likely why you actually believe sanctions are going to prevent Iran from obtaining Uranium.

Moron Faun...it is your new handle. Look! The people in Iran are already on edge with the mullahs in their country. Crushing Sanctions handed down by a president with guts and respect (unfortunately both of which Obama lacks) will put pressure on an already unstable government in Iran. Why don't you get that? Then a few thousand well placed bombs and you bring down the Iranian government in less than a year. And Kick their asses out of Iraq as well.
They do not belong there. We the United States of America won that war. We should still be there today but Obama had an election to win so he gave away our victory to Isis scumbags.
Anyone that still respects Obama is as big of a loser as he is. Check his latest poll numbers. They are doing a nose dive as we speak.
Great. Another moron. :rolleyes: Imbecile ... we had sanctions on North Korea, they still built nuclear weapons. We've had sanctions on Iran for many years now. They are still working on developing nuclear weapons.

Sanctions don't prevent nations from building nukes. Israel is fucked if they rely on America's brain-dead right to prevent Iran from building a nuclear weapon.

And really? You want to talk about Obama's poll numbers?? At this point in each Republicans presidency according to Gallup...

Obama ......... 46%
GHW Bush ... 35%
GH Bush ....... not in office
Reagan ......... 47%
Ford .............. not in office
Nixon ............ not in office
Eisenhower .. 51%

You have to go back 56 years to find one with even a 5 point margin higher than Obama. And even that was still within the MoE.

Is that all you care about, is Obama? Pathetic. FTW, as long as you can make Obama look good. You're a disgrace to the human race.
Of course that's not all I care about. However, anytime someone points to Obama's JAR and declares what a shitty president he is, comparing him to every other Republican president Gallup has tracked is entirely appropriate. I understand that may cause some like you some consternation since Obama's lasted in office longer than half of them, is up by double digits over Bush, statistically tied with Reagan (that one's gotta hurt), and [barely] within MoE of the other.

Translation for morons like you ... if Obama sucks, so does every Republican president since Hoover-R gave us the Great Depression. :ack-1:

Unlike yourself, I don't have any love for any politicians. I couldn't care less about Bush or republican presidents, moron.

What I DO care about is the POTUS helping Iran develop a nuclear program. THAT is what I am concerned with.
 
So . . . now the left wants to bomb Iran. How ironic. :rolleyes-41: We could keep enforcing sanctions. Then they don't have the MEANS to obtain uranium.

This also works on our side because once the people are hungry, they are going to become angry. What do you think the people are going to choose? Food or nuclear power plants?
You're a fucking moron. That's been thoroughly established. That's also very likely why you actually believe sanctions are going to prevent Iran from obtaining Uranium. :eusa_doh:
So you will trust a treaty negotiated by a guy that draws imaginary red lines?
The deal is not with Obama alone. It includes Britain, Russia, China, France and Germany.
If it goes through, who do you think will take credit? At least it's proven it didn't do any good.
If the deal doesn't do any good, I can't imagine anyone taking credit for it. I would assume all parties involved would point fingers.

What GOOD do you think this program is going to lead to? Elaborate please.
 
You're a fucking moron. That's been thoroughly established. That's also very likely why you actually believe sanctions are going to prevent Iran from obtaining Uranium.

Moron Faun...it is your new handle. Look! The people in Iran are already on edge with the mullahs in their country. Crushing Sanctions handed down by a president with guts and respect (unfortunately both of which Obama lacks) will put pressure on an already unstable government in Iran. Why don't you get that? Then a few thousand well placed bombs and you bring down the Iranian government in less than a year. And Kick their asses out of Iraq as well.
They do not belong there. We the United States of America won that war. We should still be there today but Obama had an election to win so he gave away our victory to Isis scumbags.
Anyone that still respects Obama is as big of a loser as he is. Check his latest poll numbers. They are doing a nose dive as we speak.
Great. Another moron. :rolleyes: Imbecile ... we had sanctions on North Korea, they still built nuclear weapons. We've had sanctions on Iran for many years now. They are still working on developing nuclear weapons.

Sanctions don't prevent nations from building nukes. Israel is fucked if they rely on America's brain-dead right to prevent Iran from building a nuclear weapon.

And really? You want to talk about Obama's poll numbers?? At this point in each Republicans presidency according to Gallup...

Obama ......... 46%
GHW Bush ... 35%
GH Bush ....... not in office
Reagan ......... 47%
Ford .............. not in office
Nixon ............ not in office
Eisenhower .. 51%

You have to go back 56 years to find one with even a 5 point margin higher than Obama. And even that was still within the MoE.

Is that all you care about, is Obama? Pathetic. FTW, as long as you can make Obama look good. You're a disgrace to the human race.
Of course that's not all I care about. However, anytime someone points to Obama's JAR and declares what a shitty president he is, comparing him to every other Republican president Gallup has tracked is entirely appropriate. I understand that may cause some like you some consternation since Obama's lasted in office longer than half of them, is up by double digits over Bush, statistically tied with Reagan (that one's gotta hurt), and [barely] within MoE of the other.

Translation for morons like you ... if Obama sucks, so does every Republican president since Hoover-R gave us the Great Depression. :ack-1:
If the media did it's job, obama would be impeached.
 
Obama is in trouble with his illegal amnesty program. Judge said he was lied to by the Obama administration...could be a constitutional crises on the horizon. The congress may have to impeach him after all. It's the law!
 

Forum List

Back
Top