Netanyahu: If you take out Saddam, I guarantee it will have enormous positive reverberations on the

[Wyatt earp]

It's funny liberals support Iran, when backed terrorist by them over through the government of Yemen..

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Like the rest of us, Bibi never imagined we'd have a President who would arm and support ISIS

 

[Wyatt earp]

.

“If you take out Saddam, Saddam’s regime, I guarantee you that it will have enormous positive reverberations on the region…the test and the great opportunity and challenge is not merely to effect the ouster of the regime, but also transform that society and thereby begin too the process of democratizing the Arab world.”​

FLASHBACK: Netanyahu Said Iraq War Would Benefit The Middle East

by Hamed Aleaziz
October 31, 2012

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu yesterday told a Paris-based magazine that a military strike on Iran would be beneficial to the region. Netanyahu’s statement was published on the eve of a meeting with French President Francois Holland, during which the two planned to discuss the Iran issue among other topics. Netanyahu cited Iran’s lack of popularity in the Middle East:

“Five minutes after, contrary to what the skeptics say, I think a feeling of relief would spread across the region…Iran is not popular in the Arab world, far from it, and some governments in the region, as well as their citizens, have understood that a nuclear armed Iran would be dangerous for them, not just for Israel.”
Sound familiar? Netanyahu’s statement echoes a point that he made in 2002, when he advocated for a strike on Iraq on the grounds that, among other things, it would benefit the region:

“If you take out Saddam, Saddam’s regime, I guarantee you that it will have enormous positive reverberations on the region…the test and the great opportunity and challenge is not merely to effect the ouster of the regime, but also transform that society and thereby begin too the process of democratizing the Arab world.”

It hardly bears repeating that Arabs in the Middle East did not react favorably to the Iraq war. The year the war began, the Los Angeles Times reported from Syria and found that negative views of America had hardened. One Syrian told the Times ”What they are doing is worse than what Saddam [Hussein] has done.” Brookings Institution polling from 2003 backed up the anecdotes. More than 60 percent of Arabs saw the Iraq war causing “less peace” in the region and more than 70 percent said it would result in “more terrorism.” Shelby Tahimi, a Middle East expert and the creator of the poll, found an “unprecedented tide of public opinion running against the United States” after the Iraq war.

<snip>
.

First of all, Saddam was a Baathist. Baathists don't acknowledge borders.That is a problem. Second, Saadam had threatened repeatedly and fired scud missiles into Israel. Saddam was not well liked by any nation-state in the region.

There was no reason to go into Iraq. But, lets be honest about it.

And no, the Americans were not well liked before the Iraq war. The British, the French, the Russians, and the Germans were not well liked either. It was and is considered another oil war by those that live in that region.

What I read the Nazis were liked in the region...

 

[Disir]

.

“If you take out Saddam, Saddam’s regime, I guarantee you that it will have enormous positive reverberations on the region…the test and the great opportunity and challenge is not merely to effect the ouster of the regime, but also transform that society and thereby begin too the process of democratizing the Arab world.”​

FLASHBACK: Netanyahu Said Iraq War Would Benefit The Middle East

by Hamed Aleaziz
October 31, 2012

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu yesterday told a Paris-based magazine that a military strike on Iran would be beneficial to the region. Netanyahu’s statement was published on the eve of a meeting with French President Francois Holland, during which the two planned to discuss the Iran issue among other topics. Netanyahu cited Iran’s lack of popularity in the Middle East:

“Five minutes after, contrary to what the skeptics say, I think a feeling of relief would spread across the region…Iran is not popular in the Arab world, far from it, and some governments in the region, as well as their citizens, have understood that a nuclear armed Iran would be dangerous for them, not just for Israel.”
Sound familiar? Netanyahu’s statement echoes a point that he made in 2002, when he advocated for a strike on Iraq on the grounds that, among other things, it would benefit the region:

“If you take out Saddam, Saddam’s regime, I guarantee you that it will have enormous positive reverberations on the region…the test and the great opportunity and challenge is not merely to effect the ouster of the regime, but also transform that society and thereby begin too the process of democratizing the Arab world.”

It hardly bears repeating that Arabs in the Middle East did not react favorably to the Iraq war. The year the war began, the Los Angeles Times reported from Syria and found that negative views of America had hardened. One Syrian told the Times ”What they are doing is worse than what Saddam [Hussein] has done.” Brookings Institution polling from 2003 backed up the anecdotes. More than 60 percent of Arabs saw the Iraq war causing “less peace” in the region and more than 70 percent said it would result in “more terrorism.” Shelby Tahimi, a Middle East expert and the creator of the poll, found an “unprecedented tide of public opinion running against the United States” after the Iraq war.

<snip>
.

First of all, Saddam was a Baathist. Baathists don't acknowledge borders.That is a problem. Second, Saadam had threatened repeatedly and fired scud missiles into Israel. Saddam was not well liked by any nation-state in the region.

There was no reason to go into Iraq. But, lets be honest about it.

And no, the Americans were not well liked before the Iraq war. The British, the French, the Russians, and the Germans were not well liked either. It was and is considered another oil war by those that live in that region.

What I read the Nazis were liked in the region...

And then what happened...........

 

[chikenwing]

The world got all butt hurt when Israel took out Saddam reactor,then when the world realized that it was a good move,and one Israel will do again if they think they are alone and or marginalized,something Obama seems to be pushing for.They have skin in the game,us not so much.You have a seasoned defender of one nation,and a narcissistic beginner on the other,Who would you pay attention to?

 

[Wyatt earp]

.

“If you take out Saddam, Saddam’s regime, I guarantee you that it will have enormous positive reverberations on the region…the test and the great opportunity and challenge is not merely to effect the ouster of the regime, but also transform that society and thereby begin too the process of democratizing the Arab world.”​

FLASHBACK: Netanyahu Said Iraq War Would Benefit The Middle East

by Hamed Aleaziz
October 31, 2012

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu yesterday told a Paris-based magazine that a military strike on Iran would be beneficial to the region. Netanyahu’s statement was published on the eve of a meeting with French President Francois Holland, during which the two planned to discuss the Iran issue among other topics. Netanyahu cited Iran’s lack of popularity in the Middle East:

“Five minutes after, contrary to what the skeptics say, I think a feeling of relief would spread across the region…Iran is not popular in the Arab world, far from it, and some governments in the region, as well as their citizens, have understood that a nuclear armed Iran would be dangerous for them, not just for Israel.”
Sound familiar? Netanyahu’s statement echoes a point that he made in 2002, when he advocated for a strike on Iraq on the grounds that, among other things, it would benefit the region:

“If you take out Saddam, Saddam’s regime, I guarantee you that it will have enormous positive reverberations on the region…the test and the great opportunity and challenge is not merely to effect the ouster of the regime, but also transform that society and thereby begin too the process of democratizing the Arab world.”

It hardly bears repeating that Arabs in the Middle East did not react favorably to the Iraq war. The year the war began, the Los Angeles Times reported from Syria and found that negative views of America had hardened. One Syrian told the Times ”What they are doing is worse than what Saddam [Hussein] has done.” Brookings Institution polling from 2003 backed up the anecdotes. More than 60 percent of Arabs saw the Iraq war causing “less peace” in the region and more than 70 percent said it would result in “more terrorism.” Shelby Tahimi, a Middle East expert and the creator of the poll, found an “unprecedented tide of public opinion running against the United States” after the Iraq war.

<snip>
.

First of all, Saddam was a Baathist. Baathists don't acknowledge borders.That is a problem. Second, Saadam had threatened repeatedly and fired scud missiles into Israel. Saddam was not well liked by any nation-state in the region.

There was no reason to go into Iraq. But, lets be honest about it.

And no, the Americans were not well liked before the Iraq war. The British, the French, the Russians, and the Germans were not well liked either. It was and is considered another oil war by those that live in that region.

What I read the Nazis were liked in the region...

And then what happened...........

maybe you know something I Don't, always thought they supported them all through WWII

 

[NYcarbineer]

We see the Democrat tools has been given their marching orders

Tear down and go out to DESTROY one of closest allies.

What makes Israel an ally? How many Israelis died fighting in the Iraq war that Netanyahu was so eager to see Americans die in?

 

[Disir]

.

“If you take out Saddam, Saddam’s regime, I guarantee you that it will have enormous positive reverberations on the region…the test and the great opportunity and challenge is not merely to effect the ouster of the regime, but also transform that society and thereby begin too the process of democratizing the Arab world.”​

FLASHBACK: Netanyahu Said Iraq War Would Benefit The Middle East

by Hamed Aleaziz
October 31, 2012

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu yesterday told a Paris-based magazine that a military strike on Iran would be beneficial to the region. Netanyahu’s statement was published on the eve of a meeting with French President Francois Holland, during which the two planned to discuss the Iran issue among other topics. Netanyahu cited Iran’s lack of popularity in the Middle East:

“Five minutes after, contrary to what the skeptics say, I think a feeling of relief would spread across the region…Iran is not popular in the Arab world, far from it, and some governments in the region, as well as their citizens, have understood that a nuclear armed Iran would be dangerous for them, not just for Israel.”
Sound familiar? Netanyahu’s statement echoes a point that he made in 2002, when he advocated for a strike on Iraq on the grounds that, among other things, it would benefit the region:

“If you take out Saddam, Saddam’s regime, I guarantee you that it will have enormous positive reverberations on the region…the test and the great opportunity and challenge is not merely to effect the ouster of the regime, but also transform that society and thereby begin too the process of democratizing the Arab world.”

It hardly bears repeating that Arabs in the Middle East did not react favorably to the Iraq war. The year the war began, the Los Angeles Times reported from Syria and found that negative views of America had hardened. One Syrian told the Times ”What they are doing is worse than what Saddam [Hussein] has done.” Brookings Institution polling from 2003 backed up the anecdotes. More than 60 percent of Arabs saw the Iraq war causing “less peace” in the region and more than 70 percent said it would result in “more terrorism.” Shelby Tahimi, a Middle East expert and the creator of the poll, found an “unprecedented tide of public opinion running against the United States” after the Iraq war.

<snip>
.

First of all, Saddam was a Baathist. Baathists don't acknowledge borders.That is a problem. Second, Saadam had threatened repeatedly and fired scud missiles into Israel. Saddam was not well liked by any nation-state in the region.

There was no reason to go into Iraq. But, lets be honest about it.

And no, the Americans were not well liked before the Iraq war. The British, the French, the Russians, and the Germans were not well liked either. It was and is considered another oil war by those that live in that region.

What I read the Nazis were liked in the region...

And then what happened...........

maybe you know something I Don't, always thought they supported them all through WWII

Common enemies help unite. Not everyone sided with the Nazis. But many did.
There are the larger wars and promises made. What value did the Middle East have for Germany that it did not hold for others vying for a piece of the pie?

In other words, what's in the goody bags and how does that benefit the actual people living there?
Germany s Arms Sales and the Middle East Daniel Wagner

 

[chikenwing]

We see the Democrat tools has been given their marching orders

Tear down and go out to DESTROY one of closest allies.

What makes Israel an ally? How many Israelis died fighting in the Iraq war that Netanyahu was so eager to see Americans die in?

You have a link to just how eager he was? other than just blurting out stuff as always?Israel had to remain on the side line,and you know why.

 

[NYcarbineer]

We see the Democrat tools has been given their marching orders

Tear down and go out to DESTROY one of closest allies.

What makes Israel an ally? How many Israelis died fighting in the Iraq war that Netanyahu was so eager to see Americans die in?

You have a link to just how eager he was? other than just blurting out stuff as always?Israel had to remain on the side line,and you know why.

Israel remains on the sidelines because they've set up a scenario where Americans are expected to die defending Israel while Israel doesn't lose a man.

That is insane and we are insane to support it.

It also proves the idiocy of calling Israel our strongest ally, which we hear over and over.

 

[The Rabbi]

We see the Democrat tools has been given their marching orders

Tear down and go out to DESTROY one of closest allies.

What makes Israel an ally? How many Israelis died fighting in the Iraq war that Netanyahu was so eager to see Americans die in?

How fucking stupid are you? America asked Israel NOT to take part. They were all set to do it. Bush was afraid of offending the Muslim allies.
Israel is an ally because it is the only democracy in the middle east, the only place where minorities have rights.

 

[NYcarbineer]

We see the Democrat tools has been given their marching orders

Tear down and go out to DESTROY one of closest allies.

What makes Israel an ally? How many Israelis died fighting in the Iraq war that Netanyahu was so eager to see Americans die in?

How fucking stupid are you? America asked Israel NOT to take part. They were all set to do it. Bush was afraid of offending the Muslim allies.
Israel is an ally because it is the only democracy in the middle east, the only place where minorities have rights.

Like I said, Americans died for Israel. Israelis don't die for America.

 

[Lakhota]

"Netanyahu: If you take out Saddam, I guarantee it will have enormous positive reverberations on the region"

He probably knew that was a lie when he said it.

 

[The Rabbi]

We see the Democrat tools has been given their marching orders

Tear down and go out to DESTROY one of closest allies.

What makes Israel an ally? How many Israelis died fighting in the Iraq war that Netanyahu was so eager to see Americans die in?

How fucking stupid are you? America asked Israel NOT to take part. They were all set to do it. Bush was afraid of offending the Muslim allies.
Israel is an ally because it is the only democracy in the middle east, the only place where minorities have rights.

Like I said, Americans died for Israel. Israelis don't die for America.

^^
Facts and logic are like water on teflon with you.
No American ever died for Israel.

 

[AceRothstein]

We see the Democrat tools has been given their marching orders

Tear down and go out to DESTROY one of closest allies.

We see the Republican tools have been given their marching orders

Tear down and go out to DESTROY their president

 

[The Rabbi]

We see the Democrat tools has been given their marching orders

Tear down and go out to DESTROY one of closest allies.

We see the Republican tools have been given their marching orders

Tear down and go out to DESTROY their president

As opposed to democrats, who supported Pres Bush no matter what. Right?
Asshole.

 

[AceRothstein]

We see the Democrat tools has been given their marching orders

Tear down and go out to DESTROY one of closest allies.

We see the Republican tools have been given their marching orders

Tear down and go out to DESTROY their president

As opposed to democrats, who supported Pres Bush no matter what. Right?
Asshole.

And you guys supported Clinton no matter what, right? We could play this game all day. I'm just pointing out Staph's typical hypocrisy.

BTW, Bush did have a ridiculously high approval rating after 9/11. Democrats didn't jump on him and claim he was responsible for the attack. Someone sneezes and you shitheads blame Obama.

 

[The Rabbi]

We see the Democrat tools has been given their marching orders

Tear down and go out to DESTROY one of closest allies.

We see the Republican tools have been given their marching orders

Tear down and go out to DESTROY their president

As opposed to democrats, who supported Pres Bush no matter what. Right?
Asshole.

And you guys supported Clinton no matter what, right? We could play this game all day. I'm just pointing out Staph's typical hypocrisy.

BTW, Bush did have a ridiculously high approval rating after 9/11. Democrats didn't jump on him and claim he was responsible for the attack. Someone sneezes and you shitheads blame Obama.

That lasted about 20 minutes. When Dems figured out that they would lose politically the jumped all over Bush.
The point is that both parties try to make the other party's president a one term president.

 

[Lakhota]

So, Nutanyahoo supported further destabilizing the Middle East and the creation of ISIS. Not surprised.

 

[Capstone]

Yes, ISIS is an arm of the Mossad, right Heinrich?

More like a copy-and-paste of previous covert operations during which the United States and NATO were vociferously "opposed to" the very terrorist organizations/activities they quietly funded, supplied, and directed.

As pointed out by Michel Chossudovsky in his article, “Islamic State Déjà Vu”: US Sponsored Islamic Fighters in the Balkans, Washington Was Behind the 2001 Terrorist Attacks in Macedonia:

What is important to underscore is that:

1. Two months before 9/11, US mercenaries on contract to the Pentagon were working hand in glove with jihadist terrorists affiliated to al Qaeda. This in itself is of crucial significance because it refutes “the theory of the blowback”. The latter was used profusely by the media in the wake of 9/11 to the effect that while Al Qaeda had been supported by the US in the heyday of the Soviet-Afghan war, it had indelibly turned against its US sponsors. “We helped them [al Qaeda] and they went against us.” This argument was used to uphold the notion of the “outside enemy” which threatened America on September 11, 2001. What is documented in this July 2001 article is that two months before 9/11, the US military was firmly behind the Al Qaeda affiliated terrorists in Macedonia. Visibly the blowback theory is a lie. Al Qaeda is a construct of US intelligence.
2. In 2001, the US was officially waging a war against terrorism in the Balkans while providing weapons and money to the Al Qaeda affiliated brigades.
3. While Washington supplied National Liberation Army (NLA) terrorists with brand new weapons “Made in America,” some 3000 heavily armed NATO troops were given the mandate to “disarm the rebels” and enforce the cease-fire. Code-named “Essential Harvest,” this bogus “peacekeeping” operation under British command was intended to weaken the Macedonian Armed Forces and destabilize national institutions.
4. Documented beyond doubt, Washington was behind the terrorist assaults in Macedonia. While Secretary of State Colin Powell reaffirmed America’s resolve to “combat terrorism,” US military advisers were fighting alongside the NLA terrorists.

While the fingerprints of Israel and the Mossad are all over the strings of some of the "Islamic" marionettes of the current regional puppet show, they are, as usual, intentionally obscured to promote the illusion of the innocent by-stander. Only the most ignorant and/or truly deluded are unable to see what's been playing for decades in various theaters around the globe.