NBC's Steve Kornacki Throws Cold Water on Kamala Harris' Chances

[Picaro]

We will have to wait and see if the RNC's poll watchers actually do their jobs this time around. They certainly didn't last time, and there is no reason to trust the RNC this time either.

 

[Cellblock2429]

The Fox News article you linked to, should have given us a link to the NY Times article or opinion piece, they quoted.... But they did not.

/—-/ The left wing rag, NY Times, has a paywall. I don’t subscribe, do you?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The fact is the crap bill failed to pass the senate, so it never made it to the house. You commie propagandist are pathetic.

.

It was bipartisan in the Senate, even Dems voted against it.

 

[BULLDOG]

I'm talking about presidential primaries. She skipped out of the 2020 Primaries dropping out even before Tom Steyer, and she has gotten ZERO primary votes to be president in 2024. Once again, the dems think they are going to game the system because they know that this woman could never actually win a primary if ever tasked to do so.


Exactly. She is not natural born because neither of her parents were American citizens when she was born. Two foreigners came here and had an anchor baby, then took her to Canada for her education. That makes her an unqualified candidate that not only is ineligible for the office but has not even had a single person vote for her in a primary.

I mean, what next--- we just start picking our presidents out of a hat??? This woman represents absolutely nothing but trouble for the Republic.

OK. Once again for those that are a little slower than most.
1. The rank and file of the Democratic party are happy with the choice of Harris for our Presidential candidate.
2.Her nomination is perfectly legal and within the rules.
3. You are not a member of the Democratic Party, and while you are free to whine about our party's actions, you have no standing in any decisions made.
4. If you don't like the rules, you are certainly free to join the Democratic party, and if you can convince enough Democrats that a change is called for, we might change them.
5. You might think it is proper for you to poke your nose where it doesn't belong. It is not.

I hope this clears up any confusion or misunderstanding you might have concerned with Harris's nomination.
If you have any further questions on this subject, then please ask.

Looks to me like you have problems in your own party that need addressing but that is your business, and not my concern.

 

[BULLDOG]

No stupid. If my parents go to France on a vacation and had me, WOULD I BE A CITIZEN OF FRANCE? No.

And if two people from Nigeria come here on a vacation or even for an education and dump their kid here, the kid is still a NIGERIAN.

If an American couple has a kid (anywhere) and one is a US citizen, then that kid is a US citizen. You can be a citizen by being naturalized. But to be a NATURAL-BORN US citizen, you must be born of at least one US citizen parent.

So just being born here DOES NOT make you a citizen, and if being natural born and just a citizen meant the same thing, then the Constitution would just have just SAID citizen.

The Founders wanted a US citizen born of a US citizen family to be president to best unsure that any president indeed had America's best interests at heart.

Harris was born of two foreigners. Worse, she was even raised and educated in a foreign country much of her childhood. It is wrong to call her a citizen unless she applied for citizenship at some point and it is certainly wrong to pretend she is Natural-Born.

I just don't get this idea of laxness that anything goes in the most important job in the country when the most STRICT standards should be adhered to instead. I guess it is all part of the selling out of our country to where now some foreign company even owns most of our businesses and many of our politicians have sold out to foreign governments. We even owe all of our debt to China.

You've made your thoughts clear on this and many other subjects. Whining on a discussion board won't change a thing. Grow up, you big baby.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

OK. Once again for those that are a little slower than most.
1. The rank and file of the Democratic party are happy with the choice of Harris for our Presidential candidate.
2.Her nomination is perfectly legal and within the rules.
3. You are not a member of the Democratic Party, and while you are free to whine about our party's actions, you have no standing in any decisions made.
4. If you don't like the rules, you are certainly free to join the Democratic party, and if you can convince enough Democrats that a change is called for, we might change them.
5. You might think it is proper for you to poke your nose where it doesn't belong. It is not.

I hope this clears up any confusion or misunderstanding you might have concerned with Harris's nomination.
If you have any further questions on this subject, then please ask.

Looks to me like you have problems in your own party that need addressing but that is your business, and not my concern.

The rank and file of the Democratic party are happy with the choice of Harris for our Presidential candidate.

And you're basing this on all the votes she received?

 

[BULLDOG]

The rank and file of the Democratic party are happy with the choice of Harris for our Presidential candidate.

And you're basing this on all the votes she received?

See answer #2 in the post above.

 

[Hollie]

Seriously, why does it bother you that I'm here???? Can't stand to be criticized???? Don't want to hear the truth???

Tour "twoofs" are screeching tirades that offer nothing of substance.

 

[AntonToo]

Yet, NBC’s Steve Kornacki threw cold water on the Harris candidacy

CBS News poll: Gender gap, enthusiasm, economy make for tight Harris-Trump race on Democratic convention eve

Harris leads Trump nationally in CBS News 2024 presidential poll, but it's even across the battlegrounds.

www.cbsnews.com

Water got hot

[/thread]

 

[OKTexas]

Why do you think Trump created the Wait in Mexico plan when in office?

Wait for what exactly?

Why is there a pile of illegals at the border that Trump has made wait, in Mexico?

Why isn't trump just denying them entry and simply turnIng them away, close the border? Send them home?

Is he required by LAW to take them? Required to give these illegals a court date?

They were waiting in Mexico for their court date. Nothing says they have to be admitted into the US to await their dates. Statistics show the vast majority would never show up. Plus during covid he had every right to send them packing.

BTW the law requires illegals to be held in detention until their court dates. Remain in Mexico was a great thing, it allowed family units to remain together, while they supported themselves. That saved taxpayers a ton of money.

.

 

[Clipper]

The fact is the crap bill failed to pass the senate, so it never made it to the house. You commie propagandist are pathetic.

.

It didn't pass the Senate because Trump ordered his jackoff buddy Johnson not to support it.

Tr to keep up, genius.

 

[Care4all]

They were waiting in Mexico for their court date. Nothing says they have to be admitted into the US to await their dates. Statistics show the vast majority would never show up. Plus during covid he had every right to send them packing.

BTW the law requires illegals to be held in detention until their court dates. Remain in Mexico was a great thing, it allowed family units to remain together, while they supported themselves. That saved taxpayers a ton of money.

.

The point is, the border can NOT refuse asylum seekers under the law. The border will always be opened, just as it was under Trump. The only difference is waiting for the court date, outside of the country, but these illegals under law, must be given a hearing in immigration court....and the wait in Mexico policy is NOT an immigration policy supported by law.... So every President, can change it, and do what they want or what they can.....making it a rollercoaster between new presidents.

This new Mexican president will not allow, wait in Mexico.... So now what?

The key to immigration reform is for asylum seekers to get their cases heard in immigration court within a couple of weeks. Preventing them from getting lost in the US the 5 year waiting time we have now for a court date. Most asylum seekers over the years have been rejected by the immigration courts.

If they were turned away immediately by the courts and returned immediately to their home countries, word would get around of these rejection rates by the immigration courts and make future asylum seekers think twice about selling all that they own to come here, only for the courts to legally reject them immediately with no ability to get lost in the system through the very long court wait times.

This takes Money for the immigration courts and legislation for it, to happen.

 

[Meathead]

Given how little people like Trump, she doesn’t have to be perfect.

"Little people like Trump". Is that the new PC term for midgets and dwarfs?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

See answer #2 in the post above.

It's okay, you can admit she got no votes.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The point is, the border can NOT refuse asylum seekers under the law. The border will always be opened, just as it was under Trump. The only difference is waiting for the court date, outside of the country, but these illegals under law, must be given a hearing in immigration court....and the wait in Mexico policy is NOT an immigration policy supported by law.... So every President, can change it, and do what they want or what they can.....making it a rollercoaster between new presidents.

This new Mexican president will not allow, wait in Mexico.... So now what?

The key to immigration reform is for asylum seekers to get their cases heard in immigration court within a couple of weeks. Preventing them from getting lost in the US the 5 year waiting time we have now for a court date. Most asylum seekers over the years have been rejected by the immigration courts.

If they were turned away immediately by the courts and returned immediately to their home countries, word would get around of these rejection rates by the immigration courts and make future asylum seekers think twice about selling all that they own to come here, only for the courts to legally reject them immediately with no ability to get lost in the system through the very long court wait times.

This takes Money for the immigration courts and legislation for it, to happen.

The point is, the border can NOT refuse asylum seekers under the law.

What law?

but these illegals under law, must be given a hearing in immigration court....

What new law is Biden using to cut the number of illegals the last few months?

 

[OKTexas]

It didn't pass the Senate because Trump ordered his jackoff buddy Johnson not to support it.

Tr to keep up, genius.

Note to the clueless, Johnson is in the House, not the senate. And tell the class exactly why commiecrats in the senate voted against it.

.

 

[Cellblock2429]

It didn't pass the Senate because Trump ordered his jackoff buddy Johnson not to support it.

Tr to keep up, genius.

/—-/ Imagine, a private citizen so powerful, all a democRAT president can do is sit by helplessly. That’s strong leader.

 

[OKTexas]

The point is, the border can NOT refuse asylum seekers under the law. The border will always be opened, just as it was under Trump. The only difference is waiting for the court date, outside of the country, but these illegals under law, must be given a hearing in immigration court....and the wait in Mexico policy is NOT an immigration policy supported by law.... So every President, can change it, and do what they want or what they can.....making it a rollercoaster between new presidents.

This new Mexican president will not allow, wait in Mexico.... So now what?

The key to immigration reform is for asylum seekers to get their cases heard in immigration court within a couple of weeks. Preventing them from getting lost in the US the 5 year waiting time we have now for a court date. Most asylum seekers over the years have been rejected by the immigration courts.

If they were turned away immediately by the courts and returned immediately to their home countries, word would get around of these rejection rates by the immigration courts and make future asylum seekers think twice about selling all that they own to come here, only for the courts to legally reject them immediately with no ability to get lost in the system through the very long court wait times.

This takes Money for the immigration courts and legislation for it, to happen.

Actually under law they can refuse entry for asylum seekers if they enter illegally, because the law requires them to come in through a port of entry. It was commie courts that have decreed they can apply from anywhere on US soil. So those entering illegally can be given a choice, remain in detention where they will be separated from their children or go back to Mexico where they can remain together. BTW the previous Mexican president didn't agree to remain in Mexico willingly, but Trump was wise enough to leverage trade to get the agreement, he can do it again.

Now xiden has added another 20 or so million, coming from virtually every country on earth, to the asylum backlog. And kneepads what to give them and the previous backlog amnesty. That's probably a total of about 50 million people. Would you be good with that?

.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Joe Biden’s presidency is over. It’s now a half-dead vessel, much like the man himself, but Democrats appear overjoyed that Vice President Kamala Harris is taking the 2024 Democratic mantle, though it’s not like Joe had much choice. He had to back Harris if he bowed out. The disunity he sowed by remaining in the race led to an unprecedented fracturing of the party not seen since 1968. Harris is the only person who could legally inherit his war chest. If he couldn’t run for a second term, maybe he could work on bringing the party back together. Harris’ ascension has led to over $250 million in donations, another damning sign that Biden likely would have run out of juice in the final and most critical phase of the 2024 election.

Yet, NBC’s Steve Kornacki threw cold water on the Harris candidacy, namely that she’s untested. She dropped out before the start of the primaries in 2020; Tom Steyer’s campaign lasted longer than hers. She’s also equally unpopular as Biden and owns the same record. Kornacki noted that “hope” more than numbers is inflating Democrats’ hopes of keeping the White House in November.

NBC Pollster Hurls Kamala Harris' Candidacy Into a Furnace

townhall.com

BJ -

Harris is by far a worse candidate than lunchpail/scranton joe.
She starts out a -9 in the states that will decide the election.
She will get a slight bump at the beginning and one at the convention (if it is still her)

She is very unlikely to win.

Townhall?? Are you shitting me??

Townhall Media Bias Rating

Learn the AllSides Media Bias Rating of Townhall. AllSides rates the media bias of hundreds of news outlets, media sources and writers.

www.allsides.com

 

[Care4all]

Actually under law they can refuse entry for asylum seekers if they enter illegally, because the law requires them to come in through a port of entry. It was commie courts that have decreed they can apply from anywhere on US soil. So those entering illegally can be given a choice, remain in detention where they will be separated from their children or go back to Mexico where they can remain together. BTW the previous Mexican president didn't agree to remain in Mexico willingly, but Trump was wise enough to leverage trade to get the agreement, he can do it again.

Now xiden has added another 20 or so million, coming from virtually every country on earth, to the asylum backlog. And kneepads what to give them and the previous backlog amnesty. That's probably a total of about 50 million people. Would you be good with that?

.

The law is he law and the courts ruled they can cross anywhere and get their day in court.

And no, trump can't change trade policies on the new trade agreement signed by the 3 countries, to get Mexico's new president to do this via threat.

Money is best spent on beefing up to the max, immigration courts and processing the backlog expeditiously.... and deporting those who do not qualify for asylum by the court. And giving court dates of just a few weeks for new seekers, so the rejected are sent back to their homelands quickly....and this word gets around and known to the locals considering the long trip in the future imo.

And increasing the capacity of detention centers...

And increasing border patrol to catch more...

And even increasing the Wall....
many things need to be done that only Congress can address and fund...imo.