Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Lol so what’s proof American entrepreneurs want to kill people LOL WHAT!?If it saves money, yes. Where the fuck have you been where no corporations have been sued for faulty products.Wow you have low thoughts on Americans.. you think we’re are all out to kill everyone lol you can’t be so wrongYou saying that people with less capital have low standards?? Huh? You hate poor ordinary people.. why?Sure the standards are high for restaurants. You would expect anything less? That is why restaurants are the one business I avoid like the plague. You can make a lot more money with less cost by opening a computer game arcade. I would even pick a book store over a restaurant.
No, what I said was that restaurants have to have high standards because it would be so easy for lots of people to be harmed or even killed by an unscrupulous restaurant owner who cut corners.
So don’t go in that building.. it’s your choiceLol so what’s proof American entrepreneurs want to kill people LOL WHAT!?If it saves money, yes. Where the fuck have you been where no corporations have been sued for faulty products.Wow you have low thoughts on Americans.. you think we’re are all out to kill everyone lol you can’t be so wrongYou saying that people with less capital have low standards?? Huh? You hate poor ordinary people.. why?
No, what I said was that restaurants have to have high standards because it would be so easy for lots of people to be harmed or even killed by an unscrupulous restaurant owner who cut corners.
When entrepreneurs use inferior and cheaper products or buildings, they don't intend to kill people, but when the accidental fire happens and the cheapskate has no sprinkler system, people can and have died in the past.
Left to their own choice, the entrepreneur will often pick profits over safety usually.
Huh? Paying a tax for things we need is not socialism lol we are free to change our minds with voteslol no it’s not.. most roads were paved by animals hahaWell you don’t have to live in this republic, and we built America on capitalism, not socialism.. never works. Sorry buddyThe point is that those with money routinely abuse the poor who have no choice by to accept any work they can get, because wealthy know the poor are so desperate just to survive.
Historically the wealthy have been guilty of slavery, child abuse, rape, long hours, dangerous work conditions, etc. and no one could do anything to stop them.
Unrestrained capitalism has never even been true in the US and we still have all this very dark history.
If you want to really see capitalism at work, you have to go back to feudal times, or ancient Rome.
The Roman circuses, gladiators, arena deaths, crucifixions, etc. are all exactly what you get when you fail to prevent the inherent abuses of capitalism. Capitalism is power, but it is totally without any degree of ethics.
This country was build on socialism, not capitalism.
For example, the Continental Army relied on volunteers, and the founder never wanted a mercenary standing military or police. Roads, schools, the post office, defense, fire fighting, etc., have all always been socialist.
Free men pioneer the west , farmers , blacksmith , carpentry regulation free , amazing times .. sorry buddy
If not for socialism, there would have been no forts, defense, roads, railroads, bridges, harbors, schools, etc.
governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goodsHuh? Paying a tax for things we need is not socialism lol we are free to change our minds with voteslol no it’s not.. most roads were paved by animals hahaWell you don’t have to live in this republic, and we built America on capitalism, not socialism.. never works. Sorry buddy
This country was build on socialism, not capitalism.
For example, the Continental Army relied on volunteers, and the founder never wanted a mercenary standing military or police. Roads, schools, the post office, defense, fire fighting, etc., have all always been socialist.
Free men pioneer the west , farmers , blacksmith , carpentry regulation free , amazing times .. sorry buddy
If not for socialism, there would have been no forts, defense, roads, railroads, bridges, harbors, schools, etc.
Paying taxes for things we need and want, that we are free to change our mind on with votes, is EXACTLY what socialism is.
Likely you are incorrectly assuming socialism is somehow related to totalitarianism because of Stalinism.
But Stalin was actually totally a capitalist because he was only profit motivated himself and his ruling elite.
Stalinism was very similar to feudalism, which is almost the exact opposite of socialism.
So don’t go in that building.. it’s your choiceLol so what’s proof American entrepreneurs want to kill people LOL WHAT!?If it saves money, yes. Where the fuck have you been where no corporations have been sued for faulty products.Wow you have low thoughts on Americans.. you think we’re are all out to kill everyone lol you can’t be so wrongNo, what I said was that restaurants have to have high standards because it would be so easy for lots of people to be harmed or even killed by an unscrupulous restaurant owner who cut corners.
When entrepreneurs use inferior and cheaper products or buildings, they don't intend to kill people, but when the accidental fire happens and the cheapskate has no sprinkler system, people can and have died in the past.
Left to their own choice, the entrepreneur will often pick profits over safety usually.
Of course you can, it’s unexposed.. are you nuts?So don’t go in that building.. it’s your choiceLol so what’s proof American entrepreneurs want to kill people LOL WHAT!?If it saves money, yes. Where the fuck have you been where no corporations have been sued for faulty products.Wow you have low thoughts on Americans.. you think we’re are all out to kill everyone lol you can’t be so wrong
When entrepreneurs use inferior and cheaper products or buildings, they don't intend to kill people, but when the accidental fire happens and the cheapskate has no sprinkler system, people can and have died in the past.
Left to their own choice, the entrepreneur will often pick profits over safety usually.
No one can tell if a building has a working sprinkler system, flammable components, a shoddy electrical system that shorts out and can cause fires, etc. Restaurants are very dangerous due to the deep fryer oil and other flammables.
governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goodsHuh? Paying a tax for things we need is not socialism lol we are free to change our minds with voteslol no it’s not.. most roads were paved by animals hahaThis country was build on socialism, not capitalism.
For example, the Continental Army relied on volunteers, and the founder never wanted a mercenary standing military or police. Roads, schools, the post office, defense, fire fighting, etc., have all always been socialist.
Free men pioneer the west , farmers , blacksmith , carpentry regulation free , amazing times .. sorry buddy
If not for socialism, there would have been no forts, defense, roads, railroads, bridges, harbors, schools, etc.
Paying taxes for things we need and want, that we are free to change our mind on with votes, is EXACTLY what socialism is.
Likely you are incorrectly assuming socialism is somehow related to totalitarianism because of Stalinism.
But Stalin was actually totally a capitalist because he was only profit motivated himself and his ruling elite.
Stalinism was very similar to feudalism, which is almost the exact opposite of socialism.
IS NOT PAYING TO FIX POTHOLES ON MY STREET.. get a education
Of course you can, it’s unexposed.. are you nuts?So don’t go in that building.. it’s your choiceLol so what’s proof American entrepreneurs want to kill people LOL WHAT!?If it saves money, yes. Where the fuck have you been where no corporations have been sued for faulty products.
When entrepreneurs use inferior and cheaper products or buildings, they don't intend to kill people, but when the accidental fire happens and the cheapskate has no sprinkler system, people can and have died in the past.
Left to their own choice, the entrepreneur will often pick profits over safety usually.
No one can tell if a building has a working sprinkler system, flammable components, a shoddy electrical system that shorts out and can cause fires, etc. Restaurants are very dangerous due to the deep fryer oil and other flammables.
That doesn’t prove government Ownership of my production lol you are living in socialism lala landgovernmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goodsHuh? Paying a tax for things we need is not socialism lol we are free to change our minds with voteslol no it’s not.. most roads were paved by animals haha
Free men pioneer the west , farmers , blacksmith , carpentry regulation free , amazing times .. sorry buddy
If not for socialism, there would have been no forts, defense, roads, railroads, bridges, harbors, schools, etc.
Paying taxes for things we need and want, that we are free to change our mind on with votes, is EXACTLY what socialism is.
Likely you are incorrectly assuming socialism is somehow related to totalitarianism because of Stalinism.
But Stalin was actually totally a capitalist because he was only profit motivated himself and his ruling elite.
Stalinism was very similar to feudalism, which is almost the exact opposite of socialism.
IS NOT PAYING TO FIX POTHOLES ON MY STREET.. get a education
Yes, it is, exactly.
Take the case of oil.
We know where it is, places like Texas, Pennsylvania, California, Alaska, Louisiana, etc.
Instead of using our tax money to pump and refine it ourselves, we sell it to private companies who buy the rights for pennies, and then jack up the prices and make huge profits.
We could instead, easily cut out the middle man and save lots of money.
So you think people open business so it will burn down and kill people?Of course you can, it’s unexposed.. are you nuts?So don’t go in that building.. it’s your choiceLol so what’s proof American entrepreneurs want to kill people LOL WHAT!?
When entrepreneurs use inferior and cheaper products or buildings, they don't intend to kill people, but when the accidental fire happens and the cheapskate has no sprinkler system, people can and have died in the past.
Left to their own choice, the entrepreneur will often pick profits over safety usually.
No one can tell if a building has a working sprinkler system, flammable components, a shoddy electrical system that shorts out and can cause fires, etc. Restaurants are very dangerous due to the deep fryer oil and other flammables.
No its not.
You can't see though the drywall to see if the walls are built out of flammable wood or inflammable steel studs.
Even if you see sprinklers, you can't tell if they are connected, if the sensors will detect the heat, etc.
That doesn’t prove government Ownership of my production lol you are living in socialism lala landgovernmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goodsHuh? Paying a tax for things we need is not socialism lol we are free to change our minds with votesIf not for socialism, there would have been no forts, defense, roads, railroads, bridges, harbors, schools, etc.
Paying taxes for things we need and want, that we are free to change our mind on with votes, is EXACTLY what socialism is.
Likely you are incorrectly assuming socialism is somehow related to totalitarianism because of Stalinism.
But Stalin was actually totally a capitalist because he was only profit motivated himself and his ruling elite.
Stalinism was very similar to feudalism, which is almost the exact opposite of socialism.
IS NOT PAYING TO FIX POTHOLES ON MY STREET.. get a education
Yes, it is, exactly.
Take the case of oil.
We know where it is, places like Texas, Pennsylvania, California, Alaska, Louisiana, etc.
Instead of using our tax money to pump and refine it ourselves, we sell it to private companies who buy the rights for pennies, and then jack up the prices and make huge profits.
We could instead, easily cut out the middle man and save lots of money.
So you think people open business so it will burn down and kill people?Of course you can, it’s unexposed.. are you nuts?So don’t go in that building.. it’s your choiceWhen entrepreneurs use inferior and cheaper products or buildings, they don't intend to kill people, but when the accidental fire happens and the cheapskate has no sprinkler system, people can and have died in the past.
Left to their own choice, the entrepreneur will often pick profits over safety usually.
No one can tell if a building has a working sprinkler system, flammable components, a shoddy electrical system that shorts out and can cause fires, etc. Restaurants are very dangerous due to the deep fryer oil and other flammables.
No its not.
You can't see though the drywall to see if the walls are built out of flammable wood or inflammable steel studs.
Even if you see sprinklers, you can't tell if they are connected, if the sensors will detect the heat, etc.
In this case government regulation is harmful and free market is less harmefulThat doesn’t prove government Ownership of my production lol you are living in socialism lala landgovernmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goodsHuh? Paying a tax for things we need is not socialism lol we are free to change our minds with votes
Paying taxes for things we need and want, that we are free to change our mind on with votes, is EXACTLY what socialism is.
Likely you are incorrectly assuming socialism is somehow related to totalitarianism because of Stalinism.
But Stalin was actually totally a capitalist because he was only profit motivated himself and his ruling elite.
Stalinism was very similar to feudalism, which is almost the exact opposite of socialism.
IS NOT PAYING TO FIX POTHOLES ON MY STREET.. get a education
Yes, it is, exactly.
Take the case of oil.
We know where it is, places like Texas, Pennsylvania, California, Alaska, Louisiana, etc.
Instead of using our tax money to pump and refine it ourselves, we sell it to private companies who buy the rights for pennies, and then jack up the prices and make huge profits.
We could instead, easily cut out the middle man and save lots of money.
{...
so·cial·ism
/ˈsōSHəˌlizəm/
noun
...}
- 1.a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
So read the definition more carefully.
While socialism can mean we collectively invest in some means of production, so that means it is goverment owned, but the definition of socialism also includes that the means of production can be just "or regulated by the community as a whole".
If the privately owned company is not causing any harm, why would anyone vote to provide an expensive government alternative? You only vote for socialization of an enterprise when it is harmful.
Well that’s a cool story and you are insane lolSo you think people open business so it will burn down and kill people?Of course you can, it’s unexposed.. are you nuts?So don’t go in that building.. it’s your choice
No one can tell if a building has a working sprinkler system, flammable components, a shoddy electrical system that shorts out and can cause fires, etc. Restaurants are very dangerous due to the deep fryer oil and other flammables.
No its not.
You can't see though the drywall to see if the walls are built out of flammable wood or inflammable steel studs.
Even if you see sprinklers, you can't tell if they are connected, if the sensors will detect the heat, etc.
Why do you think I posted the example of the Triangle products fire?
It was not intentional, but it showed how short sighted entrepreneurs trying to cut corners can and DO kill lots of people.
Bottom line is that corruption ruins everything, and it challenges a free people no matter where they are in the world. Yes there is different types of corruption, and all of them ruin freedom. Reaction to corruption has been over the top in many cases, but that's because those whom have alternative agenda's then attempt to seize upon the cracks (never let a good crisis go to waste), in an attempt to change things into the way they want things to be.governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goodsHuh? Paying a tax for things we need is not socialism lol we are free to change our minds with voteslol no it’s not.. most roads were paved by animals haha
Free men pioneer the west , farmers , blacksmith , carpentry regulation free , amazing times .. sorry buddy
If not for socialism, there would have been no forts, defense, roads, railroads, bridges, harbors, schools, etc.
Paying taxes for things we need and want, that we are free to change our mind on with votes, is EXACTLY what socialism is.
Likely you are incorrectly assuming socialism is somehow related to totalitarianism because of Stalinism.
But Stalin was actually totally a capitalist because he was only profit motivated himself and his ruling elite.
Stalinism was very similar to feudalism, which is almost the exact opposite of socialism.
IS NOT PAYING TO FIX POTHOLES ON MY STREET.. get a education
Yes, it is, exactly.
Take the case of oil.
We know where it is, places like Texas, Pennsylvania, California, Alaska, Louisiana, etc.
Instead of using our tax money to pump and refine it ourselves, we sell it to private companies who buy the rights for pennies, and then jack up the prices and make huge profits.
We could instead, easily cut out the middle man and save lots of money.
LOL, and you can keep your doctor too... ROTFLMBO.That doesn’t prove government Ownership of my production lol you are living in socialism lala landgovernmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goodsHuh? Paying a tax for things we need is not socialism lol we are free to change our minds with votes
Paying taxes for things we need and want, that we are free to change our mind on with votes, is EXACTLY what socialism is.
Likely you are incorrectly assuming socialism is somehow related to totalitarianism because of Stalinism.
But Stalin was actually totally a capitalist because he was only profit motivated himself and his ruling elite.
Stalinism was very similar to feudalism, which is almost the exact opposite of socialism.
IS NOT PAYING TO FIX POTHOLES ON MY STREET.. get a education
Yes, it is, exactly.
Take the case of oil.
We know where it is, places like Texas, Pennsylvania, California, Alaska, Louisiana, etc.
Instead of using our tax money to pump and refine it ourselves, we sell it to private companies who buy the rights for pennies, and then jack up the prices and make huge profits.
We could instead, easily cut out the middle man and save lots of money.
{...
so·cial·ism
/ˈsōSHəˌlizəm/
noun
...}
- 1.a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
So read the definition more carefully.
While socialism can mean we collectively invest in some means of production, so that means it is goverment owned, but the definition of socialism also includes that the means of production can be just "or regulated by the community as a whole".
If the privately owned company is not causing any harm, why would anyone vote to provide an expensive government alternative? You only vote for socialization of an enterprise when it is harmful.
wow !! there you have it folks the vile left is in favor of letting a baby die !^ No answer? I thought so.
Now add this to the list: Dems block 'born alive' bill to provide medical care to infants who survive failed abortions
Dems block 'born alive' bill to provide medical care to infants who survive failed abortions
Trying to care for aborted fetuses would be to prohibitively expensive and unproductive, that would kill millions by diverting health care away from those who could really use it.
Because you are nazis. And no, the people who have noticed are not nazis, too.So, the trumpettes try to paint Democrats as Nazis to hide the fact the Trump is following in the footsteps of his Homeland's Hitler.Anti semitism [the squad] .... attacks on white Christian conservatives ,outing [doxing] Trump donors and supporters targeting them and attacking with militant mobs like [ANTIFA ], a demand for the socialist takeover of the economy and private sector ,calls for forced gun confiscation and much much more are similar to the tactics used by Adolf Hitler !! the democratic party should be called the Demonazi party !!
you stupid commie !!! nobody told Hitler what to do !! this fiend killed every one he deemed a rival in his quest for power !! the Nazi [socialist] enthralled an entire country with almost supernatural like effectiveness !Hitler was chosen because of his lies and manipulation gained over a Germany in total chaos and fear due to world economic forces at play. Then he duped Germany into destroying itself all due to them following after the ideologically driven mad man in which he turned out to be.You are correct. Nazi, Germany controlled the economy and were not pro-business at all.Let's examine that.Nazis were for big business, social darwinism, against homosexuals, and Jews.
- Nazis were for big business. So you are saying that it is better to be AGAINST the one thing which creates most jobs for people, drives the economy and brings most substantive new products and inventions which improve quality of life to people? And you wonder why more democrats are poor?
- Nazis were for social Darwinism. That nature selects winners and losers and survival of the fittest is a universal proven fact in all the living world. That you are against it suggests its opposite: Social Engineering of forcing less qualified people to get hired first, and social equity of making people of different abilities all come out equal regardless. Some people call that fascism.
- Nazis were against homosexuals. Homosexuality is an obviously deviant behavior that brings chaos into society, so yes, I can see that the Nazis were against that, but even if you are not against it, why would you be FOR sexual disorder?
- Nazis were against Jews. Last I checked, it was Obama and the Dems that were always railing against Israel while Trump and the GOP are their friends.
That is incorrect. Never did the Nazis ever interfere in private profit making by corporation. In fact, they offered free, slave labor to companies. No company was ever nationalized by the Nazis or their profits reduced. They whole point of Hitler being appointed Chancellor was because big business picked him, and he never disappointed the benefactors he worked for.
No, the indications are that Hitler chosen because he was foolish enough to be used as a patsy.
The industrialists knew that while war would increase profits, they would need someone to take all the blame.
It was the industrialists who order Hitler to do insane things, like invade Russia.
In no way was Hitler the one actually in charge.
Hitler previously was on good terms with Stalin, and they got along fine.
It was the industrialists who hated Stalin.
There was nothing in the ACA that set policy networks.LOL, and you can keep your doctor too... ROTFLMBO.That doesn’t prove government Ownership of my production lol you are living in socialism lala landgovernmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goodsPaying taxes for things we need and want, that we are free to change our mind on with votes, is EXACTLY what socialism is.
Likely you are incorrectly assuming socialism is somehow related to totalitarianism because of Stalinism.
But Stalin was actually totally a capitalist because he was only profit motivated himself and his ruling elite.
Stalinism was very similar to feudalism, which is almost the exact opposite of socialism.
IS NOT PAYING TO FIX POTHOLES ON MY STREET.. get a education
Yes, it is, exactly.
Take the case of oil.
We know where it is, places like Texas, Pennsylvania, California, Alaska, Louisiana, etc.
Instead of using our tax money to pump and refine it ourselves, we sell it to private companies who buy the rights for pennies, and then jack up the prices and make huge profits.
We could instead, easily cut out the middle man and save lots of money.
{...
so·cial·ism
/ˈsōSHəˌlizəm/
noun
...}
- 1.a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
So read the definition more carefully.
While socialism can mean we collectively invest in some means of production, so that means it is goverment owned, but the definition of socialism also includes that the means of production can be just "or regulated by the community as a whole".
If the privately owned company is not causing any harm, why would anyone vote to provide an expensive government alternative? You only vote for socialization of an enterprise when it is harmful.
