NATO’s mission imperative: Break Russia even If millions worldwide perish

Baron

Platinum Member
Sep 19, 2008
14,229
6,709
370
Brooklyn, NYC
Just look on imbecile NATO babblers who believe they can defeat Russia.
Not millions, but billions will die, at first faggots from NATO command centers

“There can be no peace in Europe without Russia” was once the mantra of European political philosophers. Now, the desperate liberal order is determined to smother out this logic with all-or-nothing propaganda and a proxy war NATO strategists say will weaken Russia. Unfortunately, their strategy will probably starve half the world to death.

The other day, South Africa’s President Cyril Ramaphosa said “bystander countries” are suffering due to sanctions against Russia. The European Union’s aggressive support of the American sanction regime aimed at the severing of economic ties try and force Moscow our of Ukraine is already causing serious collateral damage to far distant states. And while western analysts and leaders prefer to blame Russia for the situation, many dissenting nations understand Vladimir Putin’s hand was forced by the NATO cadre.

 
Just look on imbecile NATO babblers who believe they can defeat Russia.
Not millions, but billions will die, at first faggots from NATO command centers

“There can be no peace in Europe without Russia” was once the mantra of European political philosophers. Now, the desperate liberal order is determined to smother out this logic with all-or-nothing propaganda and a proxy war NATO strategists say will weaken Russia. Unfortunately, their strategy will probably starve half the world to death.

The other day, South Africa’s President Cyril Ramaphosa said “bystander countries” are suffering due to sanctions against Russia. The European Union’s aggressive support of the American sanction regime aimed at the severing of economic ties try and force Moscow our of Ukraine is already causing serious collateral damage to far distant states. And while western analysts and leaders prefer to blame Russia for the situation, many dissenting nations understand Vladimir Putin’s hand was forced by the NATO cadre.


Zero Hedge is a Russian troll site, Einstein
 
It’s pretty damn funny that Americans who think they’re “conservatives” say we should own guns to protect ourselves from criminals are the same morons who think Ukraine should roll over to the criminal Russians and say we should do whatever the criminal Russians want.

LOL
 
Why is NATO involved in the defense of a Non-NATO country? Does it have any treaty authority to do so?
"treaty authority" ??? since when does a country
need "treaty authority" to come to the aid of a
country which is the victim of aggression?
 
"treaty authority" ??? since when does a country
need "treaty authority" to come to the aid of a
country which is the victim of aggression?
NATO is not a "country." It is a Treaty Organization for the mutual defense of member nations. It does not have any authority or obligation to defend non-member nations. For example, do you think that NATO should defend Taiwan if it is invaded by China?
 
Last edited:
NATO is not a "country." It is a Treaty Organization for the mutual defense of member nations. It does not have any authority or obligation to defend non-member nations. For example, do you think that NATO should defend Taiwan if it is invaded by China?
Since when is NATO defending Ukraine? Are you suggesting that NATO MEMBER COUNTRIES are
handcuffed by NATO?
 
Why is NATO involved in the defense of a Non-NATO country? Does it have any treaty authority to do so?
You probably mean treaty obligation to defend Ukraine As an organization NATO is not involved but most NATO member states are supporting Ukraine's efforts to turn back the Russan invaders. While there is no specific treaty that obligates the US to support Ukraine, the Budapest Memorandum, signed by the US, UK and Russia in 1994, guarantees Ukraine's security against the use of force against it or even the threat of force in exchange for Ukraine relinquishing its nuclear arsenal, the third largest in the world at the time. As guarantors of Ukraine's security, the US and UK have an implied obligation to aid Ukraine in turning back the Russian hordes.
 
Why is NATO involved in the defense of a Non-NATO country? Does it have any treaty authority to do so?
Because through Ukraine it defends itself. Have you heard about Russian demands in December? And now imagine with what arrogance they would have come to negotiations again had their troops reached the Polish border within a month.
 

Forum List

Back
Top