National Guard deployed to Ferguson

[CaféAuLait]

Missouri Gov. Jay Nixon has signed an executive order deploying National Guard troops to Ferguson.




Missouri National Guard headed to Ferguson - CNN.com


Damn, it must be getting a lot worse.

 

[ogibillm]

At least two mp companies.

 

[CaféAuLait]

At least two mp companies.

Wow, that could be as many as 380 MP's if just two companies.

 

[Bush92]

That's because people in the crowd were shooting at police. Two protesters hit from shots fired from people within their group. Flaming Molotov cocktails thrown at state police. Captain Wilson (Black man, from Ferguson ) is said to be exhausted and embarrassed by the community response. Hope the Guard will disperse these agitators once and for all.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Throw basketballs at them. Charles Barkley says it's a black sport. That should keep them occupied.

 

[Politico]

About freaking time. Time to bust some heads.

 

[Geaux4it]

Missouri Gov. Jay Nixon has signed an executive order deploying National Guard troops to Ferguson.




Missouri National Guard headed to Ferguson - CNN.com


Damn, it must be getting a lot worse.

Yep- It's time to start mowing down these thugs in the streets. Anarchy.

-Geaux

 

[Bush92]

Protesters being used as a shield so gang land thugs can ave target practice on the police. Lock and load National Guard.

 

[bucs90]

Haha, so the people bitched about the police acting like the military.

And now, they'll get the military...acting like police.

You ******* idiots just don't get it. A dangerous, violent person is pretty much the same in America as it is in Iraq, China, Antarctica or Timbucktoo. A person throwing a flaming gas bottle or shooting a 9mm....its all the same no matter where they do it.

So when tough guys are asked to "GO STOP THIS NONSENSE"....they put on big armor, carry big guns, and often times aren't in a touchy feely mood.

So when the Guard shows up....in camo and carrying big ass guns....just remember...you had men in camo with big guns before to stop it and you didn't like it. Is it any different in the man with the big gun and camo is being paid by the Army and not the PD? No, its not.

This is just getting hilarious to be honest.

 

[bucs90]

Will be interesting to see how some react to this.

A) Men with camo and big guns patrolling Ferguson (who are paid by the police dept)

vs

B) Men with camo and big guns patrolling Ferguson (who are paid by the Army NG)

Wonder if those who despised A will be ok with B?

 

[Ravi]

Will be interesting to see how some react to this.

A) Men with camo and big guns patrolling Ferguson (who are paid by the police dept)

vs

B) Men with camo and big guns patrolling Ferguson (who are paid by the Army NG)

Wonder if those who despised A will be ok with B?

Me for one. The Ferguson cops seem to be a bunch of retards that have mishandled this from the beginning. The Ng is a disinterested party.

 

[Geaux4it]

They need to end this now. Start busting skulls and turning loose the dogs. Dogs vs dogs in the streets

-Geaux

 

[Bush92]

Missouri Gov. Jay Nixon has signed an executive order deploying National Guard troops to Ferguson.




Missouri National Guard headed to Ferguson - CNN.com


Damn, it must be getting a lot worse.

Yep- It's time to start mowing down these thugs in the streets. Anarchy.

-Geaux

Will be interesting to see how some react to this.

A) Men with camo and big guns patrolling Ferguson (who are paid by the police dept)

vs

B) Men with camo and big guns patrolling Ferguson (who are paid by the Army NG)

Wonder if those who despised A will be ok with B?

Me for one. The Ferguson cops seem to be a bunch of retards that have mishandled this from the beginning. The Ng is a disinterested party.

Ferguson cops handled the situation properly. Liberal media wing of the federal government (CNN, MSNBC) blew it out of proportion.

 

[bucs90]

Will be interesting to see how some react to this.

A) Men with camo and big guns patrolling Ferguson (who are paid by the police dept)

vs

B) Men with camo and big guns patrolling Ferguson (who are paid by the Army NG)

Wonder if those who despised A will be ok with B?

Me for one. The Ferguson cops seem to be a bunch of retards that have mishandled this from the beginning. The Ng is a disinterested party.

Bunch of retards? They cleared a riot...without firing a single live bullet, and did so without killing or seriously injuring a single person or cop. That's textbook riot control.

Problem is, you just hate police. You have no respect for the job they do, and deep down, you just hate that they have that authority.

You'd rather have...in your own words....a "disinterested" military group put in charge of it!!!???? A DISINTERESTED military unit....put into a hotzone where people may try to harm them? And you expect BETTER (less dramatic) results?

Yeah, your logic makes the Ferguson PD look like they are a bunch of Ivy League grads. You despise the "militarized" police.....so you say you'd rather have a "disinterested" warfighting unit put in charge instead. Men who DONT want to be there, who left families at home to come get shot at and threatened for a cause they are NOT interested in????

And you think that's better? Wow.

 

[Ravi]

Will be interesting to see how some react to this.

A) Men with camo and big guns patrolling Ferguson (who are paid by the police dept)

vs

B) Men with camo and big guns patrolling Ferguson (who are paid by the Army NG)

Wonder if those who despised A will be ok with B?

Me for one. The Ferguson cops seem to be a bunch of retards that have mishandled this from the beginning. The Ng is a disinterested party.

Bunch of retards? They cleared a riot...without firing a single live bullet, and did so without killing or seriously injuring a single person or cop. That's textbook riot control.

Problem is, you just hate police. You have no respect for the job they do, and deep down, you just hate that they have that authority.

You'd rather have...in your own words....a "disinterested" military group put in charge of it!!!???? A DISINTERESTED military unit....put into a hotzone where people may try to harm them? And you expect BETTER (less dramatic) results?

Yeah, your logic makes the Ferguson PD look like they are a bunch of Ivy League grads. You despise the "militarized" police.....so you say you'd rather have a "disinterested" warfighting unit put in charge instead. Men who DONT want to be there, who left families at home to come get shot at and threatened for a cause they are NOT interested in????

And you think that's better? Wow.

you're a moron, no offense. There was no reason to roll out tanks and gas legitimate protesters, thereby treating the entire community like a bunch of animals for the actions of some. And the police should have said from the very beginning that Brown was a robbery suspect. Releasing that information a week later and the contradictory statements by the chief shows incompetence at the least and cover your ass at the worst.

 

[Ravi]

Oh, and the national guard isn't going to whine about being there. It's their job and they volunteered for it.

 

[bucs90]

Me for one. The Ferguson cops seem to be a bunch of retards that have mishandled this from the beginning. The Ng is a disinterested party.

Bunch of retards? They cleared a riot...without firing a single live bullet, and did so without killing or seriously injuring a single person or cop. That's textbook riot control.

Problem is, you just hate police. You have no respect for the job they do, and deep down, you just hate that they have that authority.

You'd rather have...in your own words....a "disinterested" military group put in charge of it!!!???? A DISINTERESTED military unit....put into a hotzone where people may try to harm them? And you expect BETTER (less dramatic) results?

Yeah, your logic makes the Ferguson PD look like they are a bunch of Ivy League grads. You despise the "militarized" police.....so you say you'd rather have a "disinterested" warfighting unit put in charge instead. Men who DONT want to be there, who left families at home to come get shot at and threatened for a cause they are NOT interested in????

And you think that's better? Wow.

you're a moron, no offense. There was no reason to roll out tanks and gas legitimate protesters, thereby treating the entire community like a bunch of animals for the actions of some. And the police should have said from the very beginning that Brown was a robbery suspect. Releasing that information a week later and the contradictory statements by the chief shows incompetence at the least and cover your ass at the worst.

Ok, lets discuss. For one, you ******* idiots continue to call the vehicles "tanks". Hey, dipshits, they aren't "tanks". Tanks have treads and big ass cannon-like turret guns on top. Like an M1 Abrams TANK. These armored personnel carriers. Which the military uses to...well, transport people from place to place in a way that a cheap shot from a rifle or pistol, or a maltov cocktail, wont hurt them. The military also builds them to resist mines. Most PD's take that excess mine-resistant armor OFF the bottoms...because that extra ton of weight sucks gas.

But you idiots still call them "tanks".


The chief explained why the video was released. You idiots just don't like it. The media did an FOIA request. PD's have to respond within 7 days. On day 6, he did. He HAD TO release the video. THE LAW required he release it. So he did.

But you idiots and the media thought "OH NO we didn't want THAT video, that makes Brown look bad, we wanted video that made YOU ALL look bad". The chief, BY LAW, had to release it within 7 days.


And using OC gas the disperse protesters, if necessary, is the LEAST abusive way to clear a protest if it becomes volatile/violent....which this one did. You want them to use their batons and beat the shit out of them? No, of course not. Gas is the least harmful way of doing it. You idiots just don't like that the cops won.

 

[bucs90]

Oh, and the national guard isn't going to whine about being there. It's their job and they volunteered for it.

Yep. Same as the cops...who volunteered to work in a shithole like Ferguson where people "peacefully protest" by looting liquor stores, chicken stores, hair weave stores, car rim stores, then shoot at cops and throw flaming bottles of fuel at cops. Seriously, all that actually happened.

The Guard may have REAL tanks, with the big ass turrets. People will beg for the cops to come back.

 

[Ravi]

Bunch of retards? They cleared a riot...without firing a single live bullet, and did so without killing or seriously injuring a single person or cop. That's textbook riot control.

Problem is, you just hate police. You have no respect for the job they do, and deep down, you just hate that they have that authority.

You'd rather have...in your own words....a "disinterested" military group put in charge of it!!!???? A DISINTERESTED military unit....put into a hotzone where people may try to harm them? And you expect BETTER (less dramatic) results?

Yeah, your logic makes the Ferguson PD look like they are a bunch of Ivy League grads. You despise the "militarized" police.....so you say you'd rather have a "disinterested" warfighting unit put in charge instead. Men who DONT want to be there, who left families at home to come get shot at and threatened for a cause they are NOT interested in????

And you think that's better? Wow.

you're a moron, no offense. There was no reason to roll out tanks and gas legitimate protesters, thereby treating the entire community like a bunch of animals for the actions of some. And the police should have said from the very beginning that Brown was a robbery suspect. Releasing that information a week later and the contradictory statements by the chief shows incompetence at the least and cover your ass at the worst.

Ok, lets discuss. For one, you ******* idiots continue to call the vehicles "tanks". Hey, dipshits, they aren't "tanks". Tanks have treads and big ass cannon-like turret guns on top. Like an M1 Abrams TANK. These armored personnel carriers. Which the military uses to...well, transport people from place to place in a way that a cheap shot from a rifle or pistol, or a maltov cocktail, wont hurt them. The military also builds them to resist mines. Most PD's take that excess mine-resistant armor OFF the bottoms...because that extra ton of weight sucks gas.

But you idiots still call them "tanks".


The chief explained why the video was released. You idiots just don't like it. The media did an FOIA request. PD's have to respond within 7 days. On day 6, he did. He HAD TO release the video. THE LAW required he release it. So he did.

But you idiots and the media thought "OH NO we didn't want THAT video, that makes Brown look bad, we wanted video that made YOU ALL look bad". The chief, BY LAW, had to release it within 7 days.


And using OC gas the disperse protesters, if necessary, is the LEAST abusive way to clear a protest if it becomes volatile/violent....which this one did. You want them to use their batons and beat the shit out of them? No, of course not. Gas is the least harmful way of doing it. You idiots just don't like that the cops won.

So the chief blames the press for his own incompetence. He should have released the video on day one.

They were tanks no matter what you pretend.

There is no reason to gas nonviolent protestors.

 

[Geaux4it]

you're a moron, no offense. There was no reason to roll out tanks and gas legitimate protesters, thereby treating the entire community like a bunch of animals for the actions of some. And the police should have said from the very beginning that Brown was a robbery suspect. Releasing that information a week later and the contradictory statements by the chief shows incompetence at the least and cover your ass at the worst.

Ok, lets discuss. For one, you ******* idiots continue to call the vehicles "tanks". Hey, dipshits, they aren't "tanks". Tanks have treads and big ass cannon-like turret guns on top. Like an M1 Abrams TANK. These armored personnel carriers. Which the military uses to...well, transport people from place to place in a way that a cheap shot from a rifle or pistol, or a maltov cocktail, wont hurt them. The military also builds them to resist mines. Most PD's take that excess mine-resistant armor OFF the bottoms...because that extra ton of weight sucks gas.

But you idiots still call them "tanks".


The chief explained why the video was released. You idiots just don't like it. The media did an FOIA request. PD's have to respond within 7 days. On day 6, he did. He HAD TO release the video. THE LAW required he release it. So he did.

But you idiots and the media thought "OH NO we didn't want THAT video, that makes Brown look bad, we wanted video that made YOU ALL look bad". The chief, BY LAW, had to release it within 7 days.


And using OC gas the disperse protesters, if necessary, is the LEAST abusive way to clear a protest if it becomes volatile/violent....which this one did. You want them to use their batons and beat the shit out of them? No, of course not. Gas is the least harmful way of doing it. You idiots just don't like that the cops won.

So the chief blames the press for his own incompetence. He should have released the video on day one.

They were tanks no matter what you pretend.

There is no reason to gas nonviolent protestors.

Just like only a few with guns are an excuse to go after ALL of them in an anti- 2A gun grab.. No different here, the small minority justify the all out assault

-Geaux